Israel killed at least 14 Iranian scientists ‘not because they knew physics but...': Israeli envoy to France
Israel killed at least 14 Iranian scientists in an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program, Israel's ambassador to France Joshua Zarka said earlier this week. He also explained why these scientists were killed.
Ambassador Zarka told the Associated Press on Monday that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who 'basically had everything in their mind.'
They were killed 'not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon," he was quoted as saying.
Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel. 'It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium,' he said.
But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is 'not that simple,' he said. "These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated.'
Nine of the 14 scientists were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said.
It added that they 'possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons' and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists.
On Tuesday, Iran state TV reported the death of another Iranian nuclear scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, in an Israeli strike, after he'd survived an earlier attack that killed his 17-year-old son on June 13.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador claimed that the killings will make it 'almost" impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by US stealth bombers.
'The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the [Iran's nuclear] program by a number of years, by quite a number of years," Ambassador Joshua Zarka said.
But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place. According to AP, experts contend that such attacks can only set back Iran's nuclear program but not stop it.
European governments reportedly said that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest.
'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon," UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the House of Commons.
Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program was peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel-Iran Conflict Spurs China to Reconsider Russian Gas Pipeline
The original Power of Siberia pipeline opened in 2019. The war between Israel and Iran has revived Chinese leaders' interest in a pipeline that would carry Russian natural gas to China, according to people close to Beijing's decision-making, potentially jump-starting a project that has been stalled for years. The Power of Siberia 2 pipeline project has been mired in disagreements over pricing and ownership terms, as well as Chinese concerns about relying too heavily on Russia for its energy supplies. But the recent war in the Middle East has given Beijing reason to reconsider the reliability of the oil and natural gas it gets from the region, the people said, even as a fragile cease-fire between Israel and Iran takes hold. China imports around 30% of its gas in the form of liquefied natural gas from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates via the Strait of Hormuz, a maritime chokepoint that Iran threatened to close, according to consulting firm Rystad Energy. Meanwhile, China's independent refineries, known as teapots, have in recent years become hooked on cheap Iranian crude. More than 90% of Iran's oil exports now go to China, analysts say, even though the U.S. has sanctions designed to prevent Iran from selling its oil abroad. Trump made an unusual acknowledgment of China's Iranian oil imports Tuesday after announcing a cease-fire in the Israel-Iran conflict. 'China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran. Hopefully, they will be purchasing plenty from the U.S., also,' he said in a post on social media. A White House official later said Trump was simply calling attention to the fact that the cease-fire prevented disruption to oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. He continues to call on China to import U.S. oil rather than Iranian oil in violation of U.S. sanctions, the official said. But, even with a cease-fire in place, the recent conflict has spurred Beijing to cast about for alternatives, the people and analysts say. Beijing is also looking to increase oil purchases from Russia, which supplies around one-fifth of China's oil, analysts say. Moscow has been pushing to boost its energy sales to its neighbor as it needs cash to fund its war in Ukraine. 'The volatility and unpredictability of the military situation have shown the Chinese leadership that stable land-based pipeline supply has geopolitical benefits,' said Alexander Gabuev, the director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center and an expert on China-Russia relations. 'Russia could benefit from that.' Russian state media have linked the tensions in the Middle East to the revival of the Power of Siberia 2 project. 'LNG Armageddon: China Urgently Returns to Power of Siberia 2 Project,' read one recent headline on Prime, a Russian state news website. Russia is expected to try to put the project on the agenda when President Vladimir Putin visits Chinese leader Xi Jinping in China in September, analysts say. The Power of Siberia 2, a sequel to the original Power of Siberia gas link that opened in 2019, has long been more urgent to Moscow than to Beijing. Russia lost its biggest energy market when much of its gas exports to Europe stopped after its invasion of Ukraine. Since then, Moscow has become increasingly dependent on China as a buyer. But limited pipeline infrastructure and small LNG capacity meant that only a new, bigger pipeline could significantly boost supplies to China. For Beijing, on the other hand, LNG supplies from the Middle East and other places meant that a deal was far less crucial. One official reason they have given to Russia is that China limits the import of oil and gas from a single country to 20%, according to the people close to Beijing's decision-making. As a result, talks have dragged on for years, even as Moscow has repeatedly indicated a deal was imminent. That might now be changing. The Strait of Hormuz, which flows between Oman and Iran and connects the energy-rich Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea, is deep and wide enough to handle the world's largest tankers. That makes it a critical pass-through point for oil and gas, and its closure could disrupt markets and raise energy costs. The likelihood of a complete closure of the Strait is low because of Iran's reliance on it and the potential U.S. military response it could draw, analysts say, but the recent conflict has highlighted the impact such a move would have. 'The escalation of the Middle East tensions underscores the severe consequences of a potential blockade in the Strait of Hormuz,' said Wei Xiong, head of China gas research at Rystad. If the chokepoint is blocked, 'China's LNG supply situation will face huge change, moving from being over-contracted to supply deficit.' Beyond the current turmoil in the Gulf, the U.S.-China trade war has in recent months led to a halt in U.S. LNG exports there, reversing years of growing energy trade between the two nations. Longer term, as China pursues its green energy goals, Beijing foresees an expanding role for natural gas as a so-called bridge fuel between the hydrocarbon and post-carbon eras, analysts say. China is also interested in strengthening its relationship with Russia at a time when the Trump administration has openly discussed trying to drive a wedge between Beijing and Moscow, the people close to Beijing's decision-making said. Moving ahead with the stalled pipeline could help solidify those ties. To be sure, even if an agreement on the pipeline is reached, analysts estimate its construction will take at least five years, similar to the original 1,800-mile long gas link. Other significant hurdles remain, including a disagreement on gas pricing and the considerable investment required for the large-scale construction. Another sticking point is China's demand for ownership stakes in the project, a concession Russia has been unwilling to make. The disagreements are ultimately a sign of mistrust that has lingered between the two countries—despite what Putin and Xi once declared was a 'no-limits' friendship. Write to Georgi Kantchev at and Lingling Wei at
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How Trump Cajoled Iran and Israel Into a Cease-Fire and Forced Them to Comply
It remains to be seen how long the truce will hold, and whether the U.S. and its allies will be able to use the leverage gained by the American and Israeli strikes to reach a diplomatic deal that prevents Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon in coming years. Yet, the rapid move from a surprise airstrike to a cease-fire, with major policy pivots announced via social-media posts that gave whiplash to friends and foes alike, has showcased Trump's unorthodox approach to wielding power. It isn't just allies who were bypassed. U.S. officials who would normally play a role during such a crisis were also left out of the loop, administration officials said, a sign of how narrow is the circle of advisers Trump trusts. Almost immediately after the American B-2 strikes, Trump called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and told him it was time to end the war, a senior administration official said. Trump's message: The U.S. had completed its military mission and would cease offensive operations and Israel needed to do the same, the official said. Vice President JD Vance has described the events of recent days as a new American foreign-policy doctrine focused on clearly defining national interests, aggressively negotiating to achieve them and the use of overwhelming force if necessary. The force in this case was the fleet of B-2 stealth bombers that struck underground Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow and Natanz with a total of 14 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs. It achieved what the Israeli military—despite gaining air superiority over Iran more than a week earlier—was unable to do. The underground facilities at Fordow were likely significantly damaged and at Natanz the enrichment plant was hit, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. 'The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it,' Trump said in a social-media post. During the conflict, Israeli cities sustained several hits from Iranian ballistic missiles, and Iranian military targets were subjected to widespread bombing. Neither side wanted the war to go on much longer, at least at that intensity, and both were eager for a way out that they could portray as a victory. By then, Israel had hit what it considered the most important Iranian military targets and saw limited upside in a continued air campaign, according to people familiar with Israeli government thinking. Iran, meanwhile, had been exchanging separate messages with Washington via Arab intermediaries for days. On Saturday evening, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff informed several Arab countries that a U.S. strike on Iran was imminent, Arab officials said. After the attack, at Trump's direction, Witkoff exchanged direct messages with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, a senior administration official said. Witkoff told Araghchi that Iran needed to come back to the negotiating table, saying the U.S. could inflict more damage on the country, according to the official. Arab leaders also told Iran it was time to offer concessions to Washington, but Iran's foreign minister responded that Iran wouldn't negotiate under fire and wouldn't abandon its nuclear program, according to Arab officials briefed on the diplomacy. A satellite view of Iran's Fordow complex, an underground nuclear facility that the U.S. struck over the weekend. Once Fordow, Natanz and a separate site in Isfahan were struck by the U.S., Iran's top military commander vowed to retaliate, saying the U.S. had violated its sovereignty. Tehran's move, a limited missile salvo fired at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, seemed designed to avoid further escalation. Around noon Monday, moments before the missiles were launched, Iranian officials called Qatar to deliver a warning that the base would be hit, according to Middle Eastern officials familiar with the situation. Qatar relayed the Iranian message to the U.S. U.S. officials told Qatar later on Monday that Washington also anticipated the attack, and that the U.S. didn't plan to retaliate, U.S. and Middle East officials said. Iran passed messages to Qatar that the attack would target solely the base, not the civilian areas of Qatar, according to those officials. That gave the U.S. military, which already removed aircraft and many troops from Al Udeid, sufficient time to move remaining personnel from the base, and for the U.S. Embassy in Doha to warn American citizens to 'shelter in place.' Qatar then closed the country's airspace to commercial flights as it awaited the Iranian barrage: a total of 19 missiles, according to Qatar. All were intercepted by air defenses, except one that fell harmlessly near the base. The interceptors collided with the missiles, leaving streaks in Doha's summer night sky. Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani, Qatar's prime minister, said at a news conference Tuesday in Doha that his country had received prior intelligence that allowed the country and the Americans to prepare, but didn't say what the intelligence was. Shortly after the barrage, Vance spoke with the Qatari prime minister around 5 p.m., and Trump spoke with Emir Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani minutes later, according to a person familiar with the calls. Trump asked the emir whether he would call Iran and ask whether the Iranian government was open to a cease-fire. He obliged, and Iran agreed. Trump—who just hours earlier publicly contemplated regime change in Iran—announced the cease-fire after the calls, posting on social media: 'CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!' A Truth Social post by President Trump announced a cease-fire between Israel and Iran. 'Donald Trump is not a pacifist, but there is an aversion to being drawn into long, drawn-out military engagements,' said Michael Wahid Hanna, director of the U.S. program at nonprofit International Crisis Group. 'There is a motivation in doing the things his predecessors failed to do.' Diplomats who would normally provide talking points for calls with regional leaders weren't asked for help, U.S. officials said. Instead of a flurry of orders and coordination requests, the National Security Council was effectively dormant. Despite Trump's social-media victory lap, Israel and Iran were still exchanging further blows. Four hours before the cease-fire was set to take effect at 7 a.m. local time on Tuesday, Israel launched a wave of strikes in Tehran, killing hundreds of security-force personnel, Netanyahu said on X. Among the targets was the headquarters of Iran's Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, a defense-ministry research institution, according to the Israeli military. Minutes before the cease-fire deadline, an Iranian missile struck a seven-story residential building in the city of Be'er Sheva, killing four people in one of the deadliest episodes of the war for Israeli civilians. Rescue workers the next day combed through piles of rubble at the site. Three more missiles were fired from Iran after 7 a.m., without causing casualties or damage, according to Netanyahu. Israel threatened further retaliation for the strikes. 'In light of the severe violation of the cease-fire carried out by the Iranian regime, we will respond with force,' warned the Israeli military's chief of the general staff, Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir. Trump was surprised to learn Tuesday morning that the war hadn't ended. He stepped out on the South Lawn of the White House before boarding a helicopter on his way to a North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in Europe and rebuked both countries for threatening the cease-fire, especially the U.S.'s closest Middle East ally. 'Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I've never seen before,' he said. He wasn't happy with the two nations 'that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f— they're doing.' After boarding a helicopter for a short flight to his presidential plane, Trump tapped out an all-caps warning to Israel: 'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!' Thirty-eight minutes later, after a call with Netanyahu, Trump announced the Israeli warplanes were turning around. 'Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect!' Trump posted on social media. President Trump said in a Truth Social post on Tuesday that Israeli warplanes would turn around. Netanyahu said Israel destroyed a radar installation near Tehran and, after the call from Trump, refrained from further attacks. Israel had 'achieved all of its objectives for the war,' he said. Iran's Supreme National Security Council proclaimed that it had delivered a 'crushing response to every act of hostility by the enemy' and 'shattered the enemy's primary strategic goal.' With quiet returning to the Middle East, Trump's attention shifted to the NATO summit, where he will dine with royals and bask in persuading European allies to spend more on their own defense. 'It will be a much calmer period than what I just went through with Israel and Iran,' he wrote online. Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at Alexander Ward at Jared Malsin at and Summer Said at How Trump Cajoled Iran and Israel Into a Cease-Fire and Forced Them to Comply How Trump Cajoled Iran and Israel Into a Cease-Fire and Forced Them to Comply
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'No space': Massive protests in Venice over Jeff Bezos' wedding
This weekend's star-studded Venice wedding of multi-billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez has galvanized activist groups that are protesting it as a sign of the growing disparity between the haves and have-not's as well as disregard of the city's residents. Critics also cite Amazon's labor practices, ongoing tax disputes with European governments and Jeff Bezos's political associations as additional reasons for concern. (Reuters) About a dozen Venetian organizations, including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups, have united to protest the multi-day event under the banner 'No Space for Bezos,' a play on words also referring to the bride's recent space flight. They have staged small-scale protests, unfurling anti-Bezos banners on iconic Venetian sites. They were joined this week by Greenpeace and the British group 'Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Teslas to protest Elon Musk, to unfurl a giant banner in St. Mark's Square protesting purported tax breaks for billionaires. 'IF YOU CAN RENT VENICE FOR YOUR WEDDING YOU CAN PAY MORE TAX,' read the banner, which featured a huge image of Bezos. Police quickly took it away. There has been no comment from Bezos' representatives on the protests. The local activists had planned a more organized protest for Saturday, aiming to obstruct access to canals with boats to prevent guests from reaching a wedding venue. Then they modified the protest to a march from the train station after claiming a victory, asserting that their pressure forced organizers to change the venue to the Arsenale, a more easily secured site beyond Venice's congested center. Also read: 'Pay more tax': Giant banner targeting Jeff Bezos appears in Venice before lavish wedding 'It will be a strong, decisive protest, but peaceful,'' said Federica Toninello, an activist with the Social Housing Assembly network. 'We want it to be like a party, with music, to make clear what we want our Venice to look like." Among the 200 guests confirmed to be attending the wedding are Mick Jagger, Ivanka Trump, Oprah Winfrey, Katy Perry and Leonardo DiCaprio. Venice, renowned for its romantic canal vistas, hosts hundreds of weddings each year, not infrequently those of the rich and famous. Previous celebrity weddings, like that of George Clooney to human rights lawyer Amal Alamuddin in 2014, were embraced by the public. Hundreds turned out to wish the couple well at City Hall. Bezos has a different political and business profile, said Tommaso Cacciari, a prominent figure in the movement that successfully pushed for a ban on cruise ships over 25,000 tons traveling through the Giudecca Canal in central Venice. 'Bezos is not a Hollywood actor,'' Cacciari said. 'He is an ultra-billionaire who sat next to Donald Trump during the inauguration, who contributed to his re-election and is contributing in a direct and heavy way to this new global obscurantism.'' Critics also cite Amazon's labor practices, ongoing tax disputes with European governments and Bezos' political associations as additional reasons for concern. Activists also argue that the Bezos wedding exemplifies broader failures in municipal governance, particularly the prioritization of tourism over residents' needs. They cite measures such as the day-tripper tax — which critics argue reinforces Venice's image as a theme park — as ineffective. Chief among their concerns is the lack of investment in affordable housing and essential services. City officials have defended the wedding. Mayor Luigi Brugnaro called the event an honor for Venice, and the city denied the wedding would cause disruptions. "Venice once again reveals itself to be a global stage,'' Brugnaro told The Associated Press, adding he hoped to meet Bezos while he was in town. Meanwhile, a Venetian environmental research association, Corila, issued a statement saying Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an 'important donation.' Corila, which unites university scholars and Italy's main national research council in researching Venetian protection strategies, wouldn't say how much Bezos was donating but said contact began in April, well before the protests started.
