‘Nomadland': Without real housing action, Canada risks a future where kids grow up in campgrounds
The girl in the fuzzy onesie pajamas with bunny ears looked to be about 12. She examined her face in the campground washroom mirror, and with no inhibition despite the stranger beside her, squeezed a pimple. It was a personal act, typically performed in private.
Privacy was a luxury this girl didn't have. Home, for the time being anyhow, was this well-tended private campground in Washington state. She and her mom were living in an RV that their vehicle was not equipped to tow. I won't name the campground: it was run by lovely people who may be ignoring state rules that limit camping in RVs to 180-day stays in most counties. I would not want to cause trouble for any of the people who, judging by permanent flower planters, elaborate outdoor kitchen structures and even some permanent flag poles, I saw during a trip through the Pacific Northwest last week, appear to be living year-round in campgrounds.
In case you wondered, I agonized about whether to attend a family event in a country now so hostile to my own. In the end, the family won out and we drove, camping and hiking in the California redwoods along the way.
Like Fern, the heroine played by Frances McDormand in the film Nomadland, some of the folks we saw living in campgrounds were on the knife's edge of homelessness, their RVs covered in tarps to keep leaks at bay, their aging vehicles dented and rusting. As the number of unhoused people in the big cities of Washington, Oregon and California continue to grow, affordable housing shortages have similarly worsened in the region's less populous counties.
The US, which still ranks among the world's top-10 wealthiest countries, has so far failed the almost 800,000 people who in January of 2024 had no permanent housing. Canada faces similar challenges, albeit on a smaller scale. It's hard to know exactly how many unhoused people there are here — the latest Statistics Canada report is stale. A point-in-time count found that between 2020 and 2022, 40,713 people were living in shelters, sleeping rough (including in encampments) and in transitional housing. The true numbers are likely far higher.
A succession of federal governments have done precious little to solve this problem since the 1990s when the Brian Mulroney Conservative government, and then the Liberals under Jean Chretien, wound down construction of social housing.
Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reversed that trend with a goal to reduce chronic homelessness by 50 per cent and rebooted social housing programs that had fallen by the wayside. But the rollout was slow and the amounts invested couldn't keep pace with the rising numbers. Since 2018, street homelessness has increased by 20 per cent, according to a report from the Parliamentary Budget Officer. Building social housing is hideously expensive and the Liberals' pace of federal investment on homelessness programs under Trudeau from 2018 to 2028 was set to average $561 million per year. Meeting Trudeau's 50 per cent target would require an astonishing $3.5 billion per year more, given current program designs, the PBO report found.
Canada's unhoused population grew by 20 per cent under the last Liberal government. PM Mark Carney seems ready to spend some serious money to help. Let's hold him to his promises. @adriennetanner.bsky.social writes for @nationalobserver.com
Now, thankfully, with Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney, Canadians have a leader who seems to understand the magnitude of Canada's affordable housing woes and says he's prepared to allocate real money to build more. Carney has promised to double the number of homes built annually in Canada to 500,000. Affordable housing needs will be handled by a new organization called Build Canada Homes (BCH), tasked with overseeing affordable housing construction across the country.
Carney has promised it will be richly funded; grants totalling $6 billion will be awarded to build "deeply affordable housing, supportive housing, Indigenous housing and shelters."
"We will immediately develop homelessness reduction targets with every province and territory to inform housing-first investments, improve access to treatment and end encampments community by community," the Carney campaign said in a statement.
That's an admirable goal and stands in stark contrast to the views of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who routinely demonizes people who have nowhere to live. His punitive solution to homelessness was to give police greater powers to dismantle tent encampments, arrest unhoused people who erect them, and steer drug users to treatment programs.
He claimed to have a 'housing first' solution to solving homelessness, but did not actually commit to building any social housing. You can see how well that's working in the US where tent cities proliferate in big cities and campgrounds have become home to those marginally better off.
Lest we get ahead of ourselves, Carney is not the first politician to promise to end street homelessness. Former Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson, now a newly elected Liberal MP, made the same pledge and was roasted for failing when the numbers of homeless people climbed under his watch. But it's far better to set lofty goals and risk failure than not to try at all. If Carney invests the kind of money he talked about during his campaign, he can make a difference.
Without serious investment, our tent cities will continue to grow, and we'll soon have families living in campgrounds like the girl in the pajamas or the mom with her preteen boy who cringed when I met him in the women's washroom the following day. 'He's embarrassed because I make him come in here with me,' she said. 'But I can't let him go to the men's alone. Too dangerous.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Serving a greying church
'God must like old people. He keeps creating more of them.' So quipped Scott Tolhurst, a former pastor who, over the course of his 48 years in ministry, developed a heart for service to seniors. Current demographics prove him right. According to Statistics Canada, seniors are the fastest-growing group in Canada. Today there are over seven million Canadians 65 and older — or about 20 per cent of the population. By 2068 that is projected to rise to 25 per cent. But it's not just society that's greying; so are churches. According to the Hartford Institute for Religion Research, in 2024 36 per cent of members of American congregations were over 65. At the same time, the percentage of those under 35 who attended religious services of all denominations fell to 32 per cent. Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS files According to Statistics Canada, seniors are the fastest-growing group in Canada. Or, as the institute put it, there are now more churchgoers older than 65 than younger than 35 in U.S. churches — and likely in Canada, too. Despite the rising number of older adults in congregations, many churches are still focused mostly on serving younger people and families, Tolhurst said. 'Seniors can be people nobody thinks of much,' said the 69-year-old. 'These are people who were very loyal, sacrificial, and who had a love for Jesus beyond words. But now they are often on the periphery in the church, left on their own.' What hurts many seniors is how their churches don't see them as having much to offer beyond money. For Tolhurst, that's a form of spiritual ageism. 'Churches need to shift their thinking to see seniors as a resource in their congregations,' he said. 'Seniors still want to serve. They have given all their lives. They're not ready to stop now.' He acknowledges seniors face unique challenges that can impact their service, such as health, loss, grief, loss of independence and other limitations. 'But they still have much to give,' he says. 'They just need someone to ask them.' Jane Kuepfer directs the Schlegel Institute in Spirituality & Aging at Conrad Grebel University College in Waterloo. She also feels many churches today don't value older people. Instead, many are putting all their efforts into attracting younger people. This is a great loss. 'There is great potential in older people,' Kuepfer said. 'They are an incredible resource. We need to encourage churches to pay more attention to people in the third act of life.' Kuepfer wants churches to realize God doesn't stop calling people to various kinds of service just because they're older. 'God will call us to different things at different stages of our lives,' she said. But, she added, God still calls — including when people are older. The best way for churches to do a better job of serving seniors is by just listening to them, Kuepfer said. 'Find out what they need to keep them spiritually sustained and healthy. Ask them what they need, where they're at and how they might become involved,' she said. As for churches worried about their futures, she suggests they would do well to focus on who is in the pews right now. 'What if the future is serving older adults? An older congregation doesn't infer a dying congregation,' she said. Tom McCormick, 75, felt a call to serve seniors when he was in his 20s. He ended up serving people in long-term care for some 50 years and also wrote two books on nursing home ministry. For him, serving seniors is 'about following a scriptural mandate. It's what it means to be the people of God.' What disappoints McCormick is how few churches seem interested in service to seniors. 'When I talk to churches, I'm often told they want to focus on the emerging generation, there's more future there,' he said. 'It must break the Lord's heart to see older people neglected by the Church in this way.' McCormick is also disappointed by the lack of courses about ministry to seniors at Canadian seminaries. 'Seminaries tell me [that subject] isn't marketable,' he says. And yet, he noted, people graduating as clergy today will find themselves in churches with a large number of seniors — but with little training in how to minister to them and their unique needs. 'Not enough seminaries are preparing clergy for this reality. It's a real blind spot,' he said. In 1971, singer-songwriter John Prine wrote a song titled Hello in There, about an older couple whose children had moved away and left their parents on their own. In the song, the couple describes the loneliness they felt. The chorus goes like this: 'You know that old trees just grow stronger And old rivers grow wider every day Sundays Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba. Old people just grow lonesome Waiting for someone to say 'Hello in there, hello.'' I wonder how many churches, and other places of worship, are saying hello to seniors as society ages? faith@ The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba. If you appreciate that coverage, help us do more! Your contribution of $10, $25 or more will allow us to deepen our reporting about faith in the province. Thanks! BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER John LonghurstFaith reporter John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Globe and Mail
5 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Ottawa retables ‘Lost Canadians' bill in bid to restore citizenship rights before court deadline
The federal government has reintroduced a bill to grant citizenship to 'Lost Canadians' – children born abroad to foreign-born Canadians – after an attempt by the Liberals to restore their right to hold a passport died before the election. The Liberals introduced a bill in the last Parliament to restore citizenship to 'Lost Canadians.' But it was one of more than 20 bills stopped in their tracks by the proroguing of Parliament ahead of the federal election. The Ontario Superior Court ruled in December 2023 that it is unconstitutional to deny citizenship to children born in another country to Canadians also born outside Canada. The last Liberal government did not appeal the ruling and the court granted the government a series of extensions – until November this year – to make changes to the law. On Thursday, Immigration Minister Lena Diab reintroduced the bill to make changes to the Citizenship Act. Bill C-3 requires Canadian parents born abroad to demonstrate a substantial connection to Canada before they can pass on citizenship to a child born outside Canada. They would need to have a cumulative 1,095 days – the equivalent of three years – spent in Canada before the birth or adoption of the child seeking citizenship. The bill is meant to reverse a change by Stephen Harper's Conservative government in 2009 that stripped children of a Canadian parent born outside Canada of their automatic right to citizenship. The 2009 change was designed to crack down on what Conservatives called 'Canadians of convenience.' It followed an outcry after Canada spent more than $80-million to evacuate 15,000 Canadian citizens from Lebanon in 2006 during the Israel-Hezbollah war. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has estimated that the bill could create around 115,000 new citizens in the next five years. Renée LeBlanc Proctor, spokesperson for the minister, said the restrictions to citizenship by descent to the first generation born abroad had led to 'unacceptable consequences for Canadians whose children were born outside the country.' She said legislation would 'ensure the remaining cohort of Lost Canadians are properly recognized as citizens.' Don Chapman, a long-time advocate for restoring citizenship to Lost Canadians, welcomed the early introduction of a bill in the new Parliament. 'People, including children, are being denied their constitutional right of citizenship,' he said. 'Canada is too good of a country to allow its own citizens to be ostracized.' Toronto lawyer Sujit Choudhry, who filed the successful constitutional challenge to the Citizenship Act on behalf of 'Lost Canadian' clients, said the new bill was identical to the last, which he said 'died on the order paper because the government did not make it a legislative priority. 'The government must use every tool at its disposal to ensure that the same fate does not befall Bill C-3, which must be passed and brought into force by November 20, 2025,' he said.
National Post
5 days ago
- National Post
Chris Selley: Liberals wrap much-needed refugee reform in a terrible privacy-invading package
Once upon a time, not so long ago, the Liberals auditioned for government in Ottawa with a promise to do away with obnoxiously enormous omnibus bills, in which dozens of separate issues are crammed into the same legislation. Article content The usual result, often by design, is that contentious issues don't get the scrutiny they deserve. The Liberals long ago having discovered that they only dislike omnibus bills when Conservatives draft them, the party's 2025 platform wisely did not promise any change on that front. Article content Article content Article content And they're right out of the gate with a doozie of an omnibus bill: Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, which seems likely to keep many lawyers gainfully employed for years fighting and defending it in court. Article content Article content There are two main objections to the bill: New restrictions on who can apply for asylum status in Canada; and making it easier for police to obtain your internet-user information. It's certainly conceivable that the latter might help police make the border safer. It could disrupt smuggling operations, be they fentanyl, drugs or human beings. But if you go look at the bill, you'll see these new measures aren't about the border. They're about everything. Article content Section 487.0121 would allow police, without a warrant, to ask an internet service provider (ISP) if someone is a subscriber; whether the ISP 'possesses … any information … in relation to that subscriber' (though it wouldn't grant access to specific data); the city in which the ISP's services were provided; and when the services were provided. Article content Article content Police must only demonstrate they had 'reasonable grounds to suspect (that) an offence has been or will be committed under this Act or any other Act of Parliament ' (my italics). Article content Article content Producing additional data attached to IP addresses would require a warrant, but not in 'exigent circumstances.' Do you trust police and courts to assure exigency? I don't. Article content You don't often hear Canadian police forces argue they have all the tools they need to fight crime. And there's a long history of Canadian governments, Conservative and Liberal alike, leveraging hot-button issues to try to broaden police or intelligence-service powers. Then public safety minister Vic Toews immortalized himself in 2012 defending internet-monitoring legislation by suggesting Canadians can either 'stand with us or with the child pornographers,' but other governments have used terrorism, 'revenge porn' and other justifications in the past.
