
Missouri Supreme Court allows abortion ban to continue
London: The
Missouri Supreme Court
on Tuesday overturned a pair of lower court rulings that had blocked the state's strict
abortion ban
, once again putting the ban in place at least for now.
The state's high court ordered a circuit court judge to vacate her injunctions against the abortion ban, saying the judge had applied the wrong standards.
The Supreme Court said one of its prior rulings had established "a more rigorous standard" when blocking a state law.
But the Supreme Court also ordered Circuit Court
Judge Jerri Zhang
to re-evaluate her rulings "in light of this standard," raising the possibility that Zhang could reissue the injunctions on a different legal basis. The underlying lawsuit challenging the law has yet to go to trial.
For now Missouri's abortion ban, which kicked in when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned
Roe v. Wade
in 2022, will once again take effect.
Missouri voters in November passed a ballot measure to ensure abortion rights by amending the state constitution that guarantees a "right to reproductive freedom" up until fetal viability, generally considered to be around 24 weeks of pregnancy.
That prompted the state's
Planned Parenthood
organizations to file a lawsuit seeking strike down the state abortion ban, which led to Zhang's rulings.
In December Zhang ruled the abortion ban violated the constitution but left in place some licensing requirements that prevented many abortions from resuming.
Then in February she ruled the licensing requirements were discriminatory, enabling Planned Parenthood to resume abortions.
The state attorney general challenged those rulings, leading to Tuesday's Supreme Court decision.
Republican lawmakers have also approved a new ballot measure, either in November 2026 or possibly sooner if a special election is held, that would seek to repeal the amendment guaranteeing abortion rights, which voters approved by 3 percentage points last November.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
Bros again? Elon Musk's posts spark buzz of 'big, beautiful' patch up with Trump
Months of bromance, a surprise resignation, social media rant, public fiery fallout and regret: Elon Musk's relationship with Donald Trump has been nothing short of a Bollywood drama. The duo once appeared inseparable, sharing stages at public events, Oval Office meetings, and joint press conferences. Then came Musk's shock resignation, and with it, an all-out public fallout. What followed was a no-holds-bar attack from both sides, with people and even Musk's father hoping that the frenemies would soon be back regret some of my posts on Donald Trump," said Musk in a humble post on Wednesday after a week of public rants against 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Though unanticipated, Musk's walk-back didn't come out of nowhere. In recent days, he's been aligning with the Trump administration's stance on the violent protests in Los Angeles, publicly supporting the crackdown while dialling back his earlier attacks."This is not ok," Musk wrote on X just days after calling for Trump's impeachment and denouncing his signature legislation as a 'disgusting abomination.' MUSK DROPPED HINTS Before today's post, Musk softened his stance on Trump, deleted harsh criticisms, reshared US President's posts and re-followed key allies. He reshared posts from Vance, who declared that the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence,' and included American flag emojis in his also went on a spree to delete his previous posts critical of Trump. In a now-deleted X post, Musk wrote: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'Musk also deleted a post promising to apologise only 'as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.' In another post, Trump had expressed support for Trump's impeachment. When a user suggested to replace him with Vance, Musk replied 'Yes.'These posts disappeared gradually, some overnight with the links to these post now showing a message that says, "Nothing to see here."Apart from deleting these posts, he re-followed Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, after unfollowing him during their feud last NOT INTERESTED?On Friday, he told ABC News' Jonathan Karl that he was "not particularly" interested in talking with Musk."You mean the man who has lost his mind?" he Friday evening, Trump told reporters, "I'm not thinking about Elon Musk. I just wish him well."Earlier, Trump warned Musk of "very serious consequences" if the tech billionaire follows through on funding primary challengers against sitting Republican have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump said while speaking to NBC News, adding that he has no intentions of reconciliation with the SpaceX CEO.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk retracts posts targeting Donald Trump amid clash over budget bill, & unproven Epstein allegations
Days after a public dispute with the U.S. President Donald Trump, Elon Musk has admitted he regrets some of the social media posts he made about him. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote online. Fallout from budget bill criticism The tension began when Musk strongly opposed a new spending bill backed by Trump. Calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination,' Musk went on to urge political retaliation against Republican lawmakers who supported it. This comment drew sharp attention from the White House. Trump, in an interview with NBC News, warned of 'very serious consequences' if Musk moved forward with plans to fund primary challengers to Republican incumbents. He didn't specify what those consequences might be, but made it clear that the relationship had soured, saying, 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' Musk resigns from government advisory role Just a week before the public fallout, Trump had praised Musk for his work as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which focused on improving federal spending practices. Musk stepped down from the role shortly after, citing differences over the administration's spending plans. Following his resignation, Musk began publicly criticising Trump's legislative agenda. The situation escalated quickly, with Trump accusing Musk of being ungrateful and threatening to re-examine federal contracts awarded to Musk's companies. Epstein allegations and deleted posts At the height of the conflict, Musk posted a claim on social media suggesting Trump was linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote, without providing evidence. He claimed the documents were being suppressed and added, 'The truth will come out.'


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Quota Within Quota Upheld To Benefit Most Marginalised: CJI Gavai At Oxford Union
Last Updated: CJI Gavai stated that sub-categorisation within quotas is essential for justice to reach the most marginalised, emphasizing the Constitution's role in addressing caste and poverty. Amid the intensifying debate over caste census and reservation policies, Chief Justice of India B R Gavai has said sub-categorisation within quotas is not an 'attack" on the policy of reservation, but a necessary refinement to ensure justice reaches the most marginalised. Addressing a gathering at Oxford Union in London, CJI Gavai said, 'The sub-classification within Scheduled Castes does not question the relevance or success of reservations. It seeks to ensure that those most historically deprived — even within these communities — are not left behind." CJI Gavai emphasised the role of the Indian Constitution as a 'social document" that confronts injustice head-on. 'The Constitution does not avert its gaze from the brutal truths of caste, poverty, exclusion, and injustice. It does not pretend that all are equal in a land scarred by deep inequality," he stated. 'Instead, it dares to intervene, to rewrite the script, to recalibrate power, and to restore dignity," he added. States Empowered To Sub-Classify SCs To Grant Quota To More BCs Within Reserved Category: SC Last year, the Supreme Court held that states are constitutionally empowered to make sub-classifications within the Scheduled Castes, which form a socially heterogeneous class, for granting reservation for the uplift of castes that are socially and educationally more backward. 'The State in exercise of its power under Articles 15 (non-discrimination against any citizen on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth) and 16 (equality of opportunity in public employment) of the Constitution is free to identify the different degrees of social backwardness and provide special provisions (such as reservation) to achieve the specific degree of harm identified," held the CJI in his 140-page judgement. First Published: June 11, 2025, 13:43 IST