Corby MP criticises 'fee chasing' over warehouse error
An MP has told the House of Commons a council is demanding £5,000 in legal fees from residents following a case arising from its own planning error.North Northamptonshire Council failed to consult people living close to the proposed site of a Corby warehouse in 2021, which was then built metres away from gardens.The town's MP, Lee Barron, told MPs that a consultation was carried out in the wrong street and the residents who took the council to court were being pursued for the costs, after their case was dismissed.The Leader of the House called the case "troubling". The council's leader said it was the judge who decided the party who brought the case should pay the fees.
The first time residents realised a giant warehouse was being built next to their homes on Hooke Close was when a 60ft (18.3m) metal frame appeared at the site.They complained to the council and it transpired that the people of Hubble Close, about half-a-mile (750m) from the site, had been sent notices about the development instead of those on Hooke Close. Planning notices had also been placed on the wrong lampposts.An internal review found that the consultation errors meant the decision to grant planning permission did not comply with the law.
One resident, Georgie Wallis, applied for a judicial review of the decision on behalf of herself and neighbours.In December 2024, Mrs Justice Beverley Lang dismissed the application, saying Ms Wallis had not issued it quickly enough.The judge did say, however, that the council's handling of the planning application had "fallen well below the standard to be expected".
Speaking during questions to the Leader of the House, Lucy Powell, on Thursday, Barron (Labour) said: "Now, the council who didn't consult the residents, who consulted the wrong street, who the judge criticised, is pursuing £5,000 in legal costs from the very people it failed."He asked Powell (Labour) whether she agreed that "authorities should be held accountable when serious consultation failures occur and that residents should not be financially penalised as a result of the incompetence of the consultation".She described the Hooke Close case as "troubling" and said she would raise it with ministers.
Ms Wallis told the BBC: "The council have already made a public statement apologising for their errors."I think they should just do the honourable thing, wipe the fees and take accountability."Jamie Hume, who also lives near the warehouse, said residents had agreed that they would share the liability for costs, even though only one of them applied for judicial review.He added that having to pay legal fees was "not fair for trying to hold a public body to account who've admitted wrongdoing".
The leader of the Conservative council, Jason Smithers, said: "The court has adjudicated the resident liable for the sum of £5,000. "In the event that the resident experiences difficulty in discharging this obligation, it shall be her responsibility to petition the court for reconsideration, as this constitutes a judicial pronouncement and not an imposition by the council."Moreover, it is not appropriate for elected members to seek to intervene in a judicial determination."A spokesperson for North Northamptonshire Council said: "Due to the ongoing legal conversations around costs, it's not possible to comment any further at this stage."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
House passes Republican-led bills to repeal D.C. laws on noncitizen voting and policing
WASHINGTON — The Republican-controlled House is poised to pass a trio of bills this week to repeal Washington, D.C., laws on immigration, voting and policing, even as it has yet to restore a painful a $1 billion cut to the city's budget. The House passed two of the bills on Tuesday. One would bar noncitizens from voting in local elections in the nation's capital, overturning a D.C. law that was passed in 2022. The other would restore collective bargaining rights and a statute of limitations for D.C. police officers involved in disciplinary cases. Then, on Thursday, the House is expected to pass a third bill, the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act, which would require the D.C. government to comply with requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security to share information and detain undocumented immigrants. Under current D.C. law, local authorities do not work with federal immigration officials unless they have a judicial warrant. All together, the bills represent House Republicans' attempt to assert authority over deep-blue D.C. at a time when the GOP has unified control of the federal government. ' Home rule ' — where the D.C. mayor and city council make their own laws but Congress has the ability to review them — has long been a point of contention. Democrats have pushed in recent years to grant full statehood to D.C., while Republicans have slammed decisions made by local leaders and sought to reverse them. 'D.C.'s City Council made radical decisions in our nation's capital under the Biden-Harris administration, passing local laws that are woefully inconsistent with national standards or constitutional principles,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, the chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee who authored the GOP voting bill, said in a statement to NBC News. 'I'm proud that the House is taking action to overturn several of these reckless measures — including my legislation to prohibit noncitizens from voting in local D.C. elections,' he said. At the same time, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Republican leaders have been dragging their feet on a legislative fix for D.C.'s budget. A government funding bill that Congress passed in March to avert a shutdown included a provision requiring the city to revert back to fiscal year 2024 funding levels, leaving it with a $1.1 billion shortfall. The move was quickly met with opposition from local D.C. leaders. The Senate voted by unanimous consent in March to undo it and restore D.C.'s authority to use local tax dollars as its leaders see fit. President Donald Trump endorsed the fix, calling on the House to 'immediately' pass that bill in a social media post on March 28. But months later, Johnson still hasn't held a vote on the bill, prompting criticism from Democrats and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. 'It's absurd that the House hasn't taken it up. It's absolutely irresponsible, unfair and beneath the credibility of leadership,' said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., who represents a congressional district just D.C. 'It's not our money, it's D.C.'s money ... and I don't know why the speaker hasn't put the Senate bill on the floor. It'll pass overwhelmingly.' 'This is a particular egregious example of substituting their judgment for those who are locally elected to govern the District of Columbia,' Hoyer said. Last month, Johnson told reporters he was in communication with Bowser and that the House would take up the funding fix 'as quickly as possible.' The speaker said that passing Trump's massive domestic policy package had taken up 'all of our energy' and insisted the delay was not for a 'political purpose.' 'We're working on it right now. It's not like we've closed the door to that,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., told NBC News on Tuesday. 'But obviously there are other problems we're trying to resolve along the way.' Bowser's office denounced the GOP bills to revoke DC law and — while noting that D.C. has mitigated the most 'catastrophic' impacts of the budget restrictions — urged Congress to pass the funding fix. 'Mayor Bowser continues to oppose all congressional interference in the lives and affairs of Washingtonians. DC will continue to fight to protect our home rule and self-determination,' a Bowser spokesperson said in an email. 'If Congress wants to be helpful, they should pass the District of Columbia Local Funds Act to fix their damage to DC's FY25 budget.' Johnson's office had no comment when asked Tuesday when — or whether — he still plans to hold a vote on the funding fix. Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., the No. 4 in Republican leadership, said, 'I honestly don't know. I haven't heard yes or no,' when asked if the funding fix will come up for a vote. Other congressional Democrats said Republicans should stay out of D.C. issues. 'It's bad enough, usually, when they're playing in D.C. local, home rule issues,' said Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., whose district abuts Washington. 'But then to do it at a time when they haven't returned the $1.1 billion is especially egregious.' Immigration has dominated the national political debate this week, with protests erupting in Los Angeles in response to the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts. Republicans said the fight over immigration is a winning issue for the party, and they've continued to lean into it with the legislation on the floor this week. 'If D.C. wants illegals to vote, we've made it clear at the federal level people here illegally should not vote in any elections,' Scalise said. 'We're still the most generous nation in the world in terms of our legal immigration system,' he continued, 'but we have to fix our broken immigration system. And you could just see what's going on in L.A. to prove the point.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in
ED Miliband was accused of 'rewriting history' yesterday after he claimed scrapping winter fuel was about stopping millionaires getting payments. The bungling Net Zero Secretary tried to justify Labour's original decision to strip the handout by suggesting the pensioners who would've missed out were all rich. 2 2 But some of them earned as little as £12,000 per year. Mr Miliband said: 'The principal question was, the richest in our society, should they get the winter fuel payment, should millionaires, should the richest get the winter fuel payment? 'I think the answer for most people to that is no.' The Net Zero Secretary's desperate bid to explain scrapping winter fuel payments – before the decision was partially reversed – was blasted by senior Tories, who accused him of spouting a 'pack of lies'. Shadow Energy Secretary Andrew Bowie told The Sun: 'Red Ed is even more out of touch than we thought if he thinks people will believe this pack of lies. 'The economy is worse off than when they found it - taxes higher, unemployment higher and living standards lower. 'He is just trying to rewrite history to try and cover up Labour's embarrassing U-turn.' Meanwhile, a flagship Net Zero plan has been spared ahead of next week's spending review — to opponents' dismay. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has ensured his £13billion warm homes scheme will not be downgraded after negotiations with the Treasury. Chancellor Rachel Reeves decided not to cut the cash which allows heating upgrades through better insulation, solar panels and heat pumps.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Fact check: Labour claims the economy is ‘in a better place'
Labour has justified its U-turn on winter fuel payments by claiming the economy 'is in a better place' and the public finances are on a 'stronger footing', according to James Murray, a Treasury minister. Is he correct? The main statistic backing the government's claim that the economy has turned a corner is the most recent set of official growth figures. Gross domestic product — a broad measure of the size of the economy — expanded by 0.7 per cent in the first three months of the year, exceeding forecasts of about 0.4 per cent and the fastest acceleration in 12 months. It also meant the UK was the fastest-growing economy in the G7 at the start of 2025. Although the growth momentum is expected to peter out over the course of the year, the strong first quarter has led City forecasters and the International Monetary Fund to modestly upgrade their annual growth forecast from 1 per cent to about 1.1-1.2 per cent. The economy expanded by 1.1 per cent last year, so growth is likely to at least match, rather than far outstrip last year's performance. Labour will also take comfort in an improvement in the UK's GDP per capita figures, which is a more accurate measure of living standards. Growth divided by the population rose by 0.5 per cent in the first quarter, after contracting for two consecutive quarters prior. One of the most important economic indicators for living standards and the sustainability of the public finances is productivity growth. This is a broad measure that combines the efficiency of worker output and investment across the economy. The UK's dismal productivity performance since the global financial crisis hasn't turned around since Labour won the election. Productivity was 0.2 per cent lower in the first quarter of the year compared with the same period in 2024. Productivity in the private sector also contracted by a surprising 0.7 per cent last year, pushing it to below pre-pandemic levels and nearly 2 per cent lower than before the financial crisis in 2008. In the public sector, productivity has contracted for the past two years. Along with productivity growth, lifting business investment will be decisive in defining the government's economic record in this parliament. Private sector investment enjoyed a strong start to the year, expanding by 5.9 per cent in the first quarter compared with the end of 2024, and is 8.1 per cent stronger compared with a year ago. However, the figures are likely to have been distorted by a sharp rise in manufacturing investment, as companies rushed to stockpile materials before President Trump's tariffs announcement on April 2. Public and private sector investment is vital to raise innovation, create jobs and ultimately boost productivity. The UK's total rate of investment has been the worst in the G7 for 24 out of the past 30 years, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research. After more than a year of steadily falling inflation, the pace of price rises has started accelerating again this spring. Annual consumer price inflation rose to 3.4 per cent in April, dragged higher by energy and utility costs. The Bank of England does not expect inflation to fall back to its 2 per cent target until the end of next year. Figures released on Tuesday showed that the labour market is in the grip of a pronounced slowdown. Unemployment has hit a four-year high of 4.6 per cent, and the number of payrolled employees contracted by 55,000 in the three months to April. A first estimate for May showed a 109,000 decline in jobs, which if confirmed would be the worst month since the height of the pandemic in April 2022. Labour has been handed some mixed news on the state of the public finances. The Office for National Statistics lowered its borrowing estimate for the last fiscal year by £3.7 billion to £148.3 billion ending in March 2025, but this figure still overshot the £137.3 billion forecast made by the government's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility. Monthly borrowing data has also consistently come in above forecasts as the government's coffers have suffered from lower-than-expected tax revenues. On the expenditure side, spending on public sector pay deals and welfare has been growing too fast for comfort for the chancellor. Financial market conditions have also turned against the government this year. Investors have driven up the UK's borrowing costs, as reflected by yields on sovereign debt. Since Rachel Reeves's spring statement in late March, higher gilt yields have blown a £5 billion hole in the chancellor's £9.9 billion buffer to meet her main fiscal rule. Labour's difficulty in balancing the books over the course of the parliament has stoked speculation that Reeves will be forced into more tax rises or spending cuts at her autumn budget.
