logo
R34 GT-R and Other JDM Imports Could Be Pricer Due to Trump's Tariffs

R34 GT-R and Other JDM Imports Could Be Pricer Due to Trump's Tariffs

Yahoo16-03-2025

The JDM car market is small, but it could be affected by potential U.S. tariffs.
Currently, Japanese market trucks are already subject to a 25 percent tariff, but ordinary passenger cars only get a 2.5 percent ding.
Those importing expensive collectibles such as the R34 Nissan GT-R could face tens of thousands in extra costs.
Last month, the leaders of Japan's auto industry met with the Japanese government to discuss concerns about impending economic damage. Those concerns were, of course, about the possibility of incoming U.S. tariffs that will affect cars and parts imported from Canada and Mexico and the likelihood of similar tariffs being placed on Japanese imports. Not on the docket for those automakers—and perhaps an unexpected fallout from the current trade situation—is that used JDM imports may also be impacted.
Japanese Domestic Market cars, the forbidden fruit that never officially made it to U.S. shores, are a drop in the bucket compared with the global auto trade. However, with the likes of the R34-chassis Nissan Skyline GT-R finally aging into importability under the 25-year Department of Transportation rules, we're at the stage where enthusiasts are going to be going after the last of the golden age of bubble-economy Japanese imports. Already, there are warehouses full of GT-Rs, lined up and just waiting for their build date to hit that 25-year mark.
R34 Skylines were never inexpensive, and they've only become more collectible and more expensive as U.S. eligibility grew closer. More than just appealing to JDM enthusiasts, the car's presence in the Fast and Furious movies and the Grand Turismo video games made the GT-R a household name. The special-edition versions are now easily six-figure cars, and slapping an extra 25 percent tariff on top of them is going to hurt.
Also an issue is a possible spike in shipping costs. Japanese manufacturers of new cars are looking to fill up their U.S. supply of foreign manufactured cars before the tariffs go into effect, and that means cargo ships are full. The JDM market is small potatoes compared with the regular market, and increased demand for shipping may price out importers. On the flip side of this, if tariffs end up reducing demand for Japanese-built new cars, JDM imports might become less expensive.
Currently, the tiny kei trucks you might see running around are already hit with a 25 percent tariff under the well-known 'chicken tax' legislation. Generally, these are inexpensive little trucks, so the added cost isn't a particular issue. Most JDM vehicles are currently hit with a 2.5 percent importation tax, and if this balloons, there'll be fewer potential bargains out there.
With a strong U.S. dollar versus a relatively weak Japanese yen, the JDM market has been pretty tempting of late. Things are further helped by a supply glut, as Japan stopped exporting used cars to Russia—a major market for its used cars—sometime around the start of the war in Ukraine.
If the U.S. market for JDM cars dries up, many of them will instead end up in Australia and New Zealand, both of which are already a paradise for JDM cars. In the meantime, if you were saving up for your favorite Japanese-only model that you'd raced so many times in Gran Turismo, it'd be a good idea to put a little extra aside.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House-Senate conference committee on budget formed
House-Senate conference committee on budget formed

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

House-Senate conference committee on budget formed

Legislative leaders have named the eight budget writers they want to resolve the seismic split between competing versions of a two-year spending plan that cleared each house of the New Hampshire Legislature. Senate President Sharon Carson and House Speaker Sherman Packard, both R-Londonderry, acted quickly in a sign that it could take some time for the two sides to find common ground. 'There are differences between the House and Senate-approved versions of the state budget. We look forward to working through them over the next two weeks and remain committed to delivering a balanced budget that protects New Hampshire taxpayers while serving all Granite Staters,' Packard and Carson said in a joint statement. As the first-named House member, Rep. Kenneth Weyler, R-Kingston, is likely to become chairman of the conference committee. Weyler chaired the House Finance Committee. The other four House members, who also serve on Weyler's committee, are Vice Chairman Dan McGuire, R-Kingston, House Deputy Majority Leader Joe Sweeney, R-Salem, Rep. Jose Cambrils, R-Loudon and Rep. Mary Jane Wallner, D-Concord and the ranking Democrat. Packard decided to name some alternates who had other experiences beyond writing the budget. The potential stand-ins are House Majority Leader Jason Osborne, R-Auburn, House Executive Departments and Administration Committee Vice Chairman Erica Layon, R-Derry, House Ways and Means Chairman John Janigian, R-Salem, Rep. Keith Erf, R-Weare, and Rep. Jess Edwards, R-Auburn. Erf and Edwards each co-chair subcommittees on the House Finance Committee. Carson names herself to commitee Carson chose to name herself as the first senator on the panel along with Senate Finance Chairman James Gray, R-Rochester, and Senate Deputy Democratic Leader Cindy Rosenwald of Nashua, the ranking Democratic Senate budget writer. The only Senate alternate is Majority Leader Regina Birdsell, R-Hampstead. Most House speakers don't get involved directly in state budget negotiations. It's not unusual for Senate presidents to get into the fray, however. Carson's predecessor, former Senate President Chuck Morse, took the gavel after serving as Senate finance chairman for many years. The House and Senate meet Thursday to complete the naming of all conference committees that will try and forge compromise on other bills. They have until June 19 to reach agreements and then the House and Senate have to vote on all of them by June 26. The $15.4 billion House-passed budget relied on conservative revenue estimates, which meant their budget writers had to make deep cuts in spending. The House plan would lay off 100 workers in the state prison system and do away with the Office of the Child Advocate, the state Division on the Arts, the Commission on Aging and the Housing Appeals Board. The Senate updated the predictions for revenue, which meant it could spend about $250 million more in state dollars than the House plan did. The Senate budget pared the layoffs down to about 25 in the Department of Corrections. It kept the child advocate office in the running while erasing four of nine jobs, revived support for the arts by proposing a new business tax credit for companies that donate to the program and restoring groups on aging and housing appeals, though with smaller budgets than the ones that Gov. Kelly Ayotte proposed last February. The Senate plan also increased by nearly $70 million the level of state aid to the University System of New Hampshire compared to the House budget. USNH would receive in the Senate proposal $85 million a year, about a 10% cut from its support in the current state budget that ends June 30. klandrigan@

The decade-old Suzuki that trumps EVs
The decade-old Suzuki that trumps EVs

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The decade-old Suzuki that trumps EVs

Despite record revenue and operating income in fiscal 2024-25, Suzuki Motor Corporation remains a cautious company. The latest results, with the main numbers equivalent to 35.4 and 3.9 billion euro, prove the wisdom of its always-keep-costs-as-low-as-possible strategy. The decade-old yet still competitive Vitara is but one example. Long lived and all the better for it Kaizen is all through this small SUV. There have been two facelifts, multiple engine changes and evolutions, new transmissions and, mercifully, an interior left mostly alone. The Vitara retains strong appeal thanks to great economy (low weight plus mild and series hybrid powertrains), fair pricing and no nagging electronics. Sure, the ADAS stuff is all there but it keeps quiet. And who wants to be asked five minutes after setting off: 'Time for a break?'. Or harangued constantly for daring to drive in sunglasses. I know people who are avoiding buying a new car due to this stuff. Press a button on either the tailgate, either front door or the ancient looking yet somehow appealing remote and the car unlocks. There is no 'welcome' sound and/or lights show, the driver's seat and steering wheel adjust manually, the door trim shifts slightly when you lower any window and there's a manual parking brake. No key, mind; firing up and shutting off are also done via a button-press. When will we see Suzuki EVs? Everything, including the steering, is the opposite of heavy in the Vitara. Which is very Suzuki. And one of the main reasons why the company has waited so long before creating EVs. And you can set a PR machine on this issue, as Renault Group has done with its fabulous new ad, yet here again is an inconvenient truth, batteries bring much mass (sorry to state one fact: the A390 prototype weighs 2,121 kilos). Plug-in Suzukis are coming but due to India being far and away the vehicles division's number one market (almost as vital as the USA is to Subaru), electric cars have not been a priority. Increasingly they will be. Maruti Suzuki (MSIL) is under constant attack from three main challengers. Recently Mahindra turned the tables on Hyundai and Tata by grabbing and holding on to second place in passenger car sales. Still the Indian-Japanese JV holds some 40 percent of the local market, down from more than half. Yet everything is changing in this now giant market. Gone are the days of outdated Maruti models, and here in Europe we too will increasingly benefit from MSIL's new-tech cars and SUVs. Even now, the Japanese market's Fronx and Jimny Nomade (five-door) are sourced from India. The e Vitara, Suzuki's first global EV, is coming our way too, as is the Urban Cruiser, a rebadged variant for Toyota Motor Europe. Four models for the UK Leveraging the well-known Vitara name could be a masterstroke for what is a small brand in the UK and the region we are part of. Suzuki may be a medium-sized OEM overall but it's only a minor one in Britain. And yet such is the reputation for value, reliability and longevity that resales tend to be strong. After a culling of certain models a while back, there are now only four models available here: Swift, S-Cross, Vitara and Across. The last of those costs almost fifty thousand pounds, a stunning amount for a Suzuki. All others start below thirty grand, or twenty in the Swift's case. Priced from GBP27,299, the cheapest Vitara is £750 less than the entry level S-Cross, with Motion and Ultra trim levels (as well as a production plant) in common. There is no higher model grade with the Hybrid, which means just one variant and pricing a little below the top-spec Mild Hybrid. See below for specifics of each. AGS solely for the Hybrid Facelift number two was announced last year, Suzuki GB terming this its 2025 range. That's also when the Motion and Ultra names were applied to this model. Strictly speaking there is no Vitara automatic. However, the Hybrid has only two pedals, its 'AGS' gearbox being an automated manual. Swapping cogs yourself is an increasingly rare thing in new cars. The shifting in this one is - that word again - light, and a delight. As Suzuki doesn't always give you this many ratios, worthy of mention is that there are six (in every Vitara, manual or AGS). Unusually, reverse is at bottom right and you must raise a collar to select it. What a pleasure and novelty choosing any gear is compared to so many awful auto-selectors. The day after this press tester went back, an XC90 arrived: its P-R-N-D is slow, vague and generally far inferior. As it has been for more than a decade. Why is such basic stuff so hard for some car makers? The tweaks for 2025 Changes for the 2025 Vitara are fairly minor, though at the front it's easy to notice the new headlights, differently shaped foglamps and DRL, plus what looks like a nudge-bar but isn't. The last of these is a small but highly effective visual change, it being merely some dark plastic below the grille. Other updates include specific alloy wheels for Motion and Ultra variants. Each are seventeen inches in diameter and for the top trim they have a chrome-look finish. Almost a convertible Gauges are analogue and all the better for being so, the eyeball-style vents remain a delight to use and the touchscreen is nicely sized at only nine inches in diameter. Plastics are all durable and certain things such as the steering wheel buttons have a satisfying feel to them, not being haptic. Overhead, and the press tester was in Ultra specification, is a metre-long glass roof. This is in fact two panels and they slide to reveal a vast space (well, 56 cm is vast for a car that's only 4.1 m long). It's a terrible shame that the light-coloured and too-thin sunblind is ineffective - a proper black-out one is needed. MHEV has more power than HEV The 48V MHEV which I had temporary custody of has more power than the HEV. With the mild hybrid, a 95 kW (129 PS) and 235 Nm 1.4-litre engine is boosted by a 10 kW (14 PS) and 53 Nm motor. Drive can be to the front or both axles. The stated WLTP average is 53.2 mpg (FWD). The AWD press vehicle returned 52.1 from a mix of city and motorway journeys. Choose the 140V Hybrid instead and you'll get Suzuki's K15C, a naturally aspirated 1.5, also with four cylinders. Outputs are 74 kW (101 PS) plus 24 kW (33 PS) and 60 Nm from the motor. Combined power for what is officially known as the 'Full Hybrid' is 85 kW (116 PS). The 0-62 mph time is 13.5 seconds, 4.0 more than the MHEV. How is it to drive? For a car that's so old the Vitara isn't at all bad to drive. Every mandated safety system is the opposite of intrusive, and sure, it rolls around if you push hard but why would you? Off-road, this has always been a highly capable 4x4 too, though less so as a 4x2. The wheelbase may be on the short side yet the ride is good and the suspension has long travel. If only the steering had better feel. And yet nobody could dislike this vehicle due to its rather wonderful almost timeless appeal. Conclusion Would I buy one? Definitely. For what you pay, there is a terrific amount of value, and compared to almost any EV, oodles of character. I hope Suzuki keeps the updates coming every few years and that production continues for another decade."The decade-old Suzuki that trumps EVs" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Sprung Structures Expands Presence in the Japanese Market
Sprung Structures Expands Presence in the Japanese Market

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sprung Structures Expands Presence in the Japanese Market

TOKYO, June 10, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Sprung Structures, a global leader in innovative building solutions, is proud to announce the expansion of its operations in Japan through a strategic alliance with WAM Co., Ltd., a multidisciplinary firm based in Tokyo. To better serve clients in Japan, Sprung has appointed WAM Co., Ltd., as its official manufacturing representative. WAM Co. offers full bilingual project support and collaborates with top architectural and design firms across the country, focusing on technology, environmental sustainability, and social innovation. Sprung's commitment to sustainability includes using 45 per cent recycled content in its buildings and fabric membranes that are 100 per cent recyclable. "We are excited to align with Sprung Structures to bring their cutting-edge, environmentally conscious buildings to the Japanese market," said Conan Morimoto, representative of WAM Co., Ltd. "Their adaptable, energy-efficient design and rapid deployment process make them uniquely suited to Japan's construction challenges." Sprung's tension membrane structures offer a faster, more cost-effective, and sustainable alternative to traditional Japanese construction. Its aluminum-framed buildings assemble quickly, require minimal foundations, and offer long-term durability backed by a 25-year warranty. "We're pleased to strengthen our presence in Japan at a time of rising costs of construction using traditional materials such as concrete and steel," said Philip Sprung, CEO of Sprung Structures. "Our energy-efficient, rapidly deployable structures meet the evolving needs of Japanese industries and municipalities looking for smart, scalable building solutions." Sprung structures in Japan are used for warehouses, sports facilities, and specialized remediation projects for Kobelco. Highly versatile, they are ideal for industries ranging from logistics and manufacturing to recreation and disaster relief. The buildings can also be installed over existing facilities—such as swimming pools—transforming them into modern, year-round recreational spaces. About Sprung Structures Founded by Philip Dorland Sprung in 1887, the company experimented with techniques and materials to create tough-canvas products for settlers, prospectors, and First Nations, used as tents, chuckwagon covers, and teepees. The Sprung product line has evolved today to withstand hurricane-strength winds and are engineered for extreme climates proven to withstand severe weather such as tropical storms, blizzards and sandstorms. They can be reconfigured, expanded, disassembled, and relocated, are built within weeks and with minimal foundation requirements. Sprung clients include NASA, Apple, Blue Origin, Boeing, Google, and the Government of Canada. Visit for more details Photo - View original content: SOURCE Sprung Structures Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store