logo
Hansen and Lems prepare to run as team for governor

Hansen and Lems prepare to run as team for governor

Yahoo22-04-2025

PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — On Thursday, two South Dakota lawmakers are expected to announce they are seeking the Republican nominations for governor and lieutenant governor that voters will decide in June 2026.
Rep. Jon Hansen and Rep. Karla Lems would be the first to officially enter the race. Hansen and Lems have placed an identical post on their Facebook pages, with a 'Stronger Together' slogan, inviting the public to a 6 p.m. event at the Military Heritage Alliance building in Sioux Falls.
Hansen is a Dell Rapids lawyer. During his 10 years in the South Dakota House of Representatives, here's what he has focused on:
Restricting abortion.
Opposing surrogate pregnancies.
Blocking carbon dioxide pipelines.
Steering state funds to non-public K-12 education.
And changing state election laws.
Hansen was prime sponsor of a Republican-led effort by the Legislature in 2022 to make it more difficult for voters to amend the South Dakota Constitution, as well as to pass or stop state laws, if the proposal sought to raise taxes or impose a new tax. Republican lawmakers supported his proposal that sought to raise the threshold to 60%. It also would have required 60% of the proposal obligated state government to appropriate $10 million or more in any of the first five fiscal years.
Opponents criticized Hansen's effort as an attempt to give the Legislature more power. He wrote the pro-side on the ballot-measure pamphlet. Voters however overwhelmingly rejected the proposed change.
Hansen, vice president of South Dakota Right to Life, most recently led the 2024 campaign that defeated a proposed amendment seeking to add abortion rights to the South Dakota Constitution. The vote was 176,809 yes and 250,136 no.
He also has been an active voice against CO2 pipelines. In 2023, Hansen sponsored legislation that sought to ban CO2 projects from using eminent domain to force their way across properties. The House passed it, but a Senate committee defeated it.
Hansen also debated Elizabeth Burns-Thompson, vice president of government and public affairs for Navigator CO2, one of the companies that was seeking to construct a pipeline to several ethanol producers in southeastern South Dakota. The state Public Utilities Commission ultimately denied Navigator's application.
Hansen has been involved in some statehouse leadership intrigue, too. In 2021, House members chose him as the chamber's speaker pro tem, making him the No. 2 presiding officer. Traditionally, the speaker pro tem rises to House speaker during the following two-year term. But in Hansen's case, that process was interrupted.
House members instead chose Rep. Hugh Bartels over Hansen as speaker for the 2023-24 term. Hansen didn't allow the setback to stop him. With new members-elect supporting him, he ran for speaker again after the 2024 elections and was chosen as the chamber's top officer for the 2025-26 term.
House members also chose Lems as speaker pro tem for the 2025-26 term. She is the first woman in South Dakota history to hold the post. Only one woman, Debra Anderson, has ever served as speaker for the South Dakota House, and that was nearly 40 years ago.
Lems, a Canton agri-business and farm owner, has served three years in the House. She was prime sponsor this year of a new law that, starting July 1, bans CO2 projects from using eminent domain to force their way across properties. The ban forced Summit Carbon Solutions to ask the state Public Utilities Commission for an indefinite hold on its CO2 route application.
Lems especially was active last year in forcing a statewide referendum on legislation that would have changed how the Public Utilities Commission permitted transmission projects such as pipelines, by saying a PUC permit for a project would override any local regulations. Voters ultimately rejected SB 201 statewide, 165,682 yes and 242,459 no, defeating it in 65 of South Dakota's 66 counties.
There was another effect — political — from SB 201. Enough of the legislators who voted yes in the House and in the Senate for the final version suffered defeats in the 2024 primaries (or they didn't seek re-election) that majorities of anti-CO2 pipeline candidates won election to both chambers of the Legislature. That opened the way for Hansen and Lems to be chosen as House speaker and speaker pro tem.
As of Monday night, neither Hansen nor Lems had filed paperwork for statewide campaign committees. However, their Facebook announcement post says their Thursday evening event is sponsored by The People First political action committee.
A public record shows the PAC was organized in March by former Rep. Randy Gross, a Republican lawmaker who represented the same district as Hansen. The PAC's stated purpose: 'To promote and support conservative candidates who put the people of South Dakota first.'
The Legislature this year changed the process for choosing lieutenant governors. In the past, political parties nominated candidates for lieutenant governors at their summer statewide conventions, even though state law has each set of candidates for governor and lieutenant governor on the November ballot as a team. The new law allows candidates for governor to choose their running mates.
This team approach isn't a first, however. Former Gov. Bill Janklow, for example, in seeking a third term in 1994, announced that then-Rep. Carole Hillard of Rapid City would be his running mate. It was a way to counter the West River strength of then-Gov. Walter Dale Miller, whose lieutenant governor was Steve Kirby of Sioux Falls. Miller had been lieutenant governor until the death of Gov. George S. Mickelson in a 1993 plane crash. Former Gov. Janklow went on to defeat sitting Gov. Miller in the Republican primary election.
While Hansen is presumed to be the first candidate to officially be entering the 2026 race for governor, a potential candidate is the current governor, Republican Larry Rhoden. In January, Rhoden officially changed the designation of his campaign fundraising committee from lieutenant governor to governor. That came after Rhoden ascended from lieutenant governor to governor, following the resignation of former Gov. Kristi Noem earlier in January.
Rhoden hasn't yet publicly declared whether he will be a candidate for governor on his own in 2026, saying he's receiving encouragement to run while still gauging potential support. He chose Tony Venhuizen, a Republican lawmaker from Sioux Falls, to serve as his lieutenant governor.
Here's a look at the legislation sponsored by Hansen and Lems during their time in the South Dakota House of Representatives.2025 – Prime sponsor of 2 House bills, 1 House resolution.
HB 1184 — amend the deadline for filing a petition to initiate a measure or constitutional amendment. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/26001
HB 1256 — require the inclusion of certain information on a candidate's nominating petition or on a ballot question petition. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/26143
HCR 6003 — To provide for an interim study regarding property tax reduction and preservation of the American dream to own a home. Passed both chambers; because it was a resolution, the governor didn't have a direct role. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/26086
2024 – Prime sponsor of 5 House bills; lead House sponsor of 3 Senate bills.
HB 1005 — revise the manner of citing the Administrative Rules of South Dakota (at the request of the Interim Committee on Rules Review.) Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24483
HB 1006 — increase the amount of time permitted the Interim Rules Review Committee to review final permanent rulemaking materials (at the request of the Interim Committee on Rules Review.) Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24520
HB 1158 — limit reliance upon secondary sources as statements of law. Passed House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25166
HB 1219 — prohibit the exercise of eminent domain for the construction of pipelines carrying carbon oxide. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25214
HB 1244 — provide a process to withdraw a signature from a petition for an initiated measure, constitutional amendment, or a referendum on a law in certain situations and to declare an emergency. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24649
SB 72 — increase the annual limit of tax credits that an insurance company may claim through the partners in education tax credit program. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24899
SB 75 — modify provisions pertaining to the designation of a legal newspaper. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24572
SB 94 — amend provisions pertaining to the partners in education tax credit program. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25060
SJR 509 — Applying to the United States Congress under Article V of the United States Constitution to call for a convention for proposing an amendment to the constitution establishing congressional term limits. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25208
2023 – Prime sponsor of 4 House bills; lead House sponsor of 3 Senate bills.
HB 1161 — provide staffing ratios for day care providers. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24258
HB 1163 — prohibit the dissemination of obscene material to minors in a public school or public library. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24265
HB 1234 — provide a voucher for students enrolled in certain grade levels at accredited nonpublic schools. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24220
HB 1235 — provide a conscience exemption from a COVID-19 vaccination. Failed on House floor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24348
SB 60 — make an appropriation for completing improvements of the road leading to the former entrance into Palisades State Park and to declare an emergency. Failed in Senate Committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23678
SB 192 — provide liability for the publishing or distributing of material harmful to minors on the internet and the wrongful retention of individually identifiable information. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24277
2022 – Prime sponsor of 5 House bills; lead House sponsor of 4 Senate bills.
HB 1207 — clarify standards for the consideration of open enrollment applications. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22946
HB 1217 — expand criminal provisions regarding the protection of minors from certain forms of sexual exploitation. Withdrawn by sponsor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23328
HB 1218 — revise the definition of abused or neglected child to include minors subject to human trafficking. Withdrawn by sponsor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23329
HB 1220 — establish a safe harbor for child survivors of certain forms of human trafficking. Withdrawn by sponsor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23330
HB 1221 — require training on human trafficking for law enforcement officers. Withdrawn by sponsor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23331
SB 71 — revise certain provisions related to the partners in education tax credit program. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22594
SB 182 — prohibit discriminatory actions against persons engaged with the firearm industry. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23259
SB 195 — establish the burden of proof after a claim of immunity. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/23466
SB 210 — provide for the establishment of education savings accounts. Withdrawn by sponsor (Sen. Jessica Castleberry); never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22924
2021 – Prime sponsor of 6 House bills and 1 House resolution; lead House sponsor of four Senate bills.
HB 1114 — provide a definition of abortion. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22210
HB 1120 — establish a website for the posting of notices for certain local governments. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22222
HB 1161 — update certain provisions regarding pregnancy help center consultations. Withdrawn by sponsor (Hansen.) https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22354
HB 1247 — provide for the protection of the consciences of medical professionals. Failed in House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22444
HB 1248 — require reports regarding the intentional disposal, destruction, or other disposition of human embryos. Passed by House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22432
HB 1249 — revise fiscal note requirements for initiative and initiated amendments. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22429
HJR 5003 — Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next primary election a new section to Article XI of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, relating to a three-fifths vote requirement for certain initiated or Legislature-proposed constitutional amendments and initiated or Legislature-referred measures. Passed both chambers; because it was a resolution, governor had no direct role. Voters rejected it at June 2022 primary: 59,125 voted yes; 122,417 voted no. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22243
SB 72 — revise notification requirements for listing and delisting species on the threatened and endangered species list. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/21983
SB 124 — provide protections for the exercise of religious freedom. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22127
SB 175 — remove certain eligibility requirements for the partners in education tax credit program. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/22268
SB 183 — declare certain contract provisions regarding abortion as unenforceable and to provide a penalty therefor. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/21911
2020 – Prime sponsor of 6 House bills and 1 House resolution; lead House sponsor of four Senate bills.
HB 1068 — include out-of-state convictions for the basis of an enhanced penalty for the crime of stalking. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10423
HB 1096 — prohibit commercial surrogacy contracts, provide a penalty for facilitating a commercial surrogacy, and establish an interim committee to evaluate surrogacy in the state. Passed House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10411
HB 1098 — authorize certain off-sale licenses for certain entities and to declare an emergency. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/11845
HB 1173 — prohibit a school board from denying an application for open enrollment from certain students with autism. Failed in House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10315
HB 1179 — authorize series limited liability companies. Passed both chambers, signed into law governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/11639
HCR 6020 — Denouncing the National Education Association's recent policy to support 'the fundamental right to abortion.' Passed both chambers; because it was a resolution, governor had no direct role. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/11979
SB 109 — provide protections for health care decisions governed by conscience. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/11951
SB 147 — prohibit collective bargaining by certain employees of the Board of Regents. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/11986
SB 176 — provide for the seizure and holding of real property as evidence. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10255
SB 180 — repeal and revise certain provisions regarding the petition circulation process. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/12123
2019 – Prime sponsor of 6 House bills and 1 House resolution; lead House sponsor of 4 Senate bills.
HB 1074 — provide a privilege for journalists and newscasters regarding refusal to disclose information. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9859
HB 1093 — establish legal standards applicable to petition challenges. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9983
HB 1094 — revise certain programs regarding transparency of the petition circulation process. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9982
HB 1192 — authorize the consumption of alcohol in certain common areas. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10071
HB 1193 — provide a criminal penalty for causing an abortion against a pregnant mother's will. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9682
HB 1196 — provide a definition of blockchain technology for certain purposes. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10020
HR 1003 — Denouncing the recent passage of New York's abortion law and requesting that the Governor declare a day of prayer and fasting to atone for the unspeakable crime of abortion. Passed in House; because it was a House-only resolution, the Senate didn't consider it. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9842
SB 51 — revise certain provisions regarding trusts. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9496
SB 78 — exempt certain medical providers from licensure. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9373
SB 96 — expand application of the tax credit for contributions to a scholarship granting organization. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/9882
SB 166 — revise certain provisions regarding occupational licensing. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/10088
2013 – Prime sponsor of 3 House bills.
HB 1235 — continue the Regional Watershed Advisory Task Force under the supervision of the Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council in a manner to save public financial resources. Passed in House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/4433
HB 1236 — prohibit the recovery of damages in certain wrongful birth and wrongful life civil suits based upon the lost opportunity to terminate the life of an unborn child. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/4354
HB 1237 — revise certain provisions to abortion counseling. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/4352
2012 – Prime sponsor of 6 House bills and 1 House resolution; lead House sponsor of two Senate bills.
HB 1112 — prohibit any person who fails to file certain campaign finance documents to be a candidate for office. Failed in House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3112
HB 1113 — prohibit the use of certain public resources to influence the outcome of elections. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3027
HB 1114 — amend provision limiting the time used to determine if a violation is a third or subsequent offense. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3522
HB 1158 — allow students attending nonpublic high schools to be eligible for the jump start scholarship program. Passed House, failed in Senate Appropriations Committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3151
HB 1185 — prohibit all qualified health plans offered through a health care exchange from including abortion coverage. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3615
HB 1274 — revise the distance within which a school district may charge a fee for providing bus transportation to students. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3672
HCR 1010 — Urging Congress to adopt a proposed constitutional amendment limiting federal legislation to a single subject. Passed both chambers; because it was a resolution, the governor had no direct role. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3613
SB 164 — require public school students in grade eleven to take certain assessments. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3669
SB 172 — toll any conviction for operation of a boat while under the influence when calculating the number of offenses for enhancement of a driving under the influence charge. Failed in Senate committee; never reached House. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/3148
2011 – Prime sponsor of 1 House bill.
HB 1104 — revise the deadline for withdrawing from a primary election. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/2640Prime sponsor of 3 House bills and 1 House resolution.
HB 1052 — prohibit the exercise of eminent domain for a pipeline that carries carbon oxide. Passed both chambers, signed into law by governor. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25581
HB 1190 — require an ownership disclosure for any non-individual entity that exercises eminent domain. Withdrawn by sponsor (Lems.) https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25913
HB 1191 — subject advertising services to a gross receipts tax, and to allocate proceeds to property tax relief. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25876
HJR 5006 — Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election amendments to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring an intervening general election before consideration of an initiated constitutional amendment or initiated measure having the same subject as a previously rejected initiated amendment or measure. Passed in House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25567
2024 – Prime sponsor of 3 House bills.
HB 1203 — clarify references to the court in a condemnation proceeding. Passed House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25257
HB 1241 — modify the amount of time allowed to an employee to vote at any election in this state. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25294
HB 1243 — extend deadlines for action by the Public Utilities Commission upon the request of any party. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/25293
2023 – Prime sponsor of 5 House bills.
HB 1084 — grant a common carrier the right of eminent domain for public use. Withdrawn by sponsor (Lems). https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24135
HB 1133 — define a commodity for the purpose of qualifying as a common carrier. Passed House, failed in Senate committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24090
HB 1188 — provide for property owner inclusion in the pipeline siting application and condemnation process. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24091
HB 1224 — require verification of landowner permission prior to certain pipeline permitting actions. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24338
HB 1232 — revise provisions related to residency for voter registration. Failed in House committee. https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24344
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids
Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids

CBS News

time10 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids

Washington — Three Democratic governors are defending their responses to the migrant crisis and dispute claims of failing to cooperate with federal authorities, according to prepared remarks that will be delivered Thursday before a House oversight panel. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are among the witnesses scheduled to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on so-called "sanctuary policies". "Let me be clear: Sanctuary policies don't protect Americans. They protect criminal illegal aliens," Oversight Chair James Comer, a Kentucky Republican will say in his opening statement. The governors' appearances come as President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom remain embroiled in a legal and political standoff over the deployment of the National Guard troops and Marines to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles. Demonstrations have spread to other U.S. cities, including New York and Chicago following a series of deportation raids. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz will tell lawmakers. "It is ridiculous to suggest that Minnesota — a state that is over 1,500 miles away from the Southern border and a thousand miles from lawmakers in Washington, D.C. who decide and implement border policy is somehow responsible for a failure of immigration enforcement." The former vice presidential candidate has drawn intense scrutiny not only over immigration policy but also for his handling of social justice protests that broke out in Minneapolis following the death of George Floyd in 2020. Trump administration officials have cited Walz' actions to justify the president's decision to federalize troops in California. While Walz does not appear to directly address the controversy in his testimony, he says he is "disappointed" in the federal government's overall approach. "As governor of Minnesota, it is incumbent on me to use the state's resources to help Minnesota families—not turn those resources over to the administration so they can stage another photo-op in tactical gear or accidentally deport more children without observing due process," Walz is set to say. Ahead of the hearing, the GOP-led panel released a video compilation of various news clips accusing the governors of "shielding" undocumented immigrants and "causing chaos" in their states. A memo from Hochul's office suggested the hearing could be "derailed by wild accusations" and "twisted characterizations" but noted the governor's position is "clear" when it comes to supporting strong borders and comprehensive immigration reform. "New York state cooperates with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in criminal cases," Hochul says. "And our values as New Yorkers demand that we treat those who arrive here in search of a better life with dignity and reject policies that tear law-abiding families apart." Hochul also addresses the influx of more than 220,000 migrants to New York City since early 2022, many of whom were bussed from border states, calling it "an unprecedented humanitarian crisis." "We have responded to this crisis with both compassion and pragmatism," Hochul states."And as a result, we largely prevented what could have become an additional crisis — one of street homelessness and tent cities." Pritzker says Illinois also stepped up to the challenge, and blamed the lack of federal intervention and cooperation from border states for exacerbating the problem. "As governor, my responsibility is to ensure that all Illinoisans feel safe in their homes, their businesses, and their communities," Pritzker is prepared to say. "That is why my administration continued to make significant investments in public safety, even as our resources were strained because of the lack of federal support during the crisis — expanding our state police force and investing in efforts to reduce gun violence." Thursday's session follows a March hearing on sanctuary cities with four Democratic mayors: Eric Adams, of New York, Mike Johnston of Denver, Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Michelle Wu of Boston. Comer launched an investigation in January into "sanctuary jurisdictions", including states, counties or cities, to examine their impact on public safety and federal immigration enforcement. President Trump has vowed to crack down on localities that don't back his immigration agenda. Earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security removed its list of sanctuary jurisdictions after several cities challenged the findings.

Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel
Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel

Associated Press

time10 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel

WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, ___ Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago.

Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates
Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates

Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates Show Caption Hide Caption See how Los Angeles protests intensified over one weekend What started as a small protest over immigration raids on Friday ballooned into large demonstrations throughout the weekend. Here's what happened. Nearly a week after protests over federal immigration enforcement raids first broke out in Los Angeles, a showdown between federal and state officials is expected to land in court on Thursday over whether President Donald Trump can use the military to assist the raids against California leaders' wishes. In the hearing, scheduled for Thursday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will hear Gov. Gavin Newsom's motion for a temporary restraining order limiting the activities of the 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines Trump deployed in Los Angeles. Newsom has decried the military intervention as an illegal waste of resources and is asking the court to block the troops' participation in law enforcement activities. He ultimately wants the National Guard returned to state control and Trump's actions declared illegal. Downtown Los Angeles remained under a curfew after days of demonstrations against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement led to hundreds of arrests. The protests broke out on June 6 in response to ongoing ICE raids that have sparked fear among immigrant communities. While many protests have been relatively peaceful, some have turned into scenes of chaos as police fired with less lethal munitions, tear gas and flash-bangs to disperse crowds. "If I didn't act quickly on that, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground right now," Trump said at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on Wednesday. State and local leaders have disputed Trump's claims, saying the decision has only provoked the unrest, likening the president's actions to "authoritarian regimes." U.S. Northern Command announced on Wednesday that the 700 active-duty Marines had completed their training for the Los Angeles mission, which included de-escalation and crowd control. The Marines were expected to be deployed within 48 hours to protect federal officers and property. National Guard commander Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman said on Wednesday that the troops wouldn't conduct arrests or searches and seizures, but would be authorized to detain protesters temporarily. Protests are planned for 1,800 communities across the country on June 14, the same day Trump holds a military parade in Washington, D.C. For decades, the GOP has claimed most of the symbols of patriotism, including the American flag, but the people protesting Trump, a Republican, say they are the true patriots now. The rallies, named "No Kings Day" to oppose what they see as Trump's power grab, are expected to be the largest and most numerous protests since Trump's second term began, dwarfing the Hands Off protests in early April that drew as many as 1 million Americans to the streets at more than 1,000 rallies. No Kings Day was organized by grassroots groups in cities and towns of all sizes to coincide with the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration, which is also Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day. Administration officials insist it is a coincidence that the parade falls on Trump's birthday. Read more here. Contributing: Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store