Ayrshire communities to benefit from boost to mobile services
Mobile network masts in Scotland's rural communities, including Ayrshire, are to be upgraded to improve mobile coverage.
Rural Ayrshire communities are set to benefit from plans to upgrade mobile network masts across Scotland.
In total, 13 masts will be upgraded as part of the UK Government 's Shared Rural Network programme - a partnership with mobile network operators aimed at improving connectivity in rural areas throughout Britain.
The masts will be upgraded to provide coverage from all four mobile network operators rather than just one as is currently the case.
It is hoped that the upgrades will transform connectivity in remote areas of Scotland that have long suffered from poor signal.
Rural areas across Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley will now be provided with reliable 4G services.
South Scotland MSP Colin Smyth said that the move would be a "game changer" for people living in rural areas.
He said: 'This news will be very welcome to thousands of my constituents who are forced to deal with poor mobile phone signal.
'For too long there has been a real digital divide between rural and urban areas when it comes to connectivity and this is a positive step to closing that divide.
'When people visit, they expect to be able to access services, book restaurants, or get information about the area- but too often they can't and that is damaging for our tourism sector.
'This move will be a game changer for people and it shows that this UK Government is really taking on board the issues of rural Scotland.'
Ian Murray MP, Secretary of State for Scotland, said: 'This significant mobile connectivity boost, funded by the UK Government, will help people in some of Scotland's most rural communities.
'It will support local businesses, and improve access and safety for residents and visitors alike. Improving digital connectivity - including in our most remote communities - is a key part of the UK Government's Plan for Change - it is vital to delivering jobs and economic growth.
'And upgrading existing masts rather than building new ones, there will be minimal environmental impact in what are some of Scotland's most scenic areas.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Sarah Jones - 'Free advice will help pubs and venues save cash on energy bills'
Our hospitality sector has been hit incredibly hard, with thousands of pubs serving pints and providing a meeting place for our communities closing their doors one last time over the last 15 years. These establishments scattered across our country, that are steeped in British tradition and heritage, are being swallowed up because of matters out of their control. Many of our favourite pubs and venues have faced soaring energy costs as a result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine – leaving us at the whim of global oil and gas prices. That is why we are driving towards clean power, getting us off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel prices. We are also rolling out schemes to provide direct support for our cash-strapped hospitality sector – helping to protect your local boozer or café. Over 600 pubs, hotels, restaurants and cafes will take part in a trial to receive free advice on how they can become more efficient and cut their energy bills, as part of the government's Plan for Change. This will save small businesses £3 million, so they can keep more money in their pockets to grow their business, employ local people and continue to serve your pint of lager or fish and chips. Businesses will have the expertise at their fingertips to make straightforward changes to save money and cut emissions so they can focus on growing the businesses they are passionate about. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday. This is exactly what businesses have been asking for, with a recent report from the Federation of Small Businesses finding that 64% of small businesses think sustainability should be a high priority for the government, but only 26% of small businesses believe they have the know-how to make their business net zero. Through this support, businesses are also estimated to cut 2,700 tonnes of carbon over the year – helping the sector go green while cutting their bills. By delivering this support, we are continuing to move forward with our plan to support British businesses - turbocharging growth, creating thousands of good jobs and a building a more sustainable future for our country.
Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
Billions, millions or nothing at all? What will Rachel Reeves provide for rail in Wales at the spending review?
Billions, millions or nothing at all? What will Rachel Reeves provide for rail in Wales at the spending review? More pain than gain is expected for most departments from this year's spending review. But there are hopes of extra cash for rail projects in Wales It is now expected funding will come to Wales in the spending review for rail (Image: Matthew Horwood ) On June 11, Chancellor Rachel Reeves will stand in the House of Commons and spell out the UK Government's spending plans for the coming years. While we are told the final details are still being worked out, there is now chatter within Welsh Labour ranks a sizeable amount of money will be allocated to spend in Wales on rail projects. Rail isn't fully devolved to the Welsh Government. Managing the Wales and Borders franchise is devolved to ministers in Cardiff Bay, and the Core Valleys Lines are now owned and operated here. But rail infrastructure planning and funding is still managed by Network Rail from Westminster and funding is not divided up fairly between England and Wales. WalesOnline had campaigned for that to change and some kind of fair funding mechanism, whether through devolution or another means, put in place. However that looks unlikely to happen. Instead of action to address the fundamental problem, there is now a growing expectation that Rachel Reeves will announce some extra money to spend on rail projects in Wales over the period of this spending review. This has been brewing for some time. There was an orchestrated release of letters in January, with an admission from the UK Government that rail in Wales had been historically underfunded. You can read that here. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Welsh Government's transport minister then set out plans for developing services in north Wales, including for electrification of the mainline - the most ambitious of which need UK Government investment. Article continues below Then a report in Politico last week quoted "government figures" saying that Wales would receive "billions" of capital investment for rail in the spending review. However, Labour sources in both governments have dampened expectations, saying the sum is unlikely to be as much as "billions" but there is an acceptance that something is coming, and it will be sizeable. Politically, the Welsh Government need a big gift from UK Labour given the Senedd election is less than a year away, and polls show Labour is in for a tough time here. The most recent poll showed Labour slipping to third, way behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK, you can see that here. UK Labour is also aware that Eluned Morgan, Wales' First Minister, has been openly criticising her counterparts in London and something is needed to unite the camp. A big cheque for something she can explain to voters in a pithy way on the back of a leaflet would be most welcome. She told plenary on June 3 that she was "hopeful" of "movement" on rail funding in the spending review. "I've made the case very clearly," she said. Wales' transport Ken Skates has made no secret of the fact he wants to see investment in rail and it is expected the investment would be for stations in south Wales. As a solution to congestion on the M4, and the abandoned relief road, proposals were made by the South East Wales Transport Commission report for increased rail services between Cardiff and the River Severn. What are known as the Burns proposals - the report's architect was Lord Burns - include upgrading the relief lines between Cardiff and the Severn Tunnel, and the development of five 'Burns stations' in Cardiff East, Newport West, Somerton, Llanwern and Magor and Undy. Mr Skates has previously said these stations would be "absolutely transformational" for Newport and the surrounding areas, and it is these stations that spending review money is widely expected to cover. But it isn't quite that simple. Whatever figure may be pledged next week, it is a matter for voters whether they think a pledge for funding - given serious physical progress is impossible before polling day - is enough to persuade them to cross in the box for Labour rather than someone else. However, the bigger question is whether any funding which comes on June 11 is enough to right the decades-long underfunding of Welsh railways and whether there are any longer-term commitments about ensuring Wales does not miss out when there are major spending commitments on rail in England. The latest row about railways which is gaining traction thanks to opposition Lib Dem MP David Chadwick and Plaid Cymru's leader Rhun ap Iorwerth is over a new rail line planned between Oxford and Cambridge. The £6.6bn line will see no tracks laid in Wales but, because it will be funded from the England and Wales pot, there are fears that it will suck up a significant part of Network Rail's budget and leave less to spend in Wales. This is all because the Barnett formula - the system where the devolved nations a fair share of the cash being spend in England - does not apply to rail in Wales. It does for Scotland and Northern Ireland but not Wales. This issue has been most acutely felt because of the HS2 scheme, which is taking up such an enormous part of that England and Wales transport pot that there were calls for it to be funded separately and Wales given a share. There was precedent for this, as it happened with the Crossrail scheme, but despite the route being entirely in England and evidence showing the scheme will have a net negative impact on the Welsh economy, UK governments led by by Labour and the Tories have consistently refused. Both Mr Chadwick and Mr ap Iorwerth have said the Oxford to Cambridge line is "worse than HS2" because the argument used for Wales not gaining any financial consequential payment from HS2 was that it would have improved services to Crewe which would have made journeys between north Wales and London quicker. There is no suggestion from anyone the Oxford to Cambridge line would improve any services for people in Wales. However, the argument isn't quite that simple. Politicians can argue about specific projects like a new rail line in Oxford and Cambridge all they want, but the issue is that the devolution settlement isn't fair. It isn't clear and the way decisions are made about what funding - if any - will come to Wales isn't transparent. The system which determines rail funding isn't fair, even Wales' transport minister admits that. Ken Skates has said today: "The system used for paying for rail improvements puts Wales and Borders within a wider network which has historically disadvantaged us," he said. "Previous governments have failed to change that, but the current UK Government has acknowledged that it short changes Wales. Past Ministers could have delivered a fair funding settlement, but failed to. Instead, they backed HS2 with no fair funding for Wales," he continued. He says it is in "stark contrast" that Labour in London has admitted Wales has been underfunded. His critics will say that admission is nice, some millions to make some improvements are helpful but this UK Labour government has to take its chance to right the historic wrong on a wider scale. Labour's former deputy transport minister, Lee Waters, has today told the BBC: "The signs are encouraging that we'll get more rail funding from the imminent spending review but we need to fix the system so that this doesn't keep happening. It's no good recognising the problem in opposition and then not sorting it when you get a chance in government." Article continues below
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
UK's arms sales to Israel must end to stop 'ethnic cleansing in Gaza'
Steve Witherden, MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr, held a Parliamentary debate on British arms sales to Israel on Monday evening, calling on the UK Government to suspend all arms exports. During the debate, Witherden described Gaza as a 'slaughterhouse' and said that the UK Government is still letting the 'weapons flow' into Israel despite the country's genocidal acts on Gaza. Witherden also highlighted the lack of transparency surrounding the true extent of UK military exports to Israel, particularly regarding the supply of components for the F-35 fighter jet programme, and urged ministers to outline the specific conditions that would trigger a halt to further exports. READ MORE: SNP reject Reform UK claims they 'organised protests against Nigel Farage' 'The Government have claimed that there are red lines that would trigger a halt to exports, but Gaza is already a slaughterhouse,' Witherden said. 'Children are emaciated or dying of hunger, hospitals have been intentionally destroyed and Israel's leaders vow to wipe out Gaza, and still the weapons flow, so finally, Minister, where is our red line?' The Labour MP added: 'I call on this Government to suspend all arms exports to Israel, to ensure that no British-made weapons are used in Israel's brutal plans to annex, starve and ethnically cleanse the Palestinian population. 'The credibility of this House depends not just on what we condemn, but on what we enable, and history will remember that we enabled too much.' Witherden has called on the UK Government to publish an exact list of export licences still in effect and has asked why it has not suspended F-35 component shipments after admitting a 'clear risk' of violations of international law. The debate comes after the UK Government said it would suspend negotiations with the Israeli government on a new free trade deal last month. The Foreign Secretary David Lammy described Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government as 'extremists' at the time, but it was revealed that the UK Government sent a spy plane to surveil Gaza just hours later after his statement. In September last year, Lammy announced the suspension of around 30 arms sale licences to Israel amid concerns that a 'clear risk' exists that they could be used to breach international humanitarian law. The UK Government said exports to the global F-35 programme would be excluded from the suspension decision to avoid 'prejudicing the entire' global supply pool – despite media confirmation that the jets had been used by Israel to bomb the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone in Gaza in July 2024. In May, figures published by the UK Government showed that Labour licensed the export of more military equipment to Israel in the final three months of 2024 than the Tories had for all of 2020-2023 combined. Challenged on those figures in the Commons, Lammy suggested the story was 'clickbait'.
