Police minister Mark Mitchell says second firearms registry review not needed
Police Minister Mark Mitchell.
Photo:
RNZ / Marika Khabazi
The police minister says a second review of the firearms registry, called for by ACT, would not produce a different result.
The
ACT Party formally invoked its "agree to disagree" clause
in its coalition agreement with National over the firearms registry on Sunday.
Earlier this month, ACT MP Nicole McKee asked Cabinet to consider that the recent review of the firearms registry didn't meet the commitment in its coalition agreement.
But Mark Mitchell told
Morning Report
that's not the case.
"We just don't' agree with that. It was a review done by her ministry and she set the terms of reference for that," he said.
"That's where we agree to differ, we think there was a good job done and don't think there would be any difference at all going through to a set reviewer, a review of a review.
"We accept the findings of the review."
This audio is not downloadable due to copyright restrictions.
McKee said the review's conclusion that the registry is justified if it prevents two fatalities a year is unsupported by evidence and asked for a more thorough and independent review.
Mitchell disagreed and said he doesn't believe another review is in their best interests.
"We absolutely believe that it was (evidence based). It was a good review, we don't think having to go back and review again would fundamentally change anything," he said.
Act MP Nicole McKee
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
However, Mitchell did downplay the significance of ACT invoking the "agree to disagree" clause.
He said he had no concerns over ACT's approach to the firearms registry.
"We've been very clear what our position is on that. We're working very closely with ACT on that, I've got a very good working relationship with minister McKee," he said.
"She's doing a full rewrite of the Arms Act; it's a big piece of work. There are some things we're not going to agree on, and we've got a mechanism to be able to deal with that."
President of the NZ Police Association Chris Cahill also labelled the ACT Party's push for a further review of the firearms registry as pointless.
He said McKee's comments over the justification of the registry hinging on the prevention of two fatalities were disturbing.
"I'm disgusted that she thinks two lives aren't worth worrying about, that is a disgusting thing to say but it's also a very narrow interpretation of what the firearms registry is doing," he said
President of the NZ Police Association Chris Cahill.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Cahill also said it was unfair to judge the registry so soon.
"It's only been going for less than two years, it takes five years for it to be fully implemented so you would certainly wait for it to be fully implemented and then operating for a few years to see what's the true value of what it is," he said.
"But I think within 12 months what this review has shown is it's very valuable."
However, McKee said the review focused on operational costs to the government, but gave little weight to the compliance costs for firearms owners or the cost of a dealer's registry.
She said it also did not consider privacy concerns.
McKee said, despite the differences on the registry, the coalition partners continue to work constructively together on the rewrite of the Arms Act.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tribunal asked to halt seabed mine fast-track
Rachel Arnott with kaumatua Ngāpari Nui at the New Plymouth District Council committee. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki South Taranaki hapū want the Waitangi Tribunal to halt a fast-track bid to mine the seabed off Pātea. Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) has applied under the new Fast-track Approvals Act to mine in the South Taranaki Bight for 20 years. The mining and processing ship would churn through 50 million tonnes of the seabed annually, discharging most of it back into the ocean in shallow water just outside the 12-nautical-mile territorial limit. Hapū and iwi are seeking a tribunal injunction to block processing of TTR's fast-track application. The claimants want an urgent hearing into alleged Crown breaches and are seeking to summon Crown officials they say are responsible. They say the Crown failed to consult tangata whenua, breaching Te Tiriti o Waitangi and ignored a Supreme Court ruling against the seabed mine. To get an urgent Waitangi Tribunal hearing, applicants must be suffering or likely to suffer significant and irreversible prejudice, as a result of current or pending Crown actions. Lead claimant Puawai Hudson of Ngāruahine hapū Ngāti Tū said their moana was rich in taonga species. "If seabed mining goes ahead, we lose more than biodiversity - we lose the mauri that binds us as Taranaki Mā Tongatonga [people of south Taranaki]," Hudson said. The area was also subject to applications under the Marine and Coastal Area Act - the law that replaced the Foreshore and Seabed Act. "This is not consultation - this is colonisation through fast-track." The applicants' legal team, who're also of Ngāruahine, say the Wai 3475 claim breaks new ground. Legal tautoko Alison Anitawaru Cole and Te Wehi Wright said the Court of Appeal proved the tribunal's powers to require Crown action in urgent and prejudicial cases, when it summonsed Children's Minister Karen Chhour. They argue the tribunal should be able to halt other urgent and prejudicial Crown actions - such as processing TTR's application under the Fast-track Approval Act (FAA). The Taranaki claimants are: Groups outside Taranaki facing FAA applications have also joined, including Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki. As opponents press their claim, TTR is due to argue its case this week at New Plymouth District Council (NPDC). Trans-Taman said opposition to seabed mining lacked scientific credibility and the waste sediment it discharges would be insignificant, given the load already carried by the turbid Tasman Sea. TTR managing director Alan Eggers is expected to lay out his wares to councillors at a public workshop on Wednesday morning. The company promises an economic boost in Taranaki and Whanganui, creating more than 1350 New Zealand jobs and becoming one of the country's top exporters. The only known local shareholder - millionaire Phillip Brown - last week was reported to lodge a complaint to NPDC, alleging bias by its iwi committee, Te Huinga Taumatua. The Taranaki Daily News reported Brown thought tribal representatives and councillors on the committee talked for too long during a deputation opposed to TTR's mining bid. After the hour-and-a-quarter discussion, Te Huinga Taumatua co-chair Gordon Brown noted it was a record extension of the officially allotted 15 minutes. The committee, including Mayor Neil Holdom, voted that the full council should consider declaring opposition to TTR's mine, when it meets on 24 June. Brown reportedly believed the meeting was procedurally flawed and predetermined. Iwi liaison committees in north and south Taranaki typically relax debate rules to allow fuller kōrero. Taranaki Regional Council's powerful policy and planning committee recently reached a rare accord on dealing with freshwater pollution, when its new chair - Māori constituency councillor Bonita Bigham - suspended standing orders in favour of flowing discussion. Ngāti Ruanui has stood against Trans-Tasman for more than a decade, including defeating their application in the Supreme Court. Rūnanga kaiwhakahaere Rachel Arnott said the Crown should know mana whenua would never give up. "We are still here, because our ancestors never gave up fighting for what is right. "Tangaroa is not yours to sell - we will never leave, we will be here way beyond TTR, they have no future here." LDR is local body reporting co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government considers Crown contributions to partnership projects
PPPs were considered for court construction, but not included in Budget 2025. Photo: RNZ / Anneke Smith Government agencies are looking into how the Crown could put capital directly into Public Private Partnership projects. This is among moves to get try to get more partnerships underway to build a wider range of public infrastructure, from courts to health facilities. Minutes from the NZ Transport Agency show it has explored direct Crown contributions to PPPs for several months. Treasury said these were used in other countries to improve value for money or project outcomes. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop said PPP guidelines due out later this year would show how to consider Crown contributions. "The inclusion of a Crown capital contribution will be considered on a project-by-project basis throughout the business case and procurement processes," Bishop said. Officials did not believe legislative or regulatory change would be required to implement contributions. A blueprint to change PPPs was put out late last year, as the Government sought to get the private sector, including international companies, enthused about investing. "The blueprint signalled that their use would be carefully considered on a project-by-project basis," Treasury said of the contributions. At the Government's infrastructure investment summit in March, PPPs were raised as an option in health. PPPs to build three new courts in Waitākere and Rotorua, and a Māori Land Court in Rotorua were initially considered by justice officials, but the courthouse builds did not receive funding in Budget 2025. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
The House: Morning Tea with Matt Doocey
Waimakariri MP Matt Doocey hosts a meeting with senior citizens in Rangiora. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins Like most electorate MPs, National MP for Waimakariri Matt Doocey spends a lot of his weekends back home in his electorate. Saturdays are generally spent in the community and chatting to constituents. Last Saturday, The House attended one of Doocey's Q&A sessions with over-60s. They're something he likes to hold regularly in the electorate's population centres of Kaiapoi, Oxford, and Rangiora. This one was at the Rangiora RSA. The issues discussed at these sessions are many and varied. Last Saturday there were both big-picture concerns about a perceived "brain drain" and international trade, as well as local queries about roading and healthcare infrastructure. "People do want to ask you a specific question about potentially a road in their neighbourhood, or maybe there might be an issue with accessing a local public service," Doocey says. "And then for some people they do think a bit more nationally and they want to have a talk about the economy or what's happening internationally in the current geopolitical environment." His electorate, historically made up of dormitory towns, has seen significant growth since the Canterbury earthquakes. Doocey, who has been the local MP since 2014, has observed the challenges that a growing population presents. "When you have that significant growth, you have what I call 'growing pains of growth'. "Quite rightly, I've got to get in and make sure I bat for this area so it gets the investment it needs into vital infrastructure like the Woodend bypass, a new road of national significance." Doocey and his family live in the Waimakariri electorate, which he says has accepted him over the years as just another member of the community. This Parliamentary term, he has the added responsibility of being a Cabinet Minister. He must balance ministerial duties in Wellington and elsewhere, with addressing the concerns of his constituents in Canterbury. Given he's out-of-town frequently, Doocey's Electorate and Community Office (ECO) staff in Kaiapoi and Rangiora act as first responders for constituents asking for help with things like ACC or Work and Income. "They are really your front line," he says. "Through our office, we can go up to a higher level in a government department, escalate their issue in quite a timely fashion, and get them connected to the person they need to talk to as well. "So in that way, constituents don't need to wait two weeks to see their local MP." Doocey says the regular sessions with the community on the weekends have been a good forum to address some of those more generalised concerns. "I'm here for the weekend, and people do like the idea of coming to a meeting when it's not as pressured [as it would be] during a nine to five, Monday to Friday, and we can spend a bit more time unpacking the issues of the day." Rangiora resident Chris Knight, who came along to Doocey's Q&A, is a regular viewer of Parliament's Question Time. For him, events like these offer a welcome opportunity. Matt Doocey at the meeting last Saturday. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins "You don't often get an opportunity to meet or talk to an acting MP," he says. "To come to something like this and actually meet your local MP is good." Knight describes himself as a social democrat and a lifelong Labour voter both in New Zealand and the UK where he emigrated from, but he acknowledges Doocey's efforts as an electorate MP. "I think Matt does a pretty good job around here. I read some of the stuff that he has in the papers, and he's always around and available, which is good. Whether or not I'll vote for him next time, remains to be seen." ECO offices sport the colours of whichever party the MP is a member of, which may give rise to the misconception that electorate MPs' offices aren't approachable if you don't support their party. "I make it very clear," Doocey says. "I work for everyone in Waimakariri, no matter how they vote. "I'm here to serve all in the Waimakariri irrespective of how they vote. "But I do acknowledge that sometimes people come in and there might be a perceived barrier there about whether they voted for me or not, or whether they voted for my party. "But as a local MP, I'm here to work for everyone. I think over time people have got to understand that, and actually when you're working as a local MP it's not a party affiliation, in fact it's a Waimakariri affiliation, because you just want to help everyone in your community." To listen to the audio version of this story, click the link near the top of the page. * RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
