logo
UN chief 'encouraged' by Armenia-Azerbaijan agreement on peace deal

UN chief 'encouraged' by Armenia-Azerbaijan agreement on peace deal

Jordan Times15-03-2025

UNITED NATIONS, United States — UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres is encouraged by news that long-time foes Armenia and Azerbaijan are ready to sign a peace treaty, his spokesman said Friday.
"The Secretary-General welcomes the announcements by Armenia and Azerbaijan on the conclusion of negotiations on the draft peace agreement," Stephane Dujarric said a day after the Caucasus neighbors who fought two wars over the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave announced they had reached an accord.
A day after arch-foes Armenia and Azerbaijan announced they were ready to sign a long-awaited peace treaty, scepticism ran high Friday among Yerevan residents, while cautious optimism prevailed in Baku.
The two Caucasus neighbours fought two wars for control of Azerbaijan's Armenian-populated region of Karabakh -- at the end of the Soviet Union and again in 2020 -- before Azerbaijan seized the entire area in a 24-hour offensive in September 2023.
After years of stalled negotiations, both sides announced on Thursday that they had agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal and were prepared to sign it.
This would be a major breakthrough in a region where Russia, the European Union, the United States and Turkey all jostle for influence.
But in the capitals of Azerbaijan and Armenia, public reaction remained divided, underscoring lingering tensions between the two ex-Soviet republics.
'Armenia's surrender'
Standing in the shade of a tree in Yerevan's central Republic Square, where the spring was in full bloom, Arman Sedrakyan, a 38-year-old construction worker, said: "This document is worthless because Azerbaijan will not stop making new demands on Armenia."
"This treaty won't stop Azerbaijan if it decides to attack again, should global and regional conditions allow it," he told AFP.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has recognised Baku's sovereignty over Karabakh after three decades of Armenian separatist rule, a move seen as a crucial first step towards a normalisation of relations.
But he has faced a domestic backlash for making territorial concessions, including the return of four border villages to Azerbaijan last year.
Anush Minasyan, 42, who sells fruit on the street in a Yerevan suburb, shared Sedrakyan's scepticism.
"This agreement won't be signed quickly," she said. "We heard yesterday that Azerbaijan is demanding that Armenia amend its Constitution, while Pashinyan said a constitutional referendum will take place next year."
Baku has made clear its expectations that Armenia remove from its constitution a reference to its 1991 declaration of independence, which asserts territorial claims over Karabakh.
Any constitutional amendment would require a national referendum that could further delay the treaty's finalisation.
Some Armenians outright rejected the treaty, viewing it as an act of capitulation.
"This is not a peace treaty but a document of Armenia's surrender, drafted under threat of war," said 62-year-old Nikolay Manukyan.
"Pashinyan is rushing to sign any document just to boost his falling ratings ahead of (parliamentary) elections" scheduled for next year, he alleged.
'Crucial for the future'
On a bustling pedestrian avenue in Baku's historic district lined with baroque and Stalin-era buildings, many supported the agreement, while some remained wary of Armenia's commitment to peace.
"I support peace and believe that normal relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia are crucial for the future," said 35-year-old translator Ferdowsi Alizadeh.
"It's encouraging that negotiations on the peace agreement text have been completed."
But Nizami Aliyev, a 74-year-old retired maths teacher, struck a more cautious note.
"We welcome our government's peace efforts," he said. "We want peace, we need peace, but history forces us to be sceptical."
"Even if a peace agreement is signed, it will remain (just) on paper: Armenians cannot be trusted."
Schoolteacher Irada Akhmedova, 26, said she welcomed the prospect of the peace treaty, adding that it was hard to believe that the conflict, "which began even before I was born, is coming to an end".
"I sincerely hope that Azerbaijan and Armenia will no longer be enemy states, and that innocent people will no longer have to die," she said.
While Washington, Brussels and European leaders such as France's President Emmanuel Macron have welcomed the breakthrough, critics argue that the road to genuine reconciliation remains uncertain.
The lingering distrust on both sides suggests that, even if a peace deal is signed, achieving lasting stability in the South Caucasus will require much more than diplomatic agreements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany: Recognizing Palestinian state now would send wrong signal
Germany: Recognizing Palestinian state now would send wrong signal

Roya News

time16 hours ago

  • Roya News

Germany: Recognizing Palestinian state now would send wrong signal

Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on Thursday voiced strong opposition to unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, warning it would be 'the wrong signal' at this stage, even as several European nations move forward with the step. Speaking at a press conference in Berlin alongside "Israeli" Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, Wadephul reaffirmed Germany's long-standing support for a two-state solution. However, he emphasized that such an outcome must come through direct negotiations between "Israelis" and Palestinians. "Negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians must be concluded" before recognition, Wadephul said. His remarks come amid a wave of diplomatic moves in Europe. Last year, Spain, Ireland, and Norway formally recognized a Palestinian state. French President Emmanuel Macron has also signaled France may follow suit as early as June — prompting harsh condemnation from "Israel", which accused Macron of launching a 'crusade against the Jewish state.' Germany, historically one of "Israel's" closest allies due to its responsibility for the Holocaust, has maintained arms sales and political backing for "Israel". But recent comments from Wadephul suggest a more critical stance is emerging, particularly over "Israel's" handling of humanitarian aid to Gaza. Wadephul said 'too little' assistance was reaching civilians in the besieged enclave, where the United Nations has warned of looming famine. He said he had repeated to Saar Germany's 'urgent request to allow humanitarian aid to Gaza' in line with international humanitarian law. Despite these concerns, Wadephul maintained Berlin's continued military support for "Israel". 'Israel has a right to defend itself against Hamas and other enemies,' he said, adding, 'therefore Germany will of course continue to support Israel with arms deliveries, that was never in doubt.' However, he also acknowledged that Berlin is reassessing its arms exports. Last week, he stated that Germany was reviewing 'whether what is happening in Gaza is in line with international law,' which would influence future weapons sales — a stance that drew criticism from some within his own conservative CDU/CSU alliance, who argued he was wavering in support of "Israel". On the broader regional situation, Wadephul also expressed alarm over rising tensions in the occupied West Bank, denouncing "Israel's" settlement expansion there. "This settlement policy in this form is contrary to international law, it literally blocks the possibility of a two-state solution," he said. His comments follow "Israel's" recent announcement of 22 new settlements and a pledge by Defense Minister Israel Katz to solidify 'a Jewish Israeli state' in the West Bank. In his remarks earlier on Thursday at Berlin's Holocaust memorial, "Israeli" Foreign Minister Saar said "Israel" is 'surrounded by enemies seeking its elimination' and drew a controversial comparison between Hamas and the Nazis, saying 'the only difference between Hamas and the Nazis was their capabilities.' Saar rejected any prospect of Palestinian statehood at this time, warning it would be a reward for Hamas. "A Palestinian state would mean the biggest prize is being offered to the murderers, establishing a new terrorist state in the heart of our homeland," he said. Saar, while placing blame entirely on Hamas, appealed for German backing.

US vetoes UN Security Council call for Gaza ceasefire
US vetoes UN Security Council call for Gaza ceasefire

Roya News

timea day ago

  • Roya News

US vetoes UN Security Council call for Gaza ceasefire

The United States vetoed Wednesday a UN Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington claimed undermined ongoing diplomacy to resolve the conflict. It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the United States -- a key 'Israeli' ally -- also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. "This resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground and emboldens Hamas," Washington's United Nations envoy Dorothy Shea said ahead of the vote. "This resolution also draws false equivalence between Israel and Hamas," she said. The draft resolution had demanded "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." It also called for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups." Underlining a "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Palestinian territory, the resolution, had it passed, would have demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. The veto was the first wielded by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. 'Israel' has faced growing international pressure to end its war on Gaza. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which 'Israel' blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations said that was not enough to meet the humanitarian needs. 'Judged by history' A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also faced criticism for going against long-standing humanitarian principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent. 'Israeli' bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in the Gaza Strip, including 12 in a single strike on a tent housing displaced people, the Palestinian territory's civil defense agency said. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when 'Israeli' troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, on Tuesday urged the Council to act. "All of us will be judged by history as to how much have we done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people," he said. 'Israel's' ambassador to the UN Danny Danon attacked the text ahead of the vote. "This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas," he was to tell the council, according to remarks released by his office.

'Israeli' drones strike Aqsa Hospital for 11th time, causing major damage
'Israeli' drones strike Aqsa Hospital for 11th time, causing major damage

Roya News

time2 days ago

  • Roya News

'Israeli' drones strike Aqsa Hospital for 11th time, causing major damage

In a fresh attack on Gaza's collapsing healthcare system, 'Israeli' drones bombed the roof of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in central Gaza on Wednesday, causing significant structural damage, according to the Government Media Office in Gaza. This marks the 11th strike on the same hospital since the beginning of the war, highlighting what officials call a systematic campaign to destroy the strip's medical infrastructure. No casualties were immediately reported. In a statement, the office described the attack as a blatant violation of international law, particularly the Geneva Conventions, which mandate protection of medical facilities and personnel during armed conflict. Three drones were reportedly used in the latest strike, triggering panic among patients and medical staff. Previous attacks on the hospital occurred at various points from January 2024 to April 2025. The media office held Israeli Occupation, along with the United States and other supporting countries, fully responsible for what it called war crimes and acts of genocide. It urged the UN and international human rights organizations to act swiftly to protect Gaza's remaining hospitals and humanitarian workers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store