logo
Survivors of Toronto's Danforth shooting get green light on lawsuit against gun manufacturer

Survivors of Toronto's Danforth shooting get green light on lawsuit against gun manufacturer

CBC12 hours ago

Social Sharing
Survivors of a mass shooting in Toronto's Greektown and their relatives can proceed with a class-action lawsuit against the gun manufacturer Smith & Wesson after Ontario's top court overturned a ruling that had dismissed their motion to certify the claim.
Eighteen-year-old Reese Fallon and 10-year-old Julianna Kozis were killed, and 13 others injured, when a gunman went on a shooting rampage on Danforth Avenue in July 2018.
The gunman, who used a stolen semi-automatic handgun made by Smith & Wesson, then turned the weapon on himself.
Some of the survivors and their families brought a class action against the gunmaker for failing to implement technology that would prevent unauthorized use of the gun, but the claim failed at the certification stage.
The motions judge found that the plaintiffs' negligence claim didn't meet one of the criteria for certification, which requires them to propose issues that are common to the members of the class.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has found the motions judge set the bar too high by essentially requiring the plaintiffs to prove their case on its merits at the certification stage.
"The plaintiffs were not required to demonstrate that their negligence claim would ultimately be successful, or even that there was a prima facie case," the court said in a unanimous decision.
"Rather, they had to show some basis in the evidence that the defendant's failure to include the authorized user technology constituted negligence and caused or increased the risk of harm to the members of the class. And that is very different than proving the case on a balance of probabilities at trial."
The plaintiffs welcomed the ruling and said they are seeking justice through safer handguns and corporate accountability.
"Handgun manufacturers like Smith & Wesson have long known their products can be designed to prevent the type of unlawful use that led to the Danforth shooting," they said in a statement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ontario Human Rights Commission offers hiring guidance to avoid Indigenous identity fraud
Ontario Human Rights Commission offers hiring guidance to avoid Indigenous identity fraud

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Ontario Human Rights Commission offers hiring guidance to avoid Indigenous identity fraud

A new policy statement from the Ontario Human Rights Commission calls on employers hiring for Indigenous-specific positions to find ways to verify candidates' Indigenous identities, with help from Indigenous communities. Juliette Nicolet, director of policy, education, monitoring and outreach at the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC), said the policy statement is a response to calls from Indigenous organizations and people who have been advocating for safeguards against Indigenous identity fraud. "The need for the guidance was really highlighted by widespread reports of alleged and proven Indigenous identity fraud across Canada ... by non-Indigenous people and so in response people called for action," Nicolet said. "We thought that it was critical that hiring practices and policies for Indigenous-specific positions include a process to confirm claims of Indigenous identity in alignment with [human rights code] obligations." The p olicy statement on Indigenous-specific hiring was released in May. It confirms that hiring Indigenous employees for Indigenous-specific positions is permissible under Ontario's human rights code and calls on employers to establish verification processes of Indigenous identity in consultation with local Indigenous peoples. Nicolet said cases of misrepresentation of Indigenous identity have been brought to the public's attention for years and the damage it does to Indigenous peoples "can't be minimized." " These [fraudulent claims] are harmful practices which, in the view of the Commission, can constitute a breach of trust and threaten the integrity of special programs and special employment positions that are specifically intended to support Indigenous people and address disadvantages resulting from discrimination," Nicolet said. Nicolet said the goal is for employers to reach out to Indigenous communities to begin a conversation. Employers have 'obligation and a right' to verify identity Maurice Switzer, a citizen of the Mississaugas of Alderville First Nation, was on the commission's Indigenous Reconciliation Advisory Group for the development of the policy and asked the OHRC in 2018 to turn its attention to this issue. Representatives from the Ontario Native Women's Association and Ontario Federation of Indigenous Friendship Centres also participated in the creation of the policy statement and context guide. Switzer said employers can be uncomfortable having conversations about verification because standard hiring practices can make it inappropriate or illegal to ask about identity and culture when interviewing candidates for jobs. He said the purpose of the policy is to reinforce to employers that they have an "obligation and a right" to ensure that the person they hire for an Indigenous-specific position is, in fact, Indigenous. "It's not a colonial institution's place to tell people how to determine Indigenous ancestry or what it is…that's up to our communities," Switzer said. He added that the policy underlines this fact, making clear the need to engage with Indigenous communities and build relationships. "A lot of people, I think with the best of intentions, have thought they were contributing to the advancement of awareness of Indigenous peoples…but to do it in a way that's not legitimate or dishonest, that really undermines a lot of what they may have accomplished and it casts a pall over Indigenous peoples," he said. 'A very uncomfortable discussion' Gabriel Maracle, an assistant professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, said it's good to see the OHRC, universities and other institutions taking a lead on some sort of verification policy. He along with Amy Shawanda co-authored a recent Yellowhead Institute report on Indigenous identity fraud in academia. Maracle, who is from Tyendinaga Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte, is hoping organizations that have been 'on the fence' about implementing verification policies become more proactive. "This is a very uncomfortable discussion to have," he said. "The next step is like, 'OK, well we've kind of put in these protective measures now, what do we do about the stuff that kind of got through?' "We're trying to lay down train tracks as the train is coming down." Shawanda, who is Anishinaabe from Wiikwemkoong Unceded Territory, is an assistant professor at McGill University in Montreal. She said she sees a need for Indigenous-specific hiring policies. "We have the OHRC now that we can rely on," she said.

Ceremony in Ottawa marks 40th anniversary of Air India terrorist bombing
Ceremony in Ottawa marks 40th anniversary of Air India terrorist bombing

CTV News

time5 hours ago

  • CTV News

Ceremony in Ottawa marks 40th anniversary of Air India terrorist bombing

CTV's Camille Wilson has more on the memorial ceremony taking place in Ottawa to commemorate the 40th anniversary of Air India bombing. A ceremony was held Monday to mark the 40th anniversary of the Air India attack, the worst terrorist attack in Canadian history. On June 23, 1985, 329 people including 268 Canadian citizens, were killed by a terrorist bomb aboard an Air India Flight from Montreal. The wreckage landed 190 kilometres offshore of Cork, Ireland. An annual commemoration ceremony was held at the Air India monument at Dow's Lake on Monday to mark the tragedy with victim's families, friends and other community members remembering those lost. Susheel Gupta lost his 37-year-old mother Ramwati Gupta in the attack, along with 21 other close friends. 'Certainly, over the years, we've gotten to know many of the other victim's families as well. I'm here in her honour and in honour of all the victims who died in this tragedy,' said Gupta, who serves as the director of the Air India Victim's Families Association. He was 12-years-old when he lost his mother. 'It's important to be here, to not only remember our loved ones but to remind Canadians that terrorism is something that happens in Canada. It has happened in Canada,' Gupta said. Susheel connected with his wife Nidhi through the tragedy after she lost her best friend in the attack at 10 years old. Nidhi Gupta says they went to school together, danced and participated in the Indian culture together. 'Just trying to understand that they were gone and in the brutal way that they were gone. Not understanding how anybody could do something like that. Just trying to grasp the fact that I'd never see her again. She was going away for the summer. We were going to reconnect in September when school started,' said Nidhi Gupta. Jagmohan and Yash Humar were close friends with the Sait's, a family of five who were killed. 'A very promising family. We were together always,' said Jagmohan Humar. 'The youngest one, Ankur his name. He was one and a half years at the time. I had given him his name.' Jagmohan says he often sings and says a prayer for them. 'Although it's been 40 years, still the memories are still the same,' says Aruna Gupta, whose friends died in the attack, 'Not a day goes by I don't think of those innocent children. The families who lost mothers, brothers, sisters, fathers, friends. I just send my prayers every time I think of them everyday.' June 23 is now recognized by the Canadian government as the National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism, not only remembering the victims of Air India but also paying tribute to those affected by terrorism worldwide.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store