
How will a new pope be chosen? An expert explains the conclave
The next pope will inherit a mixed situation: a church that has grown stronger in certain areas under Francis, yet which grapples with internal divisions and external challenge. Darius von Guttne r details how the next pope is chosen.
Following the death of Pope Francis, we'll soon be seeing a new leader in the Vatican. The conclave – a strictly confidential gathering of Roman Catholic cardinals – is due to meet in a matter of weeks to elect a new earthly head.
The word conclave is derived from the Latin con (together) and clavis (key). It means "a locked room" or "chamber", reflecting its historical use to describe the locked gathering of cardinals to elect a pope.
Held in the Sistine Chapel, the meeting follows a centuries-old process designed to ensure secrecy and prayerful deliberation. A two-thirds majority vote will be needed to successfully elect the 267th pope.
History of the conclave
The formalised papal conclave dates back centuries. And various popes have shaped the process in response to the church's needs.
In the 13th century, for example, Pope Gregory X introduced strict regulations to prevent unduly long elections.
Pope Gregory X brought in the rules to prevent a repeat of his own experience. The conclave that elected him in September 1271 (following the death of Pope Clement IV in 1268) lasted almost three years.
Further adjustments were made to streamline the process and emphasise secrecy, culminating in Pope John Paul II's 1996 constitution, Universi Dominici gregis (The Lord's whole flock). This document set the modern framework for the conclave.
READ | Riaan de Villiers: Rest well Pope Francis, a prophet who shifted the church
In 2007 and 2013, Benedict XVI reiterated that a two-thirds majority of written votes would be required to elect a new pope. He also reaffirmed penalties for breaches of secrecy.
The secrecy surrounding the conclave ensures the casting of ballots remains confidential, and without any external interference.
The last known attempt at external interference in a papal conclave occurred in 1903 when Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria sought to prevent the election of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla. However, the assembled cardinals rejected this intervention, asserting the independence of the electoral process.
How does voting work?
The conclave formally begins between 15 and 20 days after the papal vacancy, but can start earlier if all cardinals eligible to vote have arrived. Logistical details, such as the funeral rites for the deceased pope, can also influence the overall timeline.
Historically, the exact number of votes required to elect a new pope has fluctuated. Under current rules, a minimum two-thirds majority is needed. If multiple rounds of balloting fail to yield a result, the process can continue for days, or even weeks.
After every few inconclusive rounds, cardinals pause for prayer and reflection. This process continues until one candidate receives the two-thirds majority required to win. The final candidates do not vote for themselves in the decisive round.
How is voting kept secret?
The papal conclave is entirely closed to the public. Voting is conducted by secret ballot within the Sistine Chapel in the Apostolic Palace, the pope's official residence.
During the conclave, the Sistine Chapel is sealed off from outside communication. No cameras are allowed, and there is no live broadcast.
The cardinals involved swear an oath of absolute secrecy, and face the threat of excommunication if it is violated. This ensures all discussions and voting remain strictly confidential.
The iconic white smoke, produced by burning ballots once a pope has been chosen, is the only public signal that the election has concluded.
Who can be elected?
Only cardinals who are under 80 years of age at the time of conclave's commencement can vote. Older cardinals are free to attend preparatory meetings, but can not cast ballots.
While the total number of electors is intended to not exceed 120, the fluctuating nature of cardinal appointments, as well as age restrictions, make it difficult to predict the exact number of eligible voters at any given conclave.
Technically, any baptised Catholic man can be elected pope. In practice, however, the College of Cardinals traditionally chooses one of its own members. Electing an "outsider" is extremely rare, and has not occurred in modern times.
What makes a good candidate?
When faced with criticism from a member of the public about his weight, John XXIII (who was pope from 1958-1963) retorted the papal conclave was "not a exactly beauty contest".
Merit, theological understanding, administrative skill and global perspective matter greatly. But there is also a collegial element – something of a "popularity" factor. It is an election, after all.
READ | Pope Francis died after suffering stroke, cardiac arrest
Cardinals discuss the church's current priorities – be they evangelisation strategies, administrative reforms or pastoral concerns – before settling on the individual they believe is best suited to lead.
The cardinal electors seek someone who can unify the faithful, navigate modern challenges and maintain doctrinal continuity.
Controversies and criticisms
The conclave process has faced criticism for its strict secrecy, which can foster speculation about potential "politicking".
Critics argue a tightly controlled environment might not reflect the broader concerns of the global church.
Some have also questioned whether age limits on voting cardinals limit the wisdom and experience found among older members.
Nonetheless, defenders maintain that secrecy encourages free and sincere deliberation, minimising external pressure and allowing cardinals to choose the best leader without fear of reprisal, or of public opinion swaying the vote.
Challenges facing the new pope
The next pope will inherit a mixed situation: a church that has grown stronger in certain areas under Francis, yet which grapples with internal divisions and external challenges.
Like other religions, the church faces secularisation, issues with financial transparency and a waning following in some parts of the globe.
One of the earliest trials faced by the new pope will be unifying the global Catholic community around a shared vision – an obstacle almost every pope has faced. Striking the right balance between doctrine and pastoral sensitivity remains crucial.
Addressing sexual abuse scandals and their aftermath will require decisive action, transparency and continued pastoral care for survivors.
Practical concerns also loom large. The new pope will have to manage the Vatican bureaucracy and interfaith relations, while maintaining the church's stance on global crises such as migration and poverty – two issues on which Francis insisted mercy could not be optional.
The cardinal electors have a tough decision ahead of them. The Catholic community can only pray that, through their deliberations, they identify a shepherd who can guide the church through the complexities of the modern world.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump for uninviting him and his family from the White House picnic. Paul has opposed the Trump administration's decision to 'actively' seek to suspend habeas corpus. Habeas corpus — the constitutional freedom that translates to 'you should have the body' in Latin — ensures that detained individuals, whether or not they are citizens, are able to physically appear in front of a judge. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters on Wednesday. 'I just find this incredibly petty. I mean — I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the president.' The picnic is an annual event held by the White House on the South Lawn, which members from both aisles of Congress typically attend. 'They've decided they want to declare war on my family and exclude us from the White House, and I just think it's incredibly petty,' Paul added on Wednesday, saying that White House staffers are 'running sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' Paul said his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were supposed to attend the picnic with him. He also added that he did not receive an explanation as to why they all were no longer invited, and he's not sure if the revoked invitation came from Trump or his staffers. Habeas corpus is 'one most fundamental rights we have,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' Paul has drawn Trump's ire on more than one occasion in recent days. Earlier this month, Paul voiced concerns about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' prompting Trump to take jabs at him online. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' Paul also criticized Trump's upcoming military parade on Saturday, Trump's birthday. Paul told HuffPost the parade reminded him of the Soviet Union and North Korea. The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Trump Seethes Over Rand Paul Continuing To Oppose 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump for uninviting him and his family from the White House picnic. Paul has opposed the Trump administration's decision to 'actively' seek to suspend habeas corpus. Habeas corpus — the constitutional freedom that translates to 'you should have the body' in Latin — ensures that detained individuals, whether or not they are citizens, are able to physically appear in front of a judge. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters on Wednesday. 'I just find this incredibly petty. I mean — I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the president.' The picnic is an annual event held by the White House on the South Lawn, which members from both aisles of Congress typically attend. 'They've decided they want to declare war on my family and exclude us from the White House, and I just think it's incredibly petty,' Paul added on Wednesday, saying that White House staffers are 'running sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' Paul said his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were supposed to attend the picnic with him. He also added that he did not receive an explanation as to why they all were no longer invited, and he's not sure if the revoked invitation came from Trump or his staffers. Habeas corpus is 'one most fundamental rights we have,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' Paul has drawn Trump's ire on more than one occasion in recent days. Earlier this month, Paul voiced concerns about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' prompting Trump to take jabs at him online. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' Paul also criticized Trump's upcoming military parade on Saturday, Trump's birthday. Paul told HuffPost the parade reminded him of the Soviet Union and North Korea. The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Trump Seethes Over Rand Paul Continuing To Oppose 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: First Lady Melania and Pope Leo are right — it's 'unum' time
In a season of tragedy and division, two powerful voices — one from the Vatican, one from the White House — reached for the same ancient word: Unum. Last month, after the horrific shooting outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., First Lady Melania Trump offered her condolences by quoting our national motto: E Pluribus Unum — 'Out of many, one.' Days earlier, Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, delivered his inaugural message with a similar phrase etched into his papal crest: In Illo Uno Unum — 'In the One, One.' And with the horrifying attack on Jewish families in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, the same call to unity remains. These aren't just old, dusty Latin words. They were calls to unity in a time when America — and the world — feels dangerously divided. We are living through a season of immense high conflict, spilling over into hate-fueled violence. But from Rome to D.C., this month reminded us that Unum — unity — is not just a relic. It's a lifeline. Let's be honest: unity sounds soft. It can feel like wishful thinking. But today, invoking unity is a bold act. It takes guts to say, 'We still belong to each other,' especially when everything around us screams otherwise. I see signs of that courage every day. In an exhausted middle of Americans who are tired of the yelling, the blaming and the endless outrage. They're not perfect — but they're trying. Trying to build bridges instead of burning them. Trying to find common ground without giving up their convictions. That's the heart of Unum. It doesn't erase conflict or pretend we all agree. It's not utopia. It's the hard, daily work of choosing coexistence over chaos. Unum means Jewish and Muslim Americans grieving side-by-side. It means a First Lady who grew up Catholic in Slovenia invoking a motto that speaks across American synagogues, mosques and churches alike. It means a Pope who spent years in Latin America calling for peace — not as an abstract dream, but as an urgent task. And in Washington last week, that task was made painfully real. The shooting near the Israeli Embassy wasn't just another violent act. It was a national alarm. A young couple was killed. Jewish Americans and foreign diplomats had gathered at a museum dedicated to the hard work of remembering history and resisting hate. They came in peace. They fled in terror. If that doesn't shake us, what will? I mourn every loss — from D.C. to Gaza. As a former diplomat and humanitarian worker, I've seen the cost of war up close. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is heartbreaking: tens of thousands dead, aid blocked, civilians suffering. Hostages still not home. Israelis and Palestinians alike living in fear and grief. But pain doesn't have to harden us. It can humble us. It can move us to action — not vengeance. In moments like these, we face two temptations. One is despair: to give up, to believe the divisions are too deep. The other is rage: to blame, punish and retreat into our tribes. Neither will save us. The harder path — the braver one — is to build bridges anyway. Pope Leo XIV said it plainly: 'Be bridgebuilders, peace seekers, and companions on the journey.' That's not just a prayer. It's a plan. Because in a world driven by algorithms that divide and outrage that sells, choosing Unum is radical. It means staying at the table when you'd rather storm out. It means believing that pluralism — people of different faiths, races, beliefs and stories — can still build a shared life. You could say that in an interfaith nation like America, that is our common wealth — a society where deep differences don't divide us, they deepen us. The First Lady's words last month were not just a prayer — they were a call to action. Quoting our centuries-old motto E Pluribus Unum — 'Out of many, one' — was a reminder that belonging isn't partisan. It's American. It always has been. So let's hold on to that fragile hope. Let's say Unum again — and mean it.