Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail in Tennessee on Wednesday, only to be taken into immigration custody.
The Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in the fight over President Donald Trump's immigration policies has been in jail since he was returned to the U.S. on June 7, facing two counts of human smuggling.
On Sunday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail ahead of that trial. On Wednesday afternoon, she will set his conditions of release and allow him to go, according to her order. However, both his defense attorneys and prosecutors have said they expect him to be taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as soon as he is released on the criminal charges.
In addition, federal prosecutors are appealing Holmes' release order. Among other things, they expressed concern in a motion filed on Sunday that Abrego Garcia could be deported before he faces trial. Holmes has said previously that she won't step between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. It is up to them to decide whether they want to deport Abrego Garcia or prosecute him.
Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador.
Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. At his detention hearing, Homeland Security Special Agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April of this year.
Holmes said in her Sunday ruling that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children.
However, Holmes referred to her own ruling as 'little more than an academic exercise,' noting that ICE plans to detain him. It is less clear what will happen after that. Although he can't be deported to El Salvador — where an immigration judge found he faces a credible threat from gangs — he is still deportable to a third country as long as that country agrees to not send him to El Salvador.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
19 minutes ago
- Ottawa Citizen
'Fear and gratitude': Iconic photo captures Canada's role in a forgotten war
Article content Many years later, in 1994, a Korean War exhibit at the Canadian War Museum would bring to light the minor controversy over the soldier's identity. Article content Pte. Herbert Norris of Kingston, Ont., was also a signaller in Charles Company in Korea, and had been giving talks about the war and identifying himself as subject of The Face of War. This came to wide attention through media coverage of the exhibit, including the museum's presentation of a framed print to Norris at a gala. Faced with a growing scandal, the museum looked more closely into it, and based on evidence from archives, police facial recognition experts, and the confirmation of both Tomelin and the person who processed the film, concluded they had made a mistake. The Face of War was Matthews. Article content It left Norris feeling disrespected, he would later tell the Kingston Whig-Standard. He was not the only Korea veteran to feel this way. Even during the war, when U.S. President Harry Truman called it a 'police action,' rather than a war that had not been formally declared, many veterans of Korea felt their contributions were inadequately respected. Article content Article content Article content Korea was an unpopular war, and Sayle said it was a main reason the Democrats lost the 1952 U.S. election. It was especially worrying to Canada, though in a slightly different way, Sayle said. Article content The Korean War was 'exceptionally significant' in international relations, Sayle said. It transformed European security. It led to the deployment of Canadian and American forces in Europe with NATO, anticipating conflict with the Soviet Union. Article content 'The actual continental commitment begins because of the attack in Korea,' Sayle said. Article content So Canadians were alarmed to see American forces bombing defenceless villages in Korea, and came to wonder whether they would also fight that way if hot war came again to Europe. The concern reached the cabinet level, and Sayle shared a declassified message from Canada's minister of national defence to his American counterparts, warning of the 'magnificent ammunition' for enemy propaganda and the risk to military morale posed by using heavy artillery and large bombers against villages; by naming missions things like 'Operation Killer;' and by using racist slurs for South Koreans, the same ones that would later be notorious among American soldiers in Vietnam. Article content Article content There is a valid argument to be made that Canada was fighting to protect South Korea, Sayle said, but the way the conflict played out 'robs the war of any satisfying heroic narrative, especially because it ends in armistice rather than true peace. There's no closure for the public. There's no celebration, no Victory in Korea day,' Sayle said. Article content Over the following years, as Korea slipped from immediate memory into modern history, there was another shooting war in Southeast Asia that coloured its remembrance. Korea was in that sense 'in the shadow of Vietnam,' Sayle said. Article content In the 1980s and 1990s, when there was an 'explosion of memory' of the Second World War, as Sayle puts it, this sharpened the contrast with Korea, leaving its veterans sometimes overlooked, out of the Remembrance Day spotlight. Article content 'Just because of the historical nature and context I think we can understand why it was forgotten, but that doesn't excuse the forgetting of these veterans and their experiences,' Sayle said. As this photo illustrates and reminds, any individual soldier's experience of war is 'indivisible,' Sayle said.
Toronto Star
35 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Zelenskyy will sign off on special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to formally approve plans Wednesday to set up a new international court to prosecute senior Russian officials for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The special tribunal will be created through an agreement between Ukraine and the Council of Europe, the continent's top human rights body. Zelenskyy is visiting the Strasbourg-based organization for the first time as part of the announcement.
Global News
42 minutes ago
- Global News
Ontario budgeted $52M for commercials meant to fend off U.S. tariffs
It was a charm offensive aimed at American politicians and decision-makers for months. Lawmakers landing at Washington Dulles International Airport were met with signs reminding them that Ontario is 'an economic partner that helps employ millions of American workers.' Politicians who thumbed through the pages of The Washington Post were told that Ontario is a 'secure economic partner in an insecure world.' The message was even blasted out to the Super Bowl's millions of viewers. As Donald Trump was inaugurated and started his term as president, Ontario's message of partnership was everywhere. But achieving a level of saturation didn't come cheap. New invoices and documents, obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws, show the budget for the advertising blitz was set by Ontario Premier Doug Ford's office at $52 million. Story continues below advertisement Between mid-December and mid-February, the provincial government shelled out roughly $38 million of that money to buy advertising space. The vast majority went to television commercials, particularly on Fox News. When he unveiled the new strategy in November 2024, Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade Vic Fedeli said it aimed to underscore the United States' close relationship with Ontario. Fedeli wanted to push the narrative as Trump threatened massive tariffs and mused about Canada becoming the 51st state. 'It's really important just to remind them subtly: we're a trusted partner to your north, we've always been there for you and we'll be there for you tomorrow,' he said. By March, however, the United States had included Canada on its list of countries facing tariffs on steel, aluminum and autos. David Paterson, Ontario's representative on Capitol Hill, conceded the high-value charm offensive had 'been over for quite a while.' Now, opponents of the Ford government are asking what exactly the province achieved by spending tens of millions of dollars beaming its message to American lawmakers who may not have been listening. 'The government should have been looking at: Was this changing minds? Was this influencing Donald Trump? It doesn't appear to have done a whole lot,' Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said. Story continues below advertisement The province said the campaign made 1.9 billion impressions and reached more than 100 million people in the United States. Commercials run after U.S. President Donald Trump elected When Trump won the United States election on Nov. 5, 2024, Ford and his team kicked into high gear, fearing his threats of tariffs and annexation could have a crushing effect on the economy. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy By noon on Nov. 6, the premier's office had asked to increase the planned budget for a 'U.S. Partnerships campaign' from $20 million to $52 million, according to emails and other documents seen by Global News. The plan was to run advertisements targeting the United States from January to March 2025. The strategy was then revamped and reworked to start earlier. A massive commercial buy targeting Trump's favoured television network, Fox News, was approved to begin in December on shows with estimated audiences ranging from 6.5 to 8 million people. Story continues below advertisement The government earmarked $17.6 million to buy advertising space on four Fox News prime time shows. It also grabbed slots during American football games. An extra $400,000 was spent to put up posters promoting Ontario at transit shelters in Washington, D.C. and at airports in the United States. In total, the province spent $18 million in December, according to the documents obtained by Global News. That spending continued in January and February, with another total of $19.8 million. The latter cost covered commercials on Amazon Prime, YouTube, Google Search and The Wall Street Journal, among others, alongside another chunk of television commercials. The Ford government did not confirm to Global News if the entire $52 million budget for the campaign was spent. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade said the campaign made an impression. 'With the threat of tariffs, as one part of a larger engagement plan, our government launched an advertising campaign to reach Americans on American networks, highlighting our longstanding partnership and value in energy, critical minerals, and other resources that many states rely on,' they said in a statement sent to Global News. 'Our campaign received over 1.9 billion impressions and reached more than 100 million Americans, including key decision-makers who can influence trade policies with Canada and who routinely raise and celebrate the advertising campaign with Ontario officials during meetings.' Story continues below advertisement Critics question what the campaign achieved More than six months after Trump's election and the launch of Ontario's campaign to win American hearts and minds, some are questioning what the province got for its money and why the commercials ran for so long. When tariffs — which remain in place — were announced in March, Ford removed American alcohol from the shelves of the LCBO, said he would cancel a contract with Elon Musk's Starlink and briefly threatened to cut off electricity exports to the United States. The latter threat was quickly stood down in exchange for a meeting with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, but the tariffs were not removed. Critics believe none of Ford's actions — including the pricey commercial campaign — have had any effect. 'What we see is overspending on advertising in the United States,' Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie said. Story continues below advertisement 'And for what results, we have to ask ourselves. Did he stop the tariffs? He did not. Did he protect jobs? No, jobs are leaving the province. Did he strengthen our economy and diversify our trading partners? He did neither of those things.' Stiles said the strategy wasn't necessarily misguided at the beginning, but could have been cut short, with the money funnelled into relief for sectors like steel and auto manufacturing, which have seen tariff-induced layoffs. 'The government seemed to just keep wanting to throw money at advertising campaigns even at a time when Ontarians are really struggling,' she said. Ford's opponents have complained about his government's use of advertising in the past, pointing to recent findings by the auditor general. In December, the auditor general found the Ford government had spent more than any other administration on advertising. The province paid a total of $103.5 million in a single year for commercials. The auditor general concluded those advertisements were 'designed to promote the governing party' rather than to share an important message with the public.
