
How Russia's Invasion of Ukraine Transformed a Fake War in Oklahoma
Lightning lined the clouds as a young high school student from northern Oklahoma, assembled his gear for a 40-hour pellet-gun battle.
Mason Lowery, 17, plans to join the U.S. Army after graduation, but his uniform and rifle for this military simulation were almost an exact copy of the equipment carried by Russian troops fighting and dying in Ukraine.
'I don't really know what they're fighting for, just that they're fighting,' Mason said of the war. 'I watch the drone footage sometimes when it comes up on Instagram.'
The manufactured reality of war's sights and sounds, but without its trauma, is what drew Mason to this fake battle. In this game, the war in Ukraine has never happened. Instead, it is set in Russia, in a dystopian world where George W. Bush, in his sixth term as president, rallies NATO to invade the country.
Mason was joined by roughly 300 others who paid around $250 to the company MilSim West to take part in what is advertised as a 'light infantry simulation' that involves two teams — NATO and Russian forces — battling for nearly two days with plastic pellet guns, blank ammunition, night-vision goggles and explosions.
In the United States, the re-enactment of historical battles — the Revolutionary War, the Civil War and World War II — has long been a niche hobby. But fake battles that echo an ongoing war, which has killed thousands of people, are a relatively recent phenomenon.
This simulation did not start that way. Josh Warren started MilSim West in 2011 with his business partner Brian Clarkson. He never imagined that Russia would invade Ukraine, or that his business would grow despite the violence happening on the other side of the world. He puts on about a dozen simulations a year across the country and can attract several hundred to more than a thousand people.
The battles provide camaraderie for friends drawn to a hobby known as airsoft, where two teams fight each other with guns that shoot plastic BB pellets. The events are not intended to be about current events, said Mr. Warren, a U.S. Army veteran. They are strictly in the realm of fantasy, he said.
But for many of the participants, the Russian invasion of Ukraine serves as a reference point when it comes to choosing their uniforms, patches and replica rifles.
Many players buy knockoff uniforms from companies like AliExpress. But some players on the Russian team might buy uniforms from military surplus stores that draw their merchandise directly from Ukraine's battlefields, according to people with knowledge of the supply chain.
Surplus Store Kino, an online military retailer that sells uniforms and equipment, is run by a Russian-Ukrainian man who buys salvaged Russian gear in 'trophy' markets in Ukraine. Trophies are battlefield items, anything from shirts to tanks, picked off the front line and injected into an evolving wartime economy. He said his gear usually comes from abandoned positions, cars or from a reserve of uniforms predating the war.
The merchandise is sent all over the world to airsoft enthusiasts, he said, declining to provide his full name since he is trying to avoid Ukrainian draft officers and the real war.
An employee at a military surplus store in the United States who sells Russian kit recovered in Ukraine, said his company tries to ethically source their products. That means they avoid selling uniforms covered in blood and other human detritus, he said, but importers sometimes skip tracing the items' history.
'We don't think too much of it,' he said. 'It's like if you're selling hamburgers and you can't get hamburger meat, and someone gives you a bunch of hamburger meat — you start not really asking questions as much.'
Shawn Prosen, 36, an employee who works in the field during simulations, said he is firmly against wearing 'trophy' uniforms because of the ongoing conflict.
'I let the younger dudes know how I feel about that,' Mr. Prosen said, using an expletive. 'Because they can get caught up in the internet and not realize how real it is.'
Mr. Prosen is in a unique position. A former U.S. Army soldier who deployed with the elite Ranger regiment to Afghanistan, Mr. Prosen is a hybrid tour guide and platoon leader for MilSim West, shepherding his clients across a battlefield that is not without discomfort.
Many of the younger participants, especially those considering joining the military, see Mr. Prosen and other cadre members as mentors or father figures. The veterans or serving military members view them as instructors helping to refine their skills.
Mr. Prosen is also part of an airsoft chapter that sometimes participates in the fictional battles as part of a group called the Rushing Russians. Known for its esprit de corps, physical standards, strict adherence to uniform aesthetics and a genuine interest in following the real war in Ukraine, the group has nearly 30 chapters, across the United States, Canada, Mexico and Chile.
As the fictional 'Fall of Salsk' began, Mason, the high school student from northern Oklahoma, met up with his unit. He had taped a white 'Z' — a pro-war symbol that Russian forces wear in occupied Ukraine — on his backpack.
Mr. Prosen inspected his platoon of roughly 40 men, almost entirely made up of Rushing Russians. He made sure they had appropriate shelter and enough food, water and other equipment, including BB pellets, to last nearly two days in the field. With rain fast approaching they would be in for a long night.
In the evening darkness, chatter in the assembly area sounded like a cross between a video game chat room ('It's weird not to hear this over Xbox chat,' one man exclaimed) and a formation of actual infantry troops.
'We're going to kill some NATO troops,' one cosplaying Russian soldier exclaimed as his comrades joined in.
'It's fun to be the bad guys,' said another whose costume was so accurate that it included a Russian army belt buckle.
Another attendee drawled in a fake Russian accent, 'I am from Texas Oblast,' using the term denoting administrative borders in Russia and some post-Soviet states, including Ukraine.
Arturo Wells, 18, a high school senior from Las Vegas, milled about in the field with his platoon, waiting for Mr. Warren's pre-battle briefing. He said he followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the beginning but soon stopped.
'It was depressing,' he said. 'Might as well live my life and not be depressed about it.'
It was nearly dark when MilSim's co-founder, Mr. Warren, arrived and the roughly 100 players gathered around him. After more than a decade, he had ironed his safety brief into a comedic routine. He went over the rules, the boundaries of play, what to do if shot (scream), how to search players (with consent) and finally the MilSim oath of sorts.
'Everyone raise your right hand and repeat after me,' Mr. Warren yelled. 'I am a silly war nerd, who plays silly war games.' The assembled players yelled back.
Almost two days later it was over. Hail, squalls, flooding and tornadoes had turned the battlefield into a swamp. Dozens of participants had quit.
In the last hour before the 'Fall of Salsk' ended, Michael Walworth, 26, led the Rushing Russians into battle, exhausted, soaking wet and with the flag of Novorossiya, the flag of the Russian-annexed proxy republic, billowing behind them.
'We've been doing this long before there was any war in Ukraine, and hopefully, we'll be doing it long after,' Mr. Walworth said. 'When MilSim West first started Russians happened to be the de facto bad guys and that's not likely to change.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Republicans Are (Almost) Ready for Maximum Pressure on Russia
The epiphany of common sense came late in an otherwise tedious congressional subcommittee hearing, and from a Democrat, Representative Jim Costa. He gets that Republicans and the administration of Donald Trump take pride in exerting 'maximum pressure' on Iran, Costa made clear. But at this 'seminal moment in American and world history,' he asked, 'what about maximum pressure on Russia?' What about it indeed? The greatest puzzle (among many) about MAGA foreign policy is why Trump refuses to get tough with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who shows no interest in good-faith peace negotiations and is cynically stringing Trump along — 'playing this president like a fiddle,' in the words of Jeanne Shaheen, the ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China tells G7 to stop 'manipulating' China issues for its own agenda
BEIJING (Reuters) -China warned the Group of Seven advanced economies on Friday against "manipulating" issues related to the world's second-largest economy for their own agenda, after they accused Beijing of unfair business practices a year earlier. Beijing's criticism of the G7 and what it represents comes amid a surge in global trade tension between the United States and China this year, as well as within the bloc's membership. In remarks ahead of a three-day G7 summit in Canada set to start from Sunday, Lin Jian, a spokesperson of the Chinese foreign ministry, accused the group of having always upheld a Cold War mentality. The bloc should "stop interfering in other countries' internal affairs, stop undermining other countries' development, (and) stop manipulating issues related to China," Lin told a regular news conference. The G7 provokes conflicts and confrontations, said Lin, adding that such practices were "doomed to fail". In the communique after its 2024 summit in Italy that mentioned China more than 20 times, the G7 said its companies needed to be protected from China's unfair business practices. It also warned of action against Chinese financial institutions that helped Russia obtain weapons for its war in Ukraine. The participation of countries beyond the grouping, such as India and Brazil, in last year's event also irked China, which viewed the move as a bid to sow discord among countries of the Global South. New leaders will represent five of the G7's members - Britain, Canada, Germany, Japan and the United States - at next week's summit.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
NATO needs to get ready for modern war — and fast, top commander tells BI
NATO still has work to do before it becomes the 21st-century fighting force that it needs to be, and allies need to invest heavily in their domestic defense industries, a top commander told Business Insider. "I think it's a struggle," Adm. Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation and the man overseeing alliance modernization efforts, said during an interview this week at his office in Norfolk, Virginia. In recent decades, NATO militaries have been focused predominantly on lower-end counterinsurgency operations in places like Africa or Afghanistan, depending heavily on expeditionary forces enabled by uncontested airpower. In this context, allies thought differently about their own defense, and supporting industries were not sufficiently focused on preparing the alliance for a modern war against a top adversary. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 set off alarm bells throughout NATO, with Western officials warning that Moscow could feel emboldened to push deeper into Europe if it wasn't adequately deterred, presenting the alliance with the possibility of a large-scale conventional war or worse. The past three years have seen many NATO states dramatically boost their defense spending and buy more weaponry. Countries along the eastern and northern edges — the front lines of the alliance, as they share borders with Russia — are hardening their defenses. However, many still argue that there's more work to be done. "I think we forgot all the big principles of a symmetric war, and so it's where we need to reinvest," Vandier said, referring to a conflict in which combatants are more evenly matched. He added that because the defense industrial base shrank so much over the years, ramping it up is "very difficult." Delivering on high-end platforms like warships, fighter jets, and missiles can be a yearslong process. A single F-35 stealth aircraft, for instance, takes around 18 months to build. Vandier warned that if a fight breaks out before NATO has sufficiently bolstered its defenses, the alliance could have a major problem. He acknowledged that NATO still has a long way to go to reach its full potential as a modern fighting force. Member countries are pledging to spend more of their respective GDPs on defense, but the process of going from funding projects to delivery is far from quick. "It's a question of speed," Vandier said. In 2014, when Russia illegally annexed the Crimean peninsula, NATO members agreed to spend 2% of their national GDP on defense. Since then, amid increased Russian aggression, the number of allies that have met or exceeded that goal has steadily risen from three to 22 last year. Earlier this week, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said all allies will reach the 2% target this year, though he is calling for heads of state to agree to a new target — 5%, in line with calls from the Trump administration — at a summit later this month. "The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defense," he said Monday at an event in London. "We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defense plans in full. The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends." Modernizing at speed In its quest to become a modern fighting force, NATO is also focused on integrating asymmetric solutions like drones and other new emerging technologies into its planning. The conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have highlighted the value of uncrewed systems. Vandier and his Allied Command Transformation are at the forefront of these efforts. One initiative they've rolled out is Task Force X, an experiment underway in the Baltic Sea that uses drones, artificial intelligence, and other tech to monitor and deter aggressive Russian activity in the region. Unlike the West's traditional weapons procurement process, which can be slow, Task Force X is NATO's attempt to showcase its speed by quickly deploying cheap and readily available systems to counter Russia. It is simultaneously working to integrate emerging tech with traditional maritime operations. Vandier emphasized the importance of achieving what he described as "digital transformation at speed." He said that another crucial element in NATO's efforts to modernize is leveraging commercial space to improve command, control, communications, and computers, simply known as C4, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. "These are, I think, the two most critical domains for the alliance at war," the commander said. Meanwhile, NATO just shared it has signed a contract with US commercial satellite imaging company Planet Labs PBC in a first-of-its-kind agreement that will give the alliance expanded surveillance capabilities, helping it track potential threats such as new defensive fortifications or large troop build-ups along the eastern edge. Vandier said that, aside from the US, no other country in NATO had this capability and stressed that if America pivots all its surveillance focus to the Pacific, the alliance needs to be self-sufficient and have the resources to keep tabs on Russia, Ukraine, and the rest of Europe, from the Arctic down to the Black Sea. The seven-figure agreement is another example of NATO's efforts to modernize at speed and firm up Europe's defenses. "We've been able to do that in three months, from idea to delivery," Vandier said. "Three months to find the money, make the contract, put that in the field."