logo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial recap: Ex-girlfriend ‘Jane' faces cross-examination from the defense after harrowing testimony about ‘hotel nights'

Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial recap: Ex-girlfriend ‘Jane' faces cross-examination from the defense after harrowing testimony about ‘hotel nights'

Yahooa day ago

The trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs continued Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, with 'Jane' — a pseudonym for an alleged victim and ex-girlfriend of Combs — returning to the witness stand to face cross-examination from the defense in the high-profile sex trafficking case.
Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in drug-fueled marathon sexual encounters called "freak offs" and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to conceal his crimes.
Testifying for a fourth straight day, Jane said that she still loves Combs despite her allegations of abuse, and that she endured the 'freak offs,' or what she called 'hotel nights,' because 'he was my baby.'
Over three days of direct testimony, she tearfully recounted the harrowing sexual encounters — telling the court that she felt obligated to 'perform' sex acts for Combs with other men because he was paying her rent. She also testified about a brutal assault she endured before Combs ordered her to cover up her injuries and take ecstasy for an impromptu 'hotel night.'
The 55-year-old hip-hop mogul is facing five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.
Combs has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, he could face life in prison.
Here are some key takeaways from Wednesday's testimony culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including CNN, NBC News, and the Washington Post.
Under cross-examination, Jane acknowledged that despite the alleged abuse, she still loves Combs.
She told the court that she endured the 'freak offs' or 'hotel nights' — and having sex with multiple strange men in front of Combs — because she often thought it was the only way she could spend time with him.
'He was my baby,' she said. She said that after a typical 'hotel night,' she'd give him foot massages, feed and bathe him and put on his favorite show, NBC's 'Dateline,' until he fell asleep.
When asked by defense attorney Teny Geragos if she still loved Combs, Jane said that she does.
Geragos pressed Jane on the financial support she has received from Combs.
During her direct testimony, Jane told the court that Combs paid and still pays her $10,000-per-month rent — part of the 'love contract' she entered into with him — and that he is currently paying her attorney fees for appearing as a government witness at his trial.
Over the course of their three-plus-year relationship, Geragos estimated that Combs wired Jane $150,000. Jane said that she was not sure of the exact figure but that the number seemed accurate.
But Jane also testified that she lived under constant threat of Combs not paying her rent, which she said he used 'as a little tool.'
Big picture: The defense sought to underscore the consistent financial support Combs has given Jane — an arrangement that could undercut her allegations of abuse in the minds of the jury.
Jane testified that early in their relationship, she became concerned about Combs's drug use.
She recalled that on a trip to Turks and Caicos, the music mogul's hands were shaking and that the coloring of his eyes and gums seemed off.
'I could tell he wasn't taking very good care of himself,' she said, adding that she urged him to seek treatment.
When Geragos suggested that Jane knew Combs was a drug addict, she said, 'In the beginning I didn't really know how to label it. I encountered somebody that was overdoing the partying.'
'As our relationship continued I noticed a very strong pattern, and I still didn't really even label [him] as a drug addict," she said. "I think now I would say that, but then I just would say that he was a really big party guy.'
Describing the details of some of their 'hotel nights' under cross-examination, Jane testified that when they were with a male escort named Paul, they likened themselves to NBA greats.
They called themselves 'the trifecta,' a label coined by Combs, she said.
In this scenario, Jane was Kobe Bryant, Paul was Shaquille O'Neal and Combs was Michael Jordan.
"I was Kobe Bryant and Paul was Shaq," she told the court. "Sean was Michael Jordan."
As the frequency of their "hotel nights" increased, Jane said that she sought to understand Combs's desire to see her have sex with other men.
She told the court that she began researching and came across the word "cuck," which is derived from "cuckhold," a man whose wife or girlfriend is unfaithful. She said she understood a "cuck" to mean a man who is turned on by watching his woman have sex with another man. (In recent years, the word has been co-opted by right-wing conservatives as a derogatory term for a man who has politically progressive or moderate views.)
Jane said she also believed Combs could have been exploring bisexuality.
'Cucks could also have a bi-curiosity that they are too ashamed to experience themselves,' she explained. 'So they use the woman to venture out in this curiosity without actually doing the act itself.'
Big picture: The defense has argued that Combs was engaged in a "swinger" lifestyle and not a criminal enterprise as prosecutors allege. Having the jury hear Jane say that she believes Combs was exploring his sexuality through the "freak offs" could help make that case.
At one point during Tuesday's cross-examination, Jane and defense lawyer Geragos got into a pointed exchange over designer handbags.
Geragos suggested that Jane was accepting designer handbags from Combs in exchange for having sex with strange men.
"No, I got trauma," the witness said.
When Geragos asked Jane if she knew what a Bottega handbag is, she responded: "I'm sure you have one."
Then, when Geragos asked how much a Bottega bag costs, Jane shot back: "How much does my body cost?"
Before testimony got underway, Judge Arun Subramanian denied a motion for a mistrial submitted over the weekend by Combs's legal team.
The motion was centered around the testimony of government witness Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Combs's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, who testified that Combs dangled her from the 17th-floor balcony of Ventura's apartment in Los Angeles on Sept. 26, 2016. The defense submitted evidence showing Combs wasn't in Los Angeles on that date. Bongolan said she estimated the date based on photos of her injuries.
Combs's team alleged mistrial prosecutorial misconduct, claiming that the government knew or should have known that the witness's assertion of the date the alleged attack occurred was "demonstrably false.' But the judge disagreed.
'This is not fodder for a mistrial; this is the adversarial process at work,' Subramanian said, while calling defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland's cross-examination of Bongolan a 'real Perry Mason moment.'
No interference happened, Subramanian said, and the defense was fully able to undermine Bongolan's testimony.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diddy juror sparks credibility concerns, may have 'lied' to get on the case: expert
Diddy juror sparks credibility concerns, may have 'lied' to get on the case: expert

Fox News

time36 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Diddy juror sparks credibility concerns, may have 'lied' to get on the case: expert

Juror issues marred the 21st day of testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial for sex crimes. Before cross-examination continued Wednesday of Diddy's ex-girlfriend, who testified using the pseudonym "Jane," the defense told Judge Arun Subramanian that they'd like to respond to the government's attempt to dismiss a Black juror from the case. The U.S. Attorney's Office allegedly told the court that while the situation was less than desirable, they were compelled to because of a lack of candor. The judge told the court he would rule on the issue if there was any basis for removing a juror and once the defense submitted a letter. New York attorney Nicole Brenecki told Fox News Digital that complications with the jury could lead to severe problems down the road, including a possible mistrial. "Every time that we engage in a jury trial, there's a process called voir dire, which is a process that both attorneys engage in, under the supervision of a judge, where the attorneys have an opportunity to question the potential jurors and ask them questions to make sure that they are not biased, that they're truthful, and that they are capable of adjudicating this case on its facts and not based on their individual biases or prejudice or whatever," Brenecki said. "If there's a letter discussing lack of candor, that means that maybe that juror just wanted to be on the jury because it's a high-profile case or because it involves a celebrity or perhaps for other personal reasons, but the lack of candor has to go to the fact that that juror potentially is biased in one way or another." In court on Tuesday, Diddy's lawyers objected to the U.S. Attorney's Office's request to remove Juror No. 6 from the case. "We object to ask Juror No. 6 being stricken, and I understand the colloquy is under seal, so I don't want to explain further on the record now, but if the government is going to put in a letter … we'd like the opportunity to be heard either in writing or tomorrow morning," Diddy attorney Alexandra Shapiro said. The judge said "everyone will be fully heard on this issue" once a letter is filed with the court. Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani highlighted the negative effects a tainted jury may have on a case. "The big news of the day is that the judge is considering removing Juror 6 for lack of candor. That means he lied, in layman's terms. … This request was made by the prosecution, and the defense is trying to keep him on. For what it's worth, Juror 6 is a Black male and a '90s hip-hop fan." On Wednesday, Jane continued testimony about "hotel nights," where she claimed one time there were three entertainers at the party, and she allegedly did not take any drugs. She testified that while she agreed to the party, she also resented Diddy "for knowing how much I loved him and knowing how I couldn't say no to him." Under direct examination last week, the government asked Jane if she and Diddy experienced "hotel nights" without drugs. Jane explained that the former couple attempted the nights a handful of times, and it was at Diddy's request in October 2023 that they tried a "sobriety party." "Around this time, I just really wanted my partner to get sober," Jane testified. "I just really cared so much about Sean's health, and I could see that he just, like, was excessively partying on top of just so many pills that he takes daily for I don't know what. And I just really wanted him to get clean and just get better." She continued, "And he said, 'OK, I'm going to do like 30 days without anything, and I'll be sober. But let's just have, like, one more, one more sobriety party, just one, like, sobriety party.'" When asked what drugs Diddy used during the "sobriety party," Jane replied, "I believe ecstasy and cocaine, I don't know." She also alleged the party lasted "too long," claiming it was "close to 12 to 18 hours." Before cross-examination began Tuesday, Subramanian denied Diddy's second request for a mistrial. Diddy's legal team had argued that the prosecution knowingly presented false testimony to the court in a letter filed June 7 and obtained by Fox News Digital. In a federal indictment unsealed on Sept. 17, Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy (RICO); sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; and transportation to engage in prostitution. If found guilty, he faces a minimum of 15 years behind bars or a maximum sentence of life in prison. He has maintained his innocence throughout the trial, in which witnesses have testified to alleged rape, sexual assault, severe physical abuse, forced labor and drug trafficking. The trial is expected to wrap by July 4. Jane's cross-examination is expected to finish Thursday morning, and the government indicated they will rest their case by next Friday, but as early as next Wednesday.

LA mayor says city ‘will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against residents
LA mayor says city ‘will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against residents

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

LA mayor says city ‘will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against residents

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said Wednesday that her city 'will not allow fear to be used as a weapon' against its residents. 'Los Angeles will not allow fear to be used as a weapon against Angelenos who make our city strong,' Bass said in a post on the social platform X. 'My administration is working with community organizations, legal advocates, and local leaders to ensure that every resident knows their rights and has the support they need. This city stands united,' she added. Earlier Wednesday, Bass said the raids were 'political retribution' against residents of the predominantly Democratic city. 'This fear paralyzes communities. We saw it before: kids too scared to go to school, families torn apart without warning. Let's not pretend this is about public safety. It's political retribution—plain and simple,' she added. President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said the LA protests were making ICE raids more 'difficult' and 'dangerous' on Tuesday. 'It's like we're a third world nation where people think it's okay to threaten the life and safety of federal law enforcement officers and their families,' Homan said during an appearance on NBC Nightly News. On Monday, Bass said that immigration raids in her city resulted in 'disorder' the prior night. 'Well, I just have to say that if you dial back time and go to Friday, if immigration raids had not happened here, we would not have the disorder that went on last night,' Bass said on CNN's 'The Situation Room.' 'I will tell you that it is peaceful now, but we do not know where and when the next raids will be,' she added. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) went after President Trump in a video address later on Tuesday, following the Trump administration deployed thousands of National Guard soldiers and Marines to Los Angeles in an attempt to subdue immigration protests. Newsom said while California is not unfamiliar with immigration enforcement, the administration was not focusing on immigrants living in the country illegally who have criminal records or those with deportation orders but 'indiscriminately targeting hard-working immigrant families regardless of their roots or risk.'

Kaja Sokola, a former model from Poland, applauds Weinstein conviction
Kaja Sokola, a former model from Poland, applauds Weinstein conviction

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kaja Sokola, a former model from Poland, applauds Weinstein conviction

It wasn't exactly the verdict that Harvey Weinstein accuser Kaja Sokola had hoped for, but it was the verdict she said women determined to fight against sexual predators needed. Sokola, a former runway model from Poland, was one of three women who accused Weinstein of sexually assaulting them more than a decade ago. On Wednesday, a Manhattan jury found Weinstein guilty of assaulting former 'Project Runway' production assistant Miriam Haley but not her. And it deadlocked on a third-degree rape charge against Weinstein in the alleged sexual assault of former actor Jessica Mann. 'It's not ideal for me,' Sokola told NBC News shortly after the verdict was announced. 'But it doesn't change that much the most important thing, that he's convicted.' What does it mean for the #MeToo movement, which was galvanized in 2020 by Weinstein's landmark conviction for sexually abusing young women? 'I think it sends the message that we still have some work to do,' said Sokola, 39. Sokola also said she doesn't want what happened to her in court to deter other sex assault victims from coming forward. 'There's no win or lose for me. I was not the one who was on the trial,' she said. 'So I would not want these kind of decisions to discourage others from speaking their truth or from participating in proceedings like this, because we have one life to live, and if we won't fight for our own justice, then who will?' Sokola's attorney, Lindsay Goldbrum, a partner at Goddard Law PLLC, said she and her client were prepared for the outcome. 'We are in a different culture than we were five years ago when this trial first happened,' she said. 'But as a former prosecutor, I knew from the beginning that it was going to be an uphill battle for the prosecutors to be able to establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt about a crime that occurred almost 20 years ago.' Sokola wasn't among the women who testified against Weinstein at his first trial, in which he was convicted of third-degree rape of Mann in 2013. He was also convicted of first-degree criminal sexual act for forcibly performing oral sex on Haley in 2006. The convictions were overturned after an appeals court found that the judge in that trial had improperly allowed testimony against Weinstein based on allegations that weren't part of the case. Sokola was added to the case after she filed her own lawsuit against Weinstein in December 2019 under New York's Child Victims Act. On the stand, Sokola told the court that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her at a Manhattan hotel in 2006, when she was 19 years old. The alleged abuse first began in 2002, when she was 16, and Weinstein forced her to masturbate him, she said. 'I know what he did to me when I was 16, when I was 19, and nothing will change that,' Sokola told NBC News. Sokola's testimony may have been undermined by her estranged older sister, Ewa Sokola, who had been subpoenaed as a prosecution witness. She testified that Sokola seemed 'extremely tense' after a 2006 post-lunch meeting with Weinstein but didn't say she had been assaulted. 'She was proud of knowing him,' Ewa Sokola testified. Asked about that testimony, Sokola said, 'I don't have nothing to be ashamed of.' 'I think she does, or she should have,' she said of her sister. Sokola said she has never spoken with Haley and has talked to Mann just once, about two years ago. Initially, Sokola was part of a group of women who filed a class-action lawsuit against Weinstein and his companies, alleging he had sexually abused them. At first, she hid her identity behind a pseudonym. Unhappy with a proposed deal under which almost all the civil cases against Weinstein would be settled for $47 million and he would not have to admit to wrongdoing, Sokola unmasked herself in December 2019 when she filed her lawsuit. In the suit, Sokola said she was 16 in 2002 when she had just moved from Warsaw to New York City and was first introduced to Weinstein. She said that when he learned she wanted to become an actor, he told her he could help her career. Three days later, the complaint said, Weinstein picked Sokola up for what was supposed to be a business lunch and instead took her his Manhattan apartment and demanded sex. When a weeping Sokola tried to resist, Weinstein told her he had 'made' the careers of the actors Penelope Cruz and Gwyneth Paltrow and warned the teenager that she 'would never work as an actress unless she acquiesced to his demands,' according to the complaint. Sokola said at Weinstein's retrial that he demanded that she masturbate him while he touched her. Sokola, 39, became one of three women who accused Weinstein of sex assault at his retrial after she told prosecutors he had also forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006. That allegation of assault mirrored the testimony of Haley, who accused Weinstein of doing the same to her in 2006 when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Weinstein, who was hit with an additional charge of first-degree criminal sexual act, denied assaulting Sokola. He also denied assaulting Mann and Haley. Weinstein spokesman Juda Engelmayer said that 'we consider this a little bit of a victory' because Weinstein was acquitted on the Sokola charge. 'He's feeling, you know, not good about being convicted for Miriam but relieved that he wasn't convicted on Kaja and hopeful on the Jessica part,' Engelmayer said of Weinstein at a news conference. Sokola is getting back to the dreams she says Weinstein stole from her after the alleged assaults, with the launch of her own production company, Falcon 88. 'Healing means doing what I love and being able to be a helpful member of society, being a producer that listens to others, respects others, treats people with dignity that they deserve,' she said. 'It's named after my dad. He was 88 years old when he died.' Her first project is executive producing a film, 'The Eden Express,' starring Jonah Hauer-King and David Duchovny. Sokola is also a single mom with a young son. And when she was asked how she hopes her son will react when he finds out she testified against Weinstein, she smiled. 'I hope he will think that his mom is a badass and that his mom stands for the truth and is not afraid to speak her truth,' she said. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store