Save up to 70% on Bobby Flay-loved GreenPan cookware for Earth Month
Save up to 70% on Bobby Flay-loved GreenPan cookware for Earth Month Save on eco-friendly cookware sets, pots, pans and even slow cookers!
The Bobby Flay-approved cookware brand, GreenPan, is hosting a sweet Earth Month 2025 sale with up to 70% off their premium cookware, top-rated slow cookers and more kitchen essentials. Plus, for every order placed, GreenPan will plant one tree, making this a beautiful opportunity to help cultivate a greener planet while enjoying top-quality cookware. Shoppers can also get free shipping on orders of $125 or more and a free cookbook gift with purchase!
Whether you're looking for a Mother's Day gift for a seasoned chef or just starting your own cookware collection, GreenPan's non-toxic, sustainable cookware is designed to make your cooking experience healthier and more enjoyable.
Shop GreenPan cookware deals
GreenPan's cookware is not only eco-friendly but also highly durable and versatile. The Valencia Pro Ceramic Non-Stick Fry Pan, for example, is made from hard anodized aluminum with a scratch-resistant coating, making it great for everyday use. Plus, it is one of Oprah's top picks. The Reserve Non-Stick 10-Piece Set comes in a variety of colors to brighten up your kitchen, and features gold-tone handles for a touch of elegance. Plus, all GreenPan cookware is dishwasher-safe, making clean-up a breeze.
Bobby Flay By GreenPan Professional Ceramic Nonstick 13-Piece Cookware Set | Black
Bobby Flay By GreenPan Ultimate Stainless Steel Set With Bobby At Home Cookbook
35% off: GreenPan Multifunction Deep Electric Skillet | Oxford Blue
Oprah's favorite: GreenPan Reserve Ceramic Nonstick 8-Piece Cookware Set | Smoky Blue
50% off: GreenPan Merten & Storck Enameled Iron 1873 Braiser, 4-Quart | Foundry Red
GreenPan Valencia Pro Ceramic Non-Stick Fry Pan 3-Piece Set | Gray
Oprah's favorite: GreenPan Reserve Ceramic Nonstick 10-Piece Cookware Set | Smoky Blue
GreenPan Elite Reserve 6-Quart Slow Cooker
Hot Viking cookware deals: Save up to 50% on woks, roasters, knives
GreenPan GP5 Colors Ceramic Nonstick 11-Piece Cookware Set With Champagne Handles | Rain Forest Green
More: Celebrate 100 years of Le Creuset with the splurge-worthy Flamme Dorée collection
What makes GreenPan cookware eco-friendly?
GreenPan cookware is made with a Thermolon ceramic coating that is designed with non-toxic materials and free of harmful chemicals like PFAS and PFOA. The brand uses sustainable practices and innovative engineering to create cookware that is safe for both you and the environment.
Solar-Powered Manufacturing: GreenPan's factories generate 6.6 million kWh of renewable energy annually, supplying 18% of the factory's power.
GreenPan's factories generate 6.6 million kWh of renewable energy annually, supplying 18% of the factory's power. 60% Less CO2 Emissions: Their production process produces 60% less CO2 during the curing phase compared to traditional nonstick cookware.
Their production process produces 60% less CO2 during the curing phase compared to traditional nonstick cookware. Wastewater Recycling: GreenPan operates an onsite wastewater treatment facility, allowing production water to be cleaned and reused in a sustainable cycle.
GreenPan operates an onsite wastewater treatment facility, allowing production water to be cleaned and reused in a sustainable cycle. Eco-Conscious Materials: Minimum of 65% recycled aluminum in their cookware (excluding handles), 100% recycled plastic bags (GRS certified) and FSC-certified recycled cardboard packaging.
Minimum of 65% recycled aluminum in their cookware (excluding handles), 100% recycled plastic bags (GRS certified) and FSC-certified recycled cardboard packaging. Carbon-Neutral Shipping: All orders are shipped 100% carbon-neutral by supporting agroforestry initiatives that offset the environmental impact of CO2 emissions.
How does GreenPan's tree planting initiative work?
For every order placed during the sale, GreenPan will plant one tree through their partnership with environmental organizations. This initiative helps to offset carbon emissions and promote reforestation.
Shop GreenPan cookware
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Widespread Interactions With Criminal Justice System Cast Long Shadow On Retirement Savings
A lot of people get arrested and convicted in the United States. Those interactions with the criminal justice system cast long finacial shadows. This is true for retirement savings as well as calculations based on recently released Federal Reserve data show. People who have been arrested and convicted end up with lower retirement savings than people who have not been taken into custody. A recent Federal Reserve survey on people's economic situation includes a series of questions on whether people have been taken into police custody, convicted and served time. The same survey, the Fed's Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED) also asks questions about retirement savings. Interactions with the criminal justice system are fairly widespread. It is necessary to combine data years to make sure that sample sizes are large enough. In 2023 and 2024, 13.7% of adults said that they had been taken into custody in the past, 6.0% said that they had been convicted and 1.8% of people indicated that they served time. The respective shares of people are higher for Black and Latino people than for White people, with 17.3% of African-Americans and 17.9% of Latinos in 2023 and 2024 saying that they had been taken into custody, but only 12.5% of White adults said that this was the case. A lot of these racial differences are not explained by differences in criminal behavior, but rather, are the result of structural biases against Black and Latino adults. These interactions with the criminal justice system make it more difficult for people to save for retirement. For one, those who have a criminal record will face more labor market obstacles than those without a criminal record. They will work in less stable jobs and receive lower wages. This means that they will have a harder time qualifying for retirement benefits and have less money to put away towards retirement. In addition, people who have been arrested and convicted will have legal fees, but also face other economic challenges, for instance, in renting a house or apartment. They face higher costs, impeding their retirement savings and necessitating more liquidity in their retirement savings, for example, by withdrawing money pre-retirement or taking out loans on their retirement accounts. All of these factors could make it less likely that people have retirement accounts to begin with and more likely that the savings in those accounts grow more slowly. Earlier data already showed differences in retirement savings by interactions with the criminal justice system. Specifically, 48.4% of people that did not have a family member in prison or jail had any retirement savings in 2019, while this was the case for only 37.7% of people with an incarcerated family member. Recent Federal Reserve data for 2023 and 2024 provide additional details on the link between interactions with the criminal justice system and retirement savings. The data allow for a separation of respondents into three distinct groups: Those who were taken into police custody and were convicted, those who were taken into police custody, but were not convicted, and those who were not taken into police custody. The SHED also includes a number of key measures for retirement savings. It is, for example, possible to create one indicator whether people have any retirement benefit – a 401(k) type account, an IRA or a DB pension. It is also possible to create another indicator whether people increased the liquidity in their retirement savings by borrowing from their retirement accounts, withdrawing money from a retirement account or reducing their retirement account contributions. These actions all slow the growth of retirement savings as people need more liquidity. People who had any interactions with the retirement system fare worse in terms of retirement savings (see Figure below). The share of people who worked for somebody else and who were at least 25 years old with a retirement benefit is lower among those who were convicted (65.6%) than was the case for people who were taken into custody, but who were not convicted (76.5%), which was in turn much lower than the share of working people who were never taken into custody (84.5%). Having been convicted, regardless of whether the person served time or not, reduces the chance of having a retirement benefit by almost 19 percentage points, compared to somebody, who had never been taken into custody. And, those who were convicted also need more liquidity in their retirement accounts (see Figure above). In particular, 25.6% of those working for somebody else who were at least 25 years old and who had a retirement account also took out a pension loan, withdrew money before retirement or lowered their retirement plan contributions in 2023 and 2024. The respective shares for the other two groups were 16.2% and 16.0%. Having been convicted thus also goes along with a greater need for liquidity in retirement accounts, which could slow the growth of retirement savings. A substantial share of Americans are arrested and convicted. Convictions can cast a long financial shadow over people's lives. This includes negative correlations between arrests and convictions, on the one hand, and retirement savings, on the other hand. Those who have been arrested and convicted are much less likely to have any retirement plan, for instance. Financial insecurity follows criminal convictions for some time.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Atlanta nonprofit pivots after losing federal grant
One federal spending cut slashes funding for programs that fall under the diversity, equity, and inclusion umbrella and that has some groups reorganizing. Channel 2's Lori Wilson spoke with the founder of one nonprofit about how she's making an intentional shift. Ten years ago, Dr. Maxine Cain founded STEM Atlanta Women, an organization that for a decade has focused on getting more Black and brown girls into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Since the White House moved to cut federal funding for organizations that are specifically geared toward diversity, equity, and inclusion, Cain has been forced to reimagine, rebrand, and expand her sphere of influence. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] 'How do we take this change and come up with a new way to serve as many scholars as we can,' Cain said. 'Our focus now is going to be to ignite every mind and transform the future.' Through her STEM Atlanta work space in Summerhill, her board came together, dropped the word 'women' from their title, and added new programs to appeal to boys and men. The new programs include sports analysis, a drone program, and music and tech events. She's even gone as far as adding more neutral colors to what had been all pink branding. 'We said we have to scale, and this is an opportunity for us to really spread our wings. Scale and serve all innovative scholars,' Cain said. It's something the Georgia Center for Nonprofits CEO Karen Beavor said is the new reality with the White House's shift on funding DEI programs. TRENDING STORIES: 2 women critically injured after shooting on I-20 Driver pulls out knife on couple driving too slow in Kennesaw neighborhood, police say Georgia man drowns after caught in Gulf rip current For Cain, that meant a $300,000 federal grant was not renewed, and her organization is not alone. Cain, whose organization already had relationships with Nike, the Atlanta Dream, UGA, and more, says now she's looking at this 'new normal' as a fantastic opportunity. 'Now we get to embrace the amazing men and boys in this center and give them the opportunity to learn and grow as well,' Cain said. She said her website should be completely changed over to the new look and language soon. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘An abundance of pessimism': New England voters are down on Trump, the economy — and even Democrats, Suffolk/Globe poll finds
Two-thirds of those surveyed said they do not like the job Trump is doing, with most voters across the three states — 55 percent — saying they strongly disapprove of his performance. Advertisement Even in New Hampshire, where Trump has been more competitive across three elections, his ratings were far underwater: Just 35 percent said they approve of what he's done, compared to 64 percent who said they disapprove. Overall, 68 percent said the country is on the 'wrong track,' a portion that held steady when looking at results in the three individual states. The majority of those polled said they also have dim views of national Democratic leaders. And just one in four voters said the economy is in good or excellent shape. That's a notable drop from the fall. Roughly 41 percent of voters in Massachusetts Advertisement The opinions about the economy aren't driven solely along ideological lines. Just 4 percent of Republicans in those three states view the economy as 'excellent,' the poll found. @media (min-width: 500px) { .datawrapper-charts { display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr; grid-gap: 20px; width: 100%; } .datawrapper-chart iframe { width: 50%; min-width: 50%; } } '[Trump] said from day one that he's going to fix all of these problems: drive down inflation and bring the stock market to record highs. And he's done the exact opposite,' said Michael Hilliard, a 58-year-old Taunton resident and field technician for a telecommunications company. A registered Democrat, Hilliard said he's had a few friends laid off from work in recent months. It's a sign, he said, that companies and the economy are beginning to pull back. 'He's destroying the country from the inside out,' Hilliard said of Trump. 'The next president is going to have to put everything back together again.' Despite that darkening economic outlook, voters across the three states seemed relatively sanguine about their own financial situations. Nearly 58 percent said they believe their job is secure, and even more said they could easily find a job if they needed to. A plurality of those surveyed — about 44 percent — said they believe their 'household financial situation' will remain the same over the next year. Voters expressed deeply negative views on a range of Trump's specific policies. Two-thirds said they oppose the Advertisement By far, the most unpopular of Trump's decisions was his move to cancel hundreds of millions of dollars in medical and research funding to universities and hospitals, a A vast majority — some 70 percent — said they also disapprove of how Immigration and Customs Enforcement has handled arrests and deportations under the Trump administration. Black voters (89 percent) and Hispanic voters (72 percent) viewed the tactics even more negatively. 'It started off with people who were strictly criminal. Now they've taken it too far and are deporting everyone,' said Diana Mendoza, a 32-year-old Roxbury resident and administrative assistant for an elderly day-care program. A single mother of two, she said she voted for Trump last November in part because of his 'economy talk.' She said she's reserving judgment so far on his economic policies, but said she soured on his approach to immigration 'when they started pulling people apart and children are literally in the street screaming for their parents.' 'Or the kid who recently A strong majority of those polled also similarly denounced the Trump administration's approach in the case of Rümeysa Öztürk, the Tufts PhD student whom a Advertisement It's not only Trump with whom voters are unhappy. When asked to rate the performance of national Democratic leaders in addressing key issues, 56 percent of voters said it was 'poor,' while not even 10 percent rated it 'excellent' or 'good.' That number is striking because while Trump's approval ratings are likely to be lower around New England than in other parts of the country — and 'The assumption is ... if people are anti-Trump, they're going to be more bullish on Democratic leaders. And that's not really the case at all,' he said. 'There is an abundance of pessimism.' Voters differed, however, on exactly how Democrats should respond. About half of those surveyed said they wanted their senators or representatives in Congress — all of whom are Democrats in New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts — to decide on a case-by-case basis whether to support or oppose Trump. Another 29 percent said they should 'resist Trump and his administration however possible.' 'We're in the midst of a fascist takeover, and if that isn't apparent, then one of us is in denial,' said Meg Newman, a 69-year-old registered Democrat and retired physician in Lebanon, N.H. She said she doesn't view Democrats as the problem, but said she wishes they 'would push back even more.' 'We need to be explicit about what is happening, and call it what it is,' she said. 'But that doesn't mean you don't show up for votes and try to rally your colleagues, particularly your Republican colleagues, to do the right thing.' Advertisement Some who voted for Trump said they have mixed feelings about the results so far. Joan Kelly, a 57-year-old nurse practitioner and registered independent voter from Bedford, said she's 'thrilled' with Trump's But she said there's also growing instability in international relations, to the point it 'feels like we're on the brink of World War III.' 'I have a 19-year-old and a 16-year-old. I worry about their longevity and their future. And as a parent, I'm sitting here saying, 'I have guilt bringing them into the world,'' Kelly said. 'I don't know if the world is going to be here in the long term.' The Suffolk/Globe poll was conducted over five days, from June 1 to June 5, and its margin of error was plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. Live callers reached respondents via mobile and landline phones. Matt Stout can be reached at
