Installing an EV charger? You no longer need planning permission
From today, drivers and businesses will no longer have to submit planning applications for EV chargers – with the aim of making the transition to electric cars much smoother for thousands of drivers across the UK.
Implemented as part of an effort to accelerate the rollout of EV chargers across the UK, these changes are likely to benefit business owners, as well as households with on-street parking the most, given that homes with off-street parking have long largely escaped the burden of having to apply for planning permission. Advertisement - Article continues below
Now, firms looking to install so-called EV charging hubs will be able to get shovels in the ground much more quickly than before, with some previous projects having been delayed by more than half a year due to sluggish response times.
Furthermore, those looking to install a chargepoint at home will also have an easier time doing so. Previously, installing a chargepoint within two metres of a public highway was prohibited, but this restriction has now been lifted – ideal for properties in dense urban areas. That said, residents still need to apply for planning permission.
Following the announcement of these changes, Future of Roads Minister, Lilian Greenwood MP, said the Government is 'cutting down on paperwork to power up the EV revolution so that drivers, businesses and those looking to make the switch will have more chargepoints to power from and less red tape to deal with.'
However, while figures show a new public EV charger is installed every half an hour in the UK and although these changes should help boost the rollout even further, experts say more needs to be done to ensure en-masse chargepoint deployment is successful.
The AA's head of road policy, Jack Cousens, welcomed the news, but said: 'The crucial element is ensuring grid connection in a timely manner. This is especially important in rural locations and areas where there is no dedicated off-street parking.'
Only recently the UK's Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders pointed out that some firms could end up waiting up to the current maximum threshold of 15 years to secure grid connections for their charging depots.
With EV chargers currently not benefitting from the fast-track connections enjoyed by data centres and the clean energy industry, the SMMT's chief executive, Mike Hawes, was keen to point out how 'prioritising grid connections, alongside reform to planning and action on energy costs, would reduce barriers to adoption'.
Our dealer network has 1,000s of great value new cars in stock and available now right across the UK. Find your new car…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kemi Badenoch admits she is still learning how to lead the Tories: ‘It takes a while'
Kemi Badenoch has admitted she is still learning how to lead the Conservatives after seven months in job, amid dire poll ratings for the party. The Tory leader on Friday said 'it takes quite a while to learn how to do the job ' and that 'every week it gets better and better'. It came a day after her shadow chancellor promised she 'will get better', with the Conservatives tumbling in the polls and falling to fourth in a Scottish by-election on Thursday. 'She will get better through time at the media, she will get better through time at the dispatch box at PMQs,' Mel Stride said. Asked about his comments on Friday, Ms Badenoch said: 'People often assume that the minute you come into a job like being leader of the opposition, that you are ready to go. 'It actually takes quite a while to learn how to do the job, and what I have been saying is that every week it gets better and better. 'Every week I have more experience, and this is what every leader of the opposition has found from Margaret Thatcher to David Cameron.' She added that lots will change before the next general election, highlighting the outbreak of Covid and the war in Ukraine in the last election cycle. And Ms Badenoch said: 'There is going to be so much more that people are going to see, not just from me, but from the Conservative Party. 'We were down at the last election, but we are not out.' It came as the Tory leader shifted her party decisively in favour of pulling Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), a stance her leadership rival Robert Jenrick has long called for the Conservatives to adopt. Ms Badenoch said the convention has become a "sword" to "attack democratic decisions", resulting in Britain being unable to police its borders and deport foreign criminals. 'This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I am calling lawfare. It isn't just damaging our security, it's also damaging our prosperity,' she said. She stopped short of vowing to adopt leaving the ECHR as policy, but said 'I do believe that we will likely need to leave'. And she said she had tasked a team of legal experts to look at how Britain could pull out of the convention and what the impact would be, promising to announce the results at the party's conference in October. Ms Badenoch all but guaranteed a set-piece moment at the Manchester meet in which she will formally call for Britain to ditch the ECHR. Delivering her speech in Westminster, Ms Badenoch also sought to stress that the Conservatives are still the main opposition to Labour, despite the party's dire performance in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. The Tories won just 6 per cent of the vote, with Labour fending off Reform UK and the SNP to win the seat. Answering questions after a speech on Friday, Mrs Badenoch dismissed Reform as a "protest party" and said claims it was the real opposition were "nonsense". Describing Reform as "another left-wing party", she said: "What they're trying to do is talk this situation into existence. "Labour is going to be facing the Conservative Party at the next election and we're going to get them out."
The National
28 minutes ago
- The National
50,000 letters sent to minister over controversial Flamingo Land plans
More than 50,000 people have written to the Public Finance Minister, Ivan McKee, in just two weeks, demanding that the Scottish Government withdraw its approval for Flamingo Land's Loch Lomond mega-resort planning application. In September 2024, the Yorkshire-based theme park operator, Flamingo Land Ltd, had their planning permission in principle rejected after all 14 board members of the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs Planning Authority. However, the decision to reject the £40 million resort plans was overturned by a Scottish Government official last month, when the developers appealed the decision. READ MORE: More than £1m in funding announced for restoration projects for Scottish coastline The proposal for the resort includes plans for more than 100 holiday lodges, two hotels, a waterpark, a monorail, 372 car parking spaces, shops, and more on the site called Lomond Banks. According to the Scottish Greens, more than 50,000 people have used a portal on their website to call on the Scottish Government to overturn the decision and scrap the development. Greens MSP Ross Greer (below) said the public's opinion on the proposal, which is the most opposed in Scottish planning history with more than 155,000 individuals lodging objections, 'couldn't be clearer'. (Image: PA) He said: 'The Scottish Government has got this badly wrong. They are about to allow a greedy developer to trash the gateway to our National Park. It is not too late for a u-turn though. They can still save Loch Lomond. 'In just two weeks the Planning Minister has heard directly from over 50,000 people calling on him to block these proposals. Public opinion couldn't be clearer and it is backed up by experts including the Government's own environment watchdog. 'I have campaigned side by side with local residents in Balloch for nearly ten years now to stop Flamingo Land. At every stage we have won on the basis of the overwhelming evidence against their plans, but that has all now been overturned by the Scottish Government.' Organisations such as the National Trust for Scotland, the Woodland Trust, the Ramblers, and the Scottish Government environment watchdog, SEPA, also raised objections against the plans. Greer added: 'I do not understand why the Scottish Government are determined to cosy up to greedy theme park operators rather than protect Scotland's world famous natural heritage. 'It's time for Government Ministers to actually listen to the people of Scotland and save Loch Lomond.' The news comes after Scottish ministers refused planning permission for a trotting track for harness racing on the historic Bannockburn battlefield site. The Scottish Government ruled that the proposals would 'introduce new development and urbanisation in one of the few remaining undeveloped parts of the battlefield'. As such, it ruled the development 'would have a significant adverse effect on the character of the battlefield, its setting and sense of place'. The site is where in June 1314 Robert the Bruce and his Scottish army famously defeated English troops led by King Edward II. The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
How the Glazer family cost Manchester United £1.2bn
On 28 June 2005, the Glazer family completed their takeover of Manchester United Football loaded the club with debt, and over the next 20 years, BBC Verify has found about £1.2bn has been spent on debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the fund the deal, the Glazers borrowed millions of pounds from hedge funds and left the club with debts of £ year on, the club had already paid £53.2m in debt interest to its lenders and in fees to the Glazer family. June 2025 marks the 20th anniversary of the Florida-based Glazer family taking full control of the Premier League was a deeply controversial takeover from the beginning because of the financial implications for 22 June 2005, the Glazer family paid £790m to buy out the club's exiting shareholders and to remove the club from the London stock it was a deal mainly funded by borrowed money and loaded £604m in debts on to the club, which had previously had borrowings of only £ club's board had warned, external in April 2005 about the dangers of this amount of debt, saying it was not "prudent" and risked "a downward spiral in both team and financial performance".The takeover provoked protests from fans, which continue to this by BBC Verify - based on an analysis of the club's published accounts and stock market announcements - show that since the Glazer family's acquisition of the club in June 2005 it has paid out:£815m in debt interest repayments£166m in dividends to shareholders£10m in management and administration fees to Glazer family companies£197m in external net debt repaymentsThis means that, in total, £1.187bn in cash left the club between 2005 and 2024 which it is reasonable to argue would not have done so in the absence of the Glazer is a conservative estimate, too, because it does not include various fees to banks, financial advisers and other financing costs, including currency also does not include the cash that has left the club in the form of directors' the Glazers re-listed a portion of the the club's shares on the New York Stock Exchange in 2012, £125m has also been paid out in compensation to the club's half of the directors were Glazer family members, it's likely half of this sum - about £63m - went to Verify asked the club to comment on the findings and they said they would leave the accounts to speak for themselves. Have the Glazers added value? The Glazer family can legitimately point to the fact they have significantly grown the value of the club over the past two the Glazers' two decades of full ownership, United's annual commercial revenues have risen more than fivefold - from £55m in 2006 to £303m in 2024. This is reflected in the implied market value of the Glazers acquired United for £790m. The stock market implied value of the club in May 2025 was more than £ the financial terms of the sale of a stake in the club to Sir Jim Ratcliffe in 2024 implies an overall valuation of £ family can also point to the fact that, under their ownership, the club has spent more than £2bn on signing new players since 2012. This compares well with expenditure by most of the club's rivals, external over that the pitch, United have won 15 major trophies under the Glazers, but only five have those have come since the retirement of legendary former manager Sir Alex Ferguson in season they finished 15th in the Premier League - the lowest they have ended a campaign since a year in the second tier in was acknowledged in the club's quarterly accounts, released on executive officer Omar Berrada said it had been "a difficult season in the Premier League, which we all know fell below our standards and we have a clear expectation of improvement next season". How much have the Glazers invested themselves? The Glazers mainly used borrowed money to buy the club in 2005, but the accounts show they also put in £273m of their own they have invested no money of their own investments in the squad have come from the club's own internally generated cash resources and from debt secured on the club directly and on the ownership shares in the family have also realised considerable value from their 2012 and 2022 the Glazer family sold £555m in shares in the club, including the proceeds of a £150m 2012 listing on the New York Stock the sale proceeds, £484m went to them directly, though £71m went to partially pay down the debt they took out to buy the club. What has happened to the debt? In 2005, Manchester United PLC's total gross debt was just £ Glazers' leveraged buyout increased the gross debt listed in the accounts to £604m in 2006 - this was partially secured on the club's assets directly, and partially secured on the Glazer family's ownership have been been some major refinancing of the debt over the two decades, including in 2010 and 2015. But in 2024, the club's gross debt still stood at £547m. Other measures of debt which factor in the future cost of transfers put this figure at almost £ annual interest costs since 2005 have been £42m with costs of £37.2m in the most recent financial year of 2023-24. How has Jim Ratcliffe's involvement affected the finances of the club? In 2024, the Glazer family sold £732m in shares to Ratcliffe, leaving him with roughly a 30% ownership stake and control of the football part of the deal, Ratcliffe injected a further £236m of his own funds directly into the club for investment into the infrastructure of their Old Trafford additional investment was not funded by additional Jim told the BBC in March 2025 the club had been set to run out of money by the end of this year, forcing him to drastically cut costs.
