Trump issues new ban on international students at Harvard
Advertisement
In the second step earlier Wednesday, the Trump administration brandished a new weapon when it informed Columbia University's accrediting agency that the school has violated civil rights laws, triggering a process that could ultimately lead to Columbia forfeiting all federal financial aid for its students.
On the campaign trail last year, Trump
Colleges and universities must be 'accredited' by an independent association
to be eligible for the federal financial aid most students receive. And, although the accrediting agencies are private nonprofits, they operate only with the blessing of the secretary of education.
Advertisement
That gives the federal government significant leverage.
On Wednesday, the Trump administration told Columbia's accreditor, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, that the Ivy League school violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by failing to protect Jewish students from discrimination and harassment during campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war.
Now, the department says Columbia must take steps to be in compliance with the Trump administration's interpretation of the law. If it doesn't, the commission must take action
against Columbia's accreditation, the department said, which could include stripping its accreditation.
'After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in the press release Wednesday. 'We look forward to the Commission keeping the Department fully informed of actions taken to ensure Columbia's compliance with accreditation standards including compliance with federal civil rights laws.'
Higher education leaders on both sides of the political spectrum said the administration's latest threat was extraordinary.
'It's unprecedented because it's not telling accreditors, 'Here's a new standard you should follow,' ' said Larry Ladd, a former budget chief at Harvard. 'It's saying, 'You should take specific action against a specific institution.' '
Peter Wood, president of the conservative National Association of Scholars, said it would be 'wholly unprecedented' for an Ivy League university to lose its accreditation.
'But unprecedented doesn't mean it can't happen, we now know. I think it's out there as a pretty serious threat,' he said.
The announcement raises questions about the status of negotiations between Columbia and the Trump administration, and more broadly, about the strategy or wisdom of agreeing to the White House's demands. In March, after the Trump administration froze hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding, Columbia said it would comply with a list of demands related to academics and disciplinary procedures.
Advertisement
In April, Harvard rejected an even more intrusive set of demands from the Trump administration and sued, setting up a confrontation that is now in its third month and has featured billions in cuts to its federal funding and threats to block the school's enrollment of international students, including Trump's Wednesday decree.
On Wednesday, McMahon told reporters, 'I'd love to have Harvard come back to the table to negotiate with us.'
The Trump administration is also investigating dozens of other universities and has cut funding at more than half a dozen elite schools.
Columbia's accreditor, the Middle States Commission, confirmed it had received a letter Wednesday from the administration, but declined to comment further. A Columbia spokesperson, Sean Savett, said the university is 'aware of the concerns raised by the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights today to our accreditor. . . . Columbia is deeply committed to combatting antisemitism on our campus. We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it.'
Trump officials have accused universities of
that campus culture has become intolerant of conservative viewpoints. They also allege universities failed to protect Jewish students from antisemitism stemming from the pro-Palestinian protest movement.
The head of the association that accredits Harvard, Lawrence Schall, said the administration's announcement was irregular and concerning.
Advertisement
'I think this just shows a misunderstanding of the accreditation process, a misunderstanding of the actual Department of Education regulations that pertain to accreditation,' said Schall, president of the New England Commission of Higher Education. 'Accrediting agencies are meant to be independent agencies. We're not the enforcer of federal law.'
Wood, who is generally supportive of Trump's higher education priorities, viewed Wednesday's announcement as a negotiating tactic.
'This is an opening move meant to bring the other side to the negotiating table,' or apply additional pressure, he said. It's likely to result in 'some kind of settlement short of losing accreditation, but it's a good chess move on the part of the administration,' he said.
Wood and other conservative higher education leaders have criticized accreditors for what they perceive as their commitment to progressive ideals, such as diversity, equity, and inclusion. Some accreditors mandate institutions maintain diversity polices. Trump officials and allies have said they would co-opt accreditors to advance their own priorities.
The announcement Wednesday, Wood said, 'brings pressure to bear on Columbia and also brings pressure to bear on Middle States and, by extension, all the other accreditors as well who may not be so keen to be the enforcement arm of the anti-DEI regime, but are suddenly finding themselves forced to take that step.'
Republicans publicly identified the accreditation system as a potential point of leverage over universities last year.
Steve Scalise, the second-highest-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, said at a meeting in Washington in October: 'We're taking away your accreditation. You want to get their attention? Party's over.'
And in a campaign video during the president election, Trump said,
'When I return to the White House, I will fire the radical left accreditors that have allowed our colleges to become dominated by Marxist maniacs and lunatics. We will then accept applications for new accreditors, who will impose real standards on colleges once again and once and for all.'
Advertisement
Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, which represents around 1,600 colleges and universities, said, 'The accreditors will, I'm sure, treat any violations of Title VI seriously, as they do in all such cases.'
However, he added, the federal government is required to resolve alleged civil rights violations through established federal procedures, not through the accreditation process.
'This is another case of the administration running ahead of the law for the sake of the headlines,' he said.
Mike Damiano can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: What exactly is Trump's new travel ban about? Not national security
Any reasonable American could objectively ask what exactly President Donald Trump's new travel ban, which affects a dozen countries, is about. Is it about protecting Americans from 'murderers,' as Trump said Thursday, or punishing small countries for a modest number of students who overstayed their visas? The drive for Trump's first-term travel ban in 2017 and 2018 was clear. He was seeking to deliver on an ugly campaign promise to ban all Muslims from entering the US. That morphed, over the course of years as the administration adapted to court cases, into a ban on travel to the US by people from certain countries, most of which were majority-Muslim. It was only by agreeing to ignore Trump's anti-Muslim 2016 campaign statements and focus solely on the security-related language in his third attempt at a travel ban that the US Supreme Court ultimately gave its blessing to that ban. '… We must consider not only the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion. Trump is using that authority again in his second term. But this time, as he said Thursday in the Oval Office, the ban is about removing 'horrendous' people who are in the country now and about keeping murderers out. The data suggest the travel ban will primarily affect students and businesspeople from countries in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean as well as the Middle East. It was an attack on Jewish community members in Colorado by an Egyptian national that convinced Trump to speed up plans to ban people from a dozen countries from entering the US, restarting the travel ban policy he pioneered during his first term. But Egypt is not on the travel ban list. Neither is Kuwait, the country where Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the Boulder attack, lived before coming to the US. 'Egypt has been a country we deal with very closely. They have things under control,' Trump told reporters Thursday. Instead, the travel ban includes countries that Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who assembled the list, feel don't have things under control. That includes places like Equatorial Guinea in Africa and Burma, also known as Myanmar, in Asia. Neither is a nexus of terror threatening the American homeland. Trump's order announcing the travel ban explains that these countries have high rates of students and other travelers overstaying their visas in the US. It points to a report of DHS 'overstay' data from 2023 to argue that for more than 70% of people from Equatorial Guinea with US student visas, there is no record of them leaving the US when their visa ended. In real numbers, that equals 233 people with student visas. The numbers are similarly small for other African countries. 'They're just throwing things at the wall,' said David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian-leaning Cato institute and a Trump immigration policy critic. 'There's not really a coherent philosophy behind any of this,' Bier added. The reinstated travel ban does include countries associated with terrorism, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, all of which were also included in Trump's first-term travel ban. But it's worth noting that no immigrant or traveler from one of these countries has launched a terror attack on the US in recent years, according to a review by the Washington Post during Trump's first term. A man from Sudan killed one person at a Tennessee church in 2017. 'The president claims that there is no way to vet these nationals, yet that is exactly what his consular officers and border officials have successfully done for decades,' Bier said. The man responsible for the ISIS-inspired truck bomb in New Orleans in January, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, was a Texas-born Army veteran and US citizen. The new travel ban also includes Afghanistan, which could jeopardize many Afghans related to those who aided the US during its war there, as Shawn VanDiver, president of the aid organization #AfghanEvac, told CNN's Jim Sciutto on Thursday. 'There are 12,000 people who have been separated through the actions of our government, who have been waiting for more than three and a half years,' he said. The Trump administration recently paused the processing of student visas, interrupting the plans of thousands of people to study in the US. In the Oval Office, Trump said he was not interested in banning students from China. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly, we want to have foreign students, but we want them to be checked,' Trump said, suggesting there will be even more strenuous background checks in the future. The existence of the travel ban list could also factor into tariff negotiations the Trump administration has taken on with nations across the world, as well as its effort to countries nations to take back migrants it wants to deport. 'It's about power and control and manipulating both the US population to suppress dissent as well as trying to manipulate foreign relations with these countries by getting them to do whatever he wants in order to get off the disfavored nation list,' Bier said.


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Musk's Public Feud
The Pulse with Francine Lacqua Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud. Earlier in the day, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and insinuated he was withholding the release of files related to disgraced New York financier Jeffrey Epstein because of his own presence in them. Trump, in turn, proposed cutting off the billionaire's government contracts, following his onetime adviser's repeated exhortations for Republicans to vote against the president's signature tax legislation. Musk's olive branch came after Tesla Inc. shares tanked 14% and his personal wealth dropped by $34 billion. Today's guests: Emmanuel Cau, Barclays European Equity Strategy Head, Gregory Peters, PGIM Fixed Income Co-CIO, Maria Demertzis, The Conference Board Economy, Strategy & Finance Center Europe Lead. (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bessent Looks to Revamp Currency Monitoring After Damage Done
I'm Chris Anstey, an economics editor in Boston. Today we're looking at the US Treasury's semiannual foreign-exchange report. Send us feedback and tips to ecodaily@ And if you aren't yet signed up to receive this newsletter, you can do so here. The first US Treasury semiannual assessment of American trading partners' exchange-rate policies since Trump returned to the White House read, in substance, much the same as the last one under President Joe Biden.