Letby inquiry will not be halted after requests from hospital executives
The public inquiry into Lucy Letby's crimes will not be halted, its chairwoman has ruled, despite requests from hospital executives to do so.
On Wednesday, Lady Justice Thirlwall refused the application from the senior hospital managers to pause the inquiry, pending the outcome of Letby's latest challenge to her multiple convictions for murder and attempted murder.
Since September, the Thirlwall Inquiry has been examining how the former neonatal nurse was able to murder or attack 14 babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
Evidence was completed last month and the final report is due to be published in November.
In closing submissions on Tuesday, Kate Blackwell QC, representing former chief executive Tony Chambers, former medical director Ian Harvey, former director of nursing Alison Kelly and former HR director Sue Hodkinson, said there was a "real possibility" that Letby 's convictions may be overturned, and to continue the report work would be unfair to her clients.
The former senior managers have also made a parallel request to the health secretary, Wes Streeting, to suspend the inquiry on similar grounds.
Richard Baker KC, representing the families of Letby's victims, said the applications to stop the inquiry were motivated by a desire from the UK's most prolific child serial killer to "attempt to control the narrative" and for the executives "to avoid criticism".
Letby's latest legal challenge to her multiple convictions is based on recent medical evidence presented by an international panel of neonatologists and paediatric specialists, working pro bono for Letby's defence team, which found that bad medical care and natural causes were the reasons for the collapses and deaths attributed to the 35-year-old nurse.
Those findings will be passed to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, and Letby's legal team hopes her case will eventually be referred back to the Court of Appeal after two failed bids.
Sitting at Liverpool Town Hall, Lady Justice Thirlwall said: "I'm not satisfied that there is any unfairness in the current situation. I am satisfied that the process has been fair.
"As I have said before, it is not the actions of Lucy Letby that I am scrutinising, it is the actions of all those who were in the hospital... and what they did at the time, in the light of what they knew at the time and in the light of what they should have known at the time."
She continued: "There are already large numbers of concessions about what was not done and what should have been done. Those significant concessions come from the organisations and the hospital including the doctors and the managers.
"Perhaps principle, and most obvious, among the concessions made by just about everyone is the acknowledgement that there was a total failure of safeguarding at every level, and that will not change.
"It is a matter which has been debated at some length in the course of the inquiry and one that it seems to me will inevitably feature in any report."
Letby, 35, from Hereford, is serving 15 whole-life orders after she was convicted across two trials at Manchester Crown Court of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others, with two attempts on one of her victims, between June 2015 and June 2016.
Letby's barrister Mark McDonald said today's decision was "a great shame".
"Sadly, despite the millions of pounds that have been spent, any report and recommendations will one day be seen as unreliable and redundant.
"I will continue to represent Ms Letby without fear or favour and ensure the many flaws in the case are put before the Court of Appeal. If the numerous experts who have come forward are right, a young innocent woman is in prison for crimes she has not committed."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
'I believe my son is innocent, is our 17-year nightmare finally over?'
The mum of a serial killer nurse says she hopes her '17-year nightmare' is finally ending after an appeal into her son's murder conviction drew to a close on Friday. Glaswegian Colin Campbell – formerly known as Colin Norris – was convicted in 2008 of murdering four women, and attempting to murder another, by injecting them with insulin at a hospital in Leeds, West Yorkshire. But the Court of Appeal has heard that new expert knowledge may mean the former nurse's conviction is unsafe. June Morrison, Colin's mum, told STV News that she has always believed in her son's innocence. 'We have never believed that he is guilty of any of this,' she said. 'We have always believed these women were not murdered. There were other things going on with their health. They had a lot of underlying conditions. 'Whatever decision is made about Colin, it affects the whole of our family. It affects the rest of our lives. If it does not go the way we want it to, we are going to have to start thinking about another campaign because we cannot just stop there. STV News June Morrison. 'We need to keep fighting. I think we can appeal against this appeal, but again, you have got to go through the process of having new evidence or new arguments. 'I have not been able to sleep because of the stress. I am not eating properly. He is on my mind constantly. When I do sleep, I wake up thinking about Colin.' Norris was convicted of killing Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and 86-year-old Ethel Hall at Leeds General Infirmary and the city's St James' Hospital in 2002. He was also found guilty of attempting to murder 90-year-old Vera Wilby. All the women were elderly inpatients in 2002 on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked and each developed severe, unexplained hypoglycemia. STV News (Left to right) Ethel Hall, Bridget Bourke, Irene Crookes and Doris Ludlam. Campbell was alleged to have been present when or shortly before each of the patients suffered hypoglycemia and, because of the rarity of such a cluster of cases happening within a short space of time, prosecutors said the nurse must have been responsible. A total of 20 experts gave evidence during a five-month trial at Newcastle Crown Court after which Campbell was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 30 years. The judges – Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken – will now retire to consider their verdict on whether the evidence that led to Colin's conviction was unsafe. June said: 'It still doesn't feel as if it's real. It is a scary time. We are hopeful as well, but it has been quite frightening at times. You are left feeling is this finally it? 'Is this nightmare that we have been going through for over 17 years finally ending? It has been going on for longer than that, but Colin has been in prison for 17 years. Norris has been serving life imprisonment at HMP Frankland in County Durham since an investigation concluded that the women in his care developed unexplained severe hypoglycaemia while in hospital. 'A lot of these families, they believed that their loved ones died naturally and then they were told there was a nurse that had murdered them,' said June. 'Me as a mother, I know my son is not capable of anything at that. It breaks my heart to think of these families and what they are going through. 'There are no winners. Because at the end of the day, if and when my son gets released, they are going to have to go through the process again of if my mother wasn't murdered, what are they to believe? I can't think for other families but for myself, no one wins.' 'I do think nurses need better protection in court. Some kind of expert that can represent them at a court because they don't have anything at the moment. 'They do have professional bodies but practicing nurses on wards need something more to help, to ensure that no other nurse or family has to go through this again.' While the court was off, June went down to Durham to see Colin in prison. 'I think he is just taking things day by day and hoping,' she said. 'What is it they say? Prepare for the worst and hope for the best. This is what we're hoping for. STV News 'I know the trial and a hearing are totally different, but being down in London, sitting on the court benches, it brings it all back. Colin is not there. He is on a TV screen so it is just a small picture that I can see. 'During the trial, I couldn't see Colin either because there was a screen between us. If I looked up, I could just see him. When you hear from the prosecution experts and they start saying 'my opinion is', it does take you right back. 'I have allowed myself to have thoughts of 'when he gets out, what we could do?' That is all a challenge. I have also had thoughts of 'what if he doesn't get out?' How do we start campaigning again? Who do we get on board? What happens with the legal team? 'All that goes through your mind, but at the moment I just get through the day. Coming into this, as a family, we had never been in trouble with the police. 'We never had any dealings with courts or anything like that, so it was hard to accept this was what was going to be happening for the next few years.' On the final day of Campbell's appeal in London on Friday, judges heard closing submissions from barristers representing the Crown Prosecution Service, who are opposing the appeal. In written submissions, James Curtis KC said the jury in Campbell's trial had the 'exceptional assistance of a meticulous, systematic and detailed summing up' from the judge. He added: 'They were provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses. 'The judge carefully summarised and explained these, and accurately directed the jury as to how to approach them.' Michael Mansfield KC told the court on Thursday that Campbell's appeal is a 'straightforward case', and that judges 'must conclude that these convictions are unsafe'. Campbell has denied any wrongdoing and says he did nothing to cause hypoglycemia in any of the patients. He unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 2011. His appeal was heard after a review from the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) said new evidence created a 'real possibility' his conviction was unsafe. The CCRC referred his conviction to the Court of Appeal on the basis of new medical evidence in February 2021. It was agreed the new evidence could prove that natural causes may account for the hypoglycaemia in the four patients other than Mrs Hall. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Court of Appeal should uphold nurse's convictions, judges told
The Court of Appeal should uphold the convictions of a nurse who was jailed for the murders of four elderly patients, lawyers for the Crown Prosecution Service have told the court. Colin Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women and attempting to kill a fifth by injecting them with insulin. Doris Ludlam, Bridget Bourke, Irene Crookes, and Ethel Hall, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 before they developed severe, unexplained hypoglycaemia and died. Prosecutors relied on a 'wholly circumstantial' case, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) said after referring the case to the Court of Appeal in London four years ago. Campbell denied any wrongdoing and said he did nothing to cause hypoglycaemia in any of the patients. He unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the CCRC in 2011. On the final day of Campbell's appeal in London on Friday, judges heard closing submissions from barristers representing the Crown Prosecution Service, who are opposing the appeal. In written submissions, James Curtis KC said the jury in Campbell's trial had the 'exceptional assistance of a meticulous, systematic and detailed summing up' from the judge. He added: 'They were provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses. 'The judge carefully summarised and explained these, and accurately directed the jury as to how to approach them.' Michael Mansfield KC told the court on Thursday that Campbell's appeal is a 'straightforward case', and that judges 'must conclude that these convictions are unsafe'. The appeal before Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken is due to conclude later on Friday.
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Drug dealer who caused Newcastle house blast which killed two people to have sentence reviewed
A drug dealer who caused an explosion which killed two people in Newcastle is to have his sentence reviewed. Reece Galbraith caused the blast at Violet Close in Benwell in the early hours of 16 October 2024 while making cannabis gummy sweets. He and his friend Jason 'Jay' Laws were using a Newcastle flat as a drugs lab when the explosion ripped through the building, killing both laws and seven-year-old Archie York who was sleeping in the flat above. Galbraith, of Rectory Road in Gateshead, pleaded guilty to two counts of manslaughter as well as possessing and supplying cannabis. The Attorney General's Office has confirmed that a request has been received to review Galbraith's sentence under the Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) scheme, adding that a decision will be made "in due course." What is the Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme? Under the scheme, anyone - including those not involved in the case - can ask for a sentence to be reviewed. The Law Officers will then have 28 days to consider the sentence and refer it to the Court of Appeal if they agree it was unduly lenient. In this scenario, the Court of Appeal will make a final decision on whether a sentence should be increased. The blast at Violet Close destroyed six of the 12 flats in the block. It was followed by a 'fierce fire' that caused such extensive damage to the whole block that it has since been demolished. Police investigating the explosion discovered that the flat operated by Galbraith and Laws was used as a 'drugs lab' to produce cannabis concentrates, known as "shatter" or "butane honey oil," in a highly dangerous process. Galbraith suffered extensive burns and was placed in an induced coma following the blast. Bodyworn from Northumbria Police shows the moment Reece Galbraith is arrested Jailing Galbraith, the judge, Mr Justice Cotter, said: "Archie York was just a seven-year-old with a wonderful and exciting life ahead of him. "His parents have so movingly explained, their world was shattered on October 16 when their flat was blown apart and they woke up buried under the rubble, dazed, bleeding and terrified to realise their precious son had been lost." He went on to say: "Violet Close was a close-knit, multi-racial community with many families that was literally blown apart as a result of your illegal activities in their midst, regardless of the clear risks to others."
