logo
Kate Walsh recalls ‘very subtle' symptoms that led to brain tumor diagnosis: ‘Something's off'

Kate Walsh recalls ‘very subtle' symptoms that led to brain tumor diagnosis: ‘Something's off'

Yahoo01-03-2025

Kate Walsh learned an important life lesson from a health scare she encountered in 2015.
While appearing on "The Kelly Clarkson Show" on Feb. 27, the actor recalled being diagnosed with a brain tumor in 2015 and explained how the experience affected her outlook on health.
"Thankfully, it turned out to be benign, so I was very, very fortunate," she said.
Walsh, 57, went on to share some of the warning signs that led to her diagnosis.
"It was like, 'Hey, I'm really tired.' And then it's like, 'Oh, the right side of my body is dipping,'" she recalled.
At first, Walsh wasn't sure what was going on, especially since people kept telling her she was fine.
"They're like, 'Oh, you're off.' I'm like 'No,'" she said.
Walsh also felt strange while walking her dog one day and recalled thinking the street must be "windy."
"It was just sort of very subtle and then very kind of, 'Oh it's ADD. I can't really focus. Oh I've been scrolling too much.' That kind of stuff," she said.
Going through this health scare taught Walsh a lesson that she's hoping to share with others.
"I know how important it is to advocate for one's own health because people were like, You're just depressed.' It was right after (my TV show) 'Bad Judge' got canceled. 'Your show got canceled. You're just depressed,'" she recalled others saying. "I'm like, 'No something's off.'"
Still, Walsh acknowledged that it's challenging to advocate for yourself in these scenarios.
"It's a hard thing when you have everybody looking at you going, 'Hmm, I think you're just this or that. You're tired,'" she said.
In 2017, Walsh appeared on TODAY to discuss her diagnosis and recovery. After feeling 'exhausted,' she decided to seek medical assistance.
'But I'd just wrapped a show, 'Bad Judge,' and I was starring in it and executive producing, so it wasn't unheard of to be totally exhausted. So I thought I just really burned myself out.'
Soon enough, Walsh started experiencing cognitive symptoms and "couldn't find my words."
After fighting for a diagnostic MRI, Walsh learned that she had a 'very sizable tumor.' Following a surgery, she discovered that it was benign.
The non-cancerous tumor was known as a meningioma, which John Hopkins Medicine defines as "the most common type of primary brain tumor."
"These tumors originate in the meninges, which are the outer three layers of tissue between the skull and the brain that cover and protect the brain just under the skull," the John Hopkins Medicine website reads. "Meningiomas grow out of the middle layer of the meninges called the arachnoid. They grow slowly and may exist for years before being detected."
This article was originally published on TODAY.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamden school raises money for cancer research at ‘Saint Baldrick's' event
Hamden school raises money for cancer research at ‘Saint Baldrick's' event

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Hamden school raises money for cancer research at ‘Saint Baldrick's' event

HAMDEN, Conn. (WTNH) — Saint Rita School in Hamden school raised money for cancer research, participating in the 'Saint Baldrick's' event. Multiple people volunteered to shave their heads. Students, faculty and staff also used the event to recognize childhood cancer survivors, including seventh-grade student Juliette Walsh. Southington brewery hosts 'Let's Get Buzzed' fundraiser for kids battling cancer 'They're really supportive and there's always people looking out for you,' Walsh said 'I was 8 and it was hard because it was during COVID but there were always a lot of people there to help you.' Saint Rita School said this was the fourth time they have surpassed their fundraising goal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Bill targets NJ's worst nursing homes with new penalties
Bill targets NJ's worst nursing homes with new penalties

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Bill targets NJ's worst nursing homes with new penalties

New Jersey nursing homes that routinely receive low scores would face greater sanctions from state regulators, including the possibility of forced closure, under a bill making its way through Trenton. The measure targets nursing homes that have scored one star on a federal rating system in two or more consecutive quarters — a hallmark sign that the homes' owners are likely misusing large portions of taxpayer funds intended for care, State Comptroller Kevin Walsh said at a legislative hearing on June 9. "They don't get to be one-star nursing homes because the nurse is inexperienced or the administrator is inexperienced," said Walsh, whose staff has investigated nursing home fraud for years. "The reality is poor-quality nursing homes are usually in the condition they're in because of corruption and fraud."The hearing comes on the heels of an investigation by AARP into New Jersey nursing home finances. The organization found that from 2021 to 2023, nursing home owners paid $2 billion to companies in which the owners had a stake. This amounted to $285 million over federal guidelines. A frequent practice is that a nursing home owner uses a corporation that owns the property to charge "unrestricted rent and lease fees" to the nursing home using Medicaid dollars to pay themselves, the AARP report said. This includes many other nursing home operations such as management fees, dietary services and staffing. "There's a lot of money going to places it shouldn't," Walsh said. Under the bill, S1951, nursing homes with one-star ratings in two consecutive quarters would be subject to several penalties from the state Health Department including barring admission to new Medicaid residents, limiting the number of Medicaid enrollees and reducing payments under a quality incentive program. More: What happens when an elderly relative can't live alone? What to know about aging in NJ The penalties get tougher if a nursing home has a one-star rating for three consecutive quarters. They include prohibiting the nursing home from admitting any new resident and removing current residents who are Medicaid enrollees. Some lawmakers said the bill doesn't go far enough and that it should examine nursing homes that receive more than one star (on a five-star scale) but still perform poorly. 'What this bill will do is walk [owners] away from providing the worst-quality care,' Walsh said. 'This bill will not prevent every scam. This bill will not prevent fraud, waste and abuse in all cases. It will discourage nursing homes that have made a business decision to siphon money away." Of New Jersey's 350 nursing homes, 15 had been one-star facilities for two or more years, Walsh said. Those facilities care for 1,850 residents and received $310 million in Medicaid payments from 2017 to 2019. Walsh said it took his staff two years to uncover the labyrinth of shell companies and financial transactions that exposed misdeeds at a South Jersey nursing home. About 57% of New Jersey nursing home residents are covered by Medicaid, taxpayer-funded insurance for low-income people. The average daily Medicaid payment to a nursing home is $193 per resident. The star rating system by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was devised as a way for families to compare nursing homes and scrutinize the ones that continually score poorly. It is calculated based on health inspections, staffing ratios and other quality measures. But information on each facility is still limited. "I know more about the used car I buy than a nursing home," Sen. Joseph Vitale, chair of the Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee, said at the hearing. The bill was approved by the committee. Nursing home trade groups opposed the measure but did not offer anyone to testify at the hearing. This article originally appeared on Bill targets NJ's worst nursing homes with new penalties

NHS calls for 200,000 new blood donors as supplies run low
NHS calls for 200,000 new blood donors as supplies run low

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

NHS calls for 200,000 new blood donors as supplies run low

The NHS has warned that it continues to face a "challenging" blood shortage, as it calls for 200,000 new donors to come forward. Concern over blood stocks prompted the health service to issue an "amber alert" last year, meaning supplies were running low enough to have an impact on patient treatment. Supplies have remained low ever since, with officials warning there is a "critical" need for more donors who have O negative blood, which can be given to the majority of patients. NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), the body that oversees England's blood donation system, said the number of regular donors needs to rise from around 800,000 to more than one million to maintain a safe and reliable supply. NHSBT chief executive Dr Jo Farrar said: "Our stocks over the past 12 months have been challenging. If we had a million regular donors, this would help keep our stocks healthy - you'd truly be one in a million." There is a pressing need to avoid a "red alert", which would mean demand far exceeds capacity, threatening public safety, NHSBT added. The body's chief medical officer said such an alert could see patients waiting longer for treatment. Dr Gail Miflin told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It can mean, if you're not urgently needing blood, that you may be delayed or have an operation delayed. "But if you really need blood you'll still get it." Four-year-old Isaac receives transfusions every 12 weeks, which he calls "Hulk blood" because it makes him feel strong. Born with Spherocytosis, a condition which affects the red blood cells, he regularly becomes severely anaemic. His mother, Jasmin, said the "superhero blood" works like "magic" for Isaac, and that the shortage was worrying. "Everybody lives such busy lives. It isn't always a priority until it's someone you know or it's yourself that needs a transfusion," she told BBC Breakfast. Health Minister Baroness Merron said the NHS was in "urgent need" of more blood donors from all backgrounds. "We are working alongside NHS Blood and Transplant to make donating blood easier than ever before, opening up new donor centres and making appointments available closer to home," she added. NHSBT stressed the need for more black donors in particular, as they are more likely to have specific blood types which can help treat people with sickle cell disease. Just 2% of the population keep the nation's blood stocks afloat by donating regularly, the body said. Donors are defined as regular if they have donated in the last 12 months. The number of people registering as donors rose in 2024, but only 24% of them went on to donate. The appeal comes almost a year after the NHS issued an amber alert for only the second time in its history, last July. It was caused by what the NHS called a "perfect storm" of unfilled appointments at donor centres and increased demand following a cyber-attack, which affected services in London. At that time, stocks of O negative stood at just 1.6 days, and 4.3 days for all types of blood. Two thirds of the blood collected by NHSBT is used to treat people who rely on regular blood transfusions, including people with cancer and blood conditions. Those who want to give blood can register and book an appointment online. Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store