Bloomberg Intelligence on ESG Event-Driven Risk
Eric Kane, Director, ESG Research, Bloomberg Intelligence explores how ESG-related incidents can impact a company's financial standing at the Bloomberg Sustainable Business Summit 2025 in London. (Source: Bloomberg)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI CEO, Bank Officials to Speak at Fed Bank-Capital Meeting
(Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve outlined the agenda for its July 22 conference on banks' capital requirements, which will feature discussions on the Basel III endgame, the stress testing framework, the capital surcharge for the largest lenders and leverage requirements. US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined The event will include OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman, bank executives and academics, among others. 'The conference will allow for expert discussions on whether capital requirements are operating as intended and the interconnections between different requirements,' Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said in a statement Thursday. Other speakers at the conference will include former Vice Chair for Supervision Randal Quarles, Morgan Stanley Chief Financial Officer Sharon Yeshaya, Bank of America Corp. CFO Alastair Borthwick and Christina Parajon Skinner, an assistant professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Bowman, who was recently confirmed as the Fed's top bank cop, outlined an ambitious agenda earlier this month — from reviewing the confidential ratings of larger banks to insulating community banks from requirements targeting bigger firms. The central bank unveiled plans earlier this week to roll back a key capital rule that big banks have said limits their ability to act as intermediaries in the $29 trillion market. How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
TechCrunch
22 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Elon Musk reportedly fires Tesla's top sales exec
Omead Afshar, Tesla's vice president in charge of sales and manufacturing in North America and Europe, has reportedly been fired by CEO Elon Musk, according to Forbes. It's not immediately known why Musk fired Afshar, who was one of his top lieutenants and closest confidants at the company. Afshar, Musk, and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Afshar's departure was first reported by Bloomberg News. Afshar was posting support for the limited rollout of Tesla's robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, as recently as Tuesday. 'Absolutely historic day for Tesla,' he wrote on June 23 on X, the social media platform his former boss owns. 'Thank you, Elon, for pushing us all!' Afshar's departure comes at a time when the company's sales growth has vanished. Tesla sold fewer cars in 2024 than it did in 2023, the first annual drop since it started mass producing EVs more than a decade ago. Musk's involvement in U.S. politics has not helped, despite his recent pledge that he was leaving the Trump administration. Sales continued to struggle through the first half of 2025. The company's industry-leading profits fell 71% year-over-year in the first quarter. European sales fell nearly 28% percent year-over-year in May. Tesla will report global delivery figures for the second quarter next week, and financial results for the period in mid-July. Afshar was not a particularly public-facing executive at Tesla. He joined the company in 2017 and spent years working in the 'office of the CEO.' He took on increasing responsibilities ever since; Musk has previously credited Afshar with leading the construction of Tesla's massive factory in Austin, Texas. Not long after that, though, Afshar found himself in hot water. In 2022 he became a subject of an internal probe after he was allegedly involved in a plan to purchase special material for a glass building Musk reportedly wanted. Both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating those purchases in 2023. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW Afshar moved over to SpaceX during some of that time period and reportedly was involved with X for a while. Musk elevated him to the role of vice president in late 2024 after another top executive, Tom Zhu, moved back to China. Bloomberg News also reported Thursday that Tesla's director of HR for North America, Jenna Ferrua, is no longer with the company. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
A Quadruple Bottom Line. Can ProSocial AI influence Business For Good?
Pink 3d number 4 on mint background. 3D rendering. Best for anniversary, birthday party, ... More celebration. getty In boardrooms and beyond an interesting shift has begun to reshape how some enterprises measure success. The traditional singular focus on profit is evolving into a more nuanced framework that balances four dimensions: people, planet, profit and purpose — the quadruple bottom line . At the intersection of this trend lies an emerging paradigm of artificial intelligence designed not just to optimize efficiency, but to optimize for humanity itself. This transformation is still in its early stages. While the potential is compelling and early experiments show promise, the widespread adoption of ProSocial AI and quadruple bottom line thinking remains more of an aspiration than a reality across most industries. What we are witnessing are pioneering initiatives and foundational work being laid by forward-thinking institutions and entrepreneurs who recognize that the future of business may depend on getting this balance right. The quadruple bottom line concept evolves from the " Triple Bottom Line " (people, planet, profit) coined by John Elkington in 1994. It adds a fourth 'P': Purpose, recognizing that sustainable business success requires intentional alignment between technological innovation and human flourishing. While the triple bottom line prompted firms to consider their environmental and social impacts, purpose introduces a deeper sense of mission that transcends quarterly earnings and has the potential to inspire staff and customers. This evolution is particularly relevant as AI becomes more integrated into business operations. Rather than viewing AI as merely a tool for efficiency and effectiveness, a small but growing number of organizations are exploring its potential as an instrument for social good.. ProSocial AI represents a shift from the traditional take on technology as an endeavor that is driven primarily by commercial interests. It refers to AI systems that are deliberately tailored, trained, and targeted to bring out the best in and for people and planet. Unlike conventional AI that optimizes for narrow metrics, ProSocial AI is architected with human welfare and environmental sustainability as primary objectives, not afterthoughts. The distinction is important. Classic AI might optimize a supply chain for cost efficiency alone, potentially at the expense of worker welfare or environmental impact. In contrast, ProSocial AI would optimize for a holistic outcome that treats supply chain resilience, fair labor practices, environmental sustainability, and profitability as interconnected objectives. Real-World Applications: ProSocial AI In Practice Brewing Social Impact Win Win Coffee exemplifies the ProSocial AI approach by combining a social mission with technology. The company aims to "bring equity to the coffee supply chain, centering the African diaspora." This mission is powered by its technology platform, ViaNexa, which uses AI and machine learning to remove bottlenecks and waste from the coffee supply chain. It leverages AI to implement dynamic pricing models, ensuring fairer compensation for farmers and more efficient, transparent transactions. This direct link between a consumer-facing brand and its purpose-built AI platform demonstrates a cohesive quadruple bottom line strategy in action, though its market share remains small compared to industry giants (for now). Intelligent Procurement with Purpose Stimulus represents an interesting example of ProSocial AI in a B2B context. Its AI-powered "relationship intelligence platform" helps companies make optimal purchasing decisions by factoring in a wide array of metrics beyond cost. Stimulus's algorithms analyze and score suppliers based on diversity, sustainability, and ethical practices, enabling companies to build supply chains that reflect their values while maintaining a competitive edge. Financial Inclusion Through AI Some established fintech companies are also leveraging AI for social good. For example PayPal uses machine learning to assess creditworthiness for small businesses, particularly in underserved communities that traditional banks might overlook. By analyzing business performance data rather than relying solely on conventional credit scores, PayPal can provide capital to a broader range of entrepreneurs. During economic uncertainty, its AI systems can also help identify businesses at risk and proactively offer support, demonstrating how profit-driven companies can simultaneously drive positive social impact. Challenges To Widespread Prosocial AI Adoption Despite these promising examples, developing integrated systems remains technically challenging, as most current AI implementations still optimize for traditional business metrics. Selected factors hindering the widespread adoption of ProSocial AI: Measurement Complexity: Social and environmental impacts are often difficult to quantify and integrate into algorithms. (Often 'measure what we treasure' turns into 'treasure what we measure', as investors – and in the case of nonprofits – donors, cherish hard metrics.) Competitive Pressures: Companies may hesitate to adopt solutions that could increase short-term costs, even if they offer long-term benefits. Technical Hurdles: Balancing multiple, sometimes competing, objectives requires sophisticated AI capabilities that many organizations lack. Cultural Resistance: Shifting from a profit-maximizing mindset requires fundamental changes in organizational culture and incentives. The Systems Thinking Advantage What distinguishes prosocial AI is its foundation in systems thinking. Rather than optimizing individual components in isolation, these systems recognize the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and economic factors. For example, a traditional AI in customer service might optimize for the lowest cost and fastest resolution time. A prosocial AI logic optimizes for customer satisfaction, agent well-being, and long-term relationship building and planetary footprint, recognizing that the interplay of these factors ultimately drive sustainable profitability. The Economic Case For ProSocial AI While critics may argue that adding social and environmental considerations increases costs, emerging evidence suggests the opposite. Companies that integrate ProSocial AI principles tend to discover new revenue streams, reduce operational and regulatory risks, and build more resilient business models. Adopting a more holistic perspective to business does not represent a trade-off between profit and purpose;, but a more sophisticated understanding of how meaningful benefits can be generated and scaled. Done deliberately it is a win-win-win-win for the people we are, the institutions we are part of, the countries we belong to and the planet we depend on. Scaling Impact: The Institutional Imperative A transition to mainstream prosocial AI requires more than individual company initiatives; it demands systemic change. Universities, industry associations, and regulatory bodies must collaborate to create an environment where quadruple bottom line thinking becomes the norm. Programs like Wharton's executive education courses on responsible AI exemplify this approach, coupling technical proficiency with ethical reasoning. The Quadruple Bottom Line: The FOUR Framework To move from concept to reality, organizations can use the practical FOUR framework: F - Focus on Stakeholder Integration: Identify all stakeholders—employees, customers, communities, and environmental systems—and incorporate their perspectives into AI development. O - Optimize for Multiple Variables: Redesign success metrics to include social and environmental indicators alongside financial ones. U - Understand Through Measurement: Invest in robust systems to track social and environmental impact with the same rigor as traditional business metrics. R - Reflect and Adapt Continuously: Implement regular review processes to assess the real-world impact of ProSocial AI initiatives and create feedback loops for continuous improvement. A Call For Bottomline Intentionality The quadruple bottom line is a strategic necessity for businesses seeking to thrive in an increasingly hybrid and ever more interconnected world. As consumers, employees, and investors increasingly demand purpose-driven organizations, companies that master this integration will not just be doing good, but doing exceptionally well. Making the switch from purely pro-profit to a 4P-perspective makes businesses future-proof. It actually adds an additional 'P' - with prepared leadership as stressed by Wooten and James. Business schools can be champions of such an integrated approach, with examples like the Wharton AI Human Research Lab and the Wharton Accountable AI Lab which look at the intersection of intelligent technology, business strategy and human behavior, while addressing AI's ethical, regulatory and governance considerations. The transition will be gradual, driven by a combination of regulatory pressure, consumer demand and proven competitive advantage. Ultimately the future belongs to organizations that recognize technology's power to amplify human potential, strengthen communities and nurture the planet. In this future, the quadruple bottom line is not just a measurement framework. It is a pathway to shared prosperity. It's time to start walking, prosocial AI can accelerate our pace.
