Derbyshire cheese-maker calls EU deal 'a major leap forward'
A cheese-maker who says he lost £600,000 of business due to Brexit has called the prime minister's new EU deal a "major leap fowards" for his company's hopes of re-entering the European market.Simon Spurell, director of Hartington Creamery in Derbyshire, said Boris Johnson's hard Brexit deal in 2020 meant nearly £250,000 of sales revenue disappeared "overnight".He told the BBC he was later forced to sell his other "unviable" business, Cheshire Cheese Company, in November 2022.The 57 year-old said the new deal, if signed and fully implemented, was "something that should have been in place since day one".
"I'm really pleased that this will help small British producers be able to go back into the European market," Mr Spurell said.
Since Brexit, UK goods travelling to the EU, including food products like Mr Spurrell's cheese, have faced new robust checks and extra paperwork.Johnson's deal meant veterinary certificates were needed on red meat and poultry, as well as milk and cream products.The EU interpreted the deal as a departure from the agreed "dynamic alignment" on food standards, which resulted in smaller businesses having to pay more money to get their products into Europe.Mr Spurrell, who lives in Rushton Spencer, on the Derbyshire-Cheshire border, said he had to pay £160 per veterinary certification on all retail orders in Europe - even for cheese orders worth £20.In 2021 - the first year of Brexit trading operations - he says he lost £240,000 in wholesale and consumer business in Europe for both Hartington Creamery and Cheshire Cheese Company. "As there was no exemption in place for the consumer in the 2020 deal, we lost distribution deals in France, Germany and Austria," he said.A further loss of £350,000 the following year prompted Mr Spurrell to sell his business to Joseph Heler Ltd, a larger cheese maker in Nantwich, Cheshire.Mr Spurrell said Cheshire Cheese Company was sold because it was "more attractive to buy" than his smaller artisan Hartington Creamery business."The very bureaucratic form-filling and extra costs, such as veterinary checks and longer border checks was an overnight disaster and put small UK businesses at a significant commercial disadvantage," he said."We've lost out on £1m-1.5m worth of potential revenue from the EU and that Brexit deal utterly smashed businesses' opportunities to expand into Europe dead."
Now the EU and UK have agreed to work on a joint food safety agreement that could remove many of the current barriers.If signed and fully implemented, it should reduce paperwork, ease checks, and could even lift bans on products like raw meats.But the deal comes with conditions.The UK will need to follow future EU food standards – the "dynamic alignment" system – and accept that the European Court of Justice will have the final say in any disputes in this area.The UK will also have to make a financial contribution. However it is currently unknown how much this will be and when it will be required.
Hartington Creamery's co-founder and managing director Robert Gosling, said he was feeling "optimistic" about the new deal."The orginal Brexit deal was more complicated and had endless paperwork," he said."Any change should bring opportunity so we will have to wait but it should make things better for us."Mr Spurrell said: "I'm really pleased we are now having grown-up conversations that will lead to some quick transitions into a new trading partnership."The new dynamic alignment of food standards is a major leap forward and it's something that should have been in place since day one."He said he was now "fully focused" on getting his Derbyshire business back trading with Europe."Me and Robert have been building up the Hartington brand and hopefully now we can expand into Europe further with this new deal," he said."I would like to see us go back into the EU market without the overheads that have been restrictive in the past."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The radio debut of the House of Commons: ‘there could be a long-running series here' – archive, 1975
Permanent radio broadcasts from the House of Commons began on 3 April 1978, and from the House of Lords on 4 April. Television broadcasts began on 21 November 1989. 10 June 1975 Ed Boyle, the commercial radio commentator for the first broadcast of parliament, yesterday spent two hours cooped up in a tiny glass box at a temperature of nearly 90 degrees, wearing a jacket, tie, and buttoned up collar, suffering from a particularly ferocious type of dysentery which has already brought his weight down to eight stone. Just to add a touch of challenge to the job, he was operating a new type of microphone kindly supplied by the BBC with operating instructions entirely in Japanese. In spite of this, Mr Boyle and his BBC colleague, David Holmes, who were trapped together in the same tiny glass box, managed somehow to give composed and informative account of the proceedings. Mr Holmes admitted afterwards that the heat had been so great that at times he had thought he would not be able to carry on, and though listeners may have noticed his voice fading occasionally, he always remained strikingly coherent and apparently in command. Mr Boyle now intends to make a few swift changes to make life slightly more bearable. Apart from sartorial changes to Bermuda shorts, for himself, he plans to make commentating easier by fading out some members when the discussion gets too technical. 'Some of the questions are really on very minor and erudite issues, and I guess the MPs won't mind if we turn them down occasionally so as to explain to the listeners what is happening.' Yesterday the two broadcasters were blessed by a good chunk of pungent topical debates, with Tony Benn using industry questions as the chance to prove himself a good Euro-democrat, and with splendid quotations like: 'If the opposition wants any head on a charger, the leader of the Conservative party will have to be a lot more seductive as a Salome than she has been so far.' At the same time, there were highly complex questions about, for example, the funding of the new pod for the stretched version of the Rolls-Royce RB 211 – a matter of great importance, but one which cannot be explained in the few seconds between question and answer. Both commentators had to trim down their remarks to within a second or so either way: Mr Holmes reckoned that if he did not spot immediately whether the speaker was calling an MP for a supplementary or for the next question on the order paper, he would lose two of the four or five vital seconds of explaining time. Time was so tight that Mr Boyle had to make a definite policy decision to give the first name of each MP as well as his surname and party. Often their time was so limited they could only say: 'This is a question about Europe' or, 'This is about British Leyland.' Mr Holmes hopes to grab a few more seconds of talking time while MPs are laughing and cheering between answers. But both men were pleased with the way things had gone, and came out of the box easier in mind if not in body than they had been when they went in. 'What's encouraging is that it looks as if we can do a proper job without the house having to change its way of going about business or even the tempo of its debates, so no one need feel that we are interfering in any way,' said Mr Holmes. The commercial company plans to use more material than the BBC will use, with prime minister's questions live every Tuesday and Thursday, plus special debates. It will also have an hour of extracts and highlights each morning – twice as long as the BBC – with an instant feedback service from a panel of MPs who took part in the debate; and possibly a Saturday morning edition giving chunks of the week's committees. Val Arnold-Forster, our radio critic, adds: It was a lucky day for broadcasters, according to David Holmes at the end of the transmission – audibly breathing a sigh of relief. It was too, it was a well or luckily chosen parliamentary day. At first, both Holmes and his opposite number, Ed Boyle of IRN, seemed to feel a trifle defensive about parliament. Well they might, for BBC listeners anyway missed not only some of Woman's Hour and a play, but since political events always seem to invade children's entertainment, they also missed Listen with Mother. Before the actual live broadcast started, both political editors showed us round like keen members of a parent-teachers association displaying their school: eager to tell us about the hallowed tradition, the problems that the whole institution had in a changing society, and the usefulness of the work done. The leader of the house, Edward Short, appeared on both channels in his headmasterly capacity to say that this was a particularly noisy House of Commons, but he hoped that the MPs would be on their best behaviour. A bit unruly, he thought, and not only the MPs either. There would have been more room, said Mr Short, in the tiny broadcaster's box if IRN and BBC had done the decent thing and agreed to a joint transmission. Nobody need have worried: from the moment question time started we were in capable hands. Both David Holmes and Ed Boyle chipped into the debate sotto voce, to identify and give party allegiances and explanations. Both tried valiantly to feed the listener with the details that make the House of Commons come alive. 'Mr Bidwell, chairman of the Tribune Group … Mr Denis Skinner, always a lively performer … Mr Benn is smiling to himself.' But they need not really have bothered: the proceedings were jolly enough. For those of us used to hearing politicians debating cautiously in front of untried audiences or answering laboured questions and phone-ins, it was an entertaining experience to hear such skilful parliamentary technicians as Harold Wilson and Tony Benn, parrying questions, riposting, joking, and scolding. The jokes were not always very good, but that's true of other radio comedians. Perhaps the laughter and applause sometimes seemed excessive but the barbed retorts were well placed and, as in other radio shows, what seemed like impromptu repartee must have been rehearsed, if only in the bath. 'I do not require lessons in political morality from an honourable member who regularly signs the oath of allegiance and snipes continually at the royal family,' snapped Tony Benn to Willie Hamilton. The uproar which worried Edward Short was cheerful mostly. The general cosiness, which came through strikingly as everyone complimented everyone else on performances in the referendum debate, seemed as easy to grasp as the Archers: we could become as familiar with William Whitelaw's idiosyncrasies as Walter Gabriel's. Final verdict: early days yet, but there could be a compulsive, long-running series here.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Villagers vow to fight 'unfair' council tax rise in Telford
Some residents of a group of villages in Telford have vowed to fight boundary reorganisation plans which would mean they would pay more in council Hamlets brings together a number of villages, which benefit from paying less council tax than residents in neighbouring areas. However a proposal has been made to abolish Dawley Hamlets Parish Council and divvy up the into villages neighbouring towns and parishes in time for the 2027 local and Wrekin Council said its boundary review is in the consultation stage, meaning residents can still provide feedback and influence any final outcomes. "Splitting us up will hit people in their pockets," said Cllr Bob Wennington, chairman of Dawley Hamlets Parish Council."We're individual communities but we gel together and residents are happy with what we do for them."All of Little Dawley and Aqueduct could be part of Great Dawley Town Council, but we feel like we don't have much in common with the town, although we do rely on them for some services," he added. The fee added on to council tax bills for 2025/26 by Dawley Hamlets Parish Council, known as the precept, is around £29 for a Band D is spent on local services, such as litter picking and the management of two nature reserves, and also organising annual events like remembrance services and summer in the Great Dawley area to the north, residents paid £317 in town council precept, which contributes towards the running of the town hall, library, weekly market and Christmas lights switch on, to name a few of the services it boundary change would increase the council tax of more than 6,300 voters. 'We could lose our identity' The proposals also include moving the Small Hill area of Dawley Hamlets into Lawley & Overdale Parish Council, and Horsehay and Doseley into The Gorge Parish and Overdale Parish Council's precept fee was £108 this financial year, while The Gorge Parish Council added about £64."My fear is that we'll become part of the Ironbridge Gorge and lose some of our identity," said Angela Porteous from Horsehay in Dawley Hamlets."Ironbridge is a World Heritage Site, which is fantastic, but how much focus will be put on an area like Horsehay?"Telford and Wrekin Council did not answer the BBC's specific questions on why it is proposing to abolish Dawley Hamlets Parish in a statement it did say that its draft proposals aimed at better reflecting community identities, addressing electoral imbalances, and ensuring effective local representation."The final outcomes of the Community Governance Review may yet change, depending on the feedback we receive," said Cllr Giles Luter, Chair of Telford and Wrekin Council's Boundary Review Committee."We would remind residents of Dawley Hamlets, and across the Borough, to make the most of our drop-in information sessions and complete the online survey," he added. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wolverhampton taxi drivers face first licence fee hike in years
Thousands of taxi drivers and operators are facing their first licence fee increase in more than a decade as a council deals with a backlog of of Wolverhampton Council is proposing a rise of up to two thirds in the sums to be paid for new or renewed licences, to cover compliance and admin authority's licensing department looks after about 50,000 drivers according to documents, with the vast majority operating outside the regulatory committee is meeting on Wednesday to decide on the increase, which would affect licenses issued in both south Staffordshire and Wolverhampton. Under the plans, private hire vehicle operators with four vehicles or fewer could see renewal fees go up from £150 to £250 for a one-year licence - a rise of 66%.There would be a £20 rise to £69 in the sum to be paid by new hackney carriage and private hire drivers for a year's licence.A three-year licence for a new driver would increase from £98 to £128, while yearly fees paid for a vehicle are set to go from £125 to £175. 'Excellent value' A report to the committee stated "economies of scale" reflecting Wolverhampton's "significant growth over the last decade from an authority with 1,500 to 50k drivers" had previously kept fees increased compliance and the need for additional checks meant they were "required to increase for the first time since 2011".The authority, which also undertakes taxi licensing for South Staffordshire Council, had to use £493k of reserve funding on the service between 2024 and 2025."This fee increase is anticipated to prevent any overspend this year," the report said. "Additional resource requirements to tackle the backlog of applications and higher than usual internal recharges applied in March 2025 have meant that the fees require recalculation," it added. The report stated the revised fees still represented "excellent value for money" and pointed out that sums in 2011, adjusted for inflation, were to consultation responses, the charges for driver licences would apply immediately for operators, and to vehicle licenses from 10 council revealed last year 96% of licences it had issued were for drivers from outside the city. Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on Facebook, X and Instagram.
