Greenpeace must pay pipeline firm $660M US over protests, jury finds
Environmental group Greenpeace must pay more than $660 million US in damages for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company in connection with protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction in North Dakota, a jury found Wednesday.
Dallas-based Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access had accused Netherlands-based Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA and funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc. of defamation, trespass, nuisance, civil conspiracy and other acts.
Greenpeace USA was found liable for all counts, while the others were found liable for some. The damages owed will be spread out in different amounts over the three entities.
Energy Transfer called Wednesday's verdict a "win" for "Americans who understand the difference between the right to free speech and breaking the law."
Greenpeace said earlier that a large award to the pipeline company would threaten to bankrupt the organization.
Following the nine-person jury's verdict, Greenpeace's senior legal adviser said the group's work "is never going to stop."
"That's the really important message today, and we're just walking out, and we're going to get together and figure out what our next steps are," Deepa Padmanabha told reporters outside the courthouse.
Greenpeace representatives talk with reporters outside the Morton County Courthouse in Mandan, N.D., on Wednesday. From left: Greenpeace USA interim executive director Sushma Raman; Greenpeace USA senior legal adviser Deepa Padmanabha; Greenpeace International general counsel Kristin Casper; Greenpeace USA lawyer Everett Jack Jr.; Greenpeace Fund Inc. lawyer Matt Kelly; and Greenpeace USA associate general counsel Jay Meisel. (Jack Dura/The Associated Press)
The organization later said it plans to appeal the decision.
"The fight against Big Oil is not over today," Greenpeace International general counsel Kristin Casper said. "We know that the law and the truth are on our side."
Casper said the group will see Energy Transfer in court in July in Amsterdam in an anti-intimidation lawsuit filed there last month.
What the allegations were against Greenpeace
The case reaches back to protests in 2016 and 2017 against the Dakota Access pipeline and its Missouri River crossing upstream of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's reservation. For years, the tribe has opposed the line as a risk to its water supply.
WATCH | Judge allows North Dakota pipeline construction, but government seeks voluntary 'pause':
Judge allows North Dakota pipeline construction, but government seeks voluntary 'pause'
Duration 1:37
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's attempt to halt construction of an oil pipeline near its North Dakota reservation failed in federal court Friday, but three U.S. government agencies asked the pipeline company to "voluntarily pause" work on a segment that tribal officials say holds sacred artifacts.
The multi-state pipeline transports about five per cent of the United States's daily oil production. It started transporting oil in mid-2017.
Energy Transfer lawyer Trey Cox had said Greenpeace carried out a scheme to stop the pipeline's construction. During opening statements, he alleged Greenpeace paid outsiders to come into the area and protest, sent blockade supplies, organized or led protester training, and made untrue statements about the project to stop it.
Lawyers for the Greenpeace entities had said there was no evidence to the claims, and that Greenpeace employees had little or no involvement in the protests, adding that the organizations had nothing to do with Energy Transfer's delays in construction or refinancing.
Details of the damages
The damages total nearly $666.9 million US ($958 million). The jury found Greenpeace USA must pay the bulk of the damages, nearly $404 million US ($580 million), while Greenpeace Fund Inc. and Greenpeace International would each pay roughly $131 million US ($188 million).
Protesters demonstrate against the expansion of the Dakota Access pipeline near Cannon Ball, N.D., in this file photo from Nov. 2, 2016. (John L. Mone/The Associated Press)
Energy Transfer said in a statement to The Associated Press: "While we are pleased that Greenpeace has been held accountable for their actions against us, this win is really for the people of Mandan and throughout North Dakota who had to live through the daily harassment and disruptions caused by the protesters who were funded and trained by Greenpeace."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
AI-powered platform Botaplace aims to make selling products online effortless
Akeem Adebisi wants to change e-commerce. The Winnipeg entrepreneur is one of the founders of Botaplace, an artificial intelligence-powered online platform that aims to make selling products online effortless. Whether users are solo entrepreneurs, resellers or small businesses, Botaplace purports to give them everything they need to launch, promote and manage their store — all in one platform. JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS Akeem Adebisi and his wife Bunmi run Botaplace. Sellers upload a photo or description of their product and an AI assistant generates a listing and social media-ready videos for advertising. 'Our mission is simple,' said Adebisi, 45. 'We want to level the playing field and give businesses the same global reach and marketing capability that a big box retailer has.' Users can access the platform by visiting or by downloading the app. Sellers upload a photo or description of their product and 'Bo,' Botaplace's AI assistant, generates a listing and short, social media-ready videos for advertising. Additionally, Bo creates secure payment links that sellers can share on social media or by email and text. The Botaplace dashboard also tracks inventory, fulfillment and shipping. The result is a selling platform that does away with the need for advertising agencies, payment gateways and fulfillment centres, Adebisi said. In Adebisi's estimation, online selling platforms like Facebook Marketplace and Kijiji are designed with the buyer's experience in mind. Botaplace aims to help retailers sell more units by getting their listings in front of buyers who are already searching for those products on the platform. 'Then you can relax and think about your business and how to grow it,' said Adebisi, who runs Botaplace with his wife, Bunmi. Born and raised in Nigeria, Adebisi moved to Winnipeg 10 years ago to reunite with family and to pursue his dreams of helping society and creating a better life for his children. Botaplace is not the software engineer and IT professional's first online platform. Three years ago, he launched AjoPro, an app that helps people from racialized communities save money to meet their financial goals. After coming up with the idea for Botaplace, Adebisi purchased Ready Made Solutions Inc., a Calgary-based software company with around 10 employees, to help him create the platform. (He declined to disclose the terms of the deal.) 'I do have strong faith… that Bota will transform the way people sell,' Adebisi said. 'One of my strongest beliefs and hopes… is that whether you're selling on Amazon or Shopify, or selling to traditional marketplaces, that Bota can amplify your reach.' It's exciting to see what people can do with AI and Botaplace sounds like 'a really good use of it,' said Harry Roy McLaughlin, founding chairman of the Manitoba Association of AI Professionals. 'That seems to be where a lot of technology, especially with AI, is going: being able to have a more natural interaction with AI and it being able to take actions on your behalf,' McLaughlin said. Botaplace has a supporter in Zita Somakoko, president of Black-Manitobans Chamber of Commerce. At a difficult time for Canada-U.S. trade, Somakoko is promoting the platform to chamber members as a reliable customer relationship management tool. 'Bota is… offering a solution for entrepreneurs that is made in Canada,' she said. Winnipeg Free Press | Newsletter Adebisi hopes Botaplace becomes popular in the keystone province and beyond. 'The relationship between (Canada) and the United States is becoming very unreliable and we need people to look at other ways of selling their products,' he said. 'We have high hopes for this product and we think it's going to be something Manitobans can be proud of.' Botaplace takes a 15 per cent commission based on the original selling price entered by the seller. It makes additional revenue if sellers pay to boost their listing. The app has been available on Google's Play Store since May and became available on Apple's App Store last week. Aaron Epp Reporter Aaron Epp reports on business for the Free Press. After freelancing for the paper for a decade, he joined the staff full-time in 2024. He was previously the associate editor at Canadian Mennonite. Read more about Aaron.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord, insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage. It's also removed cameras. At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates, something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman. Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Developers unveil plans for aviation-themed playground on former Downsview Airport lands
A Toronto-based developer unveiled plans to convert a 100-foot decommissioned airplane into a playground on former Downsview Airport lands on Monday. The deconstructed plane, or 'playscape,' is part of a larger project including a public plaza at YZD, the community planned for the redevelopment of North York's former 370-acre airport.
