Health board seeks to restrict online viewing of tribunal involving trans doctor
A health board is seeking to bar the public from online viewing of future hearings in an employment tribunal about a transgender doctor using a female changing room.
NHS Fife has requested only media be allowed to watch the livestream of the case brought by nurse Sandie Peggie against the health board when it resumes in July.
It said technical issues and 'interruptions caused by non-media observers' caused 'significant delays' to proceedings at earlier tribunal hearings in Dundee in February.
Ms Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at the hospital where they both worked.
She lodged a complaint of sexual harassment or harassment related to a protected belief under Section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 regarding three incidents when they shared a changing room: indirect harassment, victimisation, and whistleblowing.
Ms Peggie was suspended from her work at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on January 3, 2024 after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment, the tribunal heard in February this year.
The tribunal hearings in February could initially be viewed virtually by members of the public, however the judge later restricted virtual access to accredited media.
The health board has asked the tribunal for this approach to continue, but said members of the public would still be able to attend the hearings in person.
NHS Fife said: 'During the hearing in February, the employment tribunal restricted cloud video platform (virtual viewing) access to press/journalists due to technical issues, as well as interruptions caused by non-media observers.
'The technical issues and interruptions caused significant delays which impacted the tribunal's progress. A request has therefore been made that this approach be maintained in July.
'If these requests are granted, accredited media and press outlets will still be permitted to report on matters and in-person public access to the hearing will remain available.'
The health board has also asked the tribunal to revoke the Tribunal Tweets group's permission to live-tweet proceedings, saying there had been a public complaint about the posts.
Tribunal Tweets told the Daily Telegraph, which first reported the story: 'The respondents have applied to have our permission to report using live text-based communications revoked.
'We will contest that application and believe that we have respected the relevant order and hope to be allowed to continue to report.'
Tribunal Tweets, policy analysis collective Murray Blackburn Mackenzie and the organisations For Women Scotland and Sex Matters have together written to the Nick Goodwin, chief executive of His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) suggesting improvements to the online viewing system.
Lisa Mackenzie, of Murray Blackburn Mackenzie, said: 'We have recently written to HMCTS asking them to iron out some of the technological challenges faced by those seeking to observe proceedings remotely.
'This is an important case that has generated considerable public interest.
'Seeking to restrict access to the HMCTS livestream, when there are very few seats in the public gallery, is a deeply cynical move by NHS Fife and one that we hope will be resisted by the judge.
'It should be pressing for the technical issues to be resolved instead of seeking to put in place further barriers to open justice.'
HMCTS has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Yahoo
How to apply for jobs when you're pregnant
You're through to the final interview of a job you desperately want. You're more than qualified to do it, it's at a company you've had your eye on for a long time and you're feeling quietly confident that you could land it. There's just one problem. You're pregnant, and you have no idea how to broach the topic with your potential employer. Pregnancy discrimination is illegal but common. A study by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) found that over a third (36%) of private sector employers believe it is perfectly reasonable to ask a woman about her plans to have children during a job interview. A further 46% said it is fair to ask whether a woman has young children. Up to 74,000 women every year now lose their job for getting pregnant or taking maternity leave – an increase of 37% from 54,000 in 2016. Legally, an employer can't discriminate against a job candidate because they're pregnant. But clearly, it still happens. So what can you do to minimise your chances of being rejected for a job simply because you're having a child? It's important to know your legal rights when it comes to applying for jobs. Under the Equality Act 2010, pregnant women have strong legal protection when it comes to applying and interviewing for jobs in the UK. 'This protection applies from the moment a woman becomes pregnant, including during job applications and interviews, even if the employer has no idea she's pregnant,' says Hannah Strawbridge, employment lawyer and CEO of Han Law. 'Put simply: a pregnant candidate must be treated just like any other applicant. Employers can't refuse to shortlist or offer a role just because a woman is pregnant or might soon be going on maternity leave. "That would amount to direct discrimination. It does not matter how far along the pregnancy the woman is, or how much maternity leave she intends to take.' Even seemingly 'practical' reasoning by an employer, like not wanting to find maternity cover, doesn't give them a legal excuse to treat a pregnant applicant less favourably. 'Discrimination doesn't need to be intentional to be unlawful,' says Strawbridge.R Read more: How employers can prevent mental health crises at work It's also worth noting that job adverts and interview processes must be non-discriminatory. Interviewers can't ask whether you're planning to start a family, or if you'll need time off soon. 'A candidate should be assessed on their skills, experience, and ability to do their job, not on their current or future pregnancy status,' explains Strawbridge. 'Bottom line? Pregnant women are fully entitled to apply for and start new jobs, and employers must ensure that their recruitment process does not unfairly disadvantage them, either directly or indirectly.' It's normal to feel conflicted about being honest and being worried about discrimination that might affect the likelihood of you getting a job. Legally, however, there is nothing that says you have to let a potential employer know you are pregnant, says Danielle Ayres, an employment lawyer at Primas Law. 'There is no rule about the best or right time to disclose a pregnancy to your employer,' says Ayres. 'This really comes down to whether you are comfortable enough to do so and want to disclose it from the get-go. This may include many factors, such as how far along in your pregnancy you are, but can also include the organisation you are applying to and the role you are applying for.' Read more: 'Dad strike' as UK's paternity leave worst in Europe An employer cannot revoke an offer of employment because you are pregnant. There is a chance they may feel misled if you didn't tell them about the pregnancy, but any good employer should recognise that the risks of discrimination – whether intentional or not – are high, which will lead many women to keep it to themselves until they have a clear job offer. If you're successful, your employer should ask if there is anything they can do to support you. For some jobs, this may involve a risk assessment. Once you are employed, you have until you are 15 weeks before your due date to inform your employer of your pregnancy. But, importantly, you don't have any form of protection because of a pregnancy until your employer knows about it. 'For example, women are entitled to paid time off to attend antenatal appointments,' says Strawbridge. Although women often feel guilty for asking for time off for appointments or scans, taking paid time off work to attend these types of appointments is a day one statutory right. 'This is also relevant to those suffering with pregnancy-related sickness or illness who may need time off work sick as a result,' says Ayres. 'Ensure that once your employer knows of your pregnancy that these appointments are booked in asap, so that your absence can be managed.' Finally, remember that you've got nothing to apologise for. Being pregnant is a part of life – and something employers are required, legally and morally, to accommodate. You deserve to be treated with respect, not made to feel like a burden for applying for a job you can do. Read more: Five questions you shouldn't be asked in a job interview How to manage 'time blindness' at work if you have ADHD Can body doubling make us more productive at work?Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Yahoo
Nurse demands clarity from union over single-sex spaces
A nurse who was suspended by NHS Fife after she objected to a transgender doctor using a women's changing room has demanded clarity from her union about whether it raised concerns over single-sex spaces with the health board. Sandie Peggie's solicitor has written to the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) Scotland to request its intervention in a "workplace industrial matter". It follows media reports that the RCN previously wrote to a health trust in England to inform bosses they were breaking the law by failing to provide single-sex changing rooms for staff. The RCN has been contacted for comment. Ms Peggie's solicitor Margaret Gribbon said that the union had told County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust that it had to abide by workplace regulations around single-sex spaces. The letter, seen by BBC Scotland News, said Ms Peggie - who was not given industrial support when her case was raised with NHS Fife last year - was "surprised but nevertheless delighted" by the move south of the border. No ban on public viewing Sandie Peggie tribunal online Changing room row nurse faces disciplinary hearing Ms Peggie was suspended from her work at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy in January last year after she complained about having to share changing facilities with Dr Beth Upton. Dr Upton, who is transgender, made an allegation of bullying and harassment. The incidents alleged by Dr Upton happened before the UK supreme court unanimously ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law. Ms Peggie was signed off with stress in February this year, the same month the tribunal began. Separately, the nurse had been the subject of a year-long disciplinary investigation and will face a disciplinary hearing to answer allegations of gross misconduct next month. The letter said that, before returning to work, Ms Peggie "needs assurances that no male colleagues, irrespective of their gender identity, will be permitted to use female-only workplace changing rooms". Ms Gribbon said that she was awaiting a response on this from NHS Fife. The lawyer made it clear that her client expected the union to "exercise its industrial muscle to challenge the decision which was adversely impacting her and other female union members". She also wrote that she first spoke to the union about the issue of single-sex spaces in February last year. But she added: "To Sandie's knowledge and disappointment, the union has made no attempt to resolve this matter industrially with the board." The letter said the English branch of the RCN told the County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust to abide by the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 and "provide single-sex changing rooms without delay". Ms Gribbon said it appeared the union had been prompted by ongoing litigation against the trust by a group of nurses in Darlington. The solicitor concluded by asking if the union had written to NHS Fife in the same terms that it wrote to the trust in the Darlington nurses' case. It added: "If not, does the union intend to do so in future?" She added that Ms Peggie was not asking the union to intervene in her ongoing employment tribunal. The Royal College of Nursing, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust and NHS Fife have been contacted for comment. Last week NHS Fife failed in its bid to bar the public from viewing future hearings in an employment tribunal about a transgender doctor using a female changing room. The health board sought a court order to restrict an online stream of the case brought by Ms Peggie when it resumes in July. Tribunal nurse calls for action after gender ruling
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Yahoo
People could be asked to prove biological sex under new EHRC code
Sports clubs and hospitals could ask for a person's birth certificate if there is "genuine concern" about their biological sex under an updated Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) code of practice. The regulator published updates to the code on Tuesday in light of a Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law. Other changes include guidance that trans people can be excluded from sport "when necessary for reasons of safety or fair competition". EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said the changes, which will be subject to a six-week public consultation, were intended to satisfy a "demand for authoritative guidance" after the ruling. The EHRC, a public body which enforces the Equality Act 2010, issued a code of practice to public services and businesses on how to comply with the law. The regulator began redrafting its code after the Supreme Court ruled in April that the terms "woman" and "sex" in the 2010 act "refer to a biological woman and biological sex". Shortly after that ruling, the EHRC published interim guidance intended to "highlight the main consequences of the judgment", including on the provision of single-sex toilets. That said trans women "should not be permitted to use the women's facilities" in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals, with the same applying for trans men using men's toilets. On Tuesday, the regulator published a more comprehensive update to the code and began a public consultation, which it said had been extended to six weeks, from two, due to high levels of public interest and input from a range of organisations. It says people can be asked to confirm their birth sex in some circumstances if it is "necessary and proportionate" for a service provider to "know an individual's birth sex to be able to discharge their legal obligations". Any request should be made in a "sensitive way which does not cause discrimination or harassment", it said. The commission adds that if there is "genuine concern about the accuracy of the response to a question about birth sex, then a birth certificate could be requested". As some trans people who have obtained a Gender Recognition Certificate may also have an amended birth certificate, the draft code says any further enquiries about biological sex at birth should be "made in a proportionate way which is discreet and sensitive" in the "unlikely event" they are needed. The code says: "Where obtaining information on birth sex is not necessary and proportionate, asking a trans person about their birth sex may risk unjustifiably interfering with their human rights... "Therefore, care should be taken, particularly by public authorities, that this is only done where necessary and justified. "Discrimination or harassment could occur if, for example, individuals are asked about their birth sex in a way which may require them to disclose this information in public, or if the language or manner of a request is rude, combative or offensive." Elsewhere, the draft guidelines say a service provided only to women and trans women or only to men and trans men "is not a separate-sex or single-sex service" under equalities law, and could amount to unlawful sex discrimination against those of the opposite sex who are not allowed to use it. In a statement published alongside the draft updates, Baroness Falkner said: "People with protected characteristics should never be discriminated against or harassed when using a service. "Where services are provided on a single-sex basis, that needs to be done in a way which is consistent with the law, which protects the rights of all service users and which ensures everyone is treated with respect and dignity. "It's vital that service providers know what they need to do to comply with the law, and that service users have confidence that every provider is doing so." Five key takeaways from Supreme Court ruling Trans former judge plans to challenge gender ruling at European court
