logo
Hong Kong's security net extends beyond arrests as small businesses pressured

Hong Kong's security net extends beyond arrests as small businesses pressured

Associated Press19 hours ago

HONG KONG (AP) — It's been years since mass arrests all but silenced pro-democracy activism in Hong Kong. But a crackdown on dissent in the semiautonomous Chinese city is still expanding, hitting restaurants, bookstores and other small businesses.
Shops and eateries owned by people once associated with the largely subdued pro-democracy movement are feeling a tightening grip through increased official inspections, anonymous complaint letters and other regulatory checks.
Those critical of the city's political changes say it's a less visible side of a push to silence dissent that began five years ago when Beijing imposed a national security law to crush challenges to its rule, under which opposition politicians were jailed and pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily was shuttered.
China said the law was necessary for the city's stability following anti-government protests in 2019.
In 2024, the city passed its own national security law, which has been used to jail people for actions like writing pro-independence messages on the back of bus seats and wearing a T-shirt carrying a protest slogan that authorities deemed could imply the separation of Hong Kong from China, a red line for Beijing.
In recent weeks, food authorities sent letters to restaurants warning that their business licenses could be revoked if the government deems them to be endangering national security or public interest.
Frequent inspections
Leticia Wong, a former pro-democracy district councilor who now runs a bookstore, says her shop is frequently visited by food and hygiene inspectors, the fire department or other authorities over complaints about issues like hosting events without a license. It happens most often around June 4, the anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.
Her records show government authorities took measures against her shop some 92 times between July 2022 and June 2025, including inspecting her shop, conspicuously patrolling outside, or sending letters warning her of violations. She has been studying regulations to protect herself from accidentally breaking them.
'Some areas look trivial — and they really are — but they still have the power to make you face consequences,' she said.
In an emailed reply to The Associated Press, the fire department said it conducted checks at Wong's business following multiple complaints this year. Wong's bookstore passed most of them but still faces enforcement action for failing to provide valid certificates for two fire extinguishers and its emergency lighting system, it said.
Other small business owners described similar experiences.
A bakery that put up pro-democracy decorations during the 2019 protests saw food authorities' inspections jump from quarterly to monthly over the past one to two years, mostly over labeling complaints. Its owner, who asked to remain anonymous fearing government retribution, said the frequent inspections made running the business a struggle.
A restaurant owner who received the notice of the newly added terms on possible license revocation over national security violations said he doesn't know what could be considered a violation and fears one wrong move could cost his staff their jobs. He spoke on the condition of anonymity, fearing potential impact on his business partners and employees.
Food authorities said inspections follow the law, information and public complaints. They maintained that the new national security conditions for food business licenses were clearly defined and would not affect law-abiding operators.
The Hong Kong Chief Executive's office has not immediately commented.
Anonymous denunciations
Others say they have lost opportunities after anonymous letters were sent to employers or business partners.
Wong said an anonymous letter sent to an organization that had planned an event at her shop prompted them to cancel the booking. Separately, she lost a freelance job after a funder demanded that a social enterprise not hire her without a specific reason.
Her landlord also received an anonymous letter warning them not to rent the space to her.
'I feel that this society is working very hard — that is, within the system, under the official system, working very hard to reject me, or to make my life difficult,' Wong said.
Chan Kim-kam, another former district councilor, says she lost both a part-time job and a role in a play after the people she worked for were pressured. A school where she taught sociology part-time asked her to leave after it received a letter claiming that she made a student uncomfortable.
The letter, which was written in the simplified Chinese characters used in mainland China but less prominently in Hong Kong, included links to news reports about her arrest under the homegrown national security law last year, though she was never charged.
Meanwhile, the city's Leisure and Cultural Services Department told her drama group to replace her or lose their venue, she said.
'I think it's really such a pity. When the culture of reporting people has become so intense, it destroys the trust between people,' she said.
Cultural authorities, declining to discuss specific bookings, said all their venue bookings were managed under established procedures.
Rule of law in question
Hong Kong leader John Lee has said the security law upholds the rule of law principle and only an extremely small portion of people were targeted. He noted 332 people have been arrested for offenses related to national security, about 66 each year on average, or 0.2% of the police's annual arrest figures. Still, he warned of persisting soft resistance, saying 'the streets are full of petty people.'
Local broadcaster i-Cable News said national security guidelines would be issued to government workers. Secretary for Security Chris Tang told the broadcaster that even a cleaner should report words endangering national security, if any are found during their job.
But Eric Lai, a research fellow at Georgetown Center for Asian Law, said Hong Kong is using regulatory powers to monitor and regulate dissent without checks and balances. Local courts were unable to check the powers granted to the government under the security laws, he said.
It fits a common pattern among undemocratic governments like mainland China, he said. In many cases across the border, law enforcement officers frequently harass and surveil dissenters without formal charges.
'It tells the world that the so-called rule of law in Hong Kong is only a facade of rule by men,' he said.
Outside a court on Jun. 12, members of the pro-democracy party League of Social Democrats protested against their convictions over street booth activities with a banner that says 'rule of law in name, silencing voices in reality.'
They were fined for collecting money without a permit and displaying posters without approval. The judge said freedom of expression was not absolute and restrictions could be imposed to maintain public order.
On Sunday, the party announced it had dissolved, citing immense political pressure and consideration of consequences for its members, months after the city's biggest pro-democracy party announced to move toward disbandment. Its chairperson Chan Po-ying wiped away tears at the news conference.
'In the past, the government said it focused on a small portion of people. Now, it includes various kinds of people in Hong Kong, ordinary residents,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Big, beautiful bill' funding failure puts US at risk from bad actors, expert warns
'Big, beautiful bill' funding failure puts US at risk from bad actors, expert warns

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

'Big, beautiful bill' funding failure puts US at risk from bad actors, expert warns

As lawmakers push forward with the sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the executive director and CEO of the oldest and largest organization of public safety communications professionals warns that its failure to include funding for Next Generation 911 (NG911) is a serious national security oversight with consequences for public safety. "This bill does many good things," Mel Maier, executive director and CEO of APCO International, told Fox News Digital. "However, it leaves something out that's very important, and that's funding for Next Generation 911 and failing to modernize that first call for help." NG911, Maier explained, is not just a modernization project but a public safety and national security necessity as the public remains on high alert following the U.S. strike against Iran's nuclear capabilities. He emphasized that NG911 is also a matter of national security, especially considering escalating global instability and the increasing threat of foreign cyberattacks. "Next Generation 911, at its heart, is really about national security," Maier said. "Whether it's cybersecurity from national threat actors, or from internal actors, we need to get that information to the field-based responders out there as quickly as possible." Pointing to the recent concerns about sleeper cells in the U.S., Maier said that the vulnerabilities that the current system has could easily be jeopardized. "We know that cyberterrorists and threats are being directed against 911 today, and it's affecting us today," he said. "Ransomware attacks have taken down 911 centers, police departments, fire departments, EMS agencies across the U.S. We need to stop that." Despite these warnings, NG911 funding was not included in the current "big, beautiful bill." "We do believe that working with Congress in a bicameral and bipartisan way is the only effective way to make this happen," he said. "We've had assurances from Congress on both sides of the aisle that this is a national priority." WATCH: US has 'eyes open' for possible Iranian cyberattacks, says tech expert APCO supports legislation introduced by Sen. Amy Klobuchar that contains language crafted in collaboration with public safety experts, but Maier pointed out that the bill still lacks what matters most: a funding source. "That bill in Sen. [Amy] Klobuchar's office right now has foundational and fundamental language that we support," he said. "Public safety has supported it. We've helped craft that language. However, it does not identify a funding source. That's missing. Without it, it will not move forward." Funding remains a weak spot in the organization's effort to modernize 911. A federal cost analysis from 2018 estimated that a full nationwide rollout of NG911 would require $15 billion. Without this investment, Maier warned, the U.S. risks a fragmented emergency response system and what he calls "a nation of haves and have-nots." "Some states have invested in Next Generation 911 infrastructure and technologies. Others have done nothing," Maier said. "That leaves us with haves and have-nots across the nation. We want to have cities, communities, townships, villages, rural areas, tribal areas, territories all getting the same services. It should be across the nation, the same for everyone." The current system still runs on infrastructure built in the 1960s and '70s, which was never designed to support video, multimedia messaging, or geolocation data. "Next Generation 911 allows that information to reach the 911 center, and then it can be pushed out to those field-based responders," Maier said. "That information itself can be critical in getting the best information to the right person quickly enough that they can make a difference and save lives. Next Generation 911, if implemented nationwide today, will save lives today." President Donald Trump is pressuring his party to pass the sweeping tax cuts and spending package in time for him to sign it by the Fourth of July. The spending package includes sweeping legislation and implements many of the president's campaign promises.

Tariffs could mean fewer — and pricier — fireworks displays this July 4
Tariffs could mean fewer — and pricier — fireworks displays this July 4

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Tariffs could mean fewer — and pricier — fireworks displays this July 4

Fireworks, a hallmark of July 4th celebrations, are feeling the impact of President Trump's trade war with China. More than 95% of the fireworks sold in the U.S. come from China, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. And while sales of pyrotechnics have grown in past years as more states and counties loosen restrictions, tariffs have snarled some firework importers' plans this year. For retailers, the week before July 4 is the busiest time of the year for fireworks sales. In a normal year, shelves would be fully stocked. This year, with a 30% U.S. tariff in place on imports from China, fireworks fans may find a slimmer selection and higher prices. That's because some importers asked Chinese sellers to halt orders, when sky-high 145% U.S. tariffs were in place on China. A May trade truce between the countries lowered the the levy to 30%. "The timing of the tariffs couldn't have hit at a worse time. The majority of U.S. importers told China, 'Do not ship our product, we can't afford to pay," Julie Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association, told CBS News. "It's creating a supply-chain problem. The disruption is leading to fewer choices and higher prices for consumers this Independence Day, according to Bill Weimer, vice president of Phantom Fireworks, a major vendor. "On about 30% of our products, there's going to be some effect in the price," he told CBS News, although he noted that Phantom would absorb at least some of the higher tariff costs and not pass all of it on to consumers. As U.S. importers put orders on hold, China temporarily halted production of fireworks earlier this year. With the two countries taking steps last week to ease their trade dispute, the longer term impact on fireworks products remains to be seen.

Trump Administration Live Updates: White House Presses for Trump's Big Bill as Senators Trudge Through Votes
Trump Administration Live Updates: White House Presses for Trump's Big Bill as Senators Trudge Through Votes

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Trump Administration Live Updates: White House Presses for Trump's Big Bill as Senators Trudge Through Votes

For some governments, national security tariffs are potentially more concerning than the reciprocal tariffs Mr. Trump is threatening to apply to their U.S. exports. Governments around the globe are racing to negotiate trade deals with the United States in order to forestall President Trump's punishing tariffs, which could kick in on July 9. But the discussions have been slowed because Mr. Trump has threatened to impose more tariffs even if those deals are in place. Mr. Trump announced what he refers to as 'reciprocal tariffs' on April 8, saying they were in response to other countries' unfair trading practices. But he agreed to pause those levies for 90 days to give countries time to reach trade deals with the United States. Some administration officials recently suggested that the deadline could be extended, but Mr. Trump has signaled that he is ready to slap tariffs on countries he views as uncooperative. 'We have countries that are negotiating in good faith, but they should be aware that if we can't get across the line because they are being recalcitrant, then we could spring back to the April 2 levels,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television on Monday. India, Vietnam, Japan, the European Union, Malaysia and other governments have been working toward deals that could smooth relations with the United States and avoid double-digit tariffs. But the Trump administration has been moving forward with plans to impose another set of tariffs on certain industries that it views as essential to national security, a threat that has foreign leaders worried that there could be more pain ahead. These tariffs are dependent on the outcomes of trade investigations into lumber and timber, copper and critical minerals by the Commerce Department, which are expected to be completed soon and submitted to the White House, according to people familiar with the matter. A determination that imports pose a national security threat would allow the president to issue tariffs on those products in the coming weeks. Investigations on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and electronic devices are also proceeding and could be finished in time for tariffs as early as next month, the people said. Mr. Bessent added that tariffs on imports of items such as lumber were being imposed on a different track from the reciprocal tariffs that were announced in April and are not part of the current round of trade negotiations. Those tariffs on certain critical sectors, which would be issued under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, aim to build up domestic capacity for important products and ensure that the country isn't reliant on foreign factories in times of war or shortages. But these sectors — along with automobiles and steel, on which the Trump administration has already applied national security tariffs — are also vital industries for America's largest trading partners, like Japan, the European Union and India. These governments have been hesitant to strike a deal with the Trump administration, worried that they only will be hit by more levies down the road. For some foreign governments, these national security tariffs are potentially more concerning than the reciprocal tariffs Mr. Trump is threatening to apply to all their U.S. exports. For the European Union, tariffs on medicines, the bloc's No. 1 export to America, could be enormously painful. It is unclear whether a trade deal that the United States and European Union have been drafting will address that issue. Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, has suggested that negotiations should focus on a few key sectors, including medical drugs. 'We now need rapid joint decisions for four of the five major industries: automotive, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and mechanical engineering,' Mr. Merz said last week, adding that 'we don't want the best of the best; we want the most important of the necessary.' Pharmaceutical tariffs are also a major threat for India, which the Trump team has consistently been optimistic about striking a deal with. Last year, India exported almost $13 billion worth of drugs, and the United States is its biggest market. For Japan and South Korea, as well as Europe, exports of cars and steel to the United States have been a particular concern. Along with disputes over opening Japan's market to U.S. agriculture, U.S. tariffs on Japanese cars appear to be a thorny obstacle in what U.S. officials presumed would be a relatively smooth negotiation. Vietnam, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea and Indonesia could be hit by tariffs on semiconductors and other electronics, including phones and computers. Vietnam and Malaysia could also be hurt by tariffs on lumber and timber, which could cover products like kitchen cabinets. Several foreign governments have tried to negotiate provisions exempting them from other future tariff increases, but it's not clear how lenient the Trump administration will be on national security tariffs. The Trump administration has sent some mixed messages about how much it might be willing to lower them; some officials insist they are not up for negotiation. Trump officials have criticized exemptions from global steel tariffs granted to various countries by the Biden administration, saying they undermined their effectiveness. Trade experts said giving tariff exemptions would also risk angering labor unions that support them, and undercut the Trump administration's argument that the tariffs must be in place to protect national security. Image A steel plant in Zelzate, Belgium. For Japan, South Korea and Europe, exports of cars and steel are a particular concern. Credit... Kevin Faingnaert for The New York Times Nick Iacovella, the executive vice president of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, a trade group that supports tariffs, said that if the administration was 'giving away' exemptions on tariffs on critical industries, it was 'signaling to everyone that these really aren't national security issues.' Privately, Trump officials have said there may be some wiggle room. Notably, the framework agreement that the United States announced with Britain in May included some concessions on national security tariffs on cars and steel. Britain secured an exemption from car tariffs for a volume of exports set at historical levels. That deal, as well as lower levies on aerospace exports such as Rolls-Royce jet engines, came into effect Monday, more than seven weeks after the framework agreement was announced. For most of that time, companies were unsure when lower tariffs would be implemented. However, the agreement to eliminate steel tariffs hasn't been implemented as the two sides negotiate requirements for British steel companies. This arrangement has encouraged Japan, the European Union and others to seek a 'U.K.-style deal' to also exempt them from national security tariffs. But some Trump officials say that because the volume of their exports is so large, exemptions would be a major threat to U.S. industry. British exports of cars and steel to the United States were viewed as too limited to be much of a threat. But such exports from Japan, Korea and Europe are substantial. Jamieson Greer, the United States Trade Representative, has said privately that the British provisions were not a precedent or framework for other countries, according to a person familiar with the remarks. Peter Harrell, a former Biden administration official who is a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Britain exports about 100,000 cars to the United States each year. But Japan, the European Union and South Korea together exported approximately 3.5 million cars in 2024, a much larger share of the U.S. market. If the president exempted large quantities of these cars, 'then it doesn't look like you have a 25 percent auto tariff anymore,' Mr. Harrell said. 'He'd face political blowback.' The Commerce Department and the Office of the United States Trade Representative declined to comment. The White House not respond to a request for comment. For now, foreign governments appear wary of making substantial commitments on trade, only to see U.S. tariffs rise or potentially fall. The Trump administration is awaiting the outcome of a significant court case on whether the reciprocal tariffs are lawful. That decision could come this fall. Jake Colvin, the president of the National Foreign Trade Council, a trade organization that advocates open trade, said other countries were 'looking for certainty' in deals with the Trump administration. But uncertainty continues because investigations under the 232 national security provision are still underway. 'Countries do want to make deals with us, but they are not going to agree to anything final until they know the status of the 232 investigations,' he said. Part of the confusion is because trade negotiations are being handled by various departments. Mr. Greer and his office focus on negotiating tariffs and other trade irritants. But the 232 tariffs fall under the authority of the Commerce Department, which is juggling multiple investigations and other priorities. Some foreign officials have said they have little clarity from the Commerce Department about the likelihood of exceptions. Philip Luck, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said foreign governments were experiencing 'a lot of frustration and confusion,' in part because countries have been negotiating with multiple officials. They have been hearing different things from different principles, and also been told that all their agreements were contingent on Mr. Trump. 'There doesn't seem to be anybody in charge,' Mr. Luck said. Jeanna Smialek contributed reporting from Brussels, Eshe Nelson from Lisbon and Alan Rappeport from Washington.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store