Ahmedabad plane crash: Co-pilot Clive Kunder lodged 1,100 hours; atleast 1,500 needed to command commercial flight
MANGALURU: Clive Kunder, 34, the First Officer on board Air India flight AI-171 that crashed shortly after take-off in Ahmedabad, hailed from a family with deep ties to coastal Karnataka.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Kunder was assisting the aircraft's commander, Capt Sumeet Sabharwal, on the London-bound flight when the crash occurred.
He had logged around 1,100 hours of flying experience. Under Indian aviation regulations, pilots require 1,500 hours of flight time to qualify as commanders on commercial airliners.
Kunder's father, Clifford Kunder, originally from Malpe, had worked on offshore rigs, while his mother Rekha, from Mangaluru, was previously employed as cabin crew with Air India.
The couple are currently in Australia, visiting their daughter, an architect, and were scheduled to return to India by the end of July.
'Clive's parents are expected to return earlier than planned,' said Amrith Kunder, a distant relative of the family.
Based in Mumbai, Clive was known for his quiet devotion and was a regular at the Basel Mission Church in Kurla whenever he was in the city. He remained unmarried and completed his commercial pilot training in Florida before returning to India to pursue a career in aviation.
Actor Vikrant Massey, who is related to the family, expressed his grief on social media. 'It pains even more to know that my uncle, Clifford Kunder, lost his son,' he wrote on Instagram.
Clive Kunder was one of several crew members who lost their lives in the tragic crash, which killed over 200 people and is currently under investigation by civil aviation authorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pilots, experts grapple with Guj crash videos
1 2 3 Kolkata: Veteran pilots, who told TOI about the possibility of inadvertently switching off the second live engine in the Air India Dreamliner in the event of the stalling of the first engine during take-off, have identified another error that might have occurred in the cockpit during the critical take-off phase: the retraction of flaps that assist lift instead of the landing gear that causes drag. "After take-off, when instruments show positive climb rate, the monitoring pilot announces 'positive rate'. The flying pilot verifies and commands 'gear up' to retract landing gear. This sequence occurs seconds after lift-off, approximately 100 ft above ground, to reduce drag and enhance lift. The pilot might have mistakenly retracted the flaps, crucial for lift, instead of the gear," a seasoned pilot explained. The impact of such an error, if it occurred, will be confirmed only after experts analyse the Digital Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder. Video evidence of the 31-second flight shows the landing gear remaining deployed even as the aircraft exceeded 600 ft before descending and crashing on a populated area. But the footage quality prevents confirmation of flap positions. "Retracting flaps, while the landing gear remains down, reduce lift. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pinga-Pinga e HBP? Tome isso 1x ao dia se tem mais de 40 anos Portal Saúde do Homem Clique aqui Undo The aircraft, carrying fuel for a 10-hour journey, required maximum lift. The deployed landing gear at crash time suggests either pilot distraction during an emergency or an error," the pilot said. He noted that Ahmedabad's high temperature (around 40°C) created thin air, hampering lift and engine performance, reducing thrust during take-off and ascent. Though such errors should not occur with experienced crew members, like AI 171's (Capt Sumeet Sabharwal: 8,200 hours, First Officer Clive Kunder: 1,100 hours), a source pointed at the co-pilot's previous experience on Airbus A320 before Boeing Dreamliner training. "Different manufacturers have distinct cockpit configurations. Pilots should ideally progress within the same manufacturer's aircraft family. The co-pilot should have advanced to an A330, but pilot shortages may have prevented this," the source explained. Another pilot suggested an incident during the final take-off might have distracted the crew, leading to errors with insufficient reaction time. But an experienced aviator differed with the suggestion, pointing out that the Boeing Dreamliner's sophisticated flight control system incorporates multiple safety mechanisms. These include prevention of stalling through pitch-up restrictions, speed control via elevator and auto-throttle adjustments, automatic trimming for stability and safeguards against extreme banking angles and G-force loads. Pilots agree that regardless of mechanical or human factors, the event occurred when corrective action time was minimal. Additional altitude would have provided more response time, but the available 20 seconds proved insufficient. Kolkata: Veteran pilots, who told TOI about the possibility of inadvertently switching off the second live engine in the Air India Dreamliner in the event of the stalling of the first engine during take-off, have identified another error that might have occurred in the cockpit during the critical take-off phase: the retraction of flaps that assist lift instead of the landing gear that causes drag. "After take-off, when instruments show positive climb rate, the monitoring pilot announces 'positive rate'. The flying pilot verifies and commands 'gear up' to retract landing gear. This sequence occurs seconds after lift-off, approximately 100 ft above ground, to reduce drag and enhance lift. The pilot might have mistakenly retracted the flaps, crucial for lift, instead of the gear," a seasoned pilot explained. The impact of such an error, if it occurred, will be confirmed only after experts analyse the Digital Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder. Video evidence of the 31-second flight shows the landing gear remaining deployed even as the aircraft exceeded 600 ft before descending and crashing on a populated area. But the footage quality prevents confirmation of flap positions. "Retracting flaps, while the landing gear remains down, reduce lift. The aircraft, carrying fuel for a 10-hour journey, required maximum lift. The deployed landing gear at crash time suggests either pilot distraction during an emergency or an error," the pilot said. He noted that Ahmedabad's high temperature (around 40°C) created thin air, hampering lift and engine performance, reducing thrust during take-off and ascent. Though such errors should not occur with experienced crew members, like AI 171's (Capt Sumeet Sabharwal: 8,200 hours, First Officer Clive Kunder: 1,100 hours), a source pointed at the co-pilot's previous experience on Airbus A320 before Boeing Dreamliner training. "Different manufacturers have distinct cockpit configurations. Pilots should ideally progress within the same manufacturer's aircraft family. The co-pilot should have advanced to an A330, but pilot shortages may have prevented this," the source explained. Another pilot suggested an incident during the final take-off might have distracted the crew, leading to errors with insufficient reaction time. But an experienced aviator differed with the suggestion, pointing out that the Boeing Dreamliner's sophisticated flight control system incorporates multiple safety mechanisms. These include prevention of stalling through pitch-up restrictions, speed control via elevator and auto-throttle adjustments, automatic trimming for stability and safeguards against extreme banking angles and G-force loads. Pilots agree that regardless of mechanical or human factors, the event occurred when corrective action time was minimal. Additional altitude would have provided more response time, but the available 20 seconds proved insufficient. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Woman, postponed flight to meet pregnant daughters-in-law, killed in Air India crash
Yasmin Vohra, a 51-year-old woman from Vadodara, had postponed her flight to London from June 9 to June 12, wanting to be by the side of her two pregnant daughters-in-law during their final trimester. One of them, the wife of her younger son, was expecting her first had carefully planned the journey, lovingly packing toys, lipsticks, clothes and traditional superfoods to support her daughters-in-law. It was meant to be a joyful family reunion and the beginning of a new chapter. But her plans ended in unimaginable tragedy. advertisementYasmin boarded Air India Flight AI171 on Thursday afternoon, headed for London Gatwick. Shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical hostel in Meghani Nagar, a densely populated area just outside the airport's perimeter. The crash killed 242 people on board and at least 24 others on the ground. Yasmin's nephew Parwez, who was travelling with her, also died. His wife, who is expecting a child, remains unaware of her husband's husband, Yasin Vohra, now waits in the scorching heat outside the PM Centre at Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad. DNA profiling is underway to identify the victims, and he continues to hold on to hope for a proper farewell. "After we dropped her at the airport, we had barely reached Anand when we heard about the crash," he I learnt the aircraft had 1.25 lakh litres of fuel, I knew deep inside I would never see her again. Yet I went to the hospital searching for her, only to see bodies and injured being rushed in."He now scrolls through CCTV footage of his wife bidding farewell to neighbours before leaving for the airport. "She said sorry to everyone in case she had ever made a mistake," he recalls. "We didn't know she was saying her final goodbye."Their granddaughters still ask for Yasmin. "Where is Dadi? Where are our gifts?" they wonder. Yasin says he doesn't have the heart to tell them the the formalities are complete and Yasmin's remains are identified, Yasin will take what he describes as the longest journey of his life - to bring her home one last InTrending Reel
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Vikramshila Gangetic Dolphin Sanctuary: A last bastion for endangered dolphins in Bihar
Patna: In the ancient heartland of Bihar, where the Ganga meanders past whispering sandbars and age-old settlements, a 60km stretch of river pulses with rare life. This is the Vikramshila Gangetic Dolphin Sanctuary (VGDS), India's only protected habitat for the endangered Ganges river dolphin and a last bastion for the "blind swimmers" of the subcontinent. Named after the historic Vikramshila University, this sanctuary, declared in 1991, stretches from Sultanganj to Kahalgaon, encompassing a rich mosaic of riverine biodiversity. Apart from being a safe haven for the iconic susu, it is also a thrumming aquatic theatre, hosting everything from elusive otters to critically endangered gharials, from soft-shelled turtles to over 135 species of waterfowl. The sanctuary is, in every sense, a living, breathing example of what India's rivers once were and could still be. "More than 250 dolphins and their calves can be sighted at Jhanwi Ghat, west of Bhagalpur. That is a clear indication that the water here is relatively clean and fit for the survival of dolphins," said Arvind Mishra, member of the governing council of the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) and a representative of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. "The efforts of both the authorities and environmentally conscious citizens have played a major role in creating conditions suitable for wildlife to flourish here," he added. What sets VGDS apart is its shifting, dynamic nature. During the monsoon, the Ganga's meandering channels and inundated floodplains reshape the land and water, constantly redrawing the map of this sanctuary. A particularly rich 36km stretch from Sultanpur to Bhagalpur turns into a breeding paradise for birds with sandbars emerging as seasonal nurseries for nesting species. "The sanctuary is also recognised as an 'important bird area' by the BNHS. It supports a host of endangered and migratory species like the Indian skimmer (Rynchops albicollis), Pallas's fish eagle (Haliaeetus leucoryphus), Greater spotted eagle (Clanga clanga) and Lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni). Greater and Lesser adjutants too have been reported here," said Mishra. "The ecosystem also supports a sizable population of gharials, various freshwater turtles and numerous fish species," he added. But beneath this shimmering surface lies a current of concern. "Pollution from fertilisers and pesticides in agricultural runoff, along with industrial and domestic effluents, continue to threaten the sanctuary's delicate balance," said Sunil Chaudhary, a Bhagalpur-based expert on Ganges dolphins. "Construction of hydroelectric dams, bridges and irrigation reservoirs disrupt aquatic movement, while accidental killings in gill nets and poaching remain persistent threats," he added. Despite these looming challenges, there is an undercurrent of optimism. Conservationists believe the tide may be turning. Govt initiatives, community engagement and scientific studies have started to yield visible results. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
