MN government return to office order kicks in as shutdown layoffs loom
Gov. Tim Walz's order for state employees to return to the office at least half-time went into effect this week as Minnesota government workers started receiving warnings of potential layoffs if the Legislature fails to pass a budget by the end of June.
Parking lots around the state Capitol complex appeared slightly fuller than usual Monday as the requirement kicked in for the main offices of some agencies based in St. Paul, though many agencies won't have to return to the office more until later this summer.
John Wilson, an economist with the state Department of Transportation, said he had already been working at the office most days, but his office has gotten much busier.
Work hasn't changed much for Wilson for now. But the prospect of temporary layoffs next month looms over his head. He's worked for MnDOT for 15 years and remembers the 20-day government shutdown in 2011, when the GOP-controlled Legislature and Democratic-Farmer-Labor Gov. Mark Dayton couldn't reach an agreement on the budget.
'Everybody says, well, you know, there's no sign it will come to that, but I remember it felt like that last time,' Wilson said. ' I certainly wouldn't place my bets now.'
The Department of Transportation is one of many state agencies that will run out of funding after June 30. It's been two weeks since state lawmakers ended the regular legislative session without passing all of a roughly $66 billion two-year budget. Areas that make up two-thirds of the budget — Health, Human Services and K-12 Education don't have new funding yet either. However, corrections and public safety budget bills have been passed.
Legislative leaders from the DFL majority Senate and the House tied between the DFL and Republicans say a final budget is close and could pass in a special session by the end of the week. Most conversations have been happening in private meetings, though lawmakers have provided signed agreements for big spending areas like education and health.
It comes after several delays. When the regular session ended on May 20, House DFL Leader Melissa Hortman said she hoped to get a budget done before layoff notices went out. But the process has already started.
Minnesota has already told 700 employees that they could be temporarily out of a job a month from now if the Legislature doesn't pass a new two-year budget, according to Patrick Hogan, a spokesman with Minnesota Management and Budget. The first group to get notices was represented by the Minnesota Nurses Association, and more could follow.
If there isn't any action by June 9, thousands more will receive messages, according to MMB.
The Minnesota Association of Professional Employees, which represents around 18,000 state employees, opposes the return to office order and is holding informational rallies at the Capitol on Tuesday and Wednesday this week as it continues to negotiate a new contract with the state.
MAPE, which has said a strike is not off the table over the return to work order, also called on state leaders to overcome 'political gridlock' and pass a budget amid continued uncertainty about funding at the federal level as well.
'These notices may be conditional, but the harm is real. Workers will have to prepare for lost income, disrupted lives and a government shutdown that would impact every Minnesotan who relies on public services,' union president Megan Dayton said in a recent statement. 'We hoped our elected officials in Minnesota would serve as a barrier to the dysfunction and chaos coming out of Washington.'
MAPE has said it's concerned about disruptions to families who have adjusted to flexible schedules and caring for children at home. They're also concerned about whether there will be enough office space after years of remote work. Agencies, including the Department of Human Services, Health and Revenue, have gotten exemptions to the June 1 return date.
This spring, Walz ordered government workers to report to the office at least 50% of the time if they live within 50 miles of their workplace in a move that state employee unions claimed caught them by surprise. Originally, the range was 75 miles, but the governor reduced the distance in April.
Around 60% of state employees already worked in person and did so throughout the pandemic, according to the governor's office. The state has about 50,000 employees.
The governor has said his order aims to boost 'collaboration' and help state agencies build better organizational cultures. The move is also supported by businesses in downtown St. Paul, who say they've struggled from the post-pandemic shift in work styles.
It's yet to be seen just how much the return to office order will affect downtown, but St. Paul Downtown Alliance president Joe Spencer said businesses are excited to have more workers back.
'There are a lot of great things about working in downtown, especially in the summertime,' he said. 'So, hopefully, they find a welcome reception, and they indeed feel our enthusiasm to have them back in the office.'
Ramsey County: Economic Development Authority to allow flexibility on housing projects
Special session looms as Minnesota lawmakers narrow remaining budget obstacles
Letters: St. Paul should take care of what it has before spending on new things
Derrick Thompson's trial begins in deaths of 5 women
Letters: Stop with the antisemitism
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nancy Wilson says she felt pressured to ditch the acoustics as Heart went for the mainstream in 1985
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. After seven albums, Nancy Wilson and Heart knew they needed a significant reset. Their first album for Capitol Records, 1985's self-titled effort which went on to sell five million copies, saw the band embracing the label's wishes, working with outside songwriters, and furthering their transition into a mainstream rock act. But one request was off the menu, and it saw Wilson clash with producer Ron Nevison. Passionworks, which arrived two years earlier and marked the end of the Epic Records era, hinted of a transition the band would put into overdrive under Capitol's rule. But, by the mid-'80s, Nevison recognized that the band's employment of acoustic guitars – a clear tie to their folky origins – were old hat and would struggle to resonate with contemporary audiences. Wilson, though, was unmoving. 'I felt a little pressurized, as my first love was always acoustic guitar,' she says in the June issue of Guitar World. 'That was the element that I brought when I joined Ann's band, the idea of embracing electric and acoustic sounds, much like Led Zeppelin. 'I guess the acoustic guitar was a little out of step with the digital '80s,' she accepts. 'On the live stage, it didn't really matter, as so many of our big songs did require me to play acoustic.' In the quest for harmony, a middle ground was struck. Songs like the raucous, glam rock–tinted opener If Looks Could Kill (co-written by Jack Conrad and Bob Garrett) were balanced by more classic Wilson-esque compositions like What He Don't Know, where acoustic guitars are a prominent part of the ornamentation. The instrument's presence on their eighth album may have been somewhat diminished, but it remained an important ingredient. In retrospect, Wilson says she is glad the band made the trade-offs they did. 1985's Heart was a huge success and it provided a much-needed shot in the arm. 'I think we'd reached the end of the average lifespan for most rock bands by that point,' she admits. 'We decided that if we wanted to survive, we probably needed to find a new manager and record company and have some kind of major reset. If we wanted to fit in with the whole new MTV era, we had to adapt to survive. '[Heart] revitalized the band. It took us up to a whole other level of global success, so there's nothing I regret about what we did or where we compromised, she develops.' And while the band embraced elements of '80s music trends, she confesses she found that 'grunge was a much-needed break from the corporate '80s sound.' Wilson, meanwhile, has named her favorite new guitarist, a young hotshot who's winning legions of fans.
Chicago Tribune
8 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump tax bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's big bill making its way through Congress will cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but also increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO also estimates an increase of 10.9 million people without health insurance under the bill by 2034, including 1.4 million who are in the United States without legal status in state-funded programs. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, the budget office said. What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill'In the words of Elon Musk, this bill is a 'disgusting abomination,'' said Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, reviving the billionaire former Trump aide's criticism of the package. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he called Musk late Tuesday to discuss the criticism but had not heard back. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson told reporters. The analysis comes at a crucial moment in the legislative process as Trump is pushing Congress to have the final product on his desk to sign into law by the Fourth of July. The work of the CBO, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress, will be weighed by lawmakers and others seeking to understand the budgetary impacts of the sprawling 1,000-page-plus package. Ahead of the CBO's release, the White House and Republican leaders criticized the budget office in a preemptive campaign designed to sow doubt in its findings. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the CBO has been 'historically wrong,' and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the CBO was 'flat wrong' because it underestimated the potential revenue growth from Trump's first round of tax breaks in 2017. The CBO last year said receipts were $1.5 trillion, or 5.6% greater than predicted, in large part because of the 'burst of high inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. White House Budget Director Russ Vought said when you adjust for 'current policy' — which means not counting some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that are simply being extended for the next decade — the overall package actually doesn't pile onto the deficit. He argued the spending cuts alone in fact help reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion over the decade. Democrats and even some Republicans call that 'current policy' accounting move a gimmick, but it's the approach Senate Republicans intend to use during their consideration of the package to try to show it does not add to the nation's deficits. Vought argued that the CBO is the one using a 'gimmick' by tallying the costs of continuing those tax breaks that would otherwise expire. Leavitt also suggested that the CBO's employees are biased, even though certain budget office workers face strict ethical rules — including restrictions on campaign donations and political activity — to ensure objectivity and impartiality. 'When it comes time to make prognostications on economic growth, they've always been wrong,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at a press conference. Asked if it's time to get rid of the CBO, Scalise did not dismiss the idea, saying it's valid to raise concerns. Alongside the costs of the bill, the CBO had previously estimated that nearly 4 million fewer people would have food stamps each month due to the legislation's proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The bill, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act after the president's own catch phrase, is grinding its way through Congress, as the top priority of Republicans, who control both the House and the Senate — and face stiff opposition from Democrats, who call it Trump's 'big, ugly bill.' All told, the package seeks to extend the individual income tax breaks that had been approved in 2017 but that will expire in December if Congress fails to act, while adding new ones, including no taxes on tips. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To help cover the lost revenue, Republicans want to slash some federal spending. They propose phasing out green energy tax breaks put in place during Democrat Joe Biden's presidency. New work requirements for some adults up to age 65 on Medicaid and SNAP would begin in December 2026 and are expected to result in less spending on those programs. Republicans argue their proposals are intended to make Medicaid and other programs stronger by rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. They want the federal funding to go those who most need health care and other services, often citing women and children. But Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said those claims are bogus and are simply part of long-running GOP efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as most states have expanded Medicaid to serve more people under the program. 'They just want to strangle health care,' Schumer said. The package also would provide a $4 trillion increase to the nation's debt limit, which is now $36 trillion, to allow more borrowing. The Treasury Department projects the debt limit will need to be raised this summer to pay the nation's already accrued bills. Now in its 50th year, the CBO was established by law after Congress sought to assert its control, as outlined in the Constitution, over the budget process, in part by setting up the new office as an alternative to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Staffed by some 275 economists, analysts and other employees, the CBO says it seeks to provide Congress with objective, impartial information about budgetary and economic issues. Its current director, Phillip Swagel, a former Treasury official in Republican President George W. Bush's administration, was reappointed to a four-year term in 2023.
Chicago Tribune
8 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over President Donald Trump's tax bill
WASHINGTON — A small government office with some 275 employees has found itself caught in the political crossfire as Congress debates President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill.' The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the legislation would increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years. That's a problem for a Republican Congress that has spent much of the past four years criticizing former President Joe Biden and Democrats for the nation's rising debt levels. The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are taking issue with CBO's findings. They say economic growth will be higher than the office is projecting, resulting in more revenue coming into government coffers. Meanwhile, Democrats are touting CBO's findings as evidence of the bill's failings. President Donald Trump tax bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO saysHere's a look at the office at the center of Washington's latest political tug-of-war. Lawmakers established the Congressional Budget Office more than 50 years ago to provide objective, impartial analysis to support the budget process. The CBO is required to produce a cost estimate for nearly every bill approved by a House or Senate committee and will weigh in earlier when asked to do so by lawmakers. It also produces a report each Congress on how to reduce the debt if lawmakers so choose with each option including arguments for or against. Plus, it publishes detailed estimates when presidents make proposals that would affect mandator spending, which includes programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Lawmakers created the office to help Congress play a stronger role in budget matters, providing them with an alternative to the Office of Management and Budget, which is part of a Republican or Democratic administration, depending upon the president in office. CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias. Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is also prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress. The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. The stakes are incredibly high with Republicans looking to pass their massive tax cut and immigration bill by early July. Outside groups, Democrats and some Republicans are highlighting CBO's analysis that the bill will increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years and leave 10.9 million more people uninsured in 2034. Republicans spent much of Biden's presidency focused on curbing federal deficits. They don't want to be seen as contributing to the fiscal problem. GOP lawmakers say the CBO isn't giving enough credit to the economic growth the bill will create, to the point where it would be deficit-neutral in the long run, if not better. 'The CBO assumes long-term GDP growth of an anemic 1.8% and that is absurd,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'The American economy is going to boom like never before after the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' is passed.' Republicans began taking issue with the CBO even before Trump and the current Congress were sworn into office. 'CBO will always predict a dark future when Republicans propose tax relief – but the reality is never so dire,' Rep. Jason Smith, the Republican chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a December news release. Recently, House Speaker Mike Johnson has been taking digs at the office. 'The CBO is notorious for getting things WRONG,' he said in a Facebook post. In April 2018, CBO said that tax receipts would total $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024. Receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected. Republicans have seized on that discrepancy. But the numbers don't tell the whole story. Some of the criticism of the CBO ignores the context of a global pandemic as the federal government rushed to prop the economy up with massive spending bills under both Trump and Biden. In a blog post last December, Swagel pointed out three reasons for the higher revenues: The primary reason was the burst of inflation that began in March 2021 as the country was recovering from COVID. That burst of inflation, he said, led to about $900 billion more in revenue. There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those three factors.
