
US labor unions fight to contain AI disruption
By Thomas Urbain
New York: As
artificial intelligence
threatens to upend entire sectors of the economy, American labor unions are scrambling to protect workers, demand corporate transparency, and rally political support-an uphill battle in a rapidly changing world.
"As laborers, the ability to withhold our labor is one of our only tools to improve our lives," explained Aaron Novik, a key organizer with Amazon's ALU union.
"What happens when that disappears (to AI)? It's a real existential issue," he added.
Automation has already transformed most industries since the 1960s, typically reducing workforce numbers in the process.
But the emergence of advanced "physical AI" promises a new generation of intelligent robots that won't be limited to repetitive tasks -- potentially displacing far more blue-collar workers than ever before.
The threat extends beyond manufacturing.
The CEO of Anthropic, which created Claude as a competitor to ChatGPT, warned last week that generative AI could eliminate half of all low-skilled white-collar jobs, potentially driving unemployment rates up to 10-20 percent.
"The potential displacement of workers and elimination of jobs is a significant concern not just for our members, but for the public in general," said Peter Finn of the
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
, America's largest union.
Vetoes
The Teamsters have focused their efforts on passing legislation limiting the spread of automation, but face significant political obstacles.
California's governor has twice vetoed bills that would ban autonomous trucks from public roads, despite intense lobbying from the state's hundreds of thousands of union members.
Colorado's governor followed suit last week, and similar battles are playing out in Indiana, Maryland, and other states.
At the federal level, the landscape shifted dramatically with the change in the White House.
Under former president Joe Biden, the Department of Labor issued guidelines encouraging companies to be transparent about AI use, involve workers in strategic decisions, and support employees whose jobs face elimination.
But
US
President Donald Trump canceled the protections within hours of taking office in January.
"Now it's clear. They want to fully open up AI without the safeguards that are necessary to ensure
workers' rights
and protections at work," said HeeWon Brindle-Khym of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU), which represents workers in the retail sector.
Rush to AI
Meanwhile, companies are racing to implement AI technologies, often with poor results.
"By fear of missing out on innovations, there's been a real push (to release AI products)," observed Dan Reynolds of the Communications Workers of America (CWA).
The CWA has taken a proactive approach, publishing a comprehensive guide for members that urges negotiators to include AI provisions in all collective bargaining agreements.
The union is also developing educational toolkits to help workers understand and negotiate around AI implementation.
A handful of unions have successfully negotiated AI protections into their contracts.
Notable examples include agreements with media company Ziff Davis (which owns Mashable) and video game publisher ZeniMax Studios, a Microsoft subsidiary.
The most significant victories belong to two powerful unions: the
International
Longshoremen's Association, representing dock workers, secured a moratorium on full automation of certain port operations, while the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) won guarantees that actors must be consulted and compensated whenever their AI likeness is created.
These successes remain exceptional, however.
The American labor movement, as a whole, lacks the bargaining power enjoyed by those highly strategic or publicly visible sectors, said Brindle-Khym.
"Smaller contract-by-contract improvements are a long, slow process," she added.
Despite frequent accusations by corporate interests, the unions' goal isn't to halt technological progress entirely.
"Workers are usually not seeking to stop the march of technology," noted Virginia Doellgast, a Cornell University professor specializing in labor relations.
"They just want to have some control."
As AI continues its rapid advance, the question remains whether unions can adapt quickly enough to protect workers in an economy increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
From peace talks to asylum, Russia has a laugh as Trump and Elon Musk feud
Senior Russian official Dmitry Medvedev on Friday poked fun at the increasingly bitter public feud between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk with an offer to mediate peace between the two."We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment," Medvedev, a former Russian president and prime minister, posted on fight, guys!" he added, tongue firmly in cheek. Medvedev's quip scored a laughing face emoji from Musk, who owns satellite internet service Starlink. The Russian leader's post was aimed at the spiralling war of words between the political allies-turned-foes. A close ally of Vladimir Putin, Medvedev currently serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council. His remarks came amid glee and schadenfreude among the Russian leadership at the public fallout between the two American currently trying to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine, has clashed with Musk over criticism of his administration's "big, beautiful" tax and spending Tesla and SpaceX CEO, once a Trump backer and head of the newly minted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), termed the legislation a "disgusting abomination". After his White House exit, he escalated the feud by accusing the two-time President of being tied to the Jeffrey Epstein Novikov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, said Russia is willing to offer Musk political asylum if needed."I think that Musk has a completely different game, [so] he will not need any political asylum, although if he did, Russia, of course, could provide it," Novikov told state news agency senator Dmitry Rogozin echoed the sentiment."Elon, don't be upset! If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us," Rogozin tweeted. "Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity." The Trump-Musk rift has grown steadily in recent days. Just days ago, the US President gifted Musk a golden key during a White House event honouring his work at DOGE. But relations soured quickly following Musk's public rebuke and has since said he has no plans to speak to Musk and indicated that a review of the billionaire's substantial government contracts is in the offing."We'll take a look at everything," the President said. "It's a lot of money."Tune InMust Watch


NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Delete Your Nudes': What Travellers Must Know Before Visiting The US
International travelers to the US are being cautioned to cleanse their digital devices of sensitive content, including personal photos, as border agents ramp up electronic searches under President Trump's renewed 'enhanced vetting' policies, according to The Metro. These measures, reinstated through executive orders, permit Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers to inspect smartphones, laptops, and social media accounts without a warrant. As per the news report, although such searches affect only a small fraction of travellers, they have led to detentions and deportations based on digital content, including political views and personal images. Experts advise travellers to minimise stored data, use encrypted cloud services, and disable biometric logins to protect privacy. According to The Metro report, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials have the legal authority to search electronic devices at the border: that's phones, laptops, and tablets. This includes reviewing text messages, social media activity, photos, emails, and even your browser history. In March, an unnamed French scientist was denied entry to the States after airport immigration officers searched his phone and found messages critical of the Trump administration. According to The Guardian, recently Amir Makled, a Lebanese-American lawyer representing one of the University of Michigan pro-Palestine campus protesters, was recently stopped at Detroit Metro Airport and interrogated by a tactical terrorism response team agent. Makled has said the agents knew exactly who he was; his phone was searched, and they asked about his contacts. Eventually, he was allowed to go home. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has imposed a ban on citizens from 12 countries, along with entry restrictions on nationals from seven other nations, citing national security and immigration enforcement concerns. The US President signed the executive order on June 4, nearly five months after taking office for the second term, and it will come into effect on June 9. The travel ban has been divided into two categories: a complete ban and a partial ban. Trump has imposed a full entry ban on 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Libya, Sudan, Yemen, Eritrea, and Somalia. The complete travel ban means the citizens of the aforementioned countries cannot enter the US at all, irrespective of the reason and purpose. He said that these countries don't respect US immigration rules. Most countries on the list denied taking their citizens back, and most of the people from here overstayed their visas, he said. Partial restrictions apply to seven countries: Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, Cuba, and Venezuela.


Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bilawal Bhutto gets an earful from US lawmaker, asked to eliminate Jaish-e-Mohammed
A senior US lawmaker told a visiting Pakistani delegation, led by former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, to take strong action against the terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed and to ensure the safety of religious minorities in the country. This comes as Congressman Brad Sherman met with the Pakistani delegation in Washington on Thursday. Their visit coincided with that of an Indian multi-party parliamentary team led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who is in the US to brief American officials about Operation Sindoor and India's response to terrorism following the April 22 Pahalgam attack. After meeting Bilawal Bhutto, Sherman took to social media platform 'X' and said, 'I emphasised to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combatting terrorism, and in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed, who murdered my constituent Daniel Pearl in 2002.' He was referring to a Wall Street Journal journalist, Pearl, who was kidnapped and killed by terrorists in Pakistan. Omar Saeed Sheikh was convicted for planning the crime. Sherman added that Pearl's family still lives in his district and stressed, 'Pakistan should do all it can to eliminate this vile group and combat terrorism in the region.' The US lawmaker also pressed the Pakistani side to push for the release of Dr Shakil Afridi, the physician who helped US intelligence locate Osama bin Laden. 'Freeing Dr Afridi represents an important step in bringing closure for victims of 9/11,' Sherman said. Afridi was arrested in 2011 after the bin Laden raid and was later sentenced to 33 years in prison by a Pakistani court. The US lawmaker further raised concerns about religious freedom in Pakistan, saying, 'Christians, Hindus and Ahmadiyya Muslims living in Pakistan must be allowed to practice their faith and participate in the democratic system without fear of violence, persecution, discrimination, or an unequal justice system.' Bhutto Zardari's visit, which included meetings with UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres and UN security council ambassadors in New York, appears to be part of Pakistan's effort to raise the Kashmir issue internationally. However, US lawmakers instead urged the delegation to address terrorism based in Pakistan.