logo
The dazzling underdog with amazing legs: how Anora swept the Oscars

The dazzling underdog with amazing legs: how Anora swept the Oscars

The Guardian03-03-2025

Anora is officially film of the year, crowned supreme at the Oscars, just as it was at Cannes when it was anointed with the Palme d'Or last May. That's a long path to glory, and a fairly untrodden one. Parasite made it five years ago; the previous film to do so was Marty in 1955. (In fact, Billy Wilder's The Lost Weekend achieved a similar feat 10 years before that, but then the top prize at Cannes was the Grand Prix, and it was shared.)
Anyway: a small number. Acquired by Neon for the US before Cannes, Anora opened there last October in an effective rollout. Half of its earnings were made stateside, with the rest predominantly in Europe, and France – which takes Cannes seriously – proving the major market. It has also done brisk trade in Russia ($3m so far), which can't be said for a lot of the other nominees, and says something interesting about the accuracy and flattery of film-maker Sean Baker's take on Little Odessa in New York, where Anora is set.
So far, globally, it's on about six times its $6m budget and, despite being widely available on streaming, will doubtless enjoy a lucrative theatrical rerelease.
For a long time, though, the film was not assumed to be a shoo-in for major silverware. From Hollywood, the Palme indicates uber arty, and Baker – whose previous films include the trans sex worker iPhone Christmas eve caper Tangerine, and child prankster comedy The Florida Project – is a faintly outre figure for the academy to entirely embrace (in our interview, he admits to still taking drugs).
But as the fates of its rivals ebbed and flowed, and the foundations of The Brutalist's dominance appeared a bit more crumbly, so Anora emerged as the favourite – particularly after scooping up three guild awards (other than the one voted for by actors). No film has taken the trio and then gone on to miss out on the main prize since Brokeback Mountain, in 2006, which lost to Paul Haggis's Crash.
The Independent Spirit awards were always going to lap it up, but it also proved, more unexpectedly, Baftas catnip, taking the casting prize, as well as best actress for Mikey Madison. After all that, the Hollywood Reporter gave it a 52% chance of winning, effectively meaning no white smoke for The Brutalist and poor old Conclave puffing in the shadows.
It's perhaps Parasite, also distributed by Neon, which provides the clearest explanation for how Anora won. The distributor ran a similar playbook for both films: that early Cannes debut that allowed critical buzz to slowly build across the summer, followed by a slow rollout that built audience word of mouth across the autumn. Both films had a breathless, genre-skipping style that audiences thrilled to, and both films felt firmly rooted in the present in best picture fields that otherwise seemed preoccupied with the past. (Parasite's biggest rival, after all, was the rather plodding first world war drama 1917.)
Still, also like Parasite, there was a dollop of good fortune atop the careful planning: Anora didn't assume frontrunner status until it was too late for a genuine backlash to build. In Anora's case, the film managed to stay largely clean – bar a fleeting hoo-ha around the lack of intimacy coordinators on set – while other films had to reckon with controversies around AI (The Brutalist, Emilia Pérez) and stars' disastrous past tweets (again, Emilia Pérez).
But maybe we're overthinking things: perhaps the answer was more simple, and Anora was the film enjoyed by the biggest number of that strange, wide cross-section of Academy members – from traditionalists to international-facing arthouse lovers. After all, it regularly came near the top of voters' anonymous ballots, in contrast to the forbidding, monolithic The Brutalist, or Conclave with its divisive twist ending. Anora might have just been the film, of those best picture nominees, that audience members came out of the cinema most excited about.
That feels fitting: Baker was at pains to underscore the importance of the communal cinematic experience in his (many) awards-season speeches, almost suggesting that a vote for Anora was a vote for the big screen itself, at a time when that tradition was being lost. (A similar trick was tried by The Brutalist, though it was somewhat undermined by its director, Brady Corbet, using his biggest platform – his Golden Globe speech – to drone on about the decidedly insider issue of 'final cut tie-break' instead.) With Anora Baker built a powerful movement, of cinema-lovers backing the underdog – and the medium itself.
Follow your heart, went the film's savvy tagline. It seemed that the Academy did just that.
Read more about the 2025 Oscars:
Anora takes home best picture Oscar
Adrien Brody and Mikey Madison win best acting prizes
Kieran Culkin and Zoe Saldaña win supporting awards
Anora's Sean Baker wins for directing, editing and screenplay

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The $487 Million Film That Ended A Hollywood Marriage - And That $80 Million Divorcement Settlement
The $487 Million Film That Ended A Hollywood Marriage - And That $80 Million Divorcement Settlement

Graziadaily

time2 hours ago

  • Graziadaily

The $487 Million Film That Ended A Hollywood Marriage - And That $80 Million Divorcement Settlement

As of 10 June, it is 20 years since the film that divided Hollywood first hit cinemas. Before Mr & Mrs Smith , Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were the golden couple of the entertainment industry, with Pitt the pin up heartthrob and Aniston, 'Rachel from Friends', ever the girl next door. Angelina Jolie, meanwhile, was a maverick action film star who was covered in tattoos, married to Billy Bob Thornton who was 20 years her senior, and famously kissed her own brother on stage at the Oscars. It's almost impossible to cast your mind back to those days given how Mr & Mrs Smith reshaped the cultural landscape. Not because of its gripping action sequences or its plot – it's actually a distinctly average film with a 60% rating on Rotten Tomatoes – but because it marked the end of Pitt and Aniston's marriage and the start of 'Brangelina'. Tabloid fodder at its finest, what was already an uncomfortable situation for the three actors was made worse by the frenzied rivalry whipped up by the media. 'Team Aniston' and 'Team Jolie' t-shirts swept the nation and were famously worn famous faces like Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie, tell-all interviews were offered and accepted on both sides, and an unrelenting stream of commentary followed – and in many ways still does. Despite rumours that Pitt and Jolie had an affair on the set of the film, they have always maintained that their relationship did not start until after Aniston filed for divorce in January 2005. They did, however, later admit that they developed feelings for each other while working together. 'It took until the end of the shoot for us, I think, to realise that it might mean something more than we'd earlier allowed ourselves to believe,' Jolie told The New York Post in 2006. 'And both knowing that the reality of that was a big thing, something that was going to take a lot of serious consideration.' When Aniston announced that she and Pitt were separating after five years of marriage, she cited irreconcilable differences and said, 'our separation is not the result of any of the speculation reported by the tabloid media' and that they remained 'committed and caring friends'. Of course, all that stood to change, at least in the court of public opinion, when Pitt and Jolie's romance was confirmed. First via viral pictures of them holidaying together in Kenya and then in July 2005 through their extensive W magazine spread titled, 'Domestic Bliss'. Something that, understandably, riled up Team Aniston. The following September, Aniston spoke out about her divorce for the first time, telling Vanity Fair : 'There are many stages of grief. It's sad, something coming to an end. It cracks you open.' Later adding, 'I would much rather everyone move on. I am not defined by this relationship. I am not defined by the part [the media is] making me play in the triangle.' In January 2006, Jolie and Pitt announced they were expecting a child together, six months after they adopted their daughter Zahara from Ethiopia. Four more children followed to form a total of six and all were present when the couple got married at their co-owned French Estate, Chateau Miraval, in 2014. Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and their children in 2011. (Photo: IMAGO) However, the legacy of this power couple has been tarnished for almost a decade. In 2016, two years after their wedding, Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt citing irreconcilable differences after a fateful private plane journey from France to LA. In 2022, Jolie filed court papers accusing Pitt of drunkenly attacking her and their children during the aforementioned flight, prompting her to file for divorce. She alleges that he grabbed her by the head and verbally abused and poured alcohol on his family during the journey. Pitt has always denied the allegations and was cleared of wrongdoing following an FBI investigation at the time. Nevertheless, the separation marked the start of an eight-year divorce battle that saw Pitt and Jolie in disputes over both the custody of their minor children and their French winery. The latter is still ongoing. Pitt and Jolie are finally divorced, but they are set to meet each other in court next year. They will both be subjected to depositions that may reveal additional personal details about their marriage, including the alleged 'years of abuse' Jolie claims Pitt subjected her to. The trial will also settle the rightful ownership of Jolie's 50% shares of Chateau Miraval, which Jolie sold shortly after filing for divorce. Pitt claims the sale was carried out without permission while Jolie alleges that she attempted to sell her shares to Pitt in the first instance but refused after he asked her to sign a $8.5m NDA to cover up said 'years of abuse'. As for the state of their once picture-perfect family, it similarly hangs in the balance. All six of Pitt and Jolie's children seem to have taken a marked stance with their mother, with several of them dropping 'Pitt' from their surnames. In 2023, their son Pax took to Instagram on Father's Day to share his thoughts about the F1 actor. 'You will never understand the damage you have done to my family because you are incapable of doing so,' he wrote. 'You have made the lives of those closest to me a constant hell. […] The truth will come to light someday.' Even so, anyone following the saga would assume Pitt and Jolie are at least somewhat relieved to no longer be legally married. However, in a recent interview with GQ to promote his upcoming film F1 , which is out on 27 June, Pitt seemed indifferent. 'No, I don't think it was that major of a thing,' he responded when asked if he was relieved that the divorce was behind him. 'Just something coming to fruition, legally.' The Jolie-Pitt clan's dirty laundry is set to air in court in 2026, but Jolie's lawyers have insisted she never wanted their case to go to trial. 'Angelina never wanted any of this,' her attorney Paul Murphy said after a judge ruled that Pitt must turn over documents and communications that Jolie claims will prove he covered up alleged domestic violence. 'She never pressed charges, she left all their properties, and she is the one who tried to sell him the business in the first place. […] She wants this to end, the children want this to end, and Mr. Pitt should focus on healing their family, not pursuing lawsuits.' The legacy of Mr & Mrs Smith has, in many ways, returned to its origins – a toxic, highly-publicised feud with real lives and relationships at the centre. Sadly, this is a story that has not ended well for anyone. As for the 'truth', all eyes will be on the courtroom next year. Nikki Peach is a writer at Grazia UK, working across entertainment, TV and news. She has also written for the i, i-D and the New Statesman Media Group and covers all things pop culture for Grazia (treating high and lowbrow with equal respect).

Psychological thriller hailed as a 'masterpiece' now available to stream for free on BBC iPlayer
Psychological thriller hailed as a 'masterpiece' now available to stream for free on BBC iPlayer

Daily Record

timea day ago

  • Daily Record

Psychological thriller hailed as a 'masterpiece' now available to stream for free on BBC iPlayer

This film with an all-star cast is now available to stream for free on BBC iPlayer - and it's not one to miss with fans branding it as a 'masterpiece' Released in 2021, The Power of the Dog is a haunting and slow-burning psychological thriller set in Montana in the 1920s. Directed by Jane Campion and based on Thomas Savage's 1967 novel of the same name, the film features a star-studded cast including Benedict Cumberbatch, Jesse Plemons, Kirsten Dunset and Kodi Smit-Mcphee. The film follows Phil and George Burbank, wealthy ranching brothers played by Cumberbatch and Plemons, whose lives are disturbed when they meet a widow, Rose (Dunst) and her son (Smit-McPhee) during a cattle drive. ‌ While George forms a romantic relationship with Rose, eventually marrying her, Phil's hostility towards her intensifies, creating a tense and awkward atmosphere when she and her son move into the Burbank ranch house. ‌ As Phil taunts Rose, he surprisingly begins to take Peter under his wing. But what seems like an innocent gesture of goodwill seems to unravel more complex motivations on Phil's end, leaving Rose extremely uneasy. The story is full of tension, drama and uneasiness making it a must watch for movie lovers. For those who haven't watched the award-winning hit, or just want to rewatch the film, it is now available to stream for free on BBC iPlayer, as well as being available on Netflix to watch now. The Power of the Dog was an instant hit following its premiere at the 2021 Venice Film Festival, as well as being nominated for 12 Oscars and seven Golden Globes. ‌ It has been hailed as the best film of 2021 by the American Film Institute and it currently holds a 94% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. One viewer reviewed the film on Rotten Tomatoes giving it a 4.5 out of 5 stars, writing: "When you don't know nothing about it and you are slowly surprised is nice! Everything is slow about this film (the good way) and after some hours, days and weeks still grows on you." Another view praised the acting skills, giving it a 4.5 out of 5 stars, stating: "Strong performances from Benedict Cumberbatch and Kirsten Dunst." ‌ A third hailed it as 'captivating' giving it 4 out of 5 stars, as they said: "Definitely a slow burn movie, and quite odd. But captivating and mysterious. It will leave you wondering long after the credits roll." Critics have also reviewed the film, with the New York Times stating: "The Power of the Dog builds tremendous force, gaining its momentum through the harmonious discord of its performances, the nervous rhythms of Jonny Greenwood's score and the grandeur of its visuals." And USA Today called The Power of the Dog a "picturesque, enthralling exploration of male ego and toxic masculinity, crafted by an extremely talented woman and offering enough nuanced bite to keep it interesting till the very end." The Power of the Dog is now available to stream on BBC iPlayer for free, as well as Netflix.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store