Gaza rescuers say Israeli fire kills 72
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed at least 72 people on Thursday, including 21 who had gathered near aid distribution sites as famine looms after more than 20 months of war.Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that six people were killed while waiting for aid in the southern Gaza Strip and 15 others in a central area known as the Netzarim corridor , where thousands of Palestinians have gathered daily in the hope of receiving food rations.The Israeli army told AFP that its troops in Netzarim corridor -- a strip of land militarised by Israel that bisects the Palestinian territory -- had fired "warning shots" at "suspects" approaching them, but that it was "not aware of any injured individuals".The army did not comment on the incident reported in the south.In northern Gaza, Bassal said that nine separate Israeli strikes killed another 51 people, updating earlier tolls provided by his agency.Bassam Abu Shaar, who witnessed the shooting incident in the Netzarim area, said thousands of people had gathered there overnight in the hope of receiving aid at the US- and Israeli-backed distribution site when it opened in the morning."Around 1:00 am (2200 GMT Wednesday), they started shooting at us," he told AFP by phone, reporting gunfire, tank shelling and bombs dropped by drones.Abu Shaar said that the size of the crowd had made it impossible for people to escape, with casualties left lying on the ground within walking distance of the distribution point, which is run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation."We couldn't help them or even escape ourselves," he said.At least 300 Palestinians have been killed in recent weeks while trying to reach aid distribution points in Gaza, which is suffering from famine-like conditions, the Hamas-run territory's health ministry has said.Israeli restrictions on media in the Gaza Strip and difficulties in accessing some areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers and authorities in the Palestinian territory.In early March, Israel imposed an aid blockade on Gaza amid a deadlock in truce negotiations, only partially easing restrictions in late May.After Israel loosened its blockade, the privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began distributing aid, but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes.UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation -- which has the support of Israel and its ally the United States -- over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran Israel latest: When will Donald Trump decide whether to strike Islamic Republic in middle-east? White House reveals timeline
It remained unclear whether US President Donald Trump would task American forces to join Israel's sweeping campaign against Iran's military and nuclear program. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump will decide within the next two weeks whether to strike Iran, the White House said on Thursday, saying Trump still sees a 'substantial' chance that negotiations can achieve the US and Israeli demands on Iran's nuclear program. Trump's announcement, relayed by press secretary Karoline Leavitt, puts an extended timeline on the president's warnings to Iran to immediately shut down its enrichment operations and any other potential for producing nuclear weapons, as per AP report.'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future. I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Leavitt quoted Trump as saying, AP it remained unclear whether US President Donald Trump would task American forces to join Israel's sweeping campaign against Iran's military and nuclear program, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he trusted that Trump would 'do what's best for America.'US officials said earlier this week that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Trump later said there were no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now.'The US has been weighing whether to join Israel's attack by striking Iran's well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' has said he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire and has not ruled out the U.S. joining in Israel's conflict began last Friday with a surprise wave of Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, senior officers and nuclear scientists. At least 639 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 1,300 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights has retaliated by firing hundreds of missiles and drones, killing at least 24 people in Israel and wounding 240 has long maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. However, in addition to having a nuclear power plant, it also enriches uranium up to 60 per cent, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent. Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich at that level, AP is widely believed to have nuclear weapons — making it the only such state in the Middle East — but does not acknowledge having such arms, as per the AP report.A1. Iran has uranium enrichment site at Natanz, centrifuge workshops around Tehran, and a nuclear site in Isfahan. Fordow is the deepest nuclear facility. (90 meter). Arak heavy water reactor, some 250 kilometers (155 miles) southwest of Tehran, was reportedly used to produce plutonium.A2. Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons — making it the only such state in the Middle East — but does not acknowledge having such arms, as per the AP report.
Economic Times
42 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Iran Israel latest: When will Donald Trump decide whether to strike Islamic Republic in middle-east? White House reveals timeline
It remained unclear whether US President Donald Trump would task American forces to join Israel's sweeping campaign against Iran's military and nuclear program. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump will decide within the next two weeks whether to strike Iran, the White House said on Thursday, saying Trump still sees a 'substantial' chance that negotiations can achieve the US and Israeli demands on Iran's nuclear program. Trump's announcement, relayed by press secretary Karoline Leavitt, puts an extended timeline on the president's warnings to Iran to immediately shut down its enrichment operations and any other potential for producing nuclear weapons, as per AP report.'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future. I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Leavitt quoted Trump as saying, AP it remained unclear whether US President Donald Trump would task American forces to join Israel's sweeping campaign against Iran's military and nuclear program, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he trusted that Trump would 'do what's best for America.'US officials said earlier this week that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Trump later said there were no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now.'The US has been weighing whether to join Israel's attack by striking Iran's well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' has said he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire and has not ruled out the U.S. joining in Israel's conflict began last Friday with a surprise wave of Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, senior officers and nuclear scientists. At least 639 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 1,300 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights has retaliated by firing hundreds of missiles and drones, killing at least 24 people in Israel and wounding 240 has long maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. However, in addition to having a nuclear power plant, it also enriches uranium up to 60 per cent, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent. Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich at that level, AP is widely believed to have nuclear weapons — making it the only such state in the Middle East — but does not acknowledge having such arms, as per the AP report.A1. Iran has uranium enrichment site at Natanz, centrifuge workshops around Tehran, and a nuclear site in Isfahan. Fordow is the deepest nuclear facility. (90 meter). Arak heavy water reactor, some 250 kilometers (155 miles) southwest of Tehran, was reportedly used to produce plutonium.A2. Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons — making it the only such state in the Middle East — but does not acknowledge having such arms, as per the AP report.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
How risky are Israel's strikes for nuclear contamination in Iran?
Tensions escalated in the Middle East as Israel continues its military campaign against Iran. While Israel claims that its goal is to put an end to Iran's nuclear weapons program and environmental, human risks are increasing from attacks on nuclear facilities. Till now, experts have stated the risk of nuclear contamination is low -- but the fear of disaster is to news agency Reuters, the alarm reached a new peak when the Israeli military struck Bushehr, Iran's only operational nuclear power plant on the Gulf coast. Israel later clarified that they mistakenly made the announcement and Bushehr was not actually HAS BEEN TARGETED?Israel has confirmed strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites, including Natanz, Isfahan, Arak, and parts of Tehran, Reuters reported. These locations are all linked to Iran's nuclear program. While Iran has been saying that its nuclear enrichment programme is for peaceful purposes, Israel and the US say program is intended to develop nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has verified damage at multiple sites. This includes the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, a nuclear complex in Isfahan, and centrifuge production centres in Karaj and key target, on Thursday, was Arak, also known as Khondab, where a heavy-water research reactor is located. This type of reactor can potentially produce plutonium, which can be used as an alternate material used in nuclear weapons. The IAEA confirmed that this reactor had been hit but retaliated that it was not operational at the time and there were no signs of radiation RADIATION RISK SO FARDespite the attacks, experts currently believe the danger of nuclear fallout has been Bryant, a professor at the University of Liverpool who specialises in radiation protection and nuclear energy policy, said that while these strikes raise serious concerns, they haven't resulted in a release of radioactive material. "The issue is controlling what has happened inside that facility, but nuclear facilities are designed for that," he said. He added that uranium in low concentrations is only harmful if it enters the body through inhalation or Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), pointed out that many of the facilities targeted are part of the early stages of the nuclear fuel process. This means that the risk is more chemical than also noted that weather conditions play a crucial role in how any leaked material might spread. "In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely," she said. Since many of Iran's nuclear sites are underground, the possibility of dispersal is attacks on enrichment facilities carry limited fallout risks; experts are more worried about the potential consequences of a strike on a nuclear reactor—particularly the one at Wakeford, an honorary professor at the University of Manchester, said that enrichment facility damage is largely a "chemical problem," but an attack on a functioning power reactor could lead to the release of large amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere or Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, warned that hitting the Bushehr plant "could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe." However, he noted that so far, Israel's strikes on other sites have "virtually no radiological consequences." He added, "Before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor, it is barely radioactive. The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances."advertisementGULF STATES FEAR OF THEIR WATER SUPPLYFor countries who share borders in the Gulf region, the fear is increasing day by day -- not only because of the radiation threat, but because of what it could mean for their water supply. Many of these nations are dependent almost entirely on seawater desalination to meet their drinking water United Arab Emirates gets more than 80% of its drinking water from desalinated sources. Bahrain has been fully reliant on desalinated water since 2016, and Qatar also depends entirely on it. Even Saudi Arabia, which has larger natural groundwater reserves, still gets around half its water from desalination, according to recent desalination plants sit along the Gulf coast -- close to where a potential nuclear incident could occur. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the UAE have access to both the Gulf and other bodies of water, giving them some backup options. But others -- like Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait -- have no other coastline to fall back on."If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly," said Nidal Hilal, Professor of Engineering and Director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research inputs from ReutersMust Watch
