logo
On Operation Sindoor, a case of oppositioniitis

On Operation Sindoor, a case of oppositioniitis

Indian Express28-05-2025

Nirupama Rao, whom I have held in regard for several decades, is seriously wrong on a couple of scores about why Pakistan succeeded in taking control of the narrative during Operation Sindoor. However, she does make some good points in her piece. It needs to be stated, with requisite — and imperative — eclaircissement, that, in its hallmark style, our neighbour was offering absurd falsehoods as fact; and that the better part of the world, predictably, was lapping it up.
Rao unfairly accuses the Indian media of 'hypernationalism' and levels a gamut of other allegations against it, while, in reality, large swathes of both print and broadcast media did a sterling job covering India's Operation Sindoor. Terms such as hypernationalism are deeply offensive, and it is intellectually lazy to simply throw them at the Indian media — and that is now a go-to strategy for a certain enclave — as they end up being patently uncharitable.
Rao is now saying that the Indian government 'must' develop a real-time crisis communication mechanism with strategic partners. That is what I have been requesting of our diplomatic corps for 30 years. Rao might easily have tackled the odious disinformation campaign against India when she was Foreign Secretary, between 2009 and 2011; or, if she had considered a weekly briefing of the hostile American press at her office, when she was India's Ambassador to the US between 2011 and 2013. Rao's suggestions come a few decades too late.
Pakistan said it won the 1971 war when, in reality, it had capitulated to India and General A A K Niazi handed over 93,000 prisoners of war to General Jagjit Singh Aurora. Ditto with Operation Sindoor. This is Pakistan's 'perennial volte face narrative', in which it commits — tragically — the most lethal error of all: That of consistently fooling itself. Polonius's advice would fall flat on a country that lacks a self, and whose raison d'être for 77 years has been obsessing with and perpetrating terrorist attacks on India. It is not quite enough that India gave Pakistan to Pakistan — that is, a million square kilometres of its own precious territory — but an edacious Pakistan wants more.
Kashmir has been an integral part of India for millenia: Think of Anandavardhana (820-890 AD), Bhallata (who wrote during the reign of King Shankaravarman in 883-902 AD), Kshemendra, Abhinavagupta, Utpaladeva and the glorious Kashmir Shaivism — India does not need to prove that Kashmir belongs to it.
J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's word on the Indus Waters Treaty is the final word: 'We have always believed that the Indus Waters Treaty has been the most unfair document to the people of Jammu and Kashmir.'
Sitting onstage at prominent conferences with serial — and truculent — maligners of India, and, thereby, lending them credibility, is not what we expect of former diplomats of distinction. Why destroy India, our treasured homeland, on foreign shores or at home?
The best media briefings during Operation Sindoor were provided by India's armed forces, whose strategic knowledge, confidence, command, and extraordinary capability reduced nine of the enemy's terror bases to smithereens in 20 minutes. Eleven of Pakistan's air bases were also damaged, in short order. No volume of praise for India's armed forces is hyperbole. India is not in need of cute filler words used
as pilasters to try and shore up perfunctory arguments.
The resounding and almost aesthetic Indian victory — owing to its finesse, brevity, and perfection — of Operation Sindoor robs the West of its inordinately long exercise of hegemony. What is lost is 'the ideological rationale for reducing and reconstituting the (Indian) as someone to be ruled and managed'. That is the inconvenient truth. You might recall Immanuel Kant labelling Indians — and others — as being incapable of 'moral maturity'.
Operation Sindoor was a retaliatory act in response to Pakistan's cold-blooded and well-planned terrorist invasion of Pahalgam, which led to the massacre of 26 civilians. What was India supposed to do? Sit back and munch on nuts and sip Cinzano? Our neighbour has launched dozens of terrorist attacks on India, in which over 20,000 innocent civilians have been killed (a figure cited last Friday by Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish at the UN) and many more wounded. It helps to remember that India has about 200 million Muslims.
Rao says that India also failed in what she calls the 'financial domain.' Rao's official tenure in Washington, DC should have alerted her to the fact that the Americans simply don't listen to anyone once they have made up their minds.
I remember Senator Edward Kennedy — with admiration and gratitude — because he repeatedly accused Pakistan of genocide on the floor of the US Senate in 1971. He blamed the Nixon administration for the unfolding horror show: 'Nothing is more clear, or easily documented, than the systematic campaign of terror — and its genocidal consequences — launched by the Pakistan army on the night of March 25 (1971).'
Kennedy said that it was the Bengali Hindus who were being meticulously targeted, 'systematically slaughtered, and, in some places, painted with yellow patches marked 'H'.' Comparing one of the greatest humanitarian tragedies to the Holocaust, Kennedy said: 'America's heavy support of Islamabad is nothing short of complicity in the human and political tragedy of East Bengal.'
Then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken enriched Pakistan on 28 September 2022 with a staggering $450 million sustenance package for its F-16 fleet, right in the middle of 'dialogue' with India. How did Blinken justify this? Pakistan needed that package to 'fight' ISIS and al-Qaeda. That is ominously similar to the IMF dispatching $1 billion to Pakistan right after its heinous terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Never mind, then, that the butcher and the surgeon are the same entity.
President Donald Trump now repeatedly takes credit for having negotiated a 'ceasefire' between India and Pakistan, which India has refuted. More irksome is the constant equation of India to Pakistan: Bogus equivalences are vexatious. The much-maligned Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ascertained that India is no longer a blank slate on which anyone can scribble, and India is not indigent. Ultimately, it is India the Trump administration will be forced to turn to, to keep its arch-enemy, China, in check in the South China Sea.
Language comes to you as naturally as your breath; thus, notes of artifice generate unbearable dissonance (ativa dussaham). Russia unfailingly gets its messages across to the world. As John Mearsheimer recently said: 'The Russians are unequivocal on what has to be done to satisfy their demands.' India needs to get there too, without tarrying.
I am delighted that India has dispatched the peerless, eloquent, and intellectually rigorous Shashi Tharoor, Member of Parliament, to the US and a few other countries, to brief leaders on the incessant and barbaric terrorist attacks Pakistan launches on India. India needs to be left alone — a 5,000-year-old civilisation is finally reclaiming itself. Its economy has grown to now make it the fourth largest in the world; flagitious cross-border terrorism impedes the pace of its economic growth.
If there is a toss-up between winning a narrative war and the actual war — and not a 'moral' war, as Rao mentions — it is obviously the greater victory to win the real war, instead of a psyop narrative battle, based on decades of insane concoction and terrorism.
Many of us are chagrined to witness distinguished former members of India's diplomatic corps, and the bureaucracy, reposting material from 'X' by 'columnists' whose language blazes forth malapropisms, and who make a living out of India-bashing, and faux victimhood.
Opposition for the sake of opposition is juvenile: That's Oppositioniitis. When that emanates from India's former top-line government officials, it inflicts a deep and irreversible gash on the country. That feels like stabbing one of your parents — the attendant sense of betrayal is excruciatingly powerful.
(The writer was appointed distinguished fellow at Carnegie Mellon University in 1990. She is also a global adviser on public policy, communications, and international relations, and an award-winning Odissi and Bharatanatyam artiste and choreographer. Views are personal)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals
Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals

Indian Express

time23 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the United States has reached a trade agreement with China, including an easing of curbs imposed by Beijing on export of rare earth minerals and magnets that are key inputs for industries ranging from automobiles to electronics. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. He said China would supply 'any necessary rare earths' and magnets, while the US would make concessions on allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. The Trump administration had recently begun to clamp down on the presence of Chinese nationals on US college campuses. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!' Trump wrote, without elaborating. Bloomberg quoted a White House official as saying that the agreement allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods, which, crucially, includes a 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking, and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs (imposed by Trump in his first term, that the Biden administration persisted with). China would charge a 10 per cent tariff on American imports, the official said. Though the details of the deal were still unclear, analysts predicted that China seems to have gained the upper-hand after its rare earth restrictions prompted US carmakers, including Ford Motor and Chrysler, to cut production. Significantly, Trump said a final deal is subject to approval from him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Chinese state media said earlier Wednesday that Beijing had reached a 'framework' for an agreement with the US during talks in London, but there was no official response from China on Trump's subsequent claims on Truth Social. Earlier, both the negotiating sides said they had agreed in principle to a framework for dialling down trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies. After the meeting in London — the second time the two sides have met in the last couple of months, since Trump's sweeping tariff onslaught — there were indications of a reconciliation. What is beginning to get clearer after the second meeting is that this is perhaps not how the US imagined the trade war to unfold. China is beginning to dictate the direction of the bilateral talks, with the US almost seen as requesting for much-needed concessions on the resumption of supplies of critical inputs. In the first round of talks in Geneva, the US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had asked the Chinese to cut its tariffs in tandem with theirs, primarily because the Americans were facing the heat back home from the early fallout of the high tariffs, including empty shelves at grocery stories and surging prices of daily use commodities. In London, the US side is learnt to have specifically asked the Chinese to 'suspend or remove' restrictions on rare earths magnets, which had forced a supply-chain crunch. The London meeting follows a call between Trump and Xi on June 5, which was initiated by the White House — the first call since Trump's reciprocal tariff announcement. After the London talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets 'being resolved'. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus… Once the Presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he said. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5 and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' the BBC quoted China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang as saying. Chinese export controls over rare earth minerals were high on the agenda of the meetings. While Beijing has not imposed an outright ban on the export of rare earth magnets, the process has been made very difficult; it could take a long time to source, posing shortage risks. Rare earth magnets, especially neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are crucial for EV manufacturing. They provide the strong magnetic fields needed for efficient and powerful electric motors, including traction motors that drive EVs. These magnets also play a major role in other EV components like power steering systems, wiper motors and braking systems. China has a virtual stranglehold over these rare earth magnets. In May, talks held in Geneva led to a temporary truce after the tit-for-tat tariff increases by both sides, which led to duties that peaked at 145 per cent. Trump called the outcome of the talks in Switzerland a 'total reset', which brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30 per cent, while Beijing cut duties on US imports to 10 per cent. Both sides also agreed to a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. However, the US and China have since accused each other of breaching the deal. The US has said that Beijing has been dragging its feet on opening up exports of rare earth metals and magnets while the Chinese claim that Washington has restricted its access to American goods such as semiconductors and other related technologies linked to artificial intelligence. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had said China had failed to roll back restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets. In the run-up to this week's talks, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences. The problem for the US is that the Chinese side has wrested some advantage, especially by leveraging its strategy of weaponing its dominance in key sectors. Rare earth minerals and magnets is one such area, where the US is now desperate for concessions. Both sides have since claimed breaches on non-tariff pledges, but the Americans clearly seem more eager for a reconciliation, given the impact of the Chinese blockade on its key manufacturing sectors. These Chinese trade blockades are already impacting companies in other geographies. Hamamatsu-based small car maker Suzuki Motors, for instance, said last week it plans to suspend the production of its flagship Swift compact hatchback due to China's rare earth restrictions, becoming the first Japanese automaker to be impacted. There are similar worries among other manufacturing entities across the world, including in the US. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More

Crippled by Op Sindoor strikes, Pak eyeing Germany for air defence upgrades
Crippled by Op Sindoor strikes, Pak eyeing Germany for air defence upgrades

India Today

time31 minutes ago

  • India Today

Crippled by Op Sindoor strikes, Pak eyeing Germany for air defence upgrades

Rattled by the devastating impact of BrahMos missile strikes during India's Operation Sindoor, Pakistan is now exploring the procurement of a new air defence system to counter future to sources, Islamabad is actively considering the purchase of the IRIS-T SLM air defence system from Germany in a bid to strengthen its aerial shield against India's supersonic cruise missiles, particularly the move comes after Pakistan's existing Chinese-origin air defence systems, including the HQ-9 and HQ-16, failed to detect or intercept Indian missile attacks during the operation. In contrast, the IRIS-T SLM system has demonstrated significant effectiveness in recent combat situations. In Ukraine, where several units were redirected from Egypt due to the ongoing war, the German-made system has reportedly shot down over 60 aerial targets since its deployment last it was said to have successfully intercepted Russian Oniks missiles, which are similar in profile to India's by Diehl Defence, the IRIS-T SLM is known for its modular and compact architecture. Each unit, estimated to cost around USD 200 million, includes radar, an operations centre, and launchers, all mounted on a 20-foot interest in the system highlights its urgent push to rebuild and upgrade its air defence network, particularly after key air bases were damaged by Indian missiles during Operation grappling with a severe economic crisis, Pakistan has raised its defence budget by 18 per cent this year while simultaneously scrapping domestic development projects valued at 1,000 billion Pakistani the past month, the country has secured financial assistance totalling USD 1.8 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to address its fiscal Germany's Diehl Defence, the maker of the IRIS-T SLM, is also involved in a major Indian defence initiative. The company is collaborating with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems on Project 75I, a Rs 70,000 crore programme to build six submarines for the Indian Indian-German collaboration also includes the development of the Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS), which will be integrated into the India's Reliance Defence has announced a partnership to manufacture Vulcano 155mm precision-guided artillery shells domestically. The initiative is expected to generate revenues of approximately Rs 10,000 crore, with over 50 per cent of the components to be produced indigenously.

India Won Operation Sindoor – But What Does The Army Want Next, And Who Poses The Greatest Threat?
India Won Operation Sindoor – But What Does The Army Want Next, And Who Poses The Greatest Threat?

India.com

time35 minutes ago

  • India.com

India Won Operation Sindoor – But What Does The Army Want Next, And Who Poses The Greatest Threat?

New Delhi: India crushed Pakistan's assault during Operation Sindoor. But after the dust settled, something more alarming came into view. China was not sitting on the sidelines. It was pulling strings from behind the curtain. Indian radars picked up Chinese-made jets in Pakistani skies. Chinese missiles were used to target Indian bases. Beijing was deeply involved. That means India was not fighting just Pakistan. India was up against two enemies at once. Military officers have sounded the alarm. They want India's defence budget raised to 2.5% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Right now, the defence allocation stands at just 1.9%. A huge portion of that money goes into salaries and pensions. Only a quarter of it helps modernise the military. This cannot continue. Not when two hostile neighbours are preparing for something bigger. China has been pumping weapons into Pakistan. In the May 7-10 clashes, Pakistan deployed Chinese J-10 jets and HQ-9 missile systems. Beijing has promised to send more – stealth fighters, long-range air defence weapons and new-generation drones. China is flooding Pakistan with cutting-edge military tools. Pakistan's economy is in crisis. But even then, Islamabad raised its defence budget by 20%. It cut development. It ignored debt. It focused on weapons. India must respond, believe experts, arguing that it is time for total self-reliance in defence production. India must build fighter jets, drones, loitering munitions and missiles on its own. The private sector must step in. Half-measures will not do. Half-prepared armies lose wars. India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project has started moving. But it must move faster. Tejas took decades. The same mistake cannot happen again. The Indian Air Force is short on fighter squadrons. It has just 30. The target is 42.5. Drones are the new face of war. Swarm drones. FPV kamikaze drones. Loitering drones. India needs all of these, and it needs them in bulk. No country will come to India's rescue in a full-scale war. India must stand on its own. During Operation Sindoor, India used Russian S-400s, Israeli Barak-8s and its own Akash missiles. These systems intercepted and neautralised many Pakistani drone and missile attacks. But more layers are needed. DRDO must now accelerate two things – short-range air defence systems and long-range strike missiles like Project Kusha. Military reform is also crucial. India has a huge army. It must cut unnecessary spending. It must remove red tape from weapons procurement. And it must create joint theatre commands that allow the Army, Navy and Air Force to fight as one. A senior military commander put it bluntly. India is now staring at a superpower that is feeding a hostile neighbour. Pakistan may fire the bullets. But China is loading the gun. India cannot look away anymore. The next battle may not wait for long.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store