logo
Four killed as Palestinians storm UN warehouse in search for food

Four killed as Palestinians storm UN warehouse in search for food

Four people died in the chaos, hospital officials said.
The deaths came a day after a crowd was fired upon while overrunning a new aid distribution site in the Gaza Strip set up by an Israeli and US-backed foundation, killing at least one Palestinian and wounding 48 others, Gaza's Health Ministry said on Wednesday.
The Red Cross Field Hospital said the wounded from that scene included women and children with gunshot wounds.
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel has killed senior Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar, apparently confirming his death in a recent air strike in Gaza.
Speaking before parliament, Mr Netanyahu included Mr Sinwar in a list of Hamas leaders killed in Israeli strikes.
Mohammed Sinwar is the brother of Yahya Sinwar, one of the masterminds of Hamas' October 7 attack, who was killed by Israeli forces last year.
People broke through the fences around the distribution site in Gaza on Tuesday, and an Associated Press journalist heard Israeli tank and gunfire, and saw a military helicopter firing flares.
Earlier, UN official Ajith Sunghay had said 47 Palestinians were injured, mostly by gunfire, at the hub set up by an Israeli and US-backed foundation outside Gaza's southernmost city of Rafah.
It was not yet known whether the death and injuries were caused by Israeli forces, private contractors or others. The foundation said its military contractors had not fired on the crowd but 'fell back' before resuming aid operations. Israel said its troops nearby had fired warning shots.
Ghassan, 5, a boy that UNRWA met, was born with quadriplegia after oxygen deprivation at birth. His real suffering began when the war started in #Gaza.
Medicine and specialised care kept him stable at 13kg.Now he weighs just 5kg. He is in pain and starving.
The people of Gaza… pic.twitter.com/kDaeENy0W6
— UNRWA (@UNRWA) May 28, 2025
The distribution hub outside Rafah was opened the day before by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has been slated by Israel to take over aid operations.
The UN and other humanitarian organisations have rejected the new system, saying it will not be able to meet the needs of Gaza's 2.3 million people and allows Israel to use food as a weapon to control the population.
They have also warned of the risk of friction between Israeli troops and people seeking supplies.
Mr Netanyahu said on Tuesday that 'there was some loss of control momentarily' at the distribution point, adding that 'happily, we brought it under control'.
He repeated that Israel plans to move Gaza's entire population to a 'sterile zone' at the southern end of the territory while troops fight Hamas elsewhere.
Palestinians have become desperate for food after nearly three months of Israeli blockade pushed Gaza to the brink of famine.
In a separate development, Israel said it had carried out air strikes on the international airport in Yemen's capital, Sanaa, after Iran-backed Houthi rebels fired several missiles at the country in recent days, without causing casualties.
The Israeli military said it destroyed aircraft used by the rebels.
Israel last struck the airport in Sanaa on May 6, destroying the airport's terminal and leaving its runway riddled with craters. Some flights resumed to Sanaa on May 17.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's multi-pronged attack on Harvard explained
Trump's multi-pronged attack on Harvard explained

Reuters

time19 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump's multi-pronged attack on Harvard explained

May 30 (Reuters) - The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is waging a campaign against Harvard University, the country's oldest and richest school, across multiple fronts, including funding freezes, investigations and threats to the school's tax-exempt status. The president says he's trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Others are probing if Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech, freedom of academics and the schools' very existence. Here are the main avenues Trump's administration is using to take on Harvard: The Trump administration in April sent a letter to Harvard, opens new tab demanding it make far-reaching changes in how it operates. Harvard's President Alan Garber publicly rejected the demands, saying they amounted to ceding control of the university to the government. Hours after Garber rejected the demands, the Trump administration announced it was freezing more than $2 billion in federal contracts and grants with Harvard, which mostly fund scientific and medical research. A total of some $3 billion in funding has now been frozen by the Trump administration after more blocks were announced. Those were mainly through frozen National Institutes of Health grants along with blocked monies from eight different federal agencies and the Centers for Disease Control. Harvard is fighting the funding cuts in court. Trump in May said he's considering taking previously awarded grant money for scientific and engineering research away from Harvard and giving it to trade schools. The Trump administration in May revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students and said it was forcing current foreign students to transfer to other schools or lose their legal immigration status. Harvard sued over that action, and a judge has temporarily blocked the administration's action. More than a quarter of Harvard's students come from outside the U.S., and they serve as a vital revenue source at the Ivy League school and at hundreds of other colleges across the U.S. In late May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would start "aggressively" revoking visas issued to Chinese students attending Harvard and all U.S. schools. Republican concerns over Chinese students in the U.S. are not new - many have expressed worries China is manipulating Harvard and other universities to gain access to U.S. advanced technology. The action on Chinese students is a direct blow to Harvard's strong links to China, and it has left Chinese students in a legal limbo as they contemplate their academic futures. There are two main ways the Trump administration is using the tax system to attack Harvard. First, they are threatening the university's tax-exempt status, which experts say likely saves the school hundreds of millions of dollars each year. It is unclear, however, if the Internal Revenue Service would rescind that tax exemption, or if it would hold up before courts. Most universities, including Harvard, are exempt from federal income tax because they are deemed to be charitable organizations operated exclusively for public educational purposes. The exemption also allows people to make tax-deductible donations to such organizations, a valuable source of income for colleges with wealthy alumni. The second prong on this front is language in Trump's massive spending bill that is before Congress. It would drastically hike taxes that Harvard and other elite schools pay on the profits their massive endowment investments make. Critics say that would weaken the ability of Harvard and other rich schools to provide generous financial aid packages to poorer students.

Thom Yorke calls Netanyahu an ‘extremist' in statement on Gaza
Thom Yorke calls Netanyahu an ‘extremist' in statement on Gaza

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Thom Yorke calls Netanyahu an ‘extremist' in statement on Gaza

After he was criticised for his silence on the subject, Radiohead frontman, Thom Yorke, has made a statement regarding the war in Gaza, saying Benjamin Netanyahu and his administration are 'extremists' who 'need to be stopped'. He also criticised Hamas, saying the organisation 'chooses too to hide behind the suffering of its people'. In October 2024, he was heckled during a solo concert in Melbourne by a man who asked Yorke 'How could you be silent?' regarding the death toll in the war. A flustered Yorke rebutted him and briefly left the stage. More broadly, Radiohead have been criticised for performing in Tel Aviv in 2017, with Yorke saying at the time: 'Playing in a country isn't the same as endorsing its government.' Radiohead guitarist Jonny Greenwood has recently been criticised for performing with Israeli musician Dudu Tassa, with UK venues cancelling his concerts after protests. Yorke has now made a statement about the Australian incident and the situation in Gaza, saying the October concert 'didn't really seem like the best moment to discuss the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Afterwards, I remained in shock that my supposed silence was somehow being taken as complicity, and I struggled to find an adequate way to respond to this and to carry on with the rest of the shows on the tour. 'That silence, my attempt to show respect for all those who are suffering and those who have died, and to not trivialise it in a few words, has allowed other opportunistic groups to use intimidation and defamation to fill in the blanks, and I regret giving them this chance. This has had a heavy toll on my mental health.' Yorke said he thought it would be 'self-evident' from his music 'that I could not possibly support any form of extremism or dehumanisation of others.' He added: I think Netanyahu and his crew of extremists are totally out of control and need to be stopped, and that the international community should put all the pressure it can on them to cease. Their excuse of self-defence has long since worn thin and has been replaced by a transparent desire to take control of Gaza and the West Bank permanently. I believe this ultra-nationalist administration has hidden itself behind a terrified & grieving people and used them to deflect any criticism, using that fear and grief to further their ultra-nationalist agenda with terrible consequences, as we see now with the horrific blockade of aid to Gaza … At the same time the unquestioning Free Palestine refrain that surrounds us all does not answer the simple question of why the hostages have still not all been returned? For what possible reason? Why did Hamas choose the truly horrific acts of October 7th? The answer seems obvious, and I believe Hamas chooses too to hide behind the suffering of its people, in an equally cynical fashion for their own purposes. He then turned his focus to 'social media witch-hunts' saying that pressure on 'artists and whoever they feel like that week to make statements etc do very little except heighten tension, fear and oversimplification of what are complex problems'. He concluded his lengthy statement by saying: 'I have written this in the simple hope that i can join with the many millions of others praying for this suffering, isolation and death to stop, praying that we can collectively regain our humanity and dignity and our ability to reach understanding ... that one day soon this darkness will have passed.' Sign up to Sleeve Notes Get music news, bold reviews and unexpected extras. Every genre, every era, every week after newsletter promotion As well as fronting Radiohead, Yorke has released a number of solo and group projects, including his recent trio featuring Greenwood and drummer Tom Skinner, the Smile. Radiohead haven't released an album since 2016's A Moon Shaped Pool, but the band members came together last summer to rehearse, ahead of an expected reunion. Bassist Colin Greenwood, brother of Johnny, told NME: 'We got together in the summer just for a couple of days and just ran through all the songs and picked up where we left off in 2018. It was really fun and nice to see everyone. We were going to do three or four days but knocked it on the head after two because it was fine and we could still do it. My brother said that we'd just need a couple of weeks' rehearsal and we could go on the road, no problem.'

Former UN chief's labelling of Gaza war as 'genocide' marks extraordinary shift
Former UN chief's labelling of Gaza war as 'genocide' marks extraordinary shift

Sky News

time22 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Former UN chief's labelling of Gaza war as 'genocide' marks extraordinary shift

In a stark and direct intervention, Martin Griffiths, the former UN humanitarian chief, has described the situation in Gaza as genocide. The statement, made during an interview I conducted with Griffiths on The World, marks one of the most pointed accusations yet from a figure known to be deeply embedded in the world of international politics and diplomacy. "I think now we've got to the point this is unequivocal. Of course it is genocide. Just as it is weaponising aid. "We don't need to look behind ourselves to see that's the case. That should encourage us even more because we, of course, all doubted whether it would come to that level of definition. "We all doubted whether famine is actually there. I think starvation is killing people. That's bad enough. We don't have to worry about famine, which is obviously there lurking in the shadows. "Also, genocide… of course that's what has happened. We only need to look at the statements made. Prime Minister Netanyahu has the virtue of being very clear about his objectives." 3:14 His choice of words is extraordinary - not just for its gravity, but because it's Griffiths who is saying it. A veteran diplomat with decades of experience navigating complex international crises, Griffiths is known for his calm and thoughtful demeanour - not for inflammatory language. For him to use the term "genocide" in a television interview signals a significant shift in how some within the international system are now interpreting events on the ground in Gaza - 20 months since Israel launched its war. 4:40 The timing is also noteworthy. Just weeks earlier, Tom Fletcher, another respected former British ambassador and current UN humanitarian chief, came close to using the phrase during a UN Security Council session. He said: "What more evidence do you need now? Will you act decisively to prevent genocide and to ensure respect for international humanitarian law? Or will you say instead: 'we did all we could?'" Whilst he stopped short, his tone showed a clear change in how leading international figures now view the direction of Israeli military operations in Gaza; staggering civilian deaths, and the statements made by Israeli officials prosecuting this war. 31:58 Griffiths' remarks now go a step further. It comes as the British government continues to grapple with public anger over the mounting civilian toll - and faces growing scrutiny over its continued arms exports to Israel. 6:00 This latest statement by Griffiths doesn't just reflect humanitarian concern. As a former ambassador, he knows the weight his words carry. And with the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsening, his warning challenges Israel's allies to ask deeply uncomfortable questions. South Africa to the International Court of Justice last year - accusing its actions in Gaza of amounting to genocide - called the claims "unfounded", "absurd" and amounting to "libel".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store