logo
Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia Elected as New House Speaker

Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia Elected as New House Speaker

Epoch Times27-05-2025

Veteran Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia has been elected as House Speaker in the first procedure of the new House of Commons.
MPs chose Scarpaleggia in a secret ranked ballot on May 26, the first sitting day of the new Parliament. Scarpaleggia is an MP from the Montreal area who was first elected to the House in 2004. He has
Scarpaleggia is replacing in the role Liberal MP Greg Fergus, who had a tumultuous term and failed in his bid to get re-elected.
Scarpaleggia acknowledged Fergus in his acceptance speech and noted he had taken the role at a 'difficult moment, at the end of a mandate when things tend to get a little feistier.'
'I would remind members that we are at the beginning of a mandate in the selfish hope that you will afford me a little grace period,' he told MPs in the House of Commons.
Only Liberal MPs had appeared on the final ballot, with Tory MPs Chris d'Entremont and John Nater pulling out of the race without explanation before pronouncing their candidacy speeches in the House on May 26. D'Entremont had served as deputy Speaker in the previous Parliament.
Related Stories
5/25/2025
5/25/2025
The other candidates running included Prince Edward Island MP Sean Casey, Quebec MPs Alexandra Mendès and Sherry Romanado, and Toronto MP Robert Oliphant. Mendès had previously served as assistant deputy Speaker.
The role of the Speaker is to apply the procedures of the House, maintain order, and defend the rights and privileges of MPs. The Speaker is expected to be politically neutral in the role to the greatest extent. The Speaker also chairs the group which oversees the administration and finances of the Commons.
The position comes with a $100,000 pay bump, a driver, and an official residence known as the Farm, a four-acre property located in Gatineau Park.
As is customary, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Leader of the Opposition Andrew Scheer dragged Scarpaleggia from the House floor to the Speaker's chair. The tradition reflects the Middle Ages when the king could put the Speaker to death for voicing the Commons' unwelcome stance, making the role quite risky.
'I have much to learn from the members of this great House,' Carney said after Scarpaleggia took his chair. 'I will make mistakes. I have no doubt that you will call them out for good reason, because this House has rules, it has traditions, and it's on those traditions that our Athenian democracy is founded.'
'We are Athens. They are Rome,' Carney added echoing what Scarpaleggia had said in his candidacy speech. Scarpaleggia had said that the United States may be modern Rome in 'size and power,' but Canada is Athens in 'culture, values, and democracy.'
In his speech before the vote, Scarpaleggia leaned on his experience, saying he spent 10 years in the opposition and 10 years in government. He said this has prepared him for the 'challenge of finding the right balance between respect and order on the one hand, and vigorous debate that clarifies the issues on the other.'
In his speech welcoming Scarpaleggia to his new role, Scheer asked him to let MPs have 'lively' and 'passionate' debates, saying the House is where the government is held to account.
'The lives of Canadians are changed by the decisions we make, and so it is normal that members get enthusiastic and fiery when the stakes are so high,' he said. 'Often the best thing you can do is allow the players to play a little bit.
Controversies
Scarpaleggia is the successor of two Speakers who were involved in controversies. Liberal MP Anthony Rota stepped down from the speakership after a former Ukrainian Nazi SS soldier was mistakenly invited to the House for the visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in 2023.
He was replaced by Fergus, who faced several calls to step down including an unsuccessful vote in the House in May 2024.
Conservatives tabled a motion accusing Fergus of 'ongoing and repetitive partisan conduct outside of the Chamber.' The motion was defeated with the Liberals and NDP voting against it.
This was the third call made by the Tories to have Fergus step down. It came after the Liberal Party had advertised an event with Fergus which used criticism of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in the promotional material. His office said the riding association was responsible for the ad and not Fergus. The Liberal Party subsequently apologized to Fergus.
Fergus oversaw a heated Commons at times and he had several disputes with Tory MPs. He
While there was some tension with the Opposition, Fergus also made a ruling in the fall that had a significant impact on House proceedings and allowed an Opposition filibuster.
The House ordered the production of documents related to the federal green fund, Sustainable Development Technology Canada, after it was found by the auditor general to be rife with conflicts of interest, with board directors giving taxpayer dollars to their own companies.
With the government not providing a full disclosure, Fergus ruled it amounted to a prima facie case of privilege. Conservatives followed with a motion to refer the matter to a House committee which ended up being debated for days on end. This effectively ground House business to a halt, with no bills being passed.
Rota during his tenure had also challenged the Liberal government, again around a House order for the production of documents. This time it was for the Winnipeg lab documents relating to the firing of two Chinese scientists on security grounds. The government took Rota to court to avoid the disclosure before Parliament was dissolved.
The new Speaker Scarpaleggia will again oversee House matters in a minority government, albeit a stronger one. Liberals have 169 seats, three seats shy of a majority. Conservatives are also stronger with 144 seats, while the balance of power will again reside with the NDP and Bloc Québécois. Each party has lost many seats, and the NDP also lost its official party status.
The election of the Speaker was the only item on the agenda for the first day of the new Parliament. The Royals arrived in Canada on May 26 and King Charles III will read the speech from the throne on May 27 to outline the new Liberal government's agenda.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup
Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup

If you somehow missed it, President Donald Trump and his former advisor (and bestie) Elon Musk got into a back-and-forth spat on social media yesterday. A lot was said. Trump accused Elon of backing down on his support for the president's championed "One, Big Beautiful Bill" because "he found out we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate." And Elon called said Trump was showing "such ingratitude" considering, "without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." Not one to be upstaged, Trump threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." And Elon volleyed back by accusing Trump of being "in the Epstein files," despite Trump denying connections to Jeffrey Epstein. Obviously, the sitting president and the world's richest man getting into a very public feud was widely covered by news outlets, including Fox News — a conservative outlet Trump has openly admired... and also one that appears to go light on the president. Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral So here's how they covered the quarrell: Fox News host Sean Hannity shared footage of Trump handing Elon a ceremonial, gold-colored key during Elon's government send-off last week. "That was less than a week ago," Hannity said. "These are two very talented individuals. Frankly, they don't need each other to be successful, but I do hope they work it out and set an example for the rest of the country." Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding Host of her own Fox show, Laura Ingraham ran a segment on the pair called "When Friendship Gets DOGE'd," where she praised Elon while suggesting Trump should "simply disengage." "Musk is his own person," Ingraham said. "The government contracts that he has stand on their own merit. They shouldn't be called into question. Threatening to pull them, that's not wise, when five minutes ago you were hailing Musks work in helping rescue the stranded Americans in space. Elon Musk is like the Thomas Edison of our time. He sacrificed for America personally and professionally, and he wanted to make the Trump presidency happen, and it did." Fox News / Twitter: @Acyn And finally, we have Jesse Watters, who insisted that, "Sometimes when you're angry, you say things you don't mean." As an odd and hopefully tongue-in-cheek example, Watters pointed to peer Greg Gutfeld, saying, "Greg mocked my hair last week, and I said he's on the Epstein list." Continuing, Watters said, "Now, I didn't mean that. I made it up." "Sometimes guys fight," Watters pressed on. "Guys will sometimes punch you in the face, and the next night you're having a beer. Sleep with your girlfriend, and you patch things up. Not your wife, your girlfriend!" "These guys are like roommates. They were living in close quarters for like, the first six months of the year. They're just blowing off steam." Well! There you have it. What are your thoughts on the coverage? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade

Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority.' Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.'

How long can America's colleges and universities survive Trump's ‘chaos tax'?
How long can America's colleges and universities survive Trump's ‘chaos tax'?

The Hill

time34 minutes ago

  • The Hill

How long can America's colleges and universities survive Trump's ‘chaos tax'?

The House proposed tax on college endowments has drawn considerable attention. Critics have rightly noted that it would effectively tax student scholarships as well as undermine donor intent, and lacks a clear public policy rationale. While this tax targets only the wealthiest institutions, every college and university in the country is paying a different kind of price — what I call a 'chaos tax.' This refers to the unfunded time, energy and expense required to respond to the administration's attacks on higher education, along with its onslaught of confusing policy proposals and demands. That the federal government would so recklessly jeopardize the future of American colleges and universities is mind-boggling. When my organization surveyed and interviewed hundreds of college presidents two years ago, they reported that the issues that mattered the most to them were tied to improving the education offered to students. Among their top priorities: fostering a climate for free expression, strengthening the college-to-career pipeline, and integrating new technologies. This year, college presidents tell us that the bulk of their time is taken up with responding to executive orders, protecting the rights of students, and responding to negative perceptions of higher ed. In both the near past and the present, many were also focused on the financial stability of their institutions. But the current policy climate has made this an even more pressing worry. College presidents now express concern that their institutions face an existential threat. Each time the federal government issues a threat or demand, institutions must pause to parse and interpret it. Each time funding is withheld or a grant is cancelled, institutions have to realign their already stressed budgets and make difficult decisions. Many executive orders have been paused by judges due to their lack of clarity or their lack of alignment with federal law or the Constitution. But whether they stand or fall, the toll on campus leaders — and the students they serve — is intense. If our largest universities are struggling to respond, imagine what this season of attack is doing to the many smaller and leaner institutions. To give just one example, the recent threat to disenroll Harvard's international students — a threat currently on hold thanks to a judicial ruling — has sent shock waves throughout all of higher education. Nationally, more than a million college and university students are from countries outside the U.S. For decades, American colleges and universities have welcomed them, seeing opportunities for enhanced peer-to-peer global learning, a way to keep tuition down for domestic students, and a chance to share the good news about American democracy and freedom to learn. In the wake of unprecedented arrests, sudden cancelling of visas and now the threat of disenrollment, international student applications have dropped dramatically across the board. Current international students are panicked about their future and unsure if they will be able to return after the summer. For many years, American higher education has been the envy of the world and one of our most successful exports. The international students who flock here pay top dollar to receive a world-class education, globally lauded credentials, and a deeper appreciation for the American way of life. In this case, the balance of trade is widely in our favor. The loss of international students means a less effective and robust education for all American students. Without revenue from international students, American students will have to pay more. And international enrollment is but a single target of chaotic orders and policy. With more of their college leadership investing time in navigating the many unforced errors of the current administration, American students will see less time spent on meeting their educational needs and fewer opportunities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics and other important fields. That the federal government would recklessly endanger the future of so many American colleges and universities is vexing. What are our goals as a nation? Are we looking to create well-paying jobs and enhance American prosperity? Preserve the blessings of a free society? Improve health and life expectancy for more Americans? No country has been able to achieve these aims without significant investment. It is not just the elites that are bearing the burden of this chaos. The local religious college, the small comprehensive university that educates nurses and teachers, community colleges, the land grant public institution, the state branch campus — all of them are vulnerable to the same threatened withdrawal of federal support. Collectively, American higher education is being weakened and hollowed out. Our capacity for scientific innovation is being hobbled. Our pathways out of poverty are being pruned. Our future is being mortgaged. We need to insist on a sensible policy agenda for higher education — one that is preparing the country for the impact of AI and positioning our graduates to serve their communities and lead in their professions. Students, alumni and families who hope for a bright future for their children must join higher ed leaders and insist on an end to the chaos tax. Marjorie Hass, Ph.D., is president of the Council of Independent Colleges, an organization serving more than 600 independent colleges and universities, based in Washington, D.C.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store