Two further terror arrests after vandalism of planes at RAF base
Counter Terrorism Policing South East said two men aged 22 and 24, both from London, were taken into police custody after the incident at RAF Brize Norton on June 20.
They are accused of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, contrary to Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
On Friday, a woman, aged 29, of no fixed address, and two men, aged 36 and 24, from London, were also arrested accused of the same offence.
A 41-year-old woman, of no fixed address, was also arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender, police said.
Palestine Action previously posted footage online showing people inside the Oxfordshire base, with one person appearing to ride an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker, before spray-painting into its jet engine.
The Home Secretary Yvette Cooper made the decision to proscribe Palestine Action following the incident, with the arrests coming just days before the proscription is set to come into force.
Support for the group will become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison when the ban comes into effect as soon as next Friday.
Palestine Action has staged demonstrations that have included spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.
As she announced plans for Palestine Action's proscription, Ms Cooper said the group's methods have become 'more aggressive', with its members showing 'willingness to use violence'.
At the time of the incident, the group said it had 'directly intervened in the genocide and prevented crimes against the Palestinian people' by 'decommissioning two military planes'.
Palestine Action said Thursday's arrests 'further demonstrates that proscription is not about enabling prosecutions under terrorism laws – it's about cracking down on non-violent protests which disrupt the flow of arms to Israel during its genocide in Palestine'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
15 minutes ago
- Sky News
Middle East live: Iran military chief has 'complete doubts' about Israel ceasefire; 23 killed in strikes on Gaza
Donald Trump posts: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA! GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!" But it remains unclear how close a ceasefire is. It comes as Israeli strikes overnight killed at least 23 people, according to medics. Listen to Trump 100 as you scroll.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation
It's an irony that the minerals needed to save the planet may help destroy it. Rare earth elements, the mineral backbones of wind turbines and electric vehicles, are now the prize in a geopolitical arms race. The trade agreement between Washington and Beijing restores rare earth shipments from China to the US, which had been suspended in retaliation against Donald Trump's tariffs. Behind the bluster, there has been a realisation in Washington that these are critical inputs for the US. They are needed not just by American icons such as Ford and Boeing but for its fighter jets, missile guidance systems and satellite communications. This understanding suggests that Washington will scale back some of its countermeasures once Beijing resumes delivery of rare earths. The paradox is that to reduce its dependence on China, the US must depend on Beijing a little longer. This is not yet decoupling; it's deferment. That, however, may not last. Mr Trump has signed an executive order to boost production of critical minerals, which encourages the faster granting of permits for mining and processing projects. He eyes Ukraine and Greenland's subterranean riches to break dependence on China. The west became so reliant on a single geopolitical rival for such materials – materials it once extracted and refined domestically before shuttering operations – due to cost and environmental concerns. China, for its part, has come to dominate global rare earth processing. It has used that market power before – notably against Japan in 2010. It's hard not to think that it was strategic complacency that led to the west relying so heavily on China for key minerals. This month's Nato summit has seen the west push to reindustrialise via rearming itself. This is also reawakening long-dormant extractive ambitions in the global north. Canada, flush with critical mineral deposits, says its planned mining resurgence will be a new foundation for alliance solidarity. This month the EU called for strategic reserves of rare earths 'to prevent supply chain disruptions and economic blackmail from China' – highlighting their importance not just for electric vehicles but for defence and aerospace industries. 'Resilience' means digging deeper at home and controlling extraction abroad. The same minerals we need for net zero are being justified in terms of zero-sum rivalry. It is uncomfortable that 'green growth' and militarism have merged into a single policy frame, collapsing the distinction between ecological transition and arms buildup. A magnet for an electric car is also a magnet for a hypersonic missile. And meanwhile, the human and ecological toll continues to rise – largely out of sight and out of sync with the idea of environmental sustainability. A Guardian dispatch last week from Baotou, China's rare earth capital, found evidence of toxic ponds, poisoned soil and demolished 'cancer villages' – the hidden cost of our digital and electric age. Framing this as an inconvenient necessity risks repeating past mistakes. For mineral-rich nations, the surge in global demand brings opportunity. But as a UN report this year noted, without strong institutions and safeguards, it risks a familiar fate: corruption, conflict and environmental ruin. Today's scramble for critical minerals must not see the promises of responsible sourcing give way to a familiar logic – extract first, moralise later.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woke university administrators FIRED after hidden videos revealed secret plot to destroy Trump's most cherished wish
Several college administrators in the UNC school system have been fired after they were secretly recorded saying they were still trying to implement DEI policies. Accuracy in Media, a non-profit which describes itself as using 'citizen activism to expose corruption and law-breaking', covertly filmed conversations with several North Carolina school employees which led to them losing their jobs. President Donald Trump set to work dismantling DEI initiatives from federally-funded programs through a series of executive orders during his first weeks back in office. The aggressive crackdown meant universities were asked to select students for admission based on their academic credentials rather than fulfilling diversity, equality and inclusion quotas. UNC Asheville Dean of Students Megan Pugh was caught on tape saying administrators 'probably still do' implement DEI policies anyway but in a 'quiet' way, adding: 'I love breaking the rules'. Several other administrators in the state were also seen on camera echoing the same sentiment. Some of those taped lost their jobs as a result. 'I'm so glad that you guys are still doing equity work,' the undercover reporter told Pugh on a Zoom call captured in one video. 'I mean, we probably still do anyway, but you know, gotta keep it quiet,' Pugh replied. When the reporter asked if she had to 'keep it on the down-low?', Pugh said: 'Yeah. But, I love breaking rules.' She went on to say that administrators would keep pushing DEI policies, 'until more or less, they get mad at us.' Pugh also agreed that the school was 'supportive' of secretly continuing with DEI rules, adding that her 'hope and intention' was that 'we can still incorporate those kinds of things but under a broader banner'. She was later fired by the college, according to ABC11. Assistant Director of Leadership and Community Engagement at UNC Charlotte, Janique Sanders, was also caught on video echoing the same sentiment. 'If you are looking for an outward DEI position, not gunna happen,' she told the undercover reporter, without knowing she was being filmed. 'But if you are interested in doing work that is covert, there are opportunities.' When asked whether equity work was still happening on campus, Sanders said: 'I can't say that, but... we've recalibrated, so to speak.' 'I'm just really dedicated to making sure that our students feel loved and supported,' she added. 'I could care less about whatever you want to call our office.' Sanders is 'no longer employed' by the institution, according to Yahoo. UNC Wilmington employees Asher Persin and Ashlee Fleming were also recorded in similar interactions. Persin, who is a coordinator at the school's Mohin Scholz LGBTQIA Centerconfirmed that some staff were still working on DEI policies. Meanwhile, Upperman African American Cultural Center coordinator Fleming said DEI was still being funded but money had been 'moved around'. The Daily Mail has contacted UNC press offices for comment. Asher Persin, who is a coordinator at the school's Mohin Scholz LGBTQIA Center, confirmed in one Accuracy in Media video that some staff were still working on DEI policies Trump began his second term in the White House with a bonfire of DEI policies which the government said have been pushing antisemitic, anti-American, Marxist and 'radical left' ideologies. In May, the Justice Department announced the formation of a new unit to crack down on federally-funded universities that have diversity, equity and inclusion policies using a civil anti-fraud law. 'A university that accepts federal funds could violate the False Claims Act when it encourages antisemitism, refuses to protect Jewish students, allows men to intrude into women's bathrooms or requires women to compete against men in athletic competitions,' Deputy Attorney Todd Blanche said in the announcement. 'Colleges and universities cannot accept federal funds while discriminating against their students.' The False Claims Act is a federal civil law that allows the government to recover funds lost due to fraud. Private citizens can also use it to sue on the government's behalf and can become eligible to receive a portion of the recovered proceeds.
