Karen Read retrial: Jury ends first full day of deliberations with no verdict
Editor's note: This is a summary of jury deliberations in the Karen Read trial for Monday, June 16. For the latest on the deliberations, visit USA TODAY's story for Tuesday, June 17.
Jurors in Karen Read's second murder trial ended their first full day of deliberations Monday without a verdict in the case over whether the Massachusetts woman killed her Boston police officer boyfriend.
Judge Beverly Cannone sent jurors home for the evening, telling them to come back refreshed Tuesday at 9 a.m.
The 12-person panel began discussing Read's fate Friday, June 13, for about two hours, after lawyers finished delivering closing arguments in the eight-week-long murder retrial. By 4:25 p.m. on Monday, after more than nine hours of deliberations, they still had not reached a decision.
Read, 45, has pleaded not guilty on three charges, including second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death.
Discover WITNESS: Access our exclusive collection of true crime stories, podcasts, videos and more
Prosecutors accuse Read of backing into John O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV after a night out drinking in January 2022. Her defense team has suggested she was framed for the crime by sloppy and biased investigators.
'Don't you have questions?' one of her lawyers, Alan Jackson, said, prodding jurors in his final message to them. He told them their confidence in the case against Read needed to be 'unshakeable' to convict her.
Catch up with our coverage and analysis from the most pivotal moments of the retrial.
Why Karen Read is a true-crime obsession
Karen Read screams: Jennifer McCabe, prosecution's star witness, testifies
Scratches, taillight shards, hair: Jurors get a look at Karen Read's SUV
The dog did it? What to know about the German Shepherd tied to the Karen Read trial
Karen Read claims police bungled the investigation. What did they supposedly do wrong?
Was John O'Keefe struck by a baseball bat? Doctor testifies about cops injuries
Karen Read Trial in hands of jury: Which evidence could tilt the case?
What did lead investigator Michael Proctor say about the case over text? Lewd messages revealed
The deliberations come nearly a year after the prosecution's first case against Read ended in a mistrial, when a jury could not come to a unanimous verdict on the charges against her.
Crowds of people dressed head to toe in pink, Read's favorite color, milled outside the Dedham, Massachusetts courthouse Monday to cheer for Read as they waited for a verdict. The demonstrations have become a common site, as the years-long legal saga has garnered massive intrigue and captivated true-crime fans,
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: No verdict from Karen Read jury after first full day of deliberations
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Club World Cup gets massive security upgrade after chaotic incident that led to dozens of arrests
Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, will have a massive police presence throughout the remainder of the Club World Cup this month, as the city looks to avoid a repeat of the near-deadly incident that resulted in 26 arrests last year. The 2024 Copa America final saw a swarm of ticketless fans rush the gates for a match between Argentina and Colombia, leaving fans terrified and bloodied as security struggled to contain the crush, as they attempted to break in. Videos showed some fans trying to climb through air vents to gain entry. Police had to lift distressed children over barriers to avoid them being crushed, while elsewhere officers tackled to the ground the ticketless fans they could catch in a forlorn attempt to keep the hoards at bay. But things are different this summer. "We've put extensive measures in place to protect fans, players and staff," Miami-Dade Sheriff Rosie Cordero-Stutz said before the tournament. "The Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office is leading all security efforts for this global event." Changes made over the past year mean fans for this tournament must pass through three separate checkpoints that enclose the entire campus before getting close to the stadium. Steel fencing is set up around the perimeter. First up is a ticket check at temporary gates, taking up large parts of the parking lot where tailgate parties might usually take place. Then comes another airport-style screening under tents where bags are checked by X-ray machines. Even flags need to be approved. Fans were able to get much closer to the stadium before checkpoints at the Copa America. "When I was at the final, the security guards just opened the gate and started letting people through," Edison Negron, a Boca Juniors fan from Puerto Rico, told The Associated Press when describing the scenes as fans crushed against the barriers last year. Miami-Dade County said at the time that a full review would be conducted and that the scenes "cannot happen again." "There will be a significant law enforcement and security footprint in and around the stadium to ensure public safety for all the events," Det. Argemis Colome told the AP, while adding that social media was being monitored prior to matches. Preparations have included special training for a rapid-deployment force as part of a multi-agency response to potential crowd trouble. "If things go south, we get ready for civil unrest and unruly fans," the sheriff's office said in a social media post. A large police presence has been evident at both games played at Hard Rock so far — Saturday's tournament opener when a crowd of more than 60,000 watched Inter Miami vs. Al Ahly and Monday's match between Boca Juniors and Benfica in front of nearly 56,000. Patrol cars have been stationed along the interstate outside of the stadium and, within the grounds, officers equipped with face shields and protective clothing are on patrol. FIFA said it had worked closely with stadium officials, state and federal agencies "to ensure a robust security presence." Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Downers Grove South teacher facing 52 more charges for sexually assaulting, grooming student
A Downers Grove South High School teacher previously charged with sexually assaulting her 15-year-old student is now facing 52 more charges related to that boy. Christina Formella, 30, was charged with criminal sexual abuse, criminal sexual assault and aggravated criminal sexual abuse in March after the teenager and his mother reported alleged "inappropriate sexual conduct." She was granted pre-trial release but was banned from entering Downers Grove South High School, where she was both a teacher and soccer coach, and is not allowed to have any contact with anyone under the age of 18. Tuesday the DuPage County State's Attorney announced 52 additional charges involving alleged previously unknown sexual abuse and assault of the same student. Formella is now facing 20 counts of criminal sexual assault, 20 counts of aggravated criminal sexual abuse, six counts of indecent solicitation of a child and six counts of grooming, all felonies. Prosecutors said an interview with the victim in April led to the disclosure of more alleged sexual abuse by Formella. Prosecutors say the abuse began in January 2023 and continued through August and September of 2024. Formella allegedly sent multiple texts grooming the boy, and allegedly said she and the victim had engaged in sexual activity approximately 50 times both at the school and at her home. Prosecutors say the majority of the sexual abuse took place at the school. Formella appeared in court Tuesday morning on the new charges and was once again granted pre-trial release. She is due back in court on Aug. 4.
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's pardons could have erased more than $1.3 billion in fines and restitution, Democrats say
House Democratic lawmakers released a report Tuesday alleging that President Donald Trump's federal pardons and clemency grants could wipe away more than $1.3 billion in payments to victims and the federal government. Trump's pardons have provoked ire of critics who accuse the president of using the Oval Office to benefit his supporters' political allies. Those critics, including Democratic members of Congress, say the pardons and grants of clemency wipe out payments made to victims or taxpayers. The report, which House Judiciary Committee Democrats say is based on the cases of nearly 1,600 people, is based on publicly available court documents and the Office of the Pardon Attorney's website. But it's not clear exactly how much, if any, of the $1.3 billion Democrats say was or could be owed by defendants could be collected before the pardons were issued. And some defendants continue to fight the issue in court. Generally in court, once restitution and fines have been paid by a defendant, it's not easy for them to claw back that money, even after receiving a presidential pardon. There have been loopholes, however, that are benefiting some Trump pardon recipients, such as if a defendant was appealing their case at the time of the pardon, or if they were still negotiating financial terms of a settlement, according to court records. One criminal defendant, electric vehicle startup founder Trevor Milton, skirted having to pay because his restitution amount was being negotiated when he received a pardon from Trump in March, according to court records. Judge Edgardo Ramos had ordered Milton pay restitution, because his victims in an investment scheme had lost hundreds of millions of dollars, his sentencing records say. Milton's attorneys told the judge overseeing his case that Trump's pardon covered 'financial aspects of the conviction,' and said the court should even reimburse him a $300 fee he paid. The Democrats' report said the Justice Department didn't provide it with information on how much of $1.3 billion was ever collected. 'The summer interns working for House Democrats must be busy writing and printing pointless letters that aren't worth the paper they're written on,' said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields. 'President Trump is righting the wrongs of political prosecutions and providing justice after careful consideration of thoroughly vetted cases presented to him.' Some of the criticism of Trump's pardons has focused on defendants charged in relation to the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack, nearly all of whom were pardoned. The report claims that their pardons wiped out a total of at least $3 million in restitution for beating police officers and ransacking the Capitol. Federal prosecutors said in court this spring that the DOJ does not intend to return already paid restitution and fine costs following a pardon, especially among January 6 defendants. But some newly pardoned criminal defendants have ongoing legal battles that may give them a reprieve on fines and restitution now. The department has said in court filings, however, that judges' restitution orders and the payments defendants make on them are final, once a conviction has been finalized, and cannot be recouped by a convicted defendant without intervention from Congress or higher courts. That means many January 6 defendants will not get back the $2,000 or more they already paid as restitution to the US Treasury to compensate for damage to the US Capitol building. It would take an act of Congress to return that money to many of the January 6 defendants, court records from the Justice Department also say. There is a small number of cases in which January 6 defendants' may be excused from court-ordered restitution and fines. In the federal court in Washington, DC, where the January 6 defendant's cases were handled, a handful of Capitol rioters pardoned by Trump are asking judges to order that they should get their restitution payments back. The Justice Department has supported these requests in court if the defendant had a pending appeal, yet the judges largely haven't made decisions. The ultimate decider will be the courts, according to documents in the cases of some January 6 rioters. In one case, of the January 6 defendant John Earle Sullivan, a federal judge last month blocked him from recouping $62,800 he forfeited to the US government because he had earned it by selling footage of the riot.
