logo
‘The system is under real pressure': why do so many Leaving Cert pupils need special supports?

‘The system is under real pressure': why do so many Leaving Cert pupils need special supports?

Irish Times3 days ago

Last Friday afternoon school principal Craig Petrie finally got the call he had been waiting for.
Two students who injured their hands in recent weeks were finally approved by the
State Examinations Commission
for access to a scribe to write down their answers during the
Leaving Cert
exams which begin on Wednesday.
'It's a huge relief,' he says. 'If it had been any later, we might not have found out until the day of the exams.'
Last week, the school also received late confirmation that two students who had been diagnosed with ADHD in recent months would have access to a small classroom instead of a large exam hall.
READ MORE
'If they had been turned down for any reason, it would have been too late to appeal the decision in time. Appeals can take two or three weeks,' Petrie says.
East Glendalough School in Co Wickow, where Petrie is principal, is a relatively small secondary school of 360 pupils. The process of preparing for the exams, however, is increasingly complex.
[
Classroom to College: our essential newsletter on navigating the Leaving Cert for parents, guardians and students
Opens in new window
]
It has four main exam halls for the 120 students sitting Junior Cycle and Leaving Cert exams this year, as well as 12 smaller so-called special examination centres.
They are provided under the 'reasonable accommodation' scheme, which allows for a range of adaptations for students with additional needs (such as anxiety, learning difficulties or physical disabilities) who would struggle to sit exams under normal conditions.
It means students may be sitting the same exam but they won't be in the same room. Some will be in the traditional sports hall with large numbers of students, while others may be in a classroom, one-to-one with an invigilator or with a small number of other students. Some will be using a traditional pen and paper, while others will have laptops, 'reading pens' or access to scribes.
The aim of the scheme is to remove barriers and provide a level playing field.
The problem is the number of pupils who have these arrangements has increased so significantly that schools are struggling to find enough classrooms or qualified staff.
In many cases, schools say they end up waiting until just days before the exams to find out if students have been approved for special supports.
[
'Early mornings worked best. I was at my desk at 4.30am': How I got 9H1s in the Leaving Cert
Opens in new window
]
When it started in 2003, about 5 per cent of candidates were provided with reasonable accommodations. Ten years later it had climbed to 13 per cent. Last year, the total number reached to a record 24 per cent, or 31,800 State examination candidates. If current trends continue, numbers for this year are expected to climb higher still.
The vast majority of candidates availing of the reasonable accommodation scheme have learning difficulties, while vision- and hearing-impaired candidates make up a small proportion of the overall numbers (1-2 per cent). The most common type of special measures students receive include spelling or grammar waivers, reading assistance, use of a word processor or exemption from a subject or component.
The sharp rise appears to reflect the growing prevalence of conditions such as autism and other learning difficulties. Most education experts put this down to an increased awareness of symptoms, better diagnosis and a significant widening of assessment boundaries for disorders.
More controversially, experts also say the fact that a diagnosis can unlock supports means that clinicians are more likely to diagnose a child, even if they on the borderline of clinical criteria.
[
Leaving Cert 2.0: What to expect from the reformed senior cycle
Opens in new window
]
The volume of students availing of smaller special centres has also climbed dramatically. In 2018, for example, a little more than 18,600 students sat their State exams in special centres. Last year, it climbed to 31,800 candidates, a 70 per cent increase.
With such sharp growth in numbers, can the system continue to cope into the future?
'I think the system is under real pressure, but I do think it's fit for purpose,' Petrie says. 'The SEC [State Examinations Commission] delivers an extraordinary service when you think of the numbers. They will always answer the phone and respond, under huge pressure.'
Another principal, who declined to be named, said we are at risk of reaching a point where a minority of students will be in traditional exam halls: 'We're just about responding to the needs. Too many students are finding out if they are approved late in the day. If the trends continue, it will pose serious logistical problems.
A spokesman for the SEC said it operates a number of Race (Scheme of Reasonable Accommodations at Certificate Examinations) application processes with various closing dates, including a 'late application' process with a deadline of April 2025, and a separate 'emergency application' for candidates with broken bones, hospitalisations or other issues.
Given the circumstances in which emergencies arise, the spokesman said the application and decision-making process for reasonable accommodation is 'time constrained'. SEC staff, he said, were working throughout the bank holiday weekend finalising applications, issuing decisions and putting arrangements in place with school authorities. 'All emergency applications are handled as a priority and all decisions will be issued in time for the start of examinations,' he said.
[
The rise of extreme Leaving Cert study regimes online: 5am alarms and marathon cramming sessions
Opens in new window
]
In the background, meanwhile, there is a wider debate over the level of diagnosis for a range of conditions and related supports. Petrie feels we need to tread carefully before changing eligibility rules.
'I do worry that maybe we are over-diagnosing. The system does bestow benefits in terms of reasonable accommodation, access to the Dare scheme [lower CAO points requirement] and supports in college ... but this system is also here to help students. I'd be very wary of changing rules that would not make students entitled to supports aimed at levelling the playing field.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who was Sunny Jacobs? A remarkable life from Florida's death row to Connemara
Who was Sunny Jacobs? A remarkable life from Florida's death row to Connemara

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Who was Sunny Jacobs? A remarkable life from Florida's death row to Connemara

Sonia 'Sunny' Jacobs was 76 when she died on Tuesday morning in a house fire in Connemara . Her tragic death made headlines far beyond Galway and Ireland because Jacobs had led a truly remarkable life. It included a death row sentence for the murder of two policemen in Florida in 1976. She spent 17 years in a US jail, five in solitary confinement, before a deal with prosecutors saw her released in 1995. Another person died in the fire in the remote cottage, her carer a young man called Kevin Kelly from Moycullen. READ MORE Her life – before and after that highway shooting – has been chronicled in books, a play and a film as Jacobs became a campaigner against the death penalty. In an extraordinary twist of fate, a coincidence that could barely have been imagined, she ended up married to a man whose experience mirrored hers. [ Death row survivor Sonia 'Sunny' Jacobs found 'tranquility' in Connemara before death in house fire Opens in new window ] Peter Pringle had also been handed the death sentence over his part in the murder of two policemen: gardaí John Morley and Henry Byrne during a bank robbery in Co Roscommon in 1980. After serving 15 years in jail, Pringle was acquitted of the killings in 1995 when the Court of Appeal ruled the original verdict was unsafe and unsound. The two former prisoners met in Ireland at an Amnesty event – Jacobs was a tireless campaigner for the rest of her life – and married in 2011 before settling in Connemara. Irish Times reporter Ronan McGreevy has been in Connemara where Jacobs found peace and sanctuary and where she died. He tells In the News her story. Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by John Casey.

Swimming banned at Dollymount Strand due to suspected sewage discharge after heavy rainfall
Swimming banned at Dollymount Strand due to suspected sewage discharge after heavy rainfall

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Swimming banned at Dollymount Strand due to suspected sewage discharge after heavy rainfall

Swimming has been banned at Dollymount strand in Dublin Bay after a 'suspected discharge' of sewage following heavy rainfall. The restriction at the popular designated bathing area on North Bull Island will continue over the coming days. Deputy Lord Mayor of Dublin Donna Cooney criticised the way the alert was issued and Uisce Éireann for failing to indicate the source of the discharge. 'This is disgraceful at the start of the bathing season,' she said. READ MORE She said alerts about bathing restrictions needed to be more widely disseminated, as she had found people swimming on the beach despite the measure being in place. Cllr Cooney, a member of the Green Party, said she received an alert to confirm water quality at the beach was 'excellent' on May 26th, but got no notice about the recent restriction. She said the utility company should have indicated where the discharge happened, given that real-time monitoring is supposed to be taking place at its Ringsend wastewater treatment plant. Ms Cooney is a regular swimmer at Dollymount and at the Bull Wall Ladies Shelter. She said she was concerned the discharge would lead to algal blooms as seawater warmed in the coming weeks, which would affect swimmers, water sports activities and marine life in the bay. Discharges have occurred intermittently from the plant, which has been operating at excess capacity for many years. Uisce Éireann said the discharge arose due to overflows from storm tanks at the Ringsend plant. 'There is online monitoring of these storm tanks and Dublin City Council, who are responsible for monitoring of bathing water quality, are notified of any overflows during the bathing season,' said a spokesman. 'Stormwater overflows are an essential part of any wastewater network that enable excess flows to be discharged into the sea, rivers or watercourses in a controlled and regulated manner ... Stormwater discharges normally do not have a lasting effect on bathing waters,' he added. 'The tide will wash out the spill and the salt water and sunlight acts to clean the water. Uisce Éireann apologises for any inconvenience caused and regrets the impact overflow incidents may have on beach users.' Uisce Éireann is investing more than €500 million to upgrade the plant so it can serve a 2.4 million population equivalent by the end of 2025. 'The upgrade of Ringsend means the capacity will be increased and these incidents will be fewer in number, although in extreme weather conditions they could still occur,' said the spokesman. The Environmental Protection Agency and the Health Service Executive have been informed, while the council, which erected notices at Dollymount, said it is awaiting laboratory results to determine whether the temporary prohibition can be lifted.

How was Tina Satchwell left in a makeshift grave under the stairs for more than six years?
How was Tina Satchwell left in a makeshift grave under the stairs for more than six years?

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

How was Tina Satchwell left in a makeshift grave under the stairs for more than six years?

Six-and-a-half years is an unconscionably long time for a body to lie in a makeshift grave, buried just under the stairs of her own home, awaiting discovery. One week ago, after more than four weeks of testimony and nine hours of deliberation, a Central Criminal Court jury found Richard Satchwell guilty of the murder of his wife, Tina Satchwell , or Tina Dingivan as her family know her . On Wednesday, he was sentenced to life in prison . The 58-year-old intends to appeal. Her sister, Lorraine Howard, said Satchwell secretly hid his murdered wife under the stairs of their home where he could have 'ultimate control' over her. For now, just one question remains: why did it take so long for gardaí to find Tina Satchwell's remains? In March 2017, Tina Satchwell, then aged 45, joined the ranks of Ireland's missing persons. Satchwell reported her disappearance to An Garda Síochána on March 24th. It was four days after he claimed to have last seen her, but he said he had no concerns for her welfare. READ MORE In May that year, after gardaí visited him at home, he filed a formal missing person report. He claimed that she had upped and left him without so much as a letter. Also left behind: her mobile phone, her keys, her two beloved dogs. Gardaí were reportedly 'perplexed' by her disappearance. She did not have a passport. There was no evidence that she had departed Co Cork by car, ferry, bus, or plane. She had no prior history of leaving. Still, they waited until June 7th to conduct a preliminary search of the Satchwell home. They discovered unfinished home improvement works under way. But when that search failed to turn up forensic evidence such as blood spatters or a body stuffed in a freezer, the investigation appears to have stalled. [ Tina Satchwell case: Questions raised by politicians over original Garda investigation ] Finally, after a change in the investigating team, gardaí conducted an invasive search that included a cadaver dog in October 2023. The dog solved the mystery of Tina's purported vanishing: she had never made it out of her home alive. I remember the earliest media accounts of Tina Satchwell's disappearance. I was living in Dublin on a research sabbatical at University College Dublin and studying Irish criminal justice policies. At the outset, this case tugged at me. I am a criminologist with research expertise in gender violence. At every stage of life, women and girls who are reported missing are at much greater risk of homicide than men and boys. A recent study of femicides in Ireland reveals that more than half were killed by a person they knew. In most cases, their murderers were their husbands, boyfriends or ex-partners. These are often the same people who call gardaí to report them missing. Satchwell's trial heard from Dr Niamh McCullagh, a specialist in the search and recovery of human remains concealed in a criminal context . She said that 'for all concealed homicide cases that have been studied in Ireland, victims are disposed of within one kilometre of their home address in the majority of cases'. Law enforcement delays and missteps are regrettably common in cases of missing women. Missing person cases are, in general, time-consuming, expensive and emotionally draining. In the year that Satchwell murdered Tina, An Garda Síochána investigated more than 9,500 missing persons reports. To their credit, they solved all but 36 within the year. Tina's disappearance should have been one of them. Research by Bernadette Manifold, a forensic scientist who studies femicide and long-term missing women in Ireland, found that many femicide cases were initially reported as missing persons to the police and that women who go missing have a greater risk of being a victim of homicide. Gender bias often manifests in cases involving intimate and domestic partner violence and sexual assault. In some instances, gender bias gives rise to victim-blaming and denialism. And so reports of violence and abuse in the home may be downgraded. Emergency calls concerning domestic abuse are cancelled and not recorded. In the context of missing persons, investigators may miss red flags and discount the odds of foul play. Gender bias renders men's explanations – even far-fetched explanations – credible. Tina Satchwell's disappearance was littered with red flags. Criminological research identifies several factors to help investigators determine the risk that a missing woman may be the victim of murder. Her case encompassed every single one of those factors. First, did an argument or fight precede the disappearance? Was there a history of violence in the relationship? Check and check. Second, was the last person to see the victim alive an intimate partner? Check. Third, were there delays in reporting the person missing? Check. Fourth, were there inconsistencies in accounts of the disappearance? Check. Fifth, did the missing person leave behind essential items such as a mobile phone and wallet? Check. Three red flags were present at the beginning. Satchwell was the last person to see Tina alive. He delayed contacting gardaí and her family. She left behind her phone and identification card. In the days and weeks that followed, additional flags emerged. Richard revealed that their marriage was on the rocks and that Tina left to 'clear her head'. Discrepancies crept into his statements to gardaí and the media. He suggested their relationship was punctuated by episodes of violence (in his telling, she was always the perpetrator). In his final rendering, he suggested that he killed Tina in self-defence after she charged at him with a chisel. Red flags don't make a person guilty of murder, but these do make it incumbent on investigators to treat a disappearance with utmost urgency. As An Garda Síochána's policy manual on missing persons states, 'it is easier to rein back from the early stages of a big investigation, than recover missed opportunities'. The missed opportunities in this case are glaringly obvious. The search of the Satchwell home in Youghal, Co Cork, should have been conducted in late March 2017, immediately following Satchwell's initial report of Tina's disappearance. That search should have included a cadaver dog. The home improvement works, as well as Richard's far-flung accounts of monkeys for sale, deceased parrots, undiagnosed psychiatric disorders and missing €26,000 should have immediately raised the eyebrows of gardaí. While a thorough and expedient investigation into her disappearance would not have saved Tina Satchwell, improved policing practices that incorporate what we know about gender-based violence, and are informed by criminological research, may spare other women and girls from a similar fate. Dr Jill McCorkel is professor in the Department of Sociology and Criminology at Villanova University, Pennsylvania. She is founder and executive director of Philadelphia Justice Project for Women and Girls

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store