
Truckers fear ‘greatly improved' Holyhead ferry timetable introduced after Storm Darragh is about to be scrapped
They say the new timetable greatly improved ferry services on the Irish Sea and even reduced congestion on Dublin's M50.
Now, the two main haulage industry groups on both sides of the Irish Sea have lobbied both governments to ensure the retention of the temporary post-storm timetable because of fears that the ferry companies are set to go back to their old schedule.
'The current schedules should be kept in the interests of efficiency, competitiveness, connectivity and environment,' said a joint letter to Transport Minister Darragh O'Brien from the Irish Road Haulage Association (IRHA) and the UK's Road Haulage Association.
'The more dispersed sailing schedules also provides more competition and choice on the key routes and reduces the potential impacts of the increased dominance of any one carrier or port,' said the letter, which was also sent to Tánaiste Simon Harris and Junior Minister Sean Canney, who has responsibility for ports and logistics at the Department of Transport.
Prior to Storm Darragh in December, Stena and Irish Ferries crossings ran at almost the same time. Hauliers had previously lobbied for the timetables to be staggered, without success.
But after the storm caused extensive damage to a berth at the port of Holyhead, it left just one berth available for Irish Sea services.
Following the initial closure of the port a staggered timetable was introduced to allow both ferry companies to continue to operate their ferries while repairs were under way to one of two ramps at the port that trucks use to access ferries.
The new schedule means that there is currently a roll-on roll-off ferry sailing to Ireland every 3.5 hours.
The repairs are scheduled to be completed in July 2025 and haulier associations are demanding the timetable does not revert to what was in place before the storm.
Asked to comment, a spokesman for Stena Line said it 'welcomes the news that with the planned reopening of Terminal 3 at Holyhead Port it will be able to revert to its normal sailing schedule from July 1, 2025.'
An Irish Ferries spokesperson said the 'adapted timetable' was in place to allow for a berth-sharing arrangement and that it 'is currently finalising its freight schedule from July 1'.
But the hauliers claim this new schedule has worked very well and reduced congestion at the ports. They have also said it has led to more competition and better prices for sailings – which ultimately means better prices for the consumer,
'The new schedule has had a transformative and positive impact on the flow of trade,' said the letter.
'Instead of two ferries leaving at broadly the same time, as happened prior to the storm damage, we now have seven spaced sailings a day leaving both Dublin and Holyhead.
'The more dispersed sailing frequency has led to less congestion at both Holyhead and Dublin Ports, with improved outcomes for traffic flow and customs processing or other regulatory compliance easier to deal with," it added.
The increased variety of sailing times between Dublin and Holyhead leads to far better 24-hour connectivity between both Ireland and Britain, they argued.
The new timetable has also had big environmental benefits with reduced congestion at the ports – and on the wider road network in Dublin in particular – meaning fewer emissions, they wrote.
'With the sailings from Dublin leaving now at 4am and 8am we have all the HGV traffic off the M50 and the Port Road before rush hour in the morning and likewise with sailings early in the afternoon the HGV traffic is off the M50 before rush hour going home,' said the letter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
Tánaiste unconvinced Irish Mercosur concerns have been ‘adequately addressed'
The Tánaiste is unconvinced that Ireland's concerns about the Mercosur trade agreement have been 'adequately addressed'. According to Simon Harris both he and his officials continue 'to engage at EU level at every opportunity, with both the European Commission directly through the trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and with counterparts in EU member states, including France, to 'voice our concerns with the agreement'. Harris, also the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, said both he and his officials have sought to 'interrogate the outcome of negotiations to assess if our concerns have been adequately addressed'. But speaking in the Dáil on trade agreements last week the Tánaiste said: 'I am not convinced they have been'. The Tánaiste also reiterated to TDs that the government's policy is to 'work with like-minded EU countries to stand up for Irish farmers and defend our interests in opposing the current Mercosur trade deal'. Mercosur But, the Sinn Féin TD for Louth, Ruairí Ó Murchú, challenged the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade in the Dáil to detail exactly what engagement the Irish government has had with the commission and 'what answers have been given by the commission' in relation to the Mercosur agreement. The Tánaiste said he had a 'significant one-on-one meeting' with his French counterpart specifically about Mercosur and that the government's 'links and engagement with France on this remain intense and ongoing'. 'Our position within the European Commission is very well understood. I do not think other member states would be in any way surprised by Ireland's position. What happens next is important. 'At the moment, the agreement is undergoing a legal scrubbing, after which it will be translated into all the EU languages. 'It is worth repeating that there is still a degree of uncertainty over what form the final commission proposal to member states will take,' the minister stated. According to Simon Harris 'there is one of two ways it can go'. 'It can go as what is called a mixed agreement – this would require unanimous member state approval, which clearly does not exist, or it could go as a split agreement, with the trade elements applied on an interim basis, which would require approval at council under qualified majority voting. 'That is where the question arises as to whether there is a blocking minority, for want of a better phrase,' he added. The Tánaiste emphasised that it is his 'sense of the situation is that a number of member states remain resolute in their opposition' to Mercosur. He is also of the opinion that Europe, including its member states and the European Commission, 'must get better at working out how we can engage with farmers and the agriculture sector earlier on in the process'. The minister said: 'As we go forward, we must look at how we can involve farmers and the agriculture sector in protecting their interests much earlier in the process in order that we do not end up with a trade agreement that has good elements but leaves us asking, 'what about the farmers?' 'That is not a clever way for us to proceed'.


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
State utility firms told Minister chief executive pay limits posed ‘serious risks' to organisations
The chairs of the boards of Gas Networks Ireland (GNI), Uisce Éireann and the Land Development Agency warned last year that restrictions on pay for their chief executives posed 'real and serious risks' to the organisations. In a note to the Senior Posts Remuneration Committee, established last year, Department of Housing secretary general Graham Doyle said the boards of GNI and Uisce Éireann had also expressed 'serious concerns ... about the potential loss of the CEO at a critical time for both companies'. According to submissions sent by the department to the Government-appointed review body said the chairs of the two utility firms' boards had written to then minister for housing Darragh O'Brien about chief executive pay. This correspondence was copied to the then minister for public expenditure Paschal Donohoe , who had established the committee in March 2024 to advise on pay scales for senior public-sector jobs. READ MORE 'Attempts to improve the remuneration level have failed', the Department of Housing said in the document. It said the chief executives of Uisce Éireann and GNI had a base salary that was fixed at €225,000 with no provision for increments or indexation. [ ESB board had 'significant concern' that €318,000 salary was not sufficient for chief executive post Opens in new window ] It said within Uisce Éireann and GNI the senior management teams were entitled to performance-related awards. However, the chief executive was excluded from such payments. 'In Uisce Éireann, there are nine employees in the same band as the CEO (€225,001 to €250,000) and two employees in the final band of €250,001 to €275,000 (ie above the level of remuneration of the CEO). Currently, there are a number of executives in Uisce Éireann whose salaries are capped based on the approved headroom. This presents difficulties for key roles and for succession planning. Two executives left Uisce Éireann over the past 12 months.' It said in GNI there were also two employees paid more than the chief executive and that two executives had left the company over the previous year. Mr Doyle said when the chairs had contacted the minister 'in each case the argument has been put forward that the current constraints which exist in respect of pay pose very real and serious risks to the work of these three vitally important commercial State bodies, which are delivering critical infrastructure on behalf of the State and its citizens while, at the same time contributing to the wider economy.' He said the chairs had set out the challenges of recruiting and retaining high-calibre candidates. 'It is noted, for example, that in some cases the remuneration has remained unchanged at levels approved in early 2017, that the posts are time bound at five or seven years with no opportunity for renewal or for reappointment to any other position within the company, that taking up the position can involve the surrendering of an existing (often permanent) contract to the time-bound contract and the loss of a performance-related award, and finally, that the amount of time it can take an individual to secure employment at the end of time-bound period can, in itself, shorten the length of the actual term served.' Last month following the report of the review group, the Government signalled it would update rules to allow a 'market rate' to be paid to chief executives in commercial State companies.


Extra.ie
4 days ago
- Extra.ie
Harris urges EU to stay focused on US negotiations
Tánaiste Simon Harris has said Europe must remain focused on securing a US trade deal after a New York court blocked Donald Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs. The Court of International Trade ruling came after several lawsuits arguing the US president had exceeded his authority, left American trade policy dependent on his whims and unleashed economic chaos. The White House immediately appealed the ruling by the US Court of International Trade. And late last night, a US appeals court temporarily reinstated Mr Trump's tariffs during the appeals process. Senior officials yesterday insisted the President will continue with the policy. In a statement – prior to the temporary reinstatement – Mr Harris did not go as far as welcoming the US court ruling but said that the Government has 'noted' the decision. US president Donald Trump. Pic:'I want to stress the position once again today that what is required now is for both sides, the EU and the US, to engage in calm and measured dialogue, and to do so in good faith,' he said. The Fine Gael leader highlighted concerns from businesses resulting from 'continuing uncertainty over tariffs'. 'We will continue to monitor the implications of the court decision in the US while keeping our main focus on the negotiations at hand,' Mr Harris said. Analysts have said that the end to tariffs should be celebrated across Europe as it will curtail Mr Trump's ability to follow through on threats of imposing a 50% tariff on EU goods – which are due to take effect on July 9. 'The easing of some tariffs could calm inflationary pressures and stabilise worrying growth prospects, particularly in China, which has borne the brunt of Trump's tariff policy, and we've seen a positive response in stock markets around the world,' Professor Joe Nellis, economic adviser to financial services firm Baker Tilly Ireland, said. Tánaiste Simon Harris. Pic: Leah Farrell/ But Prof. Nellis noted that the decision also 'clouds the global economy in even deeper uncertainty'. Andrew Thurston, a customs consultant who also works with Baker Tilly, echoed this sentiment. 'If the court ruling is upheld, we can expect to see fresh trade negotiations opening up. Yet, there will be no return to normality,' Mr Thurston said. The decision comes after Mr Trump said he will pause his threatened 50% tariffs on the EU until July 9, following a 'very nice call' with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. In April, Mr Trump announced a 20% tariff on EU goods being sold into the US. He later reduced that to 10% until July 9 to allow time for talks with Brussels on a potential deal. On Friday, the president claimed the talks were 'going nowhere' and said he was recommending the 50% tariff comeinto effect on June 1. He rowed back on the decision on Monday, claiming Ms von der Leyen called him asking for an extension to the date. Meanwhile, senior White House officials said yesterday they would immediately appeal and try to put a hold on the court order, insisting the President will continue with the policy. Peter Navarro, Mr Trump's trade chief, told Bloomberg: 'We think we have a strong case. Yes, we will immediately appeal and try to stay the ruling.' European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Pic:He added that the US was still negotiating trade terms with countries, saying: 'These deals are going to happen.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the court's decision was an example of 'judicial over-reach' by the judges, adding that the tariffs were 'legally sound' and the judges had 'brazenly abused their judicial power'. The three judges were nominated to the court by three presidents: Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama and Mr Trump. Lizzy Galbraith, senior political economist at UK fund manager Aberdeen, said: 'The ruling has significant implications for countries that were in trade negotiations with the US. Many are likely to wait for clarity on whether the block on tariffs is maintained before making big concessions. 'So, the ruling undercuts Trump's negotiating leverage. Even if the ruling is upheld, the adminitration will have alternative routes to implement tariffs. But these will be slower and more targeted, as opposed to the current sweeping approach.