logo
We need to ban social media access for teenagers

We need to ban social media access for teenagers

Yahoo14-03-2025

We know the terrible toll smartphones and social media take on children and teenagers. We know that screen time makes them inattentive, impulsive and aggressive. We know that it gives them low self-esteem and body-image issues. That it risks exposing them to bullying, violent pornography and sexual exploitation.
Yet we continue to sleepwalk through this strange social experiment. 97 percent of 12-year-olds have a smartphone, and on average they spend 29 hours a week on it. Even though most schools ban phone use during the day, teachers and school leaders still have to deal with the consequences of unlimited access outside the school gates.
A recent survey by the Association of College and School Leaders (ACSL) shows that teachers are reporting increased cyber-bullying, abuse and the malicious use of deepfakes. Almost 1 in 5 primary school teachers are aware of pupils using social media to watch pornography or violent content.
As a teacher, I have seen first-hand how pervasive this toxic cycle of addiction and anxiety is. My colleagues in the primary sector tell me that pupils are behind in social skills, language development and toilet-training not because of the pandemic but because iPads have replaced physical play and face-to-face interaction.
What is even more maddening is how students actually want to be released from the relentless dopamine stimulation of digital life. A Deloitte survey found that 91 percent of Gen-Zs agree that there should be stronger restrictions on children's access to social media. A New York Times report found that almost half of young people wished TikTok and Snapchat had never been invented.
Conversations with my students reveal the sense of relief they feel when they are no longer hyper-aware of what their friends are doing all of the time. Young people want freedom from as well as freedom to.
Despite some gains from the bloated and bureaucratic Online Safety Bill, the Government seems unwilling to properly commit to a digital duty of care. Politicians are too quick to disingenuously claim that the Big Tech genie is out of the bottle. They instead put the onus on schools to educate pupils on how to use these platforms safely and in moderation (which, by the apps' very design, is almost impossible).
Alternatively, they insist that accountability must lie with the platforms themselves. But we know that fining them is as effective as swatting flies. Profiteering will always come before safeguarding.
Grassroots organisations like Smartphone Free Childhood are doing admirable work to try to challenge this new norm, but Manny Bowe, the president of the ASCL, is right: 'enough is enough. As a society, we have the right to demand the protection of our children.' It is time for the Government to intervene, and follow the lead of other countries such as Australia, France and Norway in enforcing age bans for social media. After all, it is only the health and happiness of our children at stake.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer under pressure to save factories crushed by energy prices
Starmer under pressure to save factories crushed by energy prices

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Starmer under pressure to save factories crushed by energy prices

Sir Keir Starmer has been urged to dramatically cut factory energy costs amid warnings huge bills are pushing Britain towards 'de-industrialisation'. Make UK, which represents Britain's biggest manufacturers, said domestic companies faced some of the highest electricity prices in Europe – and that half now viewed this as their biggest future challenge. It called on the Prime Minister to scrap a series of 'regressive' net zero levies on bills, arguing this is 'the most direct and impactful way to improve industrial competitiveness'. Make UK is also calling for the Government to provide manufacturers with wind-farm style electricity deals, known as contracts for difference (CfDs), which would fix their electricity price at a set level. The announcement comes as ministers are preparing to unveil their industrial strategy for Britain, with Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves under pressure to help firms with their energy bills. Stephen Phipson, chief executive of Make UK, said: 'If we do not address the issue of high industrial energy costs in the UK as a priority, we risk the security of our country. 'We will fail to attract investment in the manufacturing sector and will rapidly enter a phase of renewed de-industrialisation.' The proposal to remove net zero levies would not be cheap, however. It would cost the Treasury £3.8bn, while giving manufacturers CfDs would cost a further £1.1bn. Without other immediate cuts to government expenditure, this would probably have to be shifted on to general taxation or the bills of domestic consumers. Make UK suggested the schemes could be 'phased in' gradually to reduce the financial impact and argued that both measures would be revenue-neutral in the long-run because they would stimulate industrial growth. Removing net zero levies would instantly slash the electricity price paid by manufacturers by about one quarter, according to the lobby group's analysis. The report said this should include scrapping the so-called renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs levy, capacity market levy, climate change levy and CfD costs. They currently account for about 6.4 pence per kilowatt hour of the 27.1 pence per kilowatt hours paid by industrial firms for electricity, Make UK said. A single levy, the renewables obligation, accounts for £2bn of the £3.8bn in levies paid per year by manufacturers alone. The legacy scheme was set up to support early wind and solar farms with 20-year subsidy deals, topping up the electricity price they are paid. It closed to new entrants in 2017, having been replaced with newer CfDs. CfDs guarantee renewable generators a price at which they can sell electricity, with the Government paying the difference if market prices are lower than this and generators repaying the state when market prices go higher. Manufacturers want a similar arrangement, but in reverse. This would mean they are guaranteed a fixed price for buying, rather than selling, electricity – with the Government once again covering any difference. Ministers have previously suggested they intend to provide further support on energy costs for manufacturers in the industrial strategy, but this has previously only been extended to the most energy-intensive firms such as steel makers, glass blowers and ceramic factories. A policy known as the 'British industrial supercharger', which exempts these companies from many policy costs as well as network charges, benefits around 400 businesses. But Make UK warned that the supercharger 'does not eliminate the need' for greater action on energy bills, as it only benefitted a relatively small number of firms. 'Not only is most of the manufacturing sector still exposed to these high costs, [but] as the costs of the supercharger are met by other electricity bill payers, ineligible manufacturers are facing an even greater share of costs, to subsidise eligible energy-intensive industries, further exacerbating the problem,' its report added. On Friday, a spokesman for the Government said: 'Through our clean power mission, we will get off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets – protecting business and household finances with clean, home-grown energy that we control. 'We are already bringing energy costs for UK industries closer in line with other major economies through the British Industry Supercharger – saving businesses £5bn over the next ten years.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

What to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president
What to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president

Washington Post

time3 hours ago

  • Washington Post

What to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president

WARSAW, Poland — The final result of Poland's presidential election only became clear after a long, nail-gripping night of counting as both candidates were locked in a near dead heat in the first exit polls after voting ended. Poles awakened Monday to a clear albeit close result that returns a nationalist politician to the presidency who has pledged to hinder the centrist, pro-EU government for the remainder of its term.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store