logo
Independent candidates challenge major parties in Monash

Independent candidates challenge major parties in Monash

Stretching from Mansfield to the coastal seascapes of Wilsons Promontory, the seat of Monash includes some of Victoria's fastest-growing communities.
A long-time Liberal stronghold, Monash has been held by Russell Broadbent since he won it back from Labor in 2004.
He retained the seat at the 2022 election with a reduced margin of 2.9 per cent.
Stay updated:
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
But this year, things will look a little different.
After losing Liberal preselection, Broadbent is recontesting as an independent and facing serious pressure from Phillip Island-based independent Deb Leonard.
For the first time, Monash could elect an MP from outside the major parties.
A race between two?
The seat of Monash lies east of Melbourne and runs from the Great Dividing Range to Bass Strait.
It has never been held by an independent, but Mr Broadbent's decision to recontest without the backing of a major party has shaken up a seat already feeling political pressure.
Election analyst Ren Raue told ABC Victoria Statewide Mornings Monash was an example of a seat where preferences would be critical.
"That's a seat where the order in which people get knocked out and their preferences distributed could decide who gets into that top two, and make a difference as to who wins," Mr Raue said.
"
Honestly, it could be one of those seats we don't know the results on the night.
"
The Monash electorate recorded a swing against the two major parties in the last election, with independent Deb Leonard recording a 10.7 per cent swing in her favour.
Geoffrey Robinson says there is a growing level of mistrust in politics.
(
Supplied: Geoff Robinson
)
Geoff Robinson, senior lecturer in politics and policy at Deakin University, said independents had a chance to tap into dissatisfaction with the major parties.
But he said a large number of "rusted-on" voters — about 60 per cent of the electorate — supported the Liberals, Labor or the Greens.
"It's more about the general mood of dissatisfaction," he said.
"You need a viable candidate to capture that mood."
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
The players
Mr Broadbent and Ms Leonard have competition from the major parties.
The Liberal Party's candidate is Mary Aldred, daughter of former MP Ken Aldred.
Labor's candidate is Tully Fletcher, a third-generation Gippslander.
Ms Leonard, a self-employed lawyer who finished third in the 2022 election, has capitalised on growing discontent with the major parties to help gather a war chest of close to half-a-million dollars.
Warragul resident Graeme Hollingsworth said he had voted for the Liberal party in the past.
Graeme Hollingsworth has been volunteering for Deb Leonard's campaign.
(
Supplied: Graeme Hollingsworth
)
But this year he has been backing Ms Leonard — even volunteering for her campaign.
Photo shows
An election sign of Wil Anderson in a neighbourhood with a dog urinating on it with Gruen Nation Election edition and iview.
It's election season and politicians are trying to sell you the world. The team at Gruen isn't about to buy it. They're taking a big swing at the election, showing you how the democracy sausage is made, all the sizzle and none of the meat.
"We don't actually get any funding [in Monash] and the feeling on the ground, unless you're a rusted-on Labor or Liberal voter, [is] that it's time for a change, and enough is enough," Mr Hollingsworth said.
Inverloch resident Kim White said many residents felt frustrated with the political landscape and wanted better transparency.
He said while many were happy with Mr Broadbent, Ms Leonard had political momentum.
"If an independent gets in, I hope like hell they go hard for this region," he said.
"
It'll be short-lived if they don't.
"
The candidates' view
Mr Broadbent said he was intrigued by how the weekend's vote would pan out.
"If you go to the last four election campaigns, people are moving away from the major parties," he said.
Russell Broadbent says he is confident he will retain his seat.
(
ABC News
)
The former Liberal MP said he acknowledged his previous party membership but said "that's history" he could not walk away from.
Mr Broadbent has long been an outspoken voice in the Coalition party room and was one of a handful of MPs who opposed its policy of offshore processing for refugees in 2006.
Photo shows
A compilation photo of Allegra Spender, Alex Dyson, Kate Chaney and Zoe Daniel.
Political funding body Climate 200 is bankrolling up to 75 per cent of campaign costs for several independent candidates this election.
In 2017, he was one of four MPs who voted against same-sex marriage legislation.
More recently he opposed mandatory vaccination during the pandemic and promoted the use of the anti parasitic drug Ivermectin.
Meanwhile, Ms Leonard has faced criticism of her funding head-on, stating her independence in parliament would not be influenced by donors.
"It's important to note that the donors don't shape the policy," she said.
"
Only the community shapes my policy. I'm not beholden to any organisation or entity except the people of Monash.
"
'Seat to watch'
Both independent candidates agreed Monash would be a seat worth watching this weekend.
"It'll be most intriguing, and every preference you put down is going to be crucial, even number nine," Mr Broadbent said.
Russell Broadbent has spent decades in federal parliament.
(
ABC News
)
Ms Leonard said the election presented voters alternative options away from the major two parties.
"Do they want someone that is just going to continue to vote the same way that they always have and which has led to our region being left behind," she said.
"Or do they want someone that's going to vote differently and vote in line with our community and stand up for what we need."
The federal election will be held on May 3.
Loading

Having trouble seeing this form? Try

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia warned it could 'never replicate' at risk AUKUS deal as Anthony Albanese prepares for crucial talks with Donald Trump
Australia warned it could 'never replicate' at risk AUKUS deal as Anthony Albanese prepares for crucial talks with Donald Trump

Sky News AU

time31 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Australia warned it could 'never replicate' at risk AUKUS deal as Anthony Albanese prepares for crucial talks with Donald Trump

A foreign policy expert has warned Australia and the United Kingdom could "never replicate" AUKUS without support from the United States ahead of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's crucial meeting with President Donald Trump. Concerns about President Trump's approach to AUKUS were raised to new heights following the announcement last week his administration was launching a review into the the trilateral pact. Set to be led by AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby, the review has stoked fears the US could walk away from the agreement in what would come as a huge blow to Australia's defence and strategic plan. Mr Albanese is now facing significant pressure to convince President Trump of AUKUS' value, with many analysts expecting the US leader will pressure his Australian counterpart on defence spending when the two meet on the sidelines of the G7 on Wednesday. British Foreign Policy Group senior research and programs manager Eliza Keogh warned there was a "real possibility" President Trump would pull out of the pact, with the Australian and UK governments now jointly scrambling to keep the deal alive. "AUKUS offers clear strategic advantages for the US - from regional proximity to China, to access to Australian facilities for docking and servicing - and there is a possibility the review could just be the Trump administration increasing pressure on Australia to boost its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP," she told "Nevertheless, there is a real possibility the US could withdraw from AUKUS, particularly with AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby leading the review. "The Trump administration's tendency to prioritise short-term political calculations over strategic foresight means that it may opt to withdraw from AUKUS, despite its long-term focus on countering the rise of China, as short term interests - predominantly keeping US-built submarines at home - will win out." Several analysts and observers have highlighted flagging US submarine manufacturing as a potential dealbreaker, with the nation at risk of missing its goal to increase the size of its fleet to 66 vessels by 2049. Debate over the provision of Virginia class submarines to Australia - a stop-gap measure to ensure Australia remains well equipped while AUKUS vessels are constructed - has raged for almost two years and has drawn scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans. Some have suggested President Trump may demand Australia increase the $3 billion it will send to the US to help offset production costs for the submarines in order to ensure the deal remains on tract, although Mr Albanese ruled out that possibility in 2023 and appears unlikely to change course. Instead, the Prime Minister is expected to emphasise the in-kind benefits AUKUS provides the US during his sit down with President Trump, while also pointing to Labor's $57 billion boost to defence spending over the next decade. According to Ms Keogh, highlighting Australia's role in deterring Chinese ambitions in the Indo-Pacific is likely to be another effective tactic given the US' desire to see "partners stepping up in the region". She also offered a more radical solution, which, while likely to appease President Trump, could also leave Australia dependent on the US until the first AUKUS vessels come online in the 2030s. "If they are looking to placate Trump, UK and Australian negotiators could look to renegotiate parts of the deal, including offering to loan submarines back to the US if necessary," Ms Keogh said. It remains to be seen what, if any concessions, Mr Albanese makes to the US President, but the foreign policy expert warned it would be impossible to replace AUKUS should Australia and the UK fail to maintain American support. "The UK and Australia have already agreed to negotiate a bilateral AUKUS treaty, but this could never replicate the scale and weight of the trilateral agreement," Ms Keogh said. Publicly both nations have sought to downplay the risk of US withdrawal, with Britain's Labour government highlighting the fact it held a similar review after it came to power. However, Ms Keogh explained officials were privately "very nervous" about how the Trump administration would proceed. The UK has made a flurry of announcements, including a pointed commitment to boost its own submarine production in coming years, as it attempts to demonstrate it is serious about raising its defence spend. Meanwhile, the Australian government has taken a different approach, pushing back against US calls to increase spending and insisting its current strategic plans are adequate. This has prompted intense criticism from a number of leading defence experts, who warn Australia is both weaker and less capable then in previous decades while also at risk of jeopardising its relationship with its most significant defence partner.

Liberals need to deliver tough love policy on welfare reform as Australians grapple with recent rise in food insecurity
Liberals need to deliver tough love policy on welfare reform as Australians grapple with recent rise in food insecurity

Sky News AU

time31 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Liberals need to deliver tough love policy on welfare reform as Australians grapple with recent rise in food insecurity

There are two primary methods for estimating the extent of poverty in Australia. The first step is to apply a statistical formula to a dry dataset measuring disposable household income. The second is to see for yourself, as I did, when I joined the volunteers at the Community Cafe on the outskirts of Western Sydney on Tuesday evening. Anyone prepared to sit outside in five degrees for the chance of a free feed and some company is almost certainly living below the poverty line. On Tuesday evening, I counted 130 such people, men, women, and children waiting in line to be served a nourishing hot meal on a paper plate. The eldest I person I spoke to was in the 80s. The youngest was a baby just a few months old. It would be crass to make judgements about ethnicity at a cafe that runs on the admirable principle that every human being deserves equal respect. Suffice it to say Tuesday's gathering passed the diversity test, since poverty is indiscriminate. Kirsty Parkes, the founder of the Community Café charity, says the attendance of families is relatively recent and illustrates the rising level of food insecurity. Bob Hawke lived to regret the moment he went off-script at Labor's 1987 campaign launch and declared that no Australian child would live in poverty by 1990. It is a mathematically impossible goal if we insist on pegging poverty to median incomes. In any case, poverty is not merely an absence of money, as the Centre for Social Justice recognised in its groundbreaking 2007 report 'Breakthrough Britain'. It concludes that poverty cannot be cured by dolling out money. Instead, policymakers should focus on the pathways to poverty, of which the report highlights six: family breakdown, educational failure, worklessness, addictions, problem debt and insecure housing. Judging from my conversations at the Community Cafe, we should add a seventh: loneliness. Community Cafe ensures that on Tuesday nights, at least no one in the neighbourhood is obliged to eat alone. Hawke at least deserves credit for recognising that the goal of welfare policy should be to reduce poverty, not merely to service it by handing out cash. The noble causes espoused by welfare organisations are prone to corruption through rent-seeking. The iron law of government programs is the first and sometimes only beneficiaries are the people who administer them. The true measure of a fair society is not how much money is distributed but whether it is effective. The instinct for generosity must be balanced against the perverse economic incentives welfare payments create. Mark Latham was one the few Labor leaders to acknowledge that the best form of welfare is a job. During his 2004 campaign speech, he spoke about the curse of intergenerational welfare. "We need to confront the problem of 800,000 Australian children growing up in jobless households," he said. "We know what this leads to: poverty, poor health, increased crime rates and, worst of all, lack of hope." Latham understood the challenges of life in postcode 2168 better than most. He was born there in the suburb of Ashcroft, served on Liverpool Council and represented the federal seat of Werriwa, in which 2168 falls. In a 2001 speech, he expressed his despair at the political ideology and point-scoring that were getting in the way of genuine solutions. "It's the equivalent of play-acting, as each side makes its set-piece criticism of the other." The play acting has grown worse. Labor frames any initiative by the Coalition to ensure that welfare spending is effective as a means to achieve its goals. The Liberals are inclined to characterise Labor as a spendthrift. The cashless welfare card experiment, aimed at breaking the curse of addiction, was abolished by the incoming Albanese government in 2022. Labor framed it as a punishment rather than a tool to break the cycle of poverty. Coalition attempts to add work obligations have often been framed as a breach of rights by Labor. They refuse to recognise, as Latham did, that there can be no end to the poverty circle without effort and responsibility. That rule applies to communities as much as to individuals. The Centre for Social Justice highlights how disadvantaged communities develop a poverty culture in which aspiration and mobility seem out of reach. Children who grow up in workless homes are likely to perform poorly at school and have a strong chance of becoming workless adults themselves. Community expectations shift. Educational underachievement becomes normalised, crime is legitimised, middle-class residents leave, and postcodes become stigmatised. The challenges of life in postcode 2168 are hardly unique. It is among the top two per cent of postcodes on the ABS index of socio-economic disadvantage, alongside remote areas of Aboriginal settlement and suburbs such as Elizabeth in South Australia and Broadmeadows in Victoria. The pointers to poverty are dispiritingly dissimilar: high unemployment, low education achievement, high rates of single parenthood, jobless households, and high numbers of people living in social housing. There are high rates of crime, drug addiction and family violence. This should prompt us to reconsider the assumptions underlying the challenges of closing the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous socio-economic outcomes. The challenges faced by Aboriginal Australians stem from poverty, not race. Mr Albanese's slogan, "no one left behind", will remain empty of meaning unless he is prepared to tackle the complex and politically challenging task of reforming the welfare system as Latham wanted to do. Conservatives are tempted to stay out of this policy area altogether, fearful of the dangers of being framed as the nasty party. Yet reducing social disadvantage is at the core of the liberal philosophy on which the party was founded. Robert Menzies saw no contradiction between prosperity and fairness. The duty of the Liberal Party was to recognise that every citizen is of equal worth and was committed to the principle of economic opportunity. Some of the most important welfare reform this century began on the centre right. The Centre for Social Justice was established by a former Conservative leader, Iain Duncan Smith, during the party's long-term opposition between 1997 and 2010. Conservatives were also at the forefront of welfare reform in New Zealand under the leadership of John Keys and Bill English. They didn't shrink from the harsh love measures required to break the cycle, such as encouraging single mothers to find work, knowing that single motherhood can become an apprenticeship to a life of joblessness without the right incentives in place. We can visualise Sussan Ley flinching at the mention of these kinds of measures. Yet the Liberal Party will never return to government if the trauma of this year's election makes it permanently risk-averse. Its priority is to set its aim beyond the politically expedient and invest its time in Opposition to a blueprint for national reform. It must focus on government efficiency, acknowledging that the current level of public spending is unsustainable and that challenges in welfare, education, and health can be overcome by allocating a smaller budget more wisely. The second task is to learn the art of politics, of which Menzies was a master. It is the art of persuasion backed by the conviction that the goal of their noble profession is not to win votes but to improve lives. Nick Cater is a senior fellow of the Menzies Research Centre.

Trump tariff talk to dominate PM's Canadian sit-down
Trump tariff talk to dominate PM's Canadian sit-down

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

Trump tariff talk to dominate PM's Canadian sit-down

Tariffs will be top of mind for the prime minister and his Canadian counterpart as the two meet ahead of Anthony Albanese's highly anticipated talks with Donald Trump. Mr Albanese will land in Canada on Sunday, local time, for bilateral talks after being invited to the G7 summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Both leaders have had to reckon with the impact of the US president's threatened tariffs on their economies. But Mr Carney could provide insight for the Australian's first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump. Despite vowing to fight back against the tariffs, the Canadian prime minister's meetings with the US president have been well received by both parties and raised hopes for a fresh trade deal between the two North American nations. Mr Albanese's meeting with the Republican president is scheduled for Tuesday on the sidelines of the summit. The prime minister has taken a less adversarial stance to Mr Trump's approach than his Canadian peer, preferring to highlight Australia's long history with the US. "The combination of Australia and the United States when we're working together is an unbeatable combination," he told business leaders in Seattle on Saturday. Australian imports into the US face 10 per cent tariffs and - like all trading partners except the UK - 50 per cent tariffs on aluminium and steel. The Labor government is considering using US beef imports and critical minerals as potential bargaining chips as it "engages constructively" with American officials. Australians' sense of safety and economic optimism have already plunged, according to the annual Lowy Institute Poll, amid the talk of tariffs, as well as growing conflicts and global disorder. Their trust in the US has fallen to the lowest level in the history of the decades-long poll, with two-in-three respondents holding little to no trust in the traditional Australian ally. "Australians are clearly unsettled by what they've seen of the second Trump administration," Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove said. Mr Albanese previously met the Canadian prime minister on the margins of the Papal inauguration, but this will be their first formal bilateral discussion. They are also expected to discuss defence, critical minerals, climate change and the escalating situation in the Middle East. Tariffs will be top of mind for the prime minister and his Canadian counterpart as the two meet ahead of Anthony Albanese's highly anticipated talks with Donald Trump. Mr Albanese will land in Canada on Sunday, local time, for bilateral talks after being invited to the G7 summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Both leaders have had to reckon with the impact of the US president's threatened tariffs on their economies. But Mr Carney could provide insight for the Australian's first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump. Despite vowing to fight back against the tariffs, the Canadian prime minister's meetings with the US president have been well received by both parties and raised hopes for a fresh trade deal between the two North American nations. Mr Albanese's meeting with the Republican president is scheduled for Tuesday on the sidelines of the summit. The prime minister has taken a less adversarial stance to Mr Trump's approach than his Canadian peer, preferring to highlight Australia's long history with the US. "The combination of Australia and the United States when we're working together is an unbeatable combination," he told business leaders in Seattle on Saturday. Australian imports into the US face 10 per cent tariffs and - like all trading partners except the UK - 50 per cent tariffs on aluminium and steel. The Labor government is considering using US beef imports and critical minerals as potential bargaining chips as it "engages constructively" with American officials. Australians' sense of safety and economic optimism have already plunged, according to the annual Lowy Institute Poll, amid the talk of tariffs, as well as growing conflicts and global disorder. Their trust in the US has fallen to the lowest level in the history of the decades-long poll, with two-in-three respondents holding little to no trust in the traditional Australian ally. "Australians are clearly unsettled by what they've seen of the second Trump administration," Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove said. Mr Albanese previously met the Canadian prime minister on the margins of the Papal inauguration, but this will be their first formal bilateral discussion. They are also expected to discuss defence, critical minerals, climate change and the escalating situation in the Middle East. Tariffs will be top of mind for the prime minister and his Canadian counterpart as the two meet ahead of Anthony Albanese's highly anticipated talks with Donald Trump. Mr Albanese will land in Canada on Sunday, local time, for bilateral talks after being invited to the G7 summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Both leaders have had to reckon with the impact of the US president's threatened tariffs on their economies. But Mr Carney could provide insight for the Australian's first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump. Despite vowing to fight back against the tariffs, the Canadian prime minister's meetings with the US president have been well received by both parties and raised hopes for a fresh trade deal between the two North American nations. Mr Albanese's meeting with the Republican president is scheduled for Tuesday on the sidelines of the summit. The prime minister has taken a less adversarial stance to Mr Trump's approach than his Canadian peer, preferring to highlight Australia's long history with the US. "The combination of Australia and the United States when we're working together is an unbeatable combination," he told business leaders in Seattle on Saturday. Australian imports into the US face 10 per cent tariffs and - like all trading partners except the UK - 50 per cent tariffs on aluminium and steel. The Labor government is considering using US beef imports and critical minerals as potential bargaining chips as it "engages constructively" with American officials. Australians' sense of safety and economic optimism have already plunged, according to the annual Lowy Institute Poll, amid the talk of tariffs, as well as growing conflicts and global disorder. Their trust in the US has fallen to the lowest level in the history of the decades-long poll, with two-in-three respondents holding little to no trust in the traditional Australian ally. "Australians are clearly unsettled by what they've seen of the second Trump administration," Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove said. Mr Albanese previously met the Canadian prime minister on the margins of the Papal inauguration, but this will be their first formal bilateral discussion. They are also expected to discuss defence, critical minerals, climate change and the escalating situation in the Middle East. Tariffs will be top of mind for the prime minister and his Canadian counterpart as the two meet ahead of Anthony Albanese's highly anticipated talks with Donald Trump. Mr Albanese will land in Canada on Sunday, local time, for bilateral talks after being invited to the G7 summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Both leaders have had to reckon with the impact of the US president's threatened tariffs on their economies. But Mr Carney could provide insight for the Australian's first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump. Despite vowing to fight back against the tariffs, the Canadian prime minister's meetings with the US president have been well received by both parties and raised hopes for a fresh trade deal between the two North American nations. Mr Albanese's meeting with the Republican president is scheduled for Tuesday on the sidelines of the summit. The prime minister has taken a less adversarial stance to Mr Trump's approach than his Canadian peer, preferring to highlight Australia's long history with the US. "The combination of Australia and the United States when we're working together is an unbeatable combination," he told business leaders in Seattle on Saturday. Australian imports into the US face 10 per cent tariffs and - like all trading partners except the UK - 50 per cent tariffs on aluminium and steel. The Labor government is considering using US beef imports and critical minerals as potential bargaining chips as it "engages constructively" with American officials. Australians' sense of safety and economic optimism have already plunged, according to the annual Lowy Institute Poll, amid the talk of tariffs, as well as growing conflicts and global disorder. Their trust in the US has fallen to the lowest level in the history of the decades-long poll, with two-in-three respondents holding little to no trust in the traditional Australian ally. "Australians are clearly unsettled by what they've seen of the second Trump administration," Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove said. Mr Albanese previously met the Canadian prime minister on the margins of the Papal inauguration, but this will be their first formal bilateral discussion. They are also expected to discuss defence, critical minerals, climate change and the escalating situation in the Middle East.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store