Pritzker backs Stratton in Senate race - could it narrow the field?
The Brief
Gov. J.B. Pritzker quickly endorsed Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton for U.S. Senate, making her the first official candidate for the 2026 race.
Pritzker's early support and financial backing have raised concerns about whether it will discourage other potential candidates from entering the race.
Illinois Treasurer Mike Frerichs and other possible candidates, including Congressmembers Raja Krishnamoorthi, Robin Kelly, and Lauren Underwood, are still considering a run despite Pritzker's endorsement.
CHICAGO - The lone candidate to officially declare a run for senate to replace Sen. Dick Durbin already has the backing of the state's top Democrat.
Could it radically alter the large field of candidates expected to run for this seat?
What we know
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker already has his candidate in the 2026 Senate race, a mere 48 hours after Durbin announced he won't run again. On Friday, he said he will do what it takes to make Juliana Stratton the next U.S. Senator from Illinois.
"Today, it's my honor to introduce your next United States senator, Juliana Stratton," Pritzker said.
Pritzker wasted no time throwing his support and potential big money behind his number two - Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton - before anyone else has even declared their candidacy.
"He's a fierce fighter for all of the things we care about so much, and I'm honored to have his endorsement," Stratton said.
Later, Pritzker attended a ribbon cutting for the Urban Growers Collective in the Auburn-Gresham neighborhood. He doubled down on his support for Stratton despite questions that it might appear to be a coronation and scare off candidates from competing in an open primary.
"She is the most dynamic candidate to run for United States Senate and I expect that she will win," Pritzker said.
What we don't know
It remains unclear whether other potential candidates will still enter the race.
Illinois Treasurer Mike Frerichs has also been considering a run, and said Pritzker's endorsement - and potential big money donations - won't sway his decision.
"I think the ultimate endorsements that will make the difference will be the voters," Frerichs said. "I'll be having discussions with my family over the next week or so as well," he said.
Other candidates who are mulling a bid include congressmen Raja Krishnamoorthi, Robin Kelly, and Lauren Underwood.
What's next
The primary is just 10 months away.
The Source
Details for this story were provided by Fox 32 political editor Paris Schutz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How Stablecoins Can Be Destabilizing
Stablecoins' going mainstream wouldn't take all of banks' deposits away. Just some of the better ones. The Senate looks set to soon pass the so-called Genius Act, which will set guidelines for issuers of stablecoins—digital tokens that are fully backed by fiat currencies such as dollars. One big debate over the wisdom of giving stablecoins a regulatory framework centers around how they would affect the current banking system if they were to hugely expand in size.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey discuss President Trump's "big beautiful bill", proposed tax and spending cuts
As the Republican majority in the U.S. Senate considers making changes to President Trump's "big, beautiful bill", Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas vowed, "We're going to get this done. We will get the one big, beautiful bill passed, and the reason we're going to is because we have to." Cruz made his comments to CBS News Texas Thursday during an interview for Eye On Politics. When asked what changes he would like to see made to the version of the bill passed by the U.S. House last month, Cruz said, "I'd like to see us cut more spending. I'll tell you one idea that I've been urging my colleagues to do, and an idea I urged the President in the Oval Office last week to do is to end the Federal Reserve's practice of paying interest rates on bank reserves. For most of the history of the Fed from 1913 until 2008, the Fed did not pay interest on reserves. Then it started paying interest on reserves fairly recently in 2008." A report by the Federal Reserve at the time said, "This policy gave banks an incentive to hold onto their reserves rather than lending them out, thus mitigating the need for the Federal Reserve to offset its expanded lending with reductions in other assets." But Cruz said it's too costly to taxpayers. "In the last couple of years of the Biden administration, that expenditure skyrocketed, and it's spending now over $150 billion. That is your and my taxpayer money that is going straight to big banks. Ending that practice, that one change alone, would save $1.1 trillion over the next ten years." Cruz said the U.S. could save another $2 trillion over a decade by cutting more federal spending. "For example, removing illegal aliens from federal government welfare benefits that saves hundreds of billions of dollars. Another is expanding work requirements to receive federal benefits. I think work requirements are incredibly helpful and beneficial for young, healthy people." He also said the Senate's version of the bill will include his legislation for no tax on tips, a federal tax credit that provides incentives for school choice programs, and a what's called Invest America, which provides $1,000 to newborn children that can be invested for them. Parents, family members, and employers can also give up to $5,000 a year in a tax advantage account. "By the time he or she turns 18, they'll have $170,000 in that account, and if they keep contributing $5,000 a year, by the time that child turns 35, he or she will have $700,000 in that account." House and Senate Republicans favor extending and making permanent the income tax cuts approved in 2017 during President Trump's first term. When asked about the Congressional Budget Office's projections that the "big, beautiful bill will add $2.4 trillion to the debt if passed as is, Cruz rejected it. "Historically, CBO has been wrong in its scoring. Over and over and over again, they underestimate the economic growth from tax cuts. But what I'll say secondly, is I agree. We need to cut more spending." All Democrats in the U.S. House, including Representative Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, voted against the "big, beautiful bill." When asked what he favors, Veasey told CBS News Texas, "I probably would include a much smaller tax cut. I certainly believe that when we have an opportunity to cut taxes that we should. I'm not one of these people that think that we ought to be sending out extra punishment just because someone's been successful. That's not what I'm all about. I think that entrepreneurism and people that are wealthy in this country have created a lot of jobs. I just think that people need to pay their fair share. Kicking people off of health care services so Elon (Musk) can have a tax break is not what I'm all about." The national debt has grown to nearly $37 trillion and asked whether spending cuts are necessary, Veasey said, "Spending absolutely has to be cut, but it needs to be done responsibly." The CBO also projected that under the bill passed by House Republicans last month, 7.8 million people will lose their medicaid coverage by 2034. Veasey said, "I'm not surprised. It's going to be detrimental, particularly to a state like Texas, where you hae such a high percentge of residents that really do rely on medicaid services. You're going to see mortality rates rise and you're going to see a lot of people that voted for Trump, they are literally going to see their health care coverage ripped right from up under them." Republicans in the House and Senate have said the spending on Medicaid has grown unsustainably, and that they want to preserve it for the people who it was originally designed for: pregnant women, the poor, and the disabled. Republicans favor strict work requirements. But Veasey discounted that. "There are a lot of nuances in that, that I don't think the Republicans are explaining to people on purpose. Someone that's pregnant would need to verify, probably more than once during the pregnancy that they're actually pregnant. That's the sort of thing that is going to end up through attrition kicking people off the rolls. What it's going to do is exacerbate poor health care outcomes because people won't go to the doctor anymore because they won't have a practitioner. They'll go and get all of their needs through the emergency room." Senate Republicans hope to pass the "big, beautiful bill" by July 4th. It will then go back to the House for consideration.
The Intercept
2 hours ago
- The Intercept
Democrat Michigan AG Asked FBI to Raid Protesters' Homes — But Won't Tell Students Why
On the morning of April 23, around 7 a.m., the FBI, along with other local and state police, battered down the doors of four residences across Ann Arbor, Canton, and Ypsilanti, Michigan. The homes belonged to pro-Palestine student organizers at University of Michigan. The raids were the latest move by the University of Michigan and the state against student organizers following the protest encampments last spring. The school has seen particularly harsh repression of campus protests against Israel's war on Gaza. While no arrests were made, all electronics were seized into FBI custody and at least two DNA samples were collected, according to local attorneys representing the subjects of the raids. The warrants were from Attorney General Dana Nessel's office and signed by a judge in the 45th District Court in the small town of Oak Point, Michigan, but attorneys also say they have yet to see probable cause for the search and seizures. Nessel, a Democrat, still has not unsealed and shared the affidavits for the warrants with lawyers or the residents they raided. 'These raids were very much seen as an escalation by the state attorney general.' 'These raids were very much seen as an escalation by the state attorney general, who's expressed quite a bit of an extreme reaction against the students' activism on the University of Michigan campus,' said John Philo, executive and legal director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, the group representing the targets of the raids. 'In terms of probable cause for the warrants, it's entirely unknown at the moment. The search warrants were issued based on a complaint and the judge has ordered for the affidavit to be suppressed. It's a terribly unusual thing.' Nessel, who asked the FBI to carry out the raids, has positioned herself publicly as one of President Donald Trump's biggest opponents. She also has extensive personal, political, and financial ties to the University of Michigan, which bypassed local prosecutors by enlisting Nessel to crack down on pro-Palestine protesters. According to Philo and Liz Jacob, also of the Sugar Law Center, the FBI presented warrants in Ann Arbor and Canton before entering the premises, but refused to show any at the Ypsilanti residence. 'Folks were shocked, especially to see that the FBI was executing an attorney general warrant,' Jacob told The Intercept in an interview. 'I've never seen that in my experience, and we have not seen that in Michigan around pro-Palestine protests or on any other protests, to my knowledge.' Following the raids, officials denied any connection to the students' political protest, claiming the FBI was becoming involved in a 'vandalism investigation.' In its official press release following the raids, Nessel's office claimed the 12 'coordinated' vandalism incidents that occurred across the state — including graffiti that read 'Free Palestine' — totaled to damages of $100,000. Student organizers have cast doubt on Nessel's denial that the raids were not related to their pro-Palestine protest. 'This is about the occupation and the genocide of Palestinians, and the fact that the state does not care about Americans in any way,' said Ira, a Muslim organizer with TAHRIR, a coalition that advocates against the University of Michigan's complicity in the genocide against Palestinians, who asked to use only their first name for fear of retaliation from the school. 'It's not just about us being targeted right now. All of these people — not just the Trump administration, but these Democrats — who are claiming to fight for Americans are the ones who are attacking and repressing us.' Last October, Nessel filed felony criminal trespass charges against seven student protesters who were arrested last May at a University of Michigan encampment. Those charges were dropped in May, just before a judge was to decide whether or not to disqualify Nessel over alleged bias. Nessel cited 'legal delays and controversies surrounding the case' as to why she dropped the charges. Local organizers, however, fear that the FBI raids are only a stepping stone to something bigger — and that the dropping of the charges is only a temporary relief. Affidavits are typically sealed in cases when there is a confidential informant working with law enforcement who could be compromised. Philo said this would be difficult to understand in this case, especially considering that none of the students raided have any prior criminal activity or pending criminal charges or accusations against them. For what has been alleged, the warrants appeared to be an extreme measure for a vandalism investigation, according to both Sugar Law Center and student organizers who spoke with The Intercept. 'The scope and scale of what is alleged does not seem to warrant three law enforcement agencies descending on the homes of students, who by all calculations and known facts, have been accused of a crime in the past,' said Philo, who describes his clients as 'pretty diligent and responsible students.' The attorney general's raid executed a 'shotgun approach' to further chill protest in solidarity with Palestine, he said. 'To do this in that context with the FBI, state troopers, and local law enforcement,' he said, 'sends a clear message that this is well beyond trying to determine who committed spray painting incidents.' Read our complete coverage While it may be considered unusual for the FBI to become involved in a vandalism investigation, it is not uncommon for the FBI to join forces with local and state law enforcement agencies to work in a joint terrorism task force context, said Mike German, who worked as a special agent in the FBI for six years and is now a fellow at the Brennan Center's liberty and national security program. 'In that context, it's not uncommon for a situation — where a person is alleged to have violated some state law — for them to use the state authorities to pursue that angle of investigation while also gathering evidence for a future terrorism investigation,' he explains. While German does not have any specific information about the Michigan cases, he says this does follow a pattern aligned with the government's increased surveillance of citizens coupled with the FBI's lax approach to far-right violence. He added that the raids in Michigan appear to be part of a broader escalation and expansion of power of the FBI since the September 11 attacks, particularly with the passing of more and more domestic terrorism statutes at federal and state levels. Just having increased powers, German said, created a motivation for using them. 'It has created an insatiable appetite for information,' he said. 'Anywhere that they can get data and information to put into their databases, they'll take those opportunities.'
