Judge denies emergency motion to stop transfer of L.A. zoo elephants Billy and Tina
A judge denied a temporary restraining order on Thursday seeking to stop the Los Angeles Zoo from transferring two beloved elephants to a zoo in Oklahoma.
An L.A. resident sued the zoo last Friday over its decision to move elephants Tina and Billy to the Tulsa Zoo arguing that they should instead be sent to an animal sanctuary. His lawyers then filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order on Tuesday.
Melissa Lerner, the lawyer representing the plaintiff, told reporters outside the courtroom on Thursday that the judge denied the motion 'largely on the basis that this is an issue that should be addressed by the City Council and Mayor Karen Bass,' adding that the judge 'encouraged the public to reach out to their council members and to Mayor Bass and to tell them that this is unconscionable and unacceptable.'
Animal rights advocates have criticized the L.A. Zoo for decades for holding elephants in a relatively small enclosure, which they say causes serious health issues. Two elephants were euthanized in the last few years because of health issues that the zoo said were age-related, leaving only Billy and Tina, who live in separate enclosures in an elephant habitat of about 6.5 acres.
The zoo announced they would be transferring the pachyderms to a spacious elephant complex at the Tulsa Zoo in late April, sparking further criticism.
Outside the courtroom, Lerner continued to call on the mayor to act.
'Mayor Karen Bass can resolve this with one phone call, it is not difficult,' Lerner said. 'We wish she would rise to the occasion and do the right thing here. She has the power to intervene and prevent their transfer before it's too late.'
A representative for the mayor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The emergency filing cited the urgency of the case, noting that the transfer could happen at any moment and that transporting elephants can pose serious health risks. It urged the judge to 'maintain the status quo' by keeping Billy and Tina in L.A. until the court had more time to review the case.
Much of the contents of the initial lawsuit, including a declaration from the singer Cher, discussed how the decision-making process to transfer the animals was made without input from the public or from City Council.
In its first statement since the lawsuit was filed, the L.A. Zoo said Thursday morning that the 'difficult decision' to relocate Billy and Tina was made in accordance with recommendations from and consultations with the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and its Elephant Species Survival Plan.
'The care and wellbeing of the animals is always a top priority and decisions impacting the animals are made at discretion of the Zoo Director — an authority granted in the Los Angeles City Charter. Activist agendas and protests are rightfully not a consideration in decisions that impact animal care,' the statement said.
The L.A. Zoo Director and Chief Executive Denise Verret is named as a defendant in the lawsuit.
L.A. City Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, a longtime advocate for the elephants, filed a motion last month seeking to pause their relocation until the City Council could review the possibility of sending them to a sanctuary.
At a budget hearing last week, Blumenfield asked Verret a series of questions about the elephants. In a hearing on May 8 where the councilmember and zoo director went head-to-head on the issue, Verret said as of that date that the L.A. and Tulsa zoos had not yet signed a contract and no date had been set for the transfer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
City Council Asks Watchdog to Investigate N.Y.P.D's Cooperation With ICE
The City Council requested on Tuesday that the city watchdog open an inquiry into how the Police Department under Mayor Eric Adams is sharing information with federal authorities amid President Trump's immigration crackdown. In a letter, the City Council cited news reports of cases that the Council said raised concerns about whether the police, intentionally or not, had violated New York City's sanctuary laws by sharing information with federal authorities that was used in civil cases regarding immigration enforcement. The letter to the New York City Department of Investigation was the latest escalation by the City Council as it scrutinizes the mayor's immigration policies and his support of some of the Trump administration's deportation efforts. Under the City Charter, the Department of Investigation is required to carry out reviews requested by the City Council. New York City's sanctuary laws limit cooperation between the city and the federal government on most immigration issues, which are largely civil matters. But the Police Department often assists federal law enforcement authorities with criminal cases, typically in joint investigations into sex trafficking, drug dealing and terrorism. In one case that drew scrutiny, the police provided federal investigators with information about Leqaa Kordia, 32, who had been arrested during a pro-Palestinian demonstration at Columbia University. Ms. Kordia, who is Palestinian, was not a Columbia student; federal agents told the police they were investigating her for money laundering after they detained her for overstaying her visa. 'New Yorkers must trust that their own city government will not participate in their civil rights being violated, and these recent episodes raise serious doubts that should be urgently addressed,' the letter from the City Council said. 'It is therefore imperative that any potential breaches by Mayor Eric Adams's administration and the N.Y.P.D. be investigated objectively and transparently.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
Homeless people could be arrested after refusing three offers of shelter in Silicon Valley city
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Homeless people who reject three offers of shelter could be arrested under a controversial proposal before the city council of the most populous city in California's Silicon Valley on Tuesday. The proposal being pushed by San Jose Mayor Matt Mahon is eye-opening because it comes from a liberal city headed by a Democrat in the left-leaning San Francisco Bay Area. It is among the stricter anti-encampment deterrents proposed by elected officials since the Supreme Court in 2023 made it easier to ban homeless people from camping on public property. And it's another sign of just how frustrated people have become with squalid tents lining sidewalks and riverbanks, and erratic behavior of those using drugs or in distress in a state with an estimated 187,000 homeless people. California is home to roughly a quarter of all homeless people in the country. Mahan says most people do accept offers of shelter. But he wants to make clear to the small percentage of people who refuse, that as the city builds more shelter and interim housing, they have a responsibility to move indoors. 'I think we need a cultural change, a culture of accountability for everyone involved,' said Mahan. 'I don't want to use the criminal justice system to make vulnerable people's lives harder. I want to use it as a last resort.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat and former mayor of San Francisco, has repeatedly urged cities to ban encampments. Arrests for illegal lodging have soared in San Francisco, and its current mayor, Daniel Lurie, has reiterated that it is not appropriate for people to live outdoors. Advocates for homeless people say cracking down on encampments is traumatizing and even counterproductive. Forcing a person to clear out sets them back in their search for stability as they could lose important documents needed to apply for work and housing, they said. 'Pushing people with mental health needs or drug addiction into incarceration — without any crime committed — is both inhumane and ineffective,' said Otto Lee, president of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, in a written statement emailed Monday to The Associated Press. Lee and other county leaders are opposed to the mayor's proposal. They say they need more housing, beds and services, and not punishment. The 'responsibility to shelter' proposal does not mandate an arrest after three rejected offers. After talking with the city attorney's office and police, Mahan said it made more sense to give front-line outreach workers and police officers discretion to decide when to escalate or prioritize a situation. The city will set up a new six-officer quality of life unit within the police department. 'We don't want to overly tie their hands and tell them this is the only way to do it,' the mayor said. People who repeatedly violate the city's encampment code of conduct — which also includes keeping tents free of trash and not blocking the public right of way — could be sent to a recovery center for detox or petitioned for court-mandated treatment to mental health and substance use disorder care, Mahan said. San Jose has nearly 1,400 shelter spots and hopes to add another 800 by the end of the year. Officials are aware they do not have enough beds, and Mahan said that people will not be punished if beds are unavailable or the only options are unsuitable.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayoral candidate Brad Lander burns through cash, putting him at home-stretch disadvantage
NEW YORK — Brad Lander's day job is overseeing the city's cash. As a mayoral candidate, he is burning through his own. The city comptroller had spent nearly $1 million more than any other candidate in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, as of the latest data through May 19, yet he's still polling a distant third. And with a mandatory spending cap of roughly $8 million and just two weeks until the election, Lander finds himself at a significant disadvantage to opponents with more money for voter outreach in the final stretch of the race. The fiscal steward vying to replace Mayor Eric Adams has dropped $4.7 million on two television ads, a stable of consultants and staff salaries totaling more than $700,000, according to records from the city's Campaign Finance Board. He's left with $2.8 million, as of the latest disclosure period in May. By comparison, front-runner Andrew Cuomo had $5.7 million and second-place Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist lawmaker, had $4.5 million. Also in financial distress is City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who got into the race late and has $2.3 million in the bank. The candidates' updated finances will be published Friday. Lander paid $226,500 to fundraiser Jenny Galvin, $195,650 to pollster Global Strategy Group and $161,644 to consultancy BerlinRosen. Digital marketing and fundraising firm Authentic Campaigns netted $135,451, and the campaign even paid $35,677 to a firm that helps campaigns optimize spending. The spending hasn't really helped all that much. Lander is polling significantly behind Mamdani — the state assemblymember who has captured the progressive movement Lander hoped to tap into — and Cuomo, who is benefiting from more than $10 million worth of ads coming from two super PACs and the gratis services of a prominent lobbyist quietly powering his campaign. A government reform group has requested an investigation into Cuomo's use of that firm, Tusk Strategies. 'Conventional campaign wisdom is you unload most of your spending six to eight weeks out from the primary,' said Democratic strategist Trip Yang, who is not affiliated with any of the mayoral candidates. 'Brad is doing what he needs to, but for some reason it is not really breaking through in the polls.' Lander has banked more on broadcast and digital ads than Mamdani. That strategy is reminiscent of former Mayor Bill de Blasio's 2013 campaign, which did not feature a single piece of direct mail. The city comptroller has dropped $2.5 million on TV ads via Great American Media that feature him at the controls of a frontloader crushing Teslas in a junkyard and riding Coney Island's famed Cyclone while calmly taking notes on a legal pad. 'We will be up on broadcast, streaming, and digital every day through June 24th thanks to the grassroots support for our campaign from every corner of this city and a hunger from New Yorkers to end the Adams-Cuomo nightmare of corruption,' said Alison Hirsh, Lander's campaign manager, in a statement. A Lander spokesperson argued he has less cash than other top contenders because he started running earlier. Lander began raising money in February 2022, one month into his and Eric Adams' tenures, when each was presumably planning to run for reelection. As the mayor's political standing faltered, the comptroller started to see an opening to challenge the brash, Trump-aligned Democrat. By the time Lander announced his candidacy for mayor last summer, he had already spent a half-million dollars, public records show. In the ensuing three months before Mamdani announced his candidacy in October, the comptroller dropped another $200,000. Taken together, that accounts for the bulk of the discrepancy between Lander and Mamdani, the next-biggest spender in the race. As of last month, Mamdani had dropped $3.9 million, leaving him with $4.5 million in his war chest. Once he maxed out on fundraising, he cut a video suggesting his prospective donors give to Adrienne Adams, instead — a nod to the city's ranked-choice voting system that encourages partnerships to damage the front-runner. The democratic socialist Mamdani is employing a different strategy than the city comptroller, evidenced by a substantial investment in mailers as he inches closer to Cuomo in the polls. Mamdani's campaign paid direct mail firms Moxie Media and Century Direct Solutions — along with a printing company and a sticker firm — more than $400,000. A spokesperson said the campaign wanted to balance the success Mamdani has had producing viral social media videos with an effort to reach more analog voters. (The average age of the city's most active voters suggests they are not on TikTok.) In the home stretch with a significant polling advantage, Mamdani had $1.8 million more to spend than Lander. The comptroller announced May 20 that he had maxed out on fundraising, but some of that cash won't come through until June 20, the next public matching funds payout. Both are chasing Cuomo, who does not have money troubles, despite his disastrous turn before campaign finance regulators. After initially denying him matching funds based on systemic paperwork errors, the Campaign Finance Board fined the former governor $756,994 for improper coordination with a super PAC supporting him called Fix the City. The outfit has raised $10 million and spent around $8 million boosting Cuomo with television ads. A separate super PAC affiliated with the New York Apartment Association pledged to drop $2.5 million supporting the governor. Cuomo has spent $1.9 million and has $5.7 million left in the bank. Adrienne Adams was worse off than the city comptroller as of last month's filing. She entered the race late and has been scrambling for cash since. The board awarded her $2 million in matching funds last month, which led her to announce a broadcast ad shortly afterward. Even without sufficient money, she has been polling near Lander on the strength of endorsements from municipal labor union DC 37 and state Attorney General Letitia James. On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Adrienne Adams as her second choice behind Mamdani, making the impact of her remaining cash reserves harder to predict.
