logo
Contributor: By wearing masks, immigration agents undermine authority and endanger us all

Contributor: By wearing masks, immigration agents undermine authority and endanger us all

Yahoo5 hours ago

On Tuesday, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested by several masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at a courthouse in Manhattan as he attempted to steer an individual past immigration authorities. That same day, masked agents outside a Walmart in Pico Rivera detained two individuals — one a target of immigration enforcement, the other a U.S. citizen who tried to intervene.
These two scenes from opposite sides of the country illustrate what has become a more common problem: federal agents wearing masks to avoid recognition. On Thursday, masked individuals said to be affiliated with the Department of Homeland Security descended on a Home Depot in Hollywood and on Dodger Stadium.
Masking is not good law enforcement practice. It may contradict Homeland Security regulations, while potentially providing cover for some officers to violate constitutional and civil rights. It undermines agents' authority and endangers public safety as well.
The federal government has no specific policy banning immigration agents from wearing masks. But the fact that such practice is not illegal does not make it acceptable. Department of Homeland Security regulations require immigration officers to identify themselves during an arrest or, in cases of a warrantless arrest, provide a statement explaining how they identified themselves. The use of masks seems to violate the intent of these directives for identification.
ICE agents in masks are becoming disturbingly routine. There were ICE agents in masks at the Los Angeles immigration protests recently, just as there have been at enforcement actions in Minneapolis, Boston, Phoenix and across the country. In March a video of Rumeysa Ozturk, a doctoral student at Tufts University, being detained by masked officers on the street went viral.
There seems to be no uniformity in the face coverings immigration agents wear, which has included ski masks, surgical masks, balaclavas and sunglasses. Such inconsistency across a federal workforce flies in the face of sound policing. Masked agents can confuse both bystanders and ICE targets, which risks people interfering with enforcement actions that look more like kidnappings. The International Assn. of Chiefs of Police has warned that the public 'may be intimidated or fearful of officers wearing a face covering, which may heighten their defensive reactions.'
Todd Lyons, acting director of ICE, said earlier this month that immigration agents wear masks to protect themselves. "I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks,' he said, 'but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line, because people don't like what immigration enforcement is.'
Yet law enforcement jobs come with an assumption of exactly that risk. Consider that the overwhelming majority of police officers, sheriffs and FBI agents fulfill their duties without concealing their faces. Correction officers who deal with prisoners do not wear masks, nor do judges who administer our laws. Because these public employees have such tremendous power, their roles require full transparency.
Besides, ICE agents are increasingly targeting noncriminals, which mitigates the argument that agents require masks for safety. According to the research site Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, about 44% of people in ICE detention as of June 1 have no criminal record.
When ICE agents wear masks, there can be unintended consequences. Lately, there has been a spike in people impersonating agents and engaging in harassment, assault and violence. In April, a Florida woman wore a mask as she posed as an ICE agent and attempted to kidnap her ex-boyfriend's wife.
Ironically, the Trump administration has a double standard around the idea of people wearing masks. It has demanded that universities bar students from wearing masks during protests. In the aftermath of the Los Angeles immigration protests, the president posted on social media, 'From now on, MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests.' Shouldn't that principle be applied to both sides?
True, it makes sense for immigration agents to use face coverings when they are making arrests of a high-profile target or conducting an undercover operation. However, masking should be the exception, not the norm. If ICE agents are conducting their duties anonymously, they open the door to potential civil rights and due process violations. The practice gives impunity to agents to make unlawful arrests, without the possibility of public accountability.
Masking can also be seen as a show of intimidation by immigration agents — whether their target is an undocumented migrant or an American citizen, like Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was arrested outside a New Jersey detention facility in May. Masked ICE agents give the impression of being a secret police force, which is not good for our democracy.
Last week, two Democratic lawmakers in California introduced a bill that would bar local, state and federal law enforcement officers in California from wearing masks on duty (with certain exceptions). Although this is a step in the right direction, it remains unclear whether such a state measure could be applied to federal agents. Congress should ban the use of masks by immigration agents.
ICE officers should not be allowed to conceal their faces. The public's need for accountability strongly outweighs any rationale for agents' anonymity.
Raul A. Reyes is an immigration attorney and contributor to NBC Latino and CNN Opinion. X: @RaulAReyes; Instagram: @raulareyes1
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wisconsin, NIL collective sue Miami, allege tampering and NIL inducements to land football player
Wisconsin, NIL collective sue Miami, allege tampering and NIL inducements to land football player

Associated Press

time18 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Wisconsin, NIL collective sue Miami, allege tampering and NIL inducements to land football player

The University of Wisconsin and its NIL collective VC Connect filed a joint lawsuit on Friday against the University of Miami alleging it knowingly induced one of the Badgers' football players to abandon a lucrative name, image and likeness contract to play for the Florida this upcoming season. The 23-page suit, which was filed in state court in Wisconsin and obtained by The Associated Press, could have a a wider impact on future NIL deals across college athletics. The player in question in the filing is referred to only as 'Student-Athlete A.' But the case summary describes facts that line up with the situation involving cornerback Xavier Lucas, who last December announced his plans to enter the transfer portal. Shortly afterward, Darren Heitner, who has been representing Lucas, indicated that Wisconsin was refusing to put Lucas' name in the portal and that it was hindering his ability to talk with other schools. In January, Heitner announced that Lucas would be playing for Miami this fall. The situation is fallout from the rapid changes engulfing college athletics, specifically a combination of two things: Athletes went to court and won the ability to transfer with much more freedom and the 2021 NCAA decision clearing the way for them to strike NIL endorsement deals now worth millions of dollars. That has changed the recruiting landscape and forced the issue of contracts and signed commitments to the fore. 'Indeed, student-athletes' newfound NIL rights will be rendered meaningless if third parties are allowed to induce student-athletes to abandon their contractual commitments,' a portion of the lawsuit reads. Wisconsin said in January that it had credible information that Miami and Lucas made impermissible contact with each other before the former Badgers cornerback decided to transfer. Wisconsin and VC Connect allege that the inducement for Lucas to attend Miami happened within days of him entering his NIL agreement to play for the Badgers, and that they incurred substantial monetary and reputational harm. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and 'a declaration that Miami's conduct directed towards Student-Athlete A constituted tampering.' A message left with the University of Miami seeking comment was not immediately returned. In a text message Friday, Heitner declined to comment on the lawsuit but he said that Lucas still plans to attend Miami and play football. Wisconsin said it had the support of its leadership and the Big Ten Conference in filing the lawsuit, noting its commitment to 'ensuring integrity and fundamental fairness in the evolving landscape of college athletics.' 'While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field,' the statement said. 'In addition to our legal action, we will continue to be proactive to protect the interests of our student-athletes, our program and the broader collegiate athletics community. Lucas, who is from Pompano Beach, Florida, had 12 tackles, an interception and a sack as a freshman for Wisconsin last season. Heitner said that Lucas hasn't received any money from Wisconsin and therefore owes no money to the school. Heitner also argued that Wisconsin had violated an NCAA bylaw by not entering Lucas into the transfer database within two business days of the player's request. Wisconsin issued a statement at the time saying it hadn't put Lucas' name in the portal because he had entered a two-year binding NIL agreement. In April, the surprise transfers of brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava from Tennessee to UCLA prompted fresh questions about contracts and buyouts. Nico Iamaleava, who led Tennessee to the College Football Playoff last season, walked away from a reported $2.4 million NIL contract. Arkansas freshman quarterback Madden Iamaleava entered the portal after spring practices wrapped up. Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek released a statement indicating he would support efforts by the Razorbacks' NIL collective to enforce buyout clauses in athlete contracts. Iamaleava reportedly had a contract valued at $500,000 upon signing with Arkansas. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP college football: and

Prince George's ordered to pay ex-officer $1.8 million in sexual assault case
Prince George's ordered to pay ex-officer $1.8 million in sexual assault case

Washington Post

time20 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Prince George's ordered to pay ex-officer $1.8 million in sexual assault case

A United States District Court judge this week ordered Prince George's County to pay $1.8 million to a former county police officer in economic damages stemming from a 2017 sexual assault that she alleged was committed by her supervising officer, an incident that Kara McMurray said in a lawsuit led to retaliation against her after she reported it. McMurray, who left the department in 2021, had already been awarded nearly $400,000 in compensatory damages by a federal jury last March after it found that her former lieutenant, Richard Tallant, and the county were liable for violating her civil rights. On Tuesday, Judge Theodore Chuang ordered the county to pay another $1,862,218 in back pay and wages she would have earned through retirement, according to court documents, bringing McMurray's total award to more than $2 million. The county will also be responsible for attorney fees, said Christopher Griffiths, an attorney representing McMurray. 'It's been a long, hard road for Ms. McMurray. She lost a job she loved,' Griffiths said. 'We're gratified that she is finally getting the compensation that she deserves.' On Friday, a county spokesperson said in a statement that 'the county is aware of the verdict and our office of law is reviewing it.' Chaz Ball, an attorney representing Tallant, who was previously found guilty of a criminal sexual assault charge stemming from the incident, declined to comment. The lawsuit stems from an incident that occurred on Feb. 10, 2017, when McMurray went to the Fraternal Order of Police Prince George's County Lodge 89 after finishing a late-night shift. That night, McMurray socialized with other officers, including Tallant, in the parking lot of the lodge after it closed. When she went into the woods to 'relieve herself,' Tallant followed McMurray and sexually assaulted her, according to court documents. Two other officers who went to look for McMurray in the woods, witnessed the aftermath of the assault that included 'seeing Tallant on the ground and McMurray appearing upset and running back to her car with her pants zipper broken open,' court documents stated. Tallant got up and left in his car. McMurray went back to work shortly after the assault and encountered Tallant. He cornered her in a police hallway and asked her if she wanted him to transfer her, according to court documents. Tallant then began to joke about the situation on several occasions in front of other officers, embarrassing and intimidating McMurray with his statements, court records state. She informed a sergeant of what happened to her a few months later. The sergeant appeared upset by the information, but warned McMurray of Tallant's connections throughout the department and the possibility for retaliation. She chose not to report the assault and transferred to another police squad in fall 2017. Two years later, McMurray told another officer of her assault, and that officer reported the case to the department's internal affairs division, which launched an investigation. Details of the probe, however, were leaked within the department, and McMurray found herself receiving insults and the subject of salacious rumors involving Tallant. She was bullied via social media and her options to transfer to other units within the department were blocked by friends of Tallant while her fellow officers refused to give backup to her during service calls, court records show. McMurray went on to file a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that she had experienced a hostile work environment based on her gender. Department leadership refused to take corrective actions to mitigate the rumors and the antagonism against McMurray from colleagues, she said in court documents. She resigned in December 2021 after working as a county police officer since June 2014. According to court documents, a jury found the county liable for violating McMurray's civil rights. The department showed a 'failure to supervise and discipline officers who retaliated against McMurray,' exhibited an indifference to a custom of 'black balling' officers who report officer misconduct and engaged in a practice of subjecting officers who did report such incident to be left without backup while responding to police calls, the jury found. The jury also found Tallant, who is no longer with the department, liable for battery and false imprisonment. He was found guilty of a second-degree sex offense in 2019 and sentenced to seven years in prison before appealing that conviction and being granted a new trial. In assessing the economic damages done to McMurray, Chuang said in his opinion that he disagreed with the county's assertion that she could have found a job at another police department. McMurray 'could not reasonably be expected to seek another position as a police officer and made substantial efforts to mitigate damages' when she sought other employment positions, the judge ruled. He granted McMurray back pay, covering the period between her departure from the department and when he issued his ruling. The damages also included the amount McMurray would have earned had she continued to work for the police department through her retirement eligibility date in October 2033. She was 29 at the time she was forced to resign, according to the court documents. 'Although McMurray remains relatively young, all of her prior education and experience is related to police work, a field from which she is now effectively blackballed,' Chuang said in his opinion. Katie Mettler contributed to this report.

Wisconsin lawsuit accuses Miami of tampering to nab football transfer
Wisconsin lawsuit accuses Miami of tampering to nab football transfer

Washington Post

time21 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Wisconsin lawsuit accuses Miami of tampering to nab football transfer

The University of Wisconsin and its NIL collective filed a complaint in state circuit court against the University of Miami on Friday, claiming tortious interference in a dispute over former cornerback Xavier Lucas, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post. Wisconsin claims Miami tampered with its revenue-sharing agreement with Lucas, who left the school in January to enroll at Miami. The lawsuit — for unspecified damages — highlights questions over how schools can enforce tampering within revenue-sharing agreements following the House v. NCAA settlement's June 6 approval, which permitted colleges to directly pay athletes for the first time. 'After reviewing all facts and evaluating options, the university today filed a complaint in Wisconsin state court outlining our allegations against the University of Miami,' the school said in a statement to The Washington Post. 'While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field.' Lucas established himself as a standout defensive back during his freshman season, playing in all 12 of the team's games and becoming a starter by year's end. The Pompano Beach, Florida, native had being earning 'substantial compensation' for his name, image and likeness from Wisconsin's collective starting last June, and by December, the school and the collective each offered him an NIL contract in a bid to retain his services, according to the 23-page lawsuit. Through his contract with the school, Lucas's compensation — 'one of the largest NIL financial commitments of any [Wisconsin] student-athlete' — would begin in July 2025, conditioned on the court's approval of the House settlement. His deal with the collective would pay him during the period before his university contract took effect. The former agreement gave Wisconsin exclusive license to Lucas's NIL rights for two years. Per that contract, the school said Lucas 'warranted that he had not previously made, and would not make, any agreement that conflicted with' the university contract and that he 'further represented that he would not make any similar commitment to enroll at or compete in athletics for another college or university.' Lucas asked Wisconsin on Dec. 17 to enter his name in the transfer portal and publicly stated his intentions to transfer two days later. His attorney told Yahoo Sports that Lucas requested the transfer after learning that his father suffered a 'serious, life-threatening illness.' Wisconsin — which had 48 hours to submit Lucas's name to the portal, per NCAA rules — did not, sparking a standoff with Lucas. On Dec. 27, he wrote in a since-deleted social media post, 'At the moment Wisconsin is refusing to release me into the transfer portal. I've met all NCAA requirements of the transfer portal process. I've yet to be put into the transfer portal by Wisconsin which is impeding my ability to speak with schools.' Other schools may not contact an athlete until their name has been added to the portal. The December transfer portal window closed Dec. 28. Lucas formally left Wisconsin on Jan. 13 and said he was academically enrolling at Miami. Days later, Wisconsin released a statement saying its 'binding' agreement with Lucas was violated, adding, 'We have credible information indicating impermissible contact between Xavier and University of Miami football program personnel prior to Xavier's request to enter the transfer portal.' Wisconsin's lawsuit claims that Miami had impermissible contacts with Lucas throughout December and January; that the school offered a more lucrative 'compensation commitment' to lure him from Wisconsin; and that Miami representatives facilitated Lucas's January enrollment after the deadline for spring transfer enrollment had passed. 'Miami knowingly induced [Lucas] to abandon his contractual commitments to Plaintiffs,' it said. 'Miami's actions are in direct contravention of not only the NCAA's established anti-tampering rules … but also established contract and tort law.' Miami did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication. Lucas's attorney, who has denied allegations of tampering, declined to comment, citing the fact that Lucas is not a defendant in the lawsuit. Wisconsin is seeking damages because it claims Miami's alleged tampering caused it to 'suffer substantial pecuniary and reputational harm,' including the 'loss of a student-athlete with valuable NIL rights' and the 'loss of financial benefits [Wisconsin] stood to receive from [Lucas's] continued participation in its football program.' The collective is claiming a loss of financial and promotional benefits that it anticipated receiving. Lucas recorded 18 tackles, one sack, one interception and two pass breakups last season. Miami enters the fall having added Lucas and three other cornerbacks from the portal to its transfer class, which 247 Sports ranked third nationally.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store