
Crimea Will Remain With Russia, Donald Trump Says In Big Snub To Ukraine
Last Updated:
US President Donald Trump said that Crimea would not have been annexed by Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2014 had he (Trump) been in the White House at the time.
Annexation of Crimea: US President Donald Trump has said that Crimea 'will stay with Russia".
In an interview with Time Magazine to mark 100 days in office, the US President said that Crimea would not have been annexed by Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2014 had he (Trump) been in the White House at the time.
'It was handed to them by Barack Hussein Obama (the then US President), and not by me…" he said adding, 'Crimea, if I were president, it would not have been taken."
When asked whether he would accept Crimea being 'folded" into Russia as part of a peace settlement, Trump replied, 'Crimea will stay with Russia. And Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy understands that, and everybody understands that it's been with them for a long time."
Earlier, Trump had slammed Zelenskyy for his comments that Ukraine wouldn't recognise Russian control of Crimea, calling the remarks 'very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia."
'It's inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy's that makes it so difficult to settle this War. He has nothing to boast about! The situation for Ukraine is dire — He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country," he had posted on Truth Social.
In what seemed to be an indirect response to Trump's criticism of Zelenskyy being unwilling to recognize Russian control of Crimea, Zelenskyy vowed Kyiv would abide by its constitution. 'Ukraine will always act in accordance with its Constitution and we are absolutely sure that our partners – in particular the USA – will act in line with its strong decisions," he had said.
Zelenskyy shared a screenshot of former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's 2018 Crimea Declaration which rejected Russia's occupation of the peninsula.
Crimea, annexed by Russia in 2014, hosts the Black Sea Fleet, serves as a launchpad for missile strikes, and is vital for Russia's military supply routes.
From the perspective of Ukraine, Crimea holds immense strategic and security value. It enables control over maritime activity in the Black Sea and had become an integral part of Ukraine's national identity over six decades.
After the 2014 annexation, 'Krym nash!" or 'Crimea is ours!" became a patriotic slogan across Russia.
Crimea's Role In The War In Ukraine
Crimea's annexation in 2014 marked a pivotal moment that worsened Russia's relations with the West and set the stage for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Following the annexation, conflict erupted in eastern Ukraine, where pro-Russian militias, backed by Moscow, fought against Ukrainian forces. Although Russia denied involvement, investigations, including a Dutch court ruling, presented evidence of its military support to the separatists.
Since 2022, Crimea has been a key location for Russia's military operations. It has been used as a launchpad for missile strikes and a base for aircraft sorties targeting Ukrainian cities.
(With inputs from agencies)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Saharan dust cloud arrives in Florida, here's what to expect
The African Union expressed concern over Trump's travel ban on seven African nations, citing potential negative impacts on diplomatic, educational, and commercial relations. The AU called for dialogue and consultation regarding the restrictions affecting Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan.


The Print
39 minutes ago
- The Print
Uddhav insulted Raj, says Nitesh Rane; claims ‘Ladha Aapalya Shivsenesathi' meant for Aaditya
'Uddhav Thackeray consistently insulted Raj Thackeray and forced him to leave the party. Raj was always seen as inheritor of the legacy of late Balasaheb Thackeray. That is why senior leaders of both Shiv Sena (UBT) and MNS are disturbed, They know what had happened. I am not against the family reuniting, but how can one forget the insults heaped on Raj,' Rane claimed. Speaking to reporters in Solapur, Rane, a BJP MLA, also said Uddhav Thackeray must admit the 'Ladha Aapalya Shivsenesathi' (fight for your Shiv Sena) was meant to promote his son and former minister Aaditya Thackeray. Speaking about the 'Ladha Aapalya Shivsenesathi' campaign launched by the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena, Rane said, 'It seems this campaign is chiefly for Aaditya Thackeray. Uddhav Thackeray should openly admit it. This campaign is not for the Shiv Sena.' Rane also said the first draft of the Constitution prepared by Babasaheb Ambedkar did not contain the word 'secular'. It was later inserted by the Congress, he claimed. PTI ND BNM This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


The Print
39 minutes ago
- The Print
Granting interim bail to Sharmishta Panoli, HC directs West Bengal cops to give her protection
She later deleted the video and issued an apology on 15 May, but the Kolkata Police took her into custody, saying she and her family 'absconded,' and attempts to serve notices to appear for questioning were not successful. On Saturday, Sharmishta was produced before the Alipore Court in Kolkata, which remanded her in judicial custody for 14 days. Panoli was arrested by Kolkata police from Gurugram, Haryana, last week in connection with an FIR filed at Kolkata's Garden Reach police station over an Instagram video on Operation Sindoor in which she allegedly made controversial remarks about Prophet Muhammed. New Delhi: Calcutta High Court Thursday granted interim bail to 22-year-old law student and influencer Sharmishta Panoli. The court directed Panoli to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 while instructing the police to provide her with protection if she faces any threats. The arrest had triggered a political fallout with leaders from both the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress accusing the West Bengal police and the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) of overreach and stifling freedom of speech. Before the court directed the state police to ensure her safety if she were to face any potential threats, Advocate General Kishore Datta, representing the state, argued in front of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury that Panoli evaded police and was arrested outside West Bengal; hence, regular bail had not been granted earlier, reported Live Law. The state contended that the appropriate course of action was to apply for regular bail, not to move the high court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In response, the high court sought details of the FIR from the case diary. The Advocate General contended that Panoli's remarks led to public disturbances and also urged that the case be transferred to a regular bench. At this point, the judge noted that simply because a different judge was hearing the matter did not invalidate prior observations by a coordinated bench. Challenging the state's argument, Senior Advocate D.P. Singh, appearing for Panoli, argued that the arrest was improper as no prior notice had been served. He said Panoli had approached the high court instead of seeking regular bail because her fundamental rights were at stake. Drawing comparisons with the Supreme Court's grant of interim bail to Ashoka University Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad on 21 May in an FIR lodged by Haryana Police over his social media post on 'Operation Sindoor', Singh argued that the FIR did not disclose a cognizable offence, submitting that 'blasphemy is not part of Indian law'. He also argued that Panoli had deleted the controversial video the very next day and issued an apology. The court took into account that her college details were revealed in the complaint, which allegedly led to threats against her. Considering these factors, the court held that custodial interrogation was not necessary any longer and granted Panoli interim bail. This is an updated version of the report (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Sharmishta Panoli arrest brings Congress's Karti, BJP's Suvendu on same page; Dutch MP also chimes in