SNP MSP says she will not seek re-election in 2026
An SNP MSP has announced she will be stepping down at the next election in what she says is the 'most difficult decision' she has ever made.
Natalie Don-Innes has served as SNP MSP for Renfrewshire North and West since May 2021, and on Wednesday evening, she announced via X she would not be seeking re-election in the 2026 Scottish election.
Ms Don-Innes, 36, has served as the minister for children, young people, and the promise since 2023.
In her statement on X, she said: 'It has been the honour of my life representing the people of Renfrewshire North and West.
'However, at this time I have to confirm that I will not be seeking re-election in the 2026 Scottish Parliament election.
'I honestly cannot put into words how much this role has meant to me.
'It has genuinely been the biggest honour to have served the Renfrewshire North and West constituency since May 2021.
'As a young working class woman from Renfrewshire I could never have imagined it could be possible to be elected as a member of the Scottish Parliament to represent the area that I grew up in and love so much.
'I hope that what I have achieved encourages more people who wouldn't necessarily get involved in politics to do so.'
She added: 'This has probably been the most difficult decision I have ever made and one that I have wrestled with.
'However I feel that at this time, it is the right one for me and my family.
'I have a young family, one that I am thinking of growing further and while I have balanced my family life and parliamentary life since 2021, it has come with the sacrifices that being an elected member and a mother brings.'
In her time in parliament, she has worked on a number of committees, including social justice and net zero.
She says she remains committed to First Minister John Swinney and the Scottish Government until her time as an MSP comes to an end, and that she will always support causes such as Scottish independence and will continue to campaign for it moving forward.
She added: 'From the bottom of my heart, I want to thank every single person who has voted for me, supported me and allowed me to be in this position in the first place.
'I also want to thank my amazing constituency office team for the hard work they put in every day, to help local people.
'Finally, I want to thank my family for supporting me every step of the way.'
The First Minister paid tribute to Ms Don-Innes on X, writing: 'I am sorry that Natalie has decided not to seek re-election [at the Scottish Parliament.]
'She is a young woman who has made an exceptional contribution to our work and I wish her and her family well for the future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
35 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Should Holyrood have a second chamber like the House of Lords?
Lord George Foulkes says having a second chamber could improve how many different aspects of the Scottish Parliament work. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A Labour peer and former MSP says introducing a second chamber in Scotland could improve how things work in Holyrood. Writing exclusively for Scotland on Sunday, Lord George Foulkes says the next government after the 2026 Holyrood election should consider reviewing a number of aspects of how the Scottish Parliament works. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He says this should include considering whether or not a second chamber, similar to the House of Lords in Westminster, should be created. The state opening of parliament in the House of Lords. | Henry Nicholls/Press Association. He said: 'After more than a quarter of a century of existence, I fear that the Scottish Parliament is not living up to the hopes and expectations of Donald Dewar and John Smith, its principal architects, or John P Mackintosh and Jim Boyack, who were the inspiration behind it. 'In Westminster, select committees regularly challenge governments of both main parties - however, north of the border, parliament and its committees have largely failed to act as an effective check on the executive. 'This situation is compounded by the absence of a second chamber in Scotland, which could revise, improve and very occasionally throw out defective legislation.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lord Foulkes, who was a Labour MSP from 2007 until 2011 said whichever party wins the next election need to prioritise a 'major review' of the Scottish Parliament, including the electoral system, the case for a second chamber, the size of the executive, MSPs' privileges, and the role of the presiding officer. He said: 'To rescue Holyrood, people need to see that their money is being spent wisely and effectively, especially since we have decided to impose higher tax rates than in other parts of the country.' Should the SNP win the 2026 election, this is unlikely to happen - the SNP has had a long-standing opposition to the House of Lords and refuses to nominate peers to Westminster's second chamber. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour peer Lord George Foulkes Last year, the SNP tried to force a vote on scrapping the House of Lords completely by trying to amend a bill which aimed to remove hereditary peers from the second chamber. The nationalists have previously branded the House of Lords an 'affront to democracy' and say only around one in nine peers can be described as Scottish. In his column he also attacks the current SNP government and MSPs' inability to 'stick to devolved competencies', saying this exposes flaws in the inner workings of Holyrood. He draws particular attention to former first minister Humza Yousaf for his 'misalignment of priorities' by focusing on the war in Gaza instead of Scottish public services. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lord Foulkes said: 'The SNP's unwillingness to seriously engage with the current devolution framework means that, should they triumph next year, we will face another five years of uncertainty and decline while they hum and haw over when and if to press the independence button. 'Hopefully, the recent [Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse] by-election result can be the turning point we need - if Scottish Labour risks being even bolder and more visionary, there is an excellent chance we could seize an overall majority and finally begin to realise the full benefits of devolution.'
Scotsman
35 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why we need to make fathers visible
A protest was held this week at the Scottish Parliament. Picture: Andrew Carr | Andrew Carr This would be a good time for policy makers revisit and renew a coherent parenting strategy Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There was an amiable gathering of fathers and mothers, and babies in slings and buggies outside the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday afternoon, protesting the poor provision of paternity leave in the UK. The Singing Mamas sang 'Under Pressure' and a parental leave version of 'Bella Ciao'. Paternity leave was introduced by Labour in 2003. In cash, it amounts to less than half the minimum wage. In duration, a basic two weeks. Hundreds of employers, of course, add their own more generous schemes on top of the statutory obligation. I discovered on Wednesday, that the Scottish Parliament is not among them. The campaign for fathers to spend more time with their partner and new child is like being in favour of virtue. Who can disagree? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The narrow focus on paternity leave, however, could be the key that opens up a much-needed wider debate on the visibility and positive resource of fathers that has been dormant during a period of significant demographic change. I look back to 2012 and the launch of the Scottish Government's National Parenting Strategy. The Minister for Children and Young People, Aileen Campbell, gave a passionate speech. She said, 'Valuing parents is one of the single biggest ways of giving the nation's children the best start in life.' It was part of the ambition for 'Scotland to be the best place in the world to grow up.' There were 14 pages of 'commitments'. One page was specifically about fathers under the strapline 'Parents facing additional challenges'. Funding was put in place 'for organisations such as Men in Childcare, working to redress the existing gender imbalance and the need for more men in early years settings.' The redoubtable Kenny Spence who has been driving the cause of men in childcare, reports the funding raised the number of men in the early years workforce from 2% to 4%. Is 4% in early years, or 9% of male staff in Primary Schools, enough? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Families Need Fathers Scotland – that's us. We changed our name to Shared Parenting Scotland in 2020 to reflect the evolution of our client base as we took more calls from mothers, grandmothers and new partners. We were funded to 'provide support to fathers and other family members facing contact problems with their children.' Much of our casework reveals the kaleidoscope of embedded barriers and disincentives to sharing parenting after divorce or separation. There was a commitment to a 'twice-yearly fathers round table meeting acting in an advisory capacity on national policy and how it impacts fathers.' The Fathers Advisory Board was very useful but just faded away about 2018. There have been Third Sector bright spots. The birth of Dads Rock which now reaches across Scotland was based on the building the role and recognition of fathers in parenting from ante-natal classes onwards. Fathers Network Scotland came up with the Year of the Dad in 2015, which had buy-in from all sectors. Its annual Dads Survey is now becoming a valuable longitudinal study of both the time fathers are spending with their children, as well as the pressures they experience when balancing parenting with work – feeling guilty at both. This would be a good time for policy makers at local and central government level to revisit and renew that 2012 commitment to a coherent parenting strategy.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Scottish politics isn't necessarily as bitter and divided as it seems
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I have a confession to make. It's not something I'm proud of, because who would be, but it is something you should know. I am English. I understand it's a shock, especially if you've somehow missed our video content, award-winning podcast and my appearances on whichever broadcaster will have me. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A saltire flag and Union Jack flutter in the wind. Picture: JeffIt means, nearly five years ago, I came to Scottish politics with things to learn. I was an experienced journalist in Westminster, but had not lived the Scottish experience. I merely adopted Scotland, I wasn't born in it. Moulded in it. As such, aside from my extensive reading as a dedicated student of the game, my expectations were it would not be like any other patch. The views on both sides of the independence debate were too entrenched, the vitriol felt was too strong, the wounds were too deep. Now, as I walk off into what I hope is a sunset, I can tell you I was wrong. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish politics isn't nearly as bitter and divided as it can seem at times, especially online. Working in Westminster, I see the loudest and most vocal critics of each side having a beer together in Parliament. I listen to SNP MPs talking about trips they've been on with Tories, and the funny experiences they won't share publicly 'til they leave Parliament. Following issues that go beyond the debate of the day, I witness Labour working with the SNP, and hear of rivals having a regular snooker game. Alexander Brown has been here since Boris Johnson was Prime Minister | Getty Images More importantly, they're just nice. It's nowhere near as tribal as you think. I've routinely been called a Sturgeonista (despite my accent) or a Tory stooge online and, while I'm grateful for balance, it's also not representative of what politics is. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These people don't hate each other. They aren't arguing with each other in comment sections. Sometimes the outrage is simply manufactured, playing to the gallery encouraging people to lose their minds, shortly before going for tea in the Parliament canteen. I'd add that given how biased everyone feels the media is, we sure do spend a lot of our time speaking to all the different parties. In short, Scottish politics, despite the myth of Scottish exceptionalism, is not that dissimilar to politics in the rest of the UK. Sure, there's an independence debate, but the main issues facing the country are the NHS, education, the green transition, access to rural services. Other than the ferries' farce, it's basically the same. Now you can argue that independence could fix those, but it's still the same problems as down here. That's not an argument for unionism, just a reminder that what happens in Westminster really does matter. To paraphrase one of the few successful, albeit accidental separatists, we're all in this together. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad My other main takeaway is that despite these shared values, successive UK administrations have still been a bit scared of Scotland. No prime minister has done a sit-down. Ministers avoid doing huddles in case they're caught out. You deserve better and it's appalling this has not changed since I started. This is all a long-winded way of saying I'm leaving The Scotsman, but my love of Scotland is going nowhere.
