Political violence escalates in US as Minnesota lawmaker, husband killed
Minnesota, June 17 — From the pulpit on Sunday, Father Joe Whalen urged his parishioners to avoid the extreme partisanship and hatred that appeared to be behind the killing of Democratic Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman.
It was a message Whalen felt his congregation needed to hear, even at the Catholic church where Hortman once taught Sunday school, and in a state known for the political civility of a bygone era.
In his homily at the Church of St. Timothy, Whalen told his parish to adhere to the Christian message of peace and warned against responding to political discourse with unkindness or anger, especially when cloaked in anonymity online.
'We can choose all that by our words, by our thoughts, by our actions, or we can walk a different path, and we can invite the cycle of retribution,' Whalen said. 'We know what we need to do.'
Whalen spoke one day after a gunman killed Hortman and her husband — a crime Governor Tim Walz described as a 'politically motivated assassination' — and shot and wounded State Senator John Hoffman and his wife. The suspect, identified by police as 57-year-old Vance Boelter, remains at large.
The shootings mark the most sustained period of political violence in the US since the 1970s. Reuters has documented more than 300 politically motivated violent acts since supporters of President Donald Trump attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Last summer, Trump, a Republican, survived two assassination attempts during his election campaign. In April, an assailant set fire to the official residence of Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat.
Yet the shootings outside Minneapolis shocked many, arriving during days when protests over immigration roiled Los Angeles, a US senator was forcibly removed from a press conference, and a rare military parade rolled through Washington.
Not only did the shootings highlight the spread of political violence, but they also took place in a state perceived by many as a haven of civility and bipartisanship, a stereotype captured in the phrase 'Minnesota nice'.
While Minnesota leans blue in state-wide races, its legislature is evenly split between the parties, requiring compromise. Both Hortman and Hoffman were known for working across the aisle.
'Minnesota has a unique reputation, and I think it's somewhat merited. We have typically, at least politically, not been as excessive as other places,' said David Hann, former chairman of the state Republican Party. 'But I think that has changed.'
Compromise in politics
Several parishioners said the racial justice protests following George Floyd's 2020 murder, which included looting and violence, shattered any illusion of immunity from polarisation.
'The violence is here,' said Carolyn Breitbach, 81, after attending Sunday Mass. 'I think people are interested in their own agenda. They want to take things into their own hands and make things right.'
One of Hortman's last acts as a legislator was a compromise. She cast the lone Democratic vote for a bill cutting healthcare benefits for adult undocumented immigrants — a provision her party opposed — to secure a state budget deal. Hortman, the Minnesota House's top Democrat, teared up as she explained her vote.
Larry Kraft, a Democratic colleague, said he has seen rhetoric coarsen in recent years.
'How can it not? The discourse everywhere is becoming harsher and more partisan,' Kraft said. 'That said, I think we do a reasonable job in Minnesota of bridging that. We just did with the budget that we passed.'
The 2024 election further heightened tensions in Minnesota. Then-candidate Trump and his allies targeted Walz, Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate, over Minnesota's expansions of abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.
Harris won the state with 50.9 per cent of the vote to Trump's 46.7 per cent. However, Trump narrowed his margin of loss from 2020, signalling a shift to the right. The last Republican to win Minnesota was Richard Nixon in 1972.
Trump condemned the Minnesota shootings but told ABC News on Sunday he had not called Walz, criticising him as a 'terrible governor' who was 'grossly incompetent.'
Democratic state legislator Erin Koegel, a St. Timothy parishioner, accused Trump of fanning divisions.
'He's the one who is lighting a fire,' said Koegel, adding that she was disappointed her Republican colleagues in Minnesota were not 'stepping up to say that this isn't right.'
White House comments
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson accused Democrats of exploiting the 'senseless tragedy' to 'blame President Trump — a survivor of two assassination attempts — who is unifying the country and making America safe again.'
Koegel pointed to Hortman as a model politician, recalling how she tied committee leadership appointments to promises of civility.
'That was something she always preached,' Koegel said. 'Even with divisive issues for debate on the floor, she always reminded us not to be angry or mean. We need to debate civilly.' — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Survey: Surge in hate speech on Facebook, Instagram after Meta scraps US fact-checking and eases moderation
WASHINGTON, June 17 — Harmful content including hate speech has surged across Meta's platforms since the company ended third-party fact-checking in the United States and eased moderation policies, a survey showed yesterday. The survey of around 7,000 active users on Instagram, Facebook and Threads comes after the Palo Alto company ditched US fact-checkers in January and turned over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as 'Community Notes,' popularised by X. The decision was widely seen as an attempt to appease President Donald Trump's new administration, whose conservative support base has long complained that fact-checking on tech platforms was a way to curtail free speech and censor right-wing content. Meta also rolled back restrictions around topics such as gender and sexual identity. The tech giant's updated community guidelines said its platforms would permit users to accuse people of 'mental illness' or 'abnormality' based on their gender or sexual orientation. 'These policy shifts signified a dramatic reversal of content moderation standards the company had built over nearly a decade,' said the survey published by digital and human rights groups including UltraViolet, GLAAD, and All Out. 'Among our survey population of approximately 7,000 active users, we found stark evidence of increased harmful content, decreased freedom of expression, and increased self-censorship.' One in six respondents in the survey reported being the victim of some form of gender-based or sexual violence on Meta platforms, while 66 percent said they had witnessed harmful content such as hateful or violent material. Ninety-two percent of surveyed users said they were concerned about increasing harmful content and felt 'less protected from being exposed to or targeted by' such material on Meta's platforms. Seventy-seven percent of respondents described feeling 'less safe' expressing themselves freely. The company declined to comment on the survey. In its most recent quarterly report, published in May, Meta insisted that the changes in January had left a minimal impact. 'Following the changes announced in January we've cut enforcement mistakes in the US in half, while during that same time period the low prevalence of violating content on the platform remained largely unchanged for most problem areas,' the report said. But the groups behind the survey insisted that the report did not reflect users' experiences of targeted hate and harassment. 'Social media is not just a place we 'go' anymore. It's a place we live, work, and play. That's why it's more crucial than ever to ensure that all people can safely access these spaces and freely express themselves without fear of retribution,' Jenna Sherman, campaign director at UltraViolet, told AFP. 'But after helping to set a standard for content moderation online for nearly a decade, (chief executive) Mark Zuckerberg decided to move his company backwards, abandoning vulnerable users in the process. 'Facebook and Instagram already had an equity problem. Now, it's out of control,' Sherman added. The groups implored Meta to hire an independent third party to 'formally analyse changes in harmful content facilitated by the policy changes' made in January, and for the tech giant to swiftly reinstate the content moderation standards that were in place earlier. The International Fact-Checking Network has previously warned of devastating consequences if Meta broadens its policy shift related to fact-checkers beyond US borders to the company's programs covering more than 100 countries. AFP currently works in 26 languages with Meta's fact-checking program, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union. — AFP
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
US doctor who sold overpriced ketamine to Matthew Perry to plead guilty in overdose case
LOS ANGELES, June 17 — The main doctor charged in connection with the drug overdose of 'Friends' star Matthew Perry is expected to enter a guilty plea in the coming weeks, the US Justice Department said yesterday. Salvador Plasencia 'has agreed to plead guilty to four counts of distribution of ketamine, which carries a statutory maximum sentence of 40 years in federal prison,' the department said in a statement. The second doctor in the case, Mark Chavez, pleaded guilty last October to conspiring to distribute ketamine in the weeks before the actor was found dead in the hot tub of his Los Angeles home in 2023. Perry's lengthy struggles with substance addiction were well-documented, but his death at age 54 sent shockwaves through the global legions of 'Friends' fans. A criminal investigation was launched soon after an autopsy discovered he had high levels of ketamine — an anesthetic — in his system. Plasencia allegedly bought ketamine off Chavez and sold it to the American-Canadian actor at hugely inflated prices. 'I wonder how much this moron will pay,' Plasencia wrote in one text message presented by prosecutors. He went to Perry's home to administer ketamine by injection, according to a plea deal published Monday by the Justice Department. In total, Plasencia distributed 20 vials of ketamine over a roughly two-week period in autumn 2023, the document said. Perry had been taking ketamine as part of supervised therapy for depression. But prosecutors say that before his death he became addicted to the substance, which also has psychedelic properties and is a popular party drug. Dark struggle Five people have been charged over Perry's death. Jasveen Sangha, the alleged 'Ketamine Queen' who supplied drugs to high-end clients and celebrities, is charged with selling Perry the dose that killed him. She has pleaded not guilty. Perry's live-in personal assistant and another man pleaded guilty last August to charges of conspiracy to distribute ketamine. Comedic television series 'Friends,' which followed the lives of six New Yorkers navigating adulthood, dating and careers, drew a massive global following and made megastars of previously unknown actors. Perry's role as the sarcastic man-child Chandler brought him fabulous wealth, but hid a dark struggle with addiction to painkillers and alcohol. In 2018, he suffered a drug-related burst colon and underwent multiple surgeries. In his 2022 memoir 'Friends, Lovers and the Big Terrible Thing,' Perry described going through detox dozens of times. 'I have mostly been sober since 2001,' he wrote, 'save for about sixty or seventy little mishaps.' — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rise in ‘harmful content' since Meta policy rollbacks
Meta's move was seen as appeasing Trump's administration, which claims fact-checking censors free speech and targets conservative content. (Reuters pic) PALO ALTO : Harmful content including hate speech has surged across Meta's platforms since the company ended third-party fact-checking in the US and eased moderation policies, a survey showed Monday. The survey of around 7,000 active users on Instagram, Facebook and Threads comes after the Palo Alto company ditched US fact-checkers in January and turned over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as 'Community Notes,' popularised by X. The decision was widely seen as an attempt to appease President Donald Trump's new administration, whose conservative support base has long complained that fact-checking on tech platforms was a way to curtail free speech and censor right-wing content. Meta also rolled back restrictions around topics such as gender and sexual identity. The tech giant's updated community guidelines said its platforms would permit users to accuse people of 'mental illness' or 'abnormality' based on their gender or sexual orientation. 'These policy shifts signified a dramatic reversal of content moderation standards the company had built over nearly a decade,' said the survey published by digital and human rights groups including UltraViolet, GLAAD, and All Out. 'Among our survey population of approximately 7,000 active users, we found stark evidence of increased harmful content, decreased freedom of expression, and increased self-censorship.' One in six respondents in the survey reported being the victim of some form of gender-based or sexual violence on Meta platforms, while 66% said they had witnessed harmful content such as hateful or violent material. 92% of surveyed users said they were concerned about increasing harmful content and felt 'less protected from being exposed to or targeted by' such material on Meta's platforms. 77% of respondents described feeling 'less safe' expressing themselves freely. The company declined to comment on the survey. In its most recent quarterly report, published in May, Meta insisted that the changes in January had left a minimal impact. 'Following the changes announced in January we've cut enforcement mistakes in the US in half, while during that same time period the low prevalence of violating content on the platform remained largely unchanged for most problem areas,' the report said. But the groups behind the survey insisted that the report did not reflect users' experiences of targeted hate and harassment. 'Social media is not just a place we 'go' anymore. It's a place we live, work, and play. That's why it's more crucial than ever to ensure that all people can safely access these spaces and freely express themselves without fear of retribution,' Jenna Sherman, campaign director at UltraViolet, told AFP. 'But after helping to set a standard for content moderation online for nearly a decade, (chief executive) Mark Zuckerberg decided to move his company backwards, abandoning vulnerable users in the process. 'Facebook and Instagram already had an equity problem. Now, it's out of control,' Sherman added. The groups implored Meta to hire an independent third party to 'formally analyse changes in harmful content facilitated by the policy changes' made in January, and for the tech giant to swiftly reinstate the content moderation standards that were in place earlier. The International Fact-Checking Network has previously warned of devastating consequences if Meta broadens its policy shift related to fact-checkers beyond US borders to the company's programmes covering more than 100 countries. AFP currently works in 26 languages with Meta's fact-checking programme, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union.
