CPI(M) alleges corruption and preferential treatment in award of NH-66 work
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] State secretariat has flagged alleged big-ticket corruption and preferential treatment in the award of contracts for National Highway-66 construction work in Kerala.
CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan told a press conference that contractors involved in NH-66 construction in Kerala had executed electoral bonds estimated at ₹980 crore in favour of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for official patronage in the award of Central works.
He noted that in 2023, the BJP had accused the construction firm responsible for the collapse of an elevated section of the under-construction NH-66 in Malappuram district on May 19 of astronomical corruption, pegged at ₹38,000 crore, in executing the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project in Telangana.
He said the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government had surmounted several political and administrative impediments, including impossible conditions set by the Central government, to make NH-66, a project abandoned by the Oommen Chandy government, a reality.
Mr. Govindan said the Centre made an unusual demand that Kerala pay for the land acquisition, prompting the State to raise ₹6,000 crore via the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board as compensation to landowners.
The CPI(M) lauded Union Minister for Road and Highways Nitin Gadkari for blacklisting the errant construction company and taking proactive steps to expedite the rectification works.
He said the Congress leadership attempted to blame the NH-66 collapse on the LDF despite the government having no role in the work execution.
Mr. Govindan said the Congress' opposition to the LDF lacked political or policy content and was patently hollow and catalysed by pure political spite and envy for the State government's nine years of people-centric good governance.
'The Congress has recurrently attempted to derail Kerala's development. It made the anti-development campaign a political programme after the LDF stormed back to power for a second consecutive term on a development and welfare platform in 2021. The United Democratic Front then realised that rhetoric, hyperbole, muckraking, and grandstanding do not win elections. But development, welfare, and public service delivery do,' he said.
Mr. Govindan said neither the elections, politics, nor policy animated the Congress as much as infighting for the prospective Chief Ministership did. 'K Sudhakaran, K. Muraleedharan, V.D. Satheesan, Shashi Tharoor, and Ramesh Chennithala have thrown their hat into the ring. Other dark horses might enter the ruthless rat race for the elusive title,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
36 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'
The Election Commission of India (ECI) has issued a detailed and pointed response to the Congress' allegations regarding a sharp surge in voter turnout during the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. The statement, coming after Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge echoed Rahul Gandhi's concerns in a public post, dismisses the claims as unfounded and politically motivated, while also questioning the procedural conduct of the Congress leadership. Sources within the ECI said that despite making serious public allegations, Rahul Gandhi has not approached the Commission formally. 'Even after two days of making his baseless assertions, Rahul Gandhi has not sent any complaint or letter, nor has he requested an appointment to meet the ECI. Why?' the source asked. Sources described the silence as a lack of intent to engage constructively. The Commission clarified that the Congress party had already received a formal reply to its earlier queries on December 24, 2024. This response, according to the ECI, is publicly available on its official website, contradicting claims of a lack of transparency. Refuting the charges of deliberate opacity in the electoral roll process, the ECI advised District Congress Presidents to appoint Booth Level Agents (BLAs) at every polling booth and actively participate in the annual process of electoral roll updates, sources said. The Commission sources added that it has been conducting training programmes for BLAs of all political parties at its dedicated training institute and encouraged the Congress to make full use of these opportunities to avoid any 'misconceptions". The sources further asserted that if the Congress chooses not to engage in the roll revision process, it should at least trust the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) appointed by the Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) under Section 13B(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. These officials, the ECI sources noted, function as part of a statutory framework to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the electoral rolls. The EC sources also reminded the public that the preparation of electoral rolls, conduct of polls, and counting of votes are overseen by statutory authorities such as the ERO, Presiding Officer (PRO), and Returning Officer (RO), all of whom work under the ECI's constitutional mandate under Article 324. Ultimately, it stressed, it is the voters who decide the outcome of elections, not the administrative process. In a strongly worded final remark, ECI sources took aim at what they described as a pattern of political deflection by the Congress. They said any party preparing for electoral outcomes should do so in the political domain, not by 'fighting the referee". The Commission sources concluded, 'The electors of India are intelligent enough to understand why the INC (Indian National Congress) keeps fighting the referee whenever it loses an election.'
New Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful
CHANDIGARH: Senior Congress leader and opposition leader Partap Singh Bajwa on Monday slammed the AAP government in Punjab, accusing it of a 'deliberate and deceitful attempt' to sideline the Punjabi language and deprive local youth of job opportunities in the recruitment for 166 posts in Sugarfed Punjab. Bajwa claimed that the AAP government initially attempted to dilute the requirement of Punjabi language proficiency by allowing candidates who hadn't passed Punjabi in Matric to appear for the examination, on the condition that they clear a basic Punjabi test during their three-year probation. "It was a clear attempt to recruit non-Punjabis by stealth. Only after a massive public outcry and media backlash did the government take a panicked U-turn and declare Punjabi compulsory again. This is not governance, it's deceit,' Bajwa said. He accused the AAP government of trying to sneak in policies that betray Punjab's linguistic and cultural ethos, only to reverse course when caught red-handed. 'This pattern has become a hallmark of the AAP regime, quietly undermining Punjab's interests, then staging a course correction to save face,' Bajwa stated.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why Is The Congress Reluctant To Endorse Tejashwi Yadav As Bihar Poll Nears?
New Delhi: The 2025 Bihar Assembly election is just months away and the main opposition alliance - the Mahagathbandan, which is basically the Congress and the RJD - has its work cut out to defeat the ruling pair of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar 's JDU and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP. With that in mind, the Congress' apparent continuing reluctance to back senior RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav - the son of party patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav and a two-time former Deputy Chief Minister - as the Mahagathbandan chief ministerial candidate has raised eyebrows. Bihar's 'grand alliance' was formed in 2015, more, possibly, out of necessity than claims to ideological unity. In its current avatar - post Nitish Kumar's January 2024 flip-flop, when he dumped the alliance and returned to the BJP's side - the RJD has been the dominant force. That fact has been underlined by the results of the two most recent elections in the state - the 2024 federal election, in which Tejashwi Yadav's party won four seats to the Congress' three, and the 2020 state poll, in which the RJD was the single-largest party with 71 of 243 seats. The Congress - reeling from a string of losses to the BJP in state and federal elections over the past decade - has been relegated to the role of a junior partner, much like in Tamil Nadu, where the party has played second fiddle to Chief Minister MK Stalin's DMK in the past three elections. However, unlike in Tamil Nadu, in Bihar the Congress is trying to break free from the 'junior partner' tag, boosted by senior leader Rahul Gandhi's sustained campaigns across the state. The RJD has made its position clear - Tejashwi Yadav is the party's chief ministerial candidate. Tejashwi Yadav will be the RJD' chief ministerial face in the Bihar election (File). The Congress, the subtext therefore says, can either get with the programme or leave. Does Congress Have Votes To Go Solo? Not really. In the 2020 state election the party contested 70 seats and won just 19. The RJD contested 144 and won 75. The alliance lost the election by 12 seats. The hugely disparate conversion rates - 27 per cent to 52 per cent - have often been red-flagged by the state party as a big reason for that narrow loss. The Congress, though, has argued its candidates were "set up to fail" and blamed the RJD for not extending grassroots support and allotting 'difficult-to-win' seats to the larger party. And it wants 'respectable and winnable' seats this time to remain allied, sources said. The situation, i.e., the disparity in performance between the two parties, was evident in last year's federal election too, in which 40 parliamentary seats were in play. The Mahagathbandan was trounced - it won nine seats, campaigning as the INDIA bloc, to the BJP-led NDA's 30. The RJD won four and polled over 22 per cent of the votes. The Congress got three and only nine per cent of the votes. This has led to RJD expressing frustration at the Congress' 'overestimation' of its strength. Nevertheless, the Congress reportedly remains insistent it can contest this election on its own, and its unwillingness, at this time, to back the RJD, indicates it wants to do just that. As an aside, the Congress' inability to play nicely with state/regional parties has made headlines over the past few years, and has often played its part in a big BJP win. A good example of this is the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Assembly election and the spat with Akhilesh Yadav's Samajwadi Party over six of the state's 230 seats. The Congress' subsequent defeat provoked caustic comments from other allies about not working with friendly parties. Can Congress Win Without RJD? The Congress reportedly has reservations over what it sees as a 'one-dimensional' campaign of the RJD, which is based on caste factors and, particularly, the Muslim-Yadav base. It wants to broaden the Mahagathbandan's appeal and project a more modern and inclusive image, which is why Rahul Gandhi has made frequent trips - seven in the last six months - to Bihar, with the focus on Dalits and issues of importance to the community. The Congress believes Rahul Gandhi's visits to Bihar will help it get more votes (File). But this has made the RJD anxious, since it is seen as poaching its voter base. Congress leaders in Bihar have also argued they need to contest on issues important to the party as a whole, such as employment, education, and secularism, and so attract urban voters who feel alienated from both the RJD's caste politics and BJP's Hindutva focus. A Mahjong Effect? The Congress, meanwhile, is also aware that it cannot be seen as too accepting of a junior role, of scraps in seats and at the decision-making table, since this weakens its position when negotiating with other state allies, including the DMK in Tamil Nadu. The refusal, so far, to endorse Tejashwi Yadav may therefore also be a strategic signal to allies - that the Congress is unwilling to play an increasingly weak second fiddle. So, what can the Congress do now? Either agree, again, to be the RJD's junior partner or bargain hard, knowing that this might leave the opposition alliance in tatters, and give the JDU-BJP a big boost, months before voting. And all of this does not factor in the role of Left parties that are part of the Mahagathbandan alliance. These have, so far, remained silent. They are not seen as having any objection to Tejashwi Yadav as the Chief Minister, but they are watching the Congress' moves closely. If the Congress decides to break free from the RDJ's 'shackles', it might find support from smaller parties, including the Left, unhappy with both the RJD and the BJP (and JDU).
