
With strongmen on the march, Jacinda Ardern's new film touts ‘empathetic leadership'
PARK CITY, Utah — Welcome to a special Sundance Daily edition of the Wide Shot, a newsletter about the business of entertainment. Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Good morning! It's Sunday, Jan. 26, and today's forecast is for bright skies after a partly cloudy start, with a high of 27 degrees.
Saturday night brought the premiere of one of the festival's most buzzed-about documentaries, 'The Stringer,' which challenges the authorship of one of the most famous war photographs ever produced. And as staff writer Mark Olsen reports, it's not just the Associated Press, which recently concluded its own investigation into the origins of the image, that has a response to the film.
'It's quite upsetting to him personally and emotionally, as one could imagine,' James Hornstein, an attorney for Pulitzer Prize-winning AP photographer Nick Ut, told The Times. 'This is perhaps the most important piece of work that he's done in his life in terms of the acclaim that this photo has brought. And for him to be accused of lying about it, which is what this film does, is devastating.'
More on the claims at the heart of 'The Stringer' at the link below, plus our interview with former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and recommendations for how to spend your day at the fest.
READ MORE: Inside a new documentary's provocative allegations about a famed Vietnam War photo
'Bunnylovr' (Redstone Cinemas, 9:30 p.m.)
The bunny in Katarina Zhu's debut is ridiculously cute, with eyes so big and black you could tumble into them and never hit bottom. Fittingly, its owner, a lonely twentysomething New York cam girl, spends the movie in free-fall. Rebecca (Zhu) exists to please others, including her selfish ex (Jack Kilmer) and absentee father (Perry Yung). She's a dutiful worker in today's charm economy, where making rent depends on making an online stranger (Austin Amelio) pay $500 to watch Rebecca hold her white rabbit while he unzips his pants. The lost woman's only act of rebellion is that she's late, she's late, for every important date. This year's Sundance is crowded with stories about digital disconnection (hey, maybe their filmmakers should meet up and make friends!) and this poised and darkly funny drama is so far nosing ahead of the pack. Rachel Sennott punches up this lightly autobiographical meta comedy as an artist painting her own off-kilter portrait of Rebecca. As Sennott boasts, 'It's giving deconstruction.' — Amy Nicholson
'Train Dreams' (Eccles Theatre, 9:30 p.m. Tuesday)
There is size to 'Train Dreams' — the construction of train tracks, the logging of vast forests, a cinematic sweep that says America is coming — that puts you in mind of 'There Will Be Blood' or 'The Brutalist.' But the film's real magic trick is that even swaddled in that grandeur, the story remains an intimate one, narrated by Will Patton. Credit should partly go to Joel Edgerton, quietly embodying the plot's taciturn central figure, Robert, a laborer who modestly toils and suffers and ends up leading an eventful life. Also let's recognize Denis Johnson's slender yet powerful 2011 novella, one of the author's high points. But ultimately, this is an achievement of pared-down drama-making by co-screenwriters Clint Bentley and Greg Kwedar ('Sing Sing,' 'Jockey') who have a thing for second chances and structures that give actors room to breathe. — Joshua Rothkopf
As documentaries go, 'Prime Minister' didn't follow the usual route. Then again, neither has its subject.
After all, the film's portrait of former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, who came to power in 2017, weathered a devastating mass shooting and the COVID-19 crisis, then stepped down in 2023, comes in large part from Ardern herself. This treasure trove of candid interviews, recorded during her tenure as part of an oral history project at the Alexander Turnbull library, and intimate home video footage, filmed by her broadcaster partner Clarke Gayford, left directors Michelle Walshe and Lindsay Utz with a rich vein of source material — and a 17-hour rough cut.
Trimmed down to feature length, the result, which premiered at Sundance in the world documentary competition, is an uncommonly revealing portrait of leadership in action, with Ardern opening up about her struggle to breastfeed daughter Neve; passing major gun control legislation; and feeling unmoored by contentious anti-vax protests, among other subjects.
Ardern, joined by the filmmakers, stopped by the L.A. Times Studios in Park City on Saturday, where she discussed her style of 'empathetic leadership,' the intensity of higher office and why singular figures like President Trump shouldn't be the focus of our politics. The following is an excerpt from that conversation; watch the full video here. — Matt Brennan
You describe yourself in the film as a 'reluctant prime minister.' And we see the taxing nature of the job, specifically in the period that you had the job. What made you want to do something that would put you back in the spotlight? I imagine there must have been some trepidation about it as much as excitement.
I always viewed the role of being prime minister as both a privilege, but also a responsibility. And I care a lot about public leadership and I care a lot about putting out into the world that there are alternative leadership styles like empathetic leadership. So after I left office and saw that people started talking a little bit about how empathetic leadership felt unusual to them and they hadn't seen much of it, I wondered whether or not I could play some small part in just re-humanizing leadership and demonstrating that you can be an empathetic leader and you can also do a job successfully.
I wanted to talk a little bit about some of the specifics. One is that, in the aftermath of the 2019 Christchurch mosque shooting, you led New Zealand to pass new gun restrictions. In the United States, we have what often seems like an intractable gun control debate and gun violence problem. Based on your experience, would you have any advice for legislators in the U.S. or other countries that have gun violence issues about how to move the ball forward on something that often feels like it's never going to change?
I do get asked this question a little bit and I'm very mindful that I can only speak to the New Zealand experience because, you know, that's my home. I understand the history and culture and the context of New Zealand in a way that I never will of any other country. But speaking to that experience, all I know is that in the aftermath of March 15, I felt the public expectation for us to act on what had happened and to do everything we could to prevent it from happening again. And so you saw in the film, [there are] 120 members of Parliament and 119 of them voted in favor for change. And I think that was a reflection of the people we were serving. It was a reflection of where New Zealanders were.
I was struck that, when you resigned, you described it as having 'outstayed your welcome.' Or you sort of feared that you had outstayed your welcome. I'm wondering if you think that there is still a possibility of a longer-serving democratic leader, someone like Richard Seddon in the New Zealand context, or FDR or Margaret Thatcher, in an era of the kind of level of scrutiny that you get from social media that we see during the Parliament protests.
Just to put the resignation in that wider context, I was thinking about a whole range of issues and one of them was just anticipating the progress that had been made and how to retain that. But the primary [reason] was ultimately whether I had enough to keep doing the job well. I wouldn't describe it as burnout. I described it as having enough in the tank. And I'd known that after five years... You just don't know what's going to come your way. You need to have those reserves, particularly if you do want to lead with care, curiosity and without being defensive. And so all of that weighed on my mind. But you're right to ask that question. Will we as a society [have] those longer periods of leadership when there is such an intensity to leadership now. I don't know whether or not it would be fair to call it additional scrutiny, but certainly from the outside it appears that it may be that way. And that comes back again to my hope in being so open about leadership. With that extra scrutiny, I hope we don't lose sight of the fact that there are still humans doing these jobs in public life. And maybe we need to to just remind ourselves of that — not just for politicians, but people in leadership or who are decision-makers open for scrutiny. I don't know if that means people will last for longer, but I do hope it means that good people still put themselves forward.
At this moment of sort of rejection of parties in power and the rise of authoritarianism around the globe and right-wing parties, what do you think is the way forward for progressive and empathetic parties and leadership right now that can also be electorally effective?
Perhaps we run the risk of assuming that the things that we're seeking from political leaders are different from the things that we seek from one another. I happen to be in the camp of people that thinks that the values that we value as communities should be the values that we that we seek out in leadership. And so I've always had a very simple mantra: Why should what we teach our children be any different than what we expect from our leaders? And we teach our kids kindness and generosity and bravery and curiosity. So I hope that we don't lose our expectation that we see that in leadership as well, including political leadership.
The film contains a scene at a U.N. General Assembly meeting in 2018 where you're asked by the press whether you find Donald Trump likable and you give what I would describe as a very diplomatic answer. Now that you're out of office, would you describe Donald Trump as likable? Would you answer it differently now than you had to when you had to meet with him as heads of state?
I wouldn't answer differently. We run the risk of focusing in on individual personalities. And actually we need to ask ourselves what's going on in people's lives and how that's manifesting in democracies around the world. I don't think we should define leadership by singular individuals. We should define leadership by the values that we'd like to see in our communities and in one another. So I think I feel the same way now as I did then.
As usual, this year's Sundance selection is chock-full of timely documentaries — about trans rights, prison conditions, the fate of left-leaning politicians and more. But only one is evolving so rapidly, so recently, that it could conceivably change its title.
From filmmakers Jesse Short Bull ('Lakota Nation vs. the United States') and David France ('How to Survive a Plague'), 'Free Leonard Peltier' chronicles the effort to secure the release of the Native American activist, who was sentenced to life in prison for the killing of two FBI agents in a 1975 standoff at Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Just days before the start of the festival, in one of his final acts at president, Joe Biden commuted Peltier's sentence, the culmination of decades of work by activists who claim the American Indian Movement figure was wrongfully convicted.
Ahead of the film's world premiere on Monday (3:15 p.m. at the Ray Theatre, 1768 Park Ave.), the directors and producers Bird Runningwater and Jhane Meyers will discuss the road to this moment and what recent developments in Peltier's status mean for the movement. They may not change the title to 'Leonard Peltier, Freed,' but it promises to be one of the most urgent conversations at Sundance this year.
The Box at the Ray, 1768 Park Ave., 11:30 a.m.
Most actors who stop by the L.A. Times Studios to get their photos taken are delighted to see the frames of them and their cast mates on monitors we have set up, but one star was more interested in photos on his phone. Tony Danza, who is at Sundance to support 'Power Book III: Raising Kanan,' showed off pictures of his first granddaughter (and third grandchild), who was born Friday night. She's already ready for the spotlight — a favorite snap was one of the newborn posing. Catch up and see photos of the stars who dropped by on Saturday, including Carey Mulligan and Benedict Cumberbatch, and check out clips from our video interviews below. — Vanessa Franko
WATCH: 'Train Dreams' at L.A. Times Talks @ Sundance presented by Chase Sapphire Reserve
WATCH: Dave Franco explains the keys to a lasting relationship
WATCH: The worst thing about motherhood that Rose Byrne and Mary Bronstein would wish on their husbands
WATCH: Why did Rachel Sennott carry a jar of pickles at parties?
WATCH: Logan Lerman and the pandemic vice he learned from Stanley Tucci
WATCH: When is Carey Mulligan putting out an album?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Award Winning Actress, 48, Brings Her 3 Rarely-Seen Sons for Red Carpet Appearance
Award Winning Actress, 48, Brings Her 3 Rarely-Seen Sons for Red Carpet Appearance originally appeared on Parade. It was a family affair at the Hollywood premiere of Elio on Tuesday night, where Zoe Saldaña and her three sons stole the show. The Oscar-winning actress, 46, hit the blue carpet at El Capitan Theatre with her 10-year-old twins Cy Aridio and Bowie Ezio, and 8-year-old Zen Anton Hilario, whom she shares with husband Marco Perego. The boys matched in black blazers, crisp white button-downs, blue jeans, and sneakers, while Saldaña rocked a rust-colored turtleneck blouse and a mustard-hued pencil skirt with brown pumps. In Elio, Saldaña voices Olga Solis. The Pixar film centers on her character's nephew, who gets abducted by aliens and mistaken for Earth's ambassador. 'I wanted to be able to be a part of great stories out there that my children can relate to from an early stage,' Saldaña toldEntertainment Tonight on the carpet. She added that her sons requested something different this year for summer vacation. 'Usually our summers are always spent traveling, and traveling around work and traveling in general,' she explained. 'This summer, they were very adamant about staying home.' Added Saldaña, 'Now they're getting older and they're not just little briefcases that you can take around with you. They have their own opinions, they make their own decisions, and they are very much about, 'This is what we want. We want soccer. We want music. We want playdates, but we want to be home.' So we're going to do that.' Award Winning Actress, 48, Brings Her 3 Rarely-Seen Sons for Red Carpet Appearance first appeared on Parade on Jun 11, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 11, 2025, where it first appeared.


Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
10 songs to celebrate the life and legacy of the Beach Boys' Brian Wilson
NEW YORK (AP) — The musical world lost a giant with news Wednesday that Brian Wilson, the Beach Boys' visionary and fragile leader, had died. He was 82. Attempting to distill Wilson's talent and influence in a few short songs is an impossibility; even just focusing on a few select cuts from The Beach Boys' 1966 album 'Pet Sounds,' routinely regarded as one of the greatest albums of all time, would feel shortsighted. (Lest we forget, there is no Beatles' 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club' without it, and countless other classics past and present.) Instead, to celebrate Wilson's life and legacy, we've decided to identify just a few songs that made the man, from the fiercely familiar to a few unexpected selections. Read on and then listen to all of the tracks on our Spotify playlist. 1963: 'Surfin' USA,' The Beach Boys The song of the summer in 1963 — heck, the song of any summer, ever — 'Surfin' USA' at least partially introduced the group that would forever become synonymous with an image of eternal California bliss, where the sun always shines, the waves are always pristine, and paradise is a place on Earth. It's hard to imagine the beach existing before these wake-up riffs, the guitars that sparked a surf rock movement and then some. (Though it is important to mention that the song borrows heavily from Chuck Berry's 'Sweet Little Sixteen.') It's hard to think that surf music was once mostly just instrumental — even when Wilson and his cousin, fellow Beach Boy Mike Love, hastily wrote up their first single, 'Surfin,'' a minor hit released in 1961. 1964: 'Don't Worry Baby,' The Beach Boys Think of it as a response to The Ronettes' 'Be My Baby.' The hot-rod hit 'Don't Worry Baby' is the cheery B-side to 'I Get Around,' and has one of the most transformative key shifts in pop music history, from the man's perspective in the verse to the woman's response in the chorus. Brilliant! 1965: 'California Girls,' The Beach Boys Headphones on, stereo up. The Beach Boys' 'California Girls' sounds massive. It is no doubt the result of Wilson's love and admiration for Phil Spector's 'Wall of Sound,' which lead to the song's use of guitar, horns, percussion and organ as its overture. The song is a sunshine-y good time — and would later inspire Katy Perry's 'California Gurls,' among countless others. But most importantly, the song establishes the band — and Wilson's own — larger-than-life aspirations, where pop music could be both avant-garde and built of earworms. 1966: 'Wouldn't It Be Nice,' The Beach Boys Wilson's voice is the first one heard on the Beach Boys' unimpeachable 'Pet Sounds.' 'Wouldn't it be nice if we were older? / Then we wouldn't have to wait so long,' he sweetly sings on the album's opener. 'And wouldn't it be nice to live together / In the kind of world where we belong?' Optimism and innocence are the name of the game, and the listener is the winner. 1966: 'God Only Knows,' The Beach Boys If Wilson must be known for one thing, let it be his inimitable sense of harmony, perfected across his craft and completely unignorable on 'God Only Knows,' a masterclass in vocals, love, emotional depth, harpsichord and the intersection of all such forces. 'God Only Knows' is also one of Paul McCartney's favorite songs of all time, one known to bring him to tears. 1967: 'Good Vibrations,' The Beach Boys What kind of vibrations? Good, good, GOOD vibrations. And at a cost. As the story goes, one of the Beach Boys' best-known hits — and, arguably, one of the most immediately recognizable songs in rock 'n' roll history — was recorded over seven months, in four different studios, reportedly costing up to $75,000. And it is an absolute masterpiece of theremin, cello, harmonica and so much more. Pop music has never been so ambitious — and successful. 1967: 'Heroes and Villains,' The Beach Boys 'Heroes and Villains' might be one of the most complex songs in the Beach Boys' discography, and with good reason. It is the opener of 'Smile,' what Wilson called a 'teenage symphony to God,' a whimsical cycle of songs on nature and American folklore written with lyricist Van Dyke Parks. It was delayed, then canceled, then rerecorded and issued in September 1967 on 'Smiley Smile,' dismissed by Carl Wilson as a 'bunt instead of a grand slam.' In moments, 'Heroes and Villains' is psychedelic, in others, it embodies an otherworldly barbershop quartet. It is off-kilter and clever, as Wilson's band so often proved to be. 1967: 'Darlin',' The Beach Boys The late '60s are an undercelebrated time in Wilson's creative oeuvre — no doubt an effect of his declining mental health — but there are many rich songs to dig into. Particularly, the soulful, R&B, Motown-esque harmonies of 'Darlin'.' 2004: 'Don't Let Her Know She's an Angel,' Brian Wilson As the story goes, 'Don't Let Her Know She's an Angel' was originally record for his 1991 unreleased album 'Sweet Insanity,' but did not officially appear until it was rerecorded for his 2004 album 'Gettin' in Over My Head.' The song features a bunch of programming, synths and percussion, which might strike Beach Boys fans as odd. But trust us, it works here. 2012: 'Isn't It Time,' The Beach Boys This pick might come as a surprise for many fans. 'Isn't It Time' is a cut from 'That's Why God Made the Radio,' the album the legendary group put out to celebrate their 50th anniversary and left a lot to be desired. But within its filler, this song is undoubtedly catchy, with its ukulele and handclap percussion. ___ AP National Writer Hillel Italie contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What to know about Harvey Weinstein's conviction on a top sex crimes charge at his #MeToo retrial
NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty again, convicted Wednesday of a top sex crimes charge at his #MeToo retrial in New York City. The mixed and partial verdict came more than five years after his first conviction, which an appeals court overturned last year. The jury returned a verdict on two of three charges against Weinstein, acquitting him of one. Jurors indicated that they had yet to achieve unanimity on the final count. That could mean more deliberations on Thursday. The verdict capped an extraordinary fifth day of deliberations. The jury foreperson complained that he was being bullied by other jurors. Weinstein's lawyer then asked for a mistrial, and Weinstein himself addressed the judge without jurors in the courtroom, imploring him to end the case without a verdict. Minutes later, the jury of seven women and five men declared the ailing 73-year-old guilty of one count of criminal sex act, which carries a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison. Weinstein denies raping or sexually assaulting anyone. Once he's sentenced, he can appeal. Here's what you need to know about the verdict: What was Weinstein convicted of? Jurors convicted Weinstein of one count of criminal sex act, finding that he forcibly performed oral sex on a TV and movie producer and production assistant, Miriam Haley, nearly two decades ago. Haley, who had a short stint working on the Weinstein-produced 'Project Runway,' testified that he assaulted her in July 2006 after inviting her to stop by his SoHo apartment before a flight his company booked her on the next day to Los Angeles to attend a movie premiere. Haley testified that Weinstein backed her into a bedroom, pushed her onto a bed and forced oral sex on her, undeterred by her kicks and pleas of, 'No, no — it's not going to happen.' Weinstein was convicted of the same charge at his first trial. Haley, who has also gone by the name Mimi Haleyi, told jurors that she was never interested in any sexual or romantic relationship with Weinstein but still wanted his help professionally. She acknowledged she kept in touch and exchanged warm messages with him and accepted an invitation to his hotel room two weeks after the alleged assault, when she said he pulled her into bed for sex. What was Weinstein acquitted of? Weinstein acquitted of a charge of criminal sex act relating to a previously uncharged allegation that he forced oral sex on Kaja (KEYE'-ah) Sokola, a psychologist and former Polish model and actor, at a Manhattan hotel in 2006 just before her 20th birthday. Sokola, who wasn't a part of Weinstein's first trial, testified that Weinstein assaulted her after luring her to his hotel room by telling her had a script to show her. As he pushed her onto a bed, stripped off her boots, her stockings and her underwear, 'my soul was removed from me," she said. Now 39, Sokola said he held her down while ignoring her pleas of 'please don't, please stop, I don't want this.' She said she tried to push him away but was no match against the much larger Weinstein. Sokola also testified that Weinstein sexually assaulted her when she was 16 years old, but that allegation was beyond legal time limits for a potential criminal charge. Sokola said she stayed in touch with Weinstein because she had dreams of an acting career. She went to authorities in January 2020, a few days into Weinstein's first trial. Prosecutors halted their investigation after Weinstein was convicted, but revived it when the verdict was thrown out last year. What charge hasn't been decided yet? The jury hasn't reached a verdict on a third-degree rape charge involving Jessica Mann's allegation that Weinstein assaulted her in March 2013. Mann, a cosmetologist and hairstylist, said she met Weinstein at a party in late 2012 or early 2013, when she was 27 and trying to launch an acting career. She alleges Weinstein trapped her in a Manhattan hotel room, demanded that she undress as he loomed over her, grabbed her arms and raped her after, she believes, he injected himself with an erection-promoting drug that she later found in the bathroom trash. Mann said she had a consensual, on-and-off relationship with the then-married Weinstein, but that he was volatile and violated her if she refused him. She said she kept in touch with Weinstein after the alleged rape, telling jurors she 'compartmentalized the part of Harvey that was hurting me,' and that flattery and friendliness 'kept the peace.' The Associated Press generally does not name sexual assault accusers without their permission, which Haley, Mann and Sokola have given. Why was there a new trial? New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, threw out Weinstein's conviction in April 2024. In a 4-3 decision, the court said the judge in the first trial, James Burke, denied Weinstein a fair trial by letting three women testify about allegations that didn't result in charges and by deciding that prosecutors could confront Weinstein, if he testified, about stories of him behaving brutishly. The court labeled the allegations against Weinstein 'appalling, shameful, repulsive conduct' but warned that 'destroying a defendant's character under the guise of prosecutorial need' did not justify some trial evidence and testimony. Burke's term expired at the end of 2022, and he is no longer a judge. Prosecutors were not allowed to retry Weinstein on charges that he was acquitted of during his first trial, including predatory sexual assault and one count of first-degree rape. What about Weinstein's other criminal case? Weinstein is appealing his conviction in Los Angeles in a similar case in 2022. Jurors there found him guilty of three of seven charges, including rape, and he was sentenced to 16 years in prison. Weinstein's lawyers argued he did not get a fair trial. They contend that the judge in the California case wrongly allowed jurors to know about Weinstein's 2020 New York conviction, and that the jury was unfairly prejudiced by testimony from women about alleged assaults Weinstein was not charged with. __ Associated Press journalists Ruth Brown and Philip Marcelo contributed to this report.