Alabama Senate committee rejects bill regulating hemp drinks, products
Sen. Tim Melson, R-Florence, walks across the floor of the Alabama Senate on March 19, 2025 at the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)
A Senate committee Wednesday rejected a bill aimed at regulating hemp beverages and products following a tense public hearing.
SB 237, sponsored by Sen. Tim Melson, R-Florence, would create regulations on consumable hemp products similar to those for alcohol and tobacco, requiring licenses for manufacturers and retailers while imposing a 10% excise tax. The bill would also ban smokable hemp products and restrict sales to individuals 21 and older.
'It's not trying to prohibit anybody from being in business or put them out (of business),' Melson said. 'We're just trying to regulate it and make sure that it's put in a place that will prevent it from getting to students.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The bill would have distinguished 'hemp beverages' from other hemp products, defined in the bill as 'psychoactive hemp products.' It would also require licenses to manufacture, distribute, or sell cannabis drinks to be consumed on or off-site.
Other hemp products would have been regulated similarly to tobacco, with products being placed on a state directory maintained by the Department of Revenue.
Melson told the committee that the bill would keep children from accessing hemp products, saying there are reports of emergency room visits linked to their consumption.
'I honestly believe, going to your place, you're doing it the right way,' Melson said to one of the public speakers. 'But somebody is selling a product that's not done the right way, and having children having seizures and going to the hospital and tying up ERs that could be taking care of heart attacks or other real patients, driving costs up for the rest us,' Melson said.
Industry representatives pushed back, arguing the bill would harm their businesses while failing to effectively regulate the market.
Molly Cole, a lobbyist for the Alabama Hemp and Vape Association, said the bill 'creates more problems than it solves' and asked lawmakers to consider alternative legislation that mirrors policies in other states.
'It over-regulates small businesses, making it harder for them to operate, while failing to put real protections in place to keep hemp products away from minors,' she said. 'So yes, we need regulation, but we need a 21-plus model that will mirror successful policies in other states.'
Cole said that a 21-plus law would prevent minors from accessing hemp while allowing Alabama businesses to compete. She also suggested shifting regulation to the Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries, recognizing hemp as an agricultural commodity rather than an intoxicating substance.
Although industrial hemp is currently regulated by the Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries, a law passed in 2024 shifted licensing powers for medical cannabis cultivators from the Department of Agriculture and Industries to the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission.
Melson entered into a tense exchange with Carmelo Parasiliti, founder and CEO of Green Acres Organic Pharms in Florence, over the issue of product safety testing.
The senator repeatedly said there is a lack of oversight in the current market and concerns about mislabeled and potentially harmful hemp products being sold without proper testing.
'You're saying that they do complete analysis?' Melson asked Parasiliti, to which he responded, 'Yes, sir.'
'I think you ought to be for this bill. You got something you could promote and say that you got a product that's legit, pure and everything,' Melson said. Melson and Parasiliti then dove into a lengthy exchange about the original intent of the Farm Bill that legalized the sale of certain cannabis products that are classified as 'hemp.'
After a lengthy debate, the bill failed on a tied vote, but Melson suggested a similar bill could through the House.
'We will see you with the House version when it comes up,' Melson said after announcing the bill failed on a 4-4 vote.
Rep. Andy Whitt, R-Harvest, has introduced HB 445 in the House, but it has yet to be assigned to a committee.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
ACLU files federal lawsuit against Chambers County Board of Education
The Chambers County Courthouse as seen on Wednesday, Aug. 2, 2023 in Lafayette, Ala. ACLU filed a federal lawsuit against the Chambers County Board of Education on behalf of two teachers who were wrongfully arrested in 2023.(Stew Milne for Alabama Reflector) The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Alabama filed a federal lawsuit in May against the Chambers County Board of Education on behalf of two teachers who were wrongfully arrested in 2023. According to the lawsuit, Yolanda Ratchford and Tytianna Smith held letter-size papers at a Chambers County Board of Education meeting picturing John Lewis reading 'Good Trouble.' 'Silently holding pieces of paper is not a crime. What happened to Ms. Ratchford and Ms. Smith is a clear and shocking abuse of power,' said Alison Mollman, legal director at the ACLU of Alabama. 'These women were exercising their most basic constitutional rights—freedom of speech and peaceful protest—and they were punished for it.' According to a May press release, the complaint includes claims under the First and Fourth Amendments, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Alabama common law. The litigation, filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, is to get Ratchford and Smith compensated for the harm they endured while in police custody. She said Ratchford is wheelchair bound and was not given access to a toilet while in police custody. A judge ruled the two teachers were not guilty of disorderly conduct. Messages seeking comment from Chambers County Board of Education and the Valley Police Department were left Tuesday. As of Tuesday, the defendants have not responded to the lawsuit through the court. According to a press release, the silent protest was part of ongoing community opposition to the school board's plan to consolidate the county's two public high schools into a new facility located in Valley, a predominantly white city, which would displace Black students and educators from LaFayette. Mollman said the merging of the two schools would cause issues with commuting for Black students that live in spread out county and they would get a different education in the city. 'When you're going a few miles down county roads, it's much different than going down I 65 or 85 you know, at 80 miles an hour. And so that's part of the issue,' Mollman said in an interview in May. The merging of the two schools, Mollman said, would put the Black students at a disadvantage because they would no longer be with their teachers. 'Many of those teachers were black, and so it's not just the bussing times. It's also where those students are going to be placed, who they're going to be taught by, and how that's going to be different, how they're going to be differently situated than from their white peers.' 'A judge determined that they were not guilty of those offenses, and made comments to the effect that if anyone was disorderly in the incident, it was law enforcement,' she said. For the past 50 years, the Chambers County School District has been under a federal desegregation order. A federal judge ruled that both Valley and Lafayette high schools must be combined into one Chambers County High School. A new consolidated high school is set to be built this year, according to WTVM.
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall to run for U.S. Senate
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall delivers his inaugural speech during inauguration ceremonies at the Alabama State Capitol on Monday, Jan. 16, 2023 in Montgomery, Alabama. Marshall said Thursday he will run for U.S. Senate in 2026. (Stew Milne for Alabama Reflector) Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said Thursday he will seek the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Tommy Tuberville. 'Right now, the nation needs strong conservative leadership, somebody that's going to be able to advance President Trump's agenda,' Marshall said in an interview with Washington Examiner Thursday. 'And the work that I've done as attorney general, I think, makes it abundantly clear that I'm willing to fight the right battles and to be effective in doing it, and look forward to being able to take that to the Senate.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX As the attorney general, Marshall has embraced conservative causes and beliefs including joining a lawsuit filed last year seeking to prevent New York from withdrawing religious exemptions for the measles vaccine, briefs that support efforts to restrict gender affirming care for transgender people and efforts to overturn gun restrictions in other states. When it comes to state issues, Marshall's office prevailed in a lawsuit challenging Alabama's transgender care ban earlier this year. But it lost a high-profile battle over congressional districting that led a federal court to order the redrawing of two districts where Black voters would have an opportunity to select their preferred representatives. Marshall was appointed Alabama attorney general by former Gov. Robert Bentley in 2017, after former Attorney General Luther Strange was appointed to the U.S. Senate. He won re-election in 2018 and 2022 and is not eligible for re-election again. Tuberville on Tuesday announced that he would run for governor of Alabama next year. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Alabama may pause redistricting efforts until 2030 to avoid federal oversight
The front of Hugo L Black Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama on August 15, 2023. (Jemma Stephenson/Alabama Reflector) The Alabama Attorney General's Office said Wednesday the state may forgo drawing new congressional district maps before 2030 to prevent federal oversight of future redistricting. The state made the argument during a meeting with a three-judge federal panel and attorneys for plaintiffs who successfully challenged two congressional maps drawn by the Legislature in 2021 and 2023 that the panel said earlier this month showed intentional discrimination against Black voters. The plaintiffs asked the panel to consider preclearance under the Voting Rights Act as a possible remedy. Preclearance would require federal approval of any changes to election laws. Alabama was subject to preclearance from 1965 to 2013, when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the relevant section of the Voting Rights Act that dictated preclearance for areas with histories of voting discrimination. But the law does allow courts to impose it as a remedy. Less than two hours before Wednesday's hearing, attorneys for the state filed a court document stating that while they 'maintain their arguments about the necessity and constitutionality of any remedial plan,' legislative leaders 'will voluntarily forgo any rights that they may have to attempt to draw an additional congressional district map as part of remedial proceedings in this case.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'We have been talking to the state about the possibility of perhaps resolving some or all of the remedial issues in this case, and that we would like the court to give us an opportunity to continue to have those discussions if they prove fruitful,' said Deuel Ross, an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund representing the plaintiffs, during the status conference. Federal court: Alabama Legislature intentionally discriminated against Black voters in redistricting Jim Davis of the Alabama Attorney General's Office said during the status conference that, though subject to appeal, the state agrees that the map drawn by a special master would be the final remedial map. 'There have been a few discussions,' Davis said to the three-judge panel. 'It's possible that it could influence the briefing, possibly even resolve some issues.' A message seeking comment was left Wednesday with the Alabama Attorney General's office. The three-judge panel set a June 9 deadline for parties to file a joint written report on the status of the case and the possibility of resolving outstanding issues, including a request to place Alabama back into federal preclearance. 'Either we're going to sort of settle things and resolve this case, or we're going to continue on with our request for preclearance in this,' Ross said in a phone interview after the status conference. The federal court ruling found that the Alabama Legislature had ignored previous orders to create a congressional map with two districts where Black voters would have a substantial opportunity to elect their preferred candidate. Alabama has had at least one majority-Black U.S. House district – the 7th – since 1992, but plaintiffs argued that it failed to give proper representation to Black Alabamians, who make up about 27% of the state's population but, with a single majority-Black district, only made up 14% of Alabama's U.S. House delegation. The three-judge panel struck down the 2021 map in 2022, ruling that racially polarized voting in Alabama meant that Black Alabamians could not select their preferred leaders. The judges ordered the state to draw a new map, a move the U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 2023. That summer, the Republican-controlled Legislature approved a map with one majority Black district and one district that was 40% Black. The judges sharply criticized the Legislature and appointed a special master who drew a map where two of Alabama's seven U.S. House districts — the 2nd and the 7th – have majority-Black or near-majority Black populations. This map was used in the 2024 elections, resulting in the first time in history that Alabama elected two Black U.S. Representatives simultaneously. The court Wednesday also provided a hearing schedule for the preclearance issue if a settlement is not reached. The state would file its brief by June 16, and the plaintiffs would have until June 23 to respond. Intervening legislative defendants would have until June 27 to file a reply. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
