Covid families meet Emma Little-Pengelly in bid to influence policy
Families bereaved by Covid-19 in Northern Ireland have expressed hope they can influence public policy.
Members of the Covid Bereaved Families for Justice NI group met deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly at Parliament Buildings in Belfast on Monday afternoon.
The families had previously accused Stormont's leaders of ignoring them and failing to meet them before formulating and publishing the Executive's formal response to the first phase of the UK-wide inquiry into the pandemic.
Brenda Doherty, whose mother Ruth died in the pandemic, said it was a 'productive meeting', but expressed regret that First Minister Michelle O'Neill had been unwell and was unable to attend.
'We have had a guarantee she will meet us again in future, and we will certainly hold her to that,' she said.
'We are coming away feeling that we were heard today. The proof will be in the pudding but they know that we are not going away anywhere and if we don't see active engagement with us, we will be back again.'
Martina Ferguson, whose mother Ursula died in the pandemic, said she discussed some of the recommendations, adding the group felt they lacked detail, and asked for further information, particularly around the civil contingencies structure in Northern Ireland.
'I specifically asked for the First Minister and deputy First Minister to initiate legislation around the care partner guidance because we were totally failed during the pandemic, and we have asked for that to extend to end of life,' she said.
'We have got a commitment to engage, and that is what we'll do.'
Ms Doherty added: 'We see this as the start of a partnership. We're going to be working alongside senior civil servants. That was only the module one report, there are going to be another nine to follow.
'We want engagement either before or when the report is issued to look at how they're going to act upon the recommendations.'
Ms Little-Pengelly also spoke to the media after the meeting, and thanked the families for taking part.
'I want to pay tribute to the incredible work that they have done over a sustained period of time, not just to fight for recognition and justice for their loved ones, but of course to try and improve processes,' she said.
'I made a promise to those families today, that promise is that we will listen to them, that we will engage with them and, of course importantly, that we will be implementing these recommendations in a way that is fit for purpose in Northern Ireland.
'But most of all, that we will be doing everything in our power to significantly improve the processes that we have, the planning that we do in order to protect lives moving forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
26 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said employers should be able to decide if their staff can wear burkas in the workplace. Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Advertisement Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. Advertisement 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Advertisement Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' Advertisement He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. Advertisement 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is the new Steve Jobs, says Cabinet minister
A Cabinet minister has been ridiculed for comparing Rachel Reeves to the creator of the iPhone. In an attempt to defend Labour's spending plans, Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, said the Chancellor was fixing the public finances in much the same way Steve Jobs saved Apple from the brink of bankruptcy in the late 1990s. Mr Kyle's comments prompted a swift backlash from the Tories, who argued it was ridiculous to liken Jobs's achievements to Ms Reeves's record tax rises on businesses. The Chancellor launched a £40 billion tax raid in her first Budget last year, including an increase in employers' National Insurance contributions. At the spending review on Wednesday, she will announce departmental budgets for the next three years. The process has involved a significant amount of wrangling behind the scenes as ministers attempt to dodge expected real-term cuts. Challenged on where the money was coming from for his department, Mr Kyle told the Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips show on Sky News that the Government is going 'to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future '. 'Just bear in mind how Apple turned itself around … when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency,' he said. 'That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. Now, Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. 'Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector … they will create jobs in the future.' Mr Jobs, who co-founded Apple in 1976, was credited with rescuing the company from collapse in 1997, when it teetered on the brink of bankruptcy in the face of competition from Microsoft. He died aged 56 in 2011 after a long battle with cancer. At the time, floods of tributes described him as a 'visionary' whose impact would be felt for many generations to come. Labour has long blamed 'difficult' decisions on tax and spending on the 'dire' state of the economy they inherited from the Conservatives. However, the Tories claimed that comparing Ms Reeves to Mr Jobs was inappropriate. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, told The Telegraph: 'Labour are plumbing new depths of delusion. Steve Jobs, creator of Apple and the iPhone, improved life for billions of people. 'In contrast, Rachel Reeves has trashed the UK economy, spending billions of pounds that we don't have in the process. 'This comment just shows Labour have not the faintest understanding of business.' Greg Smith, the shadow business minister, added: 'Kyle's comments are a little far of the mark. 'Steve Jobs created a mega international business from scratch and Rachel Reeves is actively preventing anyone doing that in the UK, ripping businesses apart, increasing tax and red tape. Apart from that, yeah, they're identical.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: Labour-run councils are housing 3 times as many asylum seekers as Reform-controlled areas - so how many are in YOUR authority?
Labour-ran councils are bearing the brunt of Britain's asylum crisis, according to an analysis which piles even more pressure on Keir Starmer. Authorities controlled by Sir Keir's party house more than 26 asylum seekers for every 10,000 residents – almost triple the rate of councils now under Reform's watch, MailOnline can reveal today. Pollsters warn Labour may become victims of Reform's 'humongous strides' unless the 'hot topic' in traditional Red Wall strongholds is addressed. Wary of the threat posed by Nigel Farage 's outfit, which has seized on the public's immigration fears, Sir Keir earlier this month promised to deliver Brits what they had 'asked for time and time again'. The Prime Minister, who warned mass immigration risked turning us into an 'island of strangers', unveiled a package to 'take back control of our borders'. The skills threshold will be hiked and rules on fluency in English toughened under the Government's plan to bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. Basking in Reform's extraordinary dominance in May's local elections, Mr Farage vowed to reject migrants across his party's 10 newly-gained councils. Zia Yusuf, the party chair and a major donor, later promised to use 'every instrument of power' to do so, including the threat of court action. MailOnline analysis, based on Home Office figures, show there are nine asylum seekers for 10,000 residents across those Reform-held councils, including Lincolnshire and County Durham. For comparison, the UK-wide average is 16. The figure for councils under Tory rule is 11.5. Twenty-one of the 218 upper-tier local authorities in MailOnline's audit supported no asylum seekers. The Labour-run councils housing the most asylum seekers, in relation to their population, are Hounslow (72 per 10,000) Halton (70) and Coventry (59). The council housing the most, Hillingdon (94), is run by Tories. Chris Hopkins, political research director at polling firm Savanta, believes immigration is a major hurdle for Sir Keir's Government. He said: 'Immigration and asylum is increasing in salience among the British public, probably is reaching the highs now of sort of 2015/2016 to be honest, having taken a bit of a drop off during the pandemic. 'I'm not going to say the next election is going to be about immigration but it definitely does feel like the hot topic of the moment. 'It presents a problem – not just for the Labour Party – but for any government of any colour because there is a sense in the country that numbers are too high.' Mr Hopkins added: 'There is a sense that Labour's opposition now is Reform UK, not the Conservatives. 'Obviously Reform UK are known, to some extent, as a single issue, anti-immigration party. So Labour have to navigate that ultimately, and need to be seen acting on that. 'I think that there's a danger of them trying to "out Reform" Reform, which isn't going to work for them as it didn't work for Rishi Sunak. 'And I think that Labour potentially risk alienating some of their more Left-wing liberal voters to the Liberal Democrats or Greens if they go down that route. 'A lot could change at the next General Election (to be held no later than August 2029) but the direction of travel at the minute is Reform UK making humongous strides.' Polls suggest that Labour's failure to address sky high immigration could spell further disaster for the party at the ballot box. A recent survey by IPSOS found 68 per cent of the public deem the numbers coming to the UK to seek refugee status or asylum too high. And 33 per cent think they are doing a worse job on immigration than the Tories. Just 17 per cent feel Labour is handling it better. Labour's highest-profile defeat in May's locals was in the Runcorn by-election, where Reform narrowly beat them by six votes. In the run-up to polling day, both parties promised to close a 425-bed hotel in the constituency that was being used by the Home Office to house asylum seekers. Locals in the Cheshire town claimed crime had increased in the area since it started housing asylum seekers in 2020. On a national level, Downing Street's sweeping new plan will increase efforts to stop housing asylum seekers in hotels. It comes as a series of investigations by MailOnline have revealed the 'absurd' reality of asylum claims in Britain, with critics saying that it was proof we've become a 'soft touch'. Fuelled by the small boats crisis plaguing the Channel, a record 108,000 applications were lodged in 2024. Claims from dozens of countries, including Afghanistan and Iran, have doubled over the last 20 years. Last month we revealed that citizens in the US, Australia and even Scandinavia are trying to claim asylum here – despite already residing in wealthy Western countries that are free of major human rights abuses. And a fortnight ago we exposed how Northumberland council in Britain is housing 600 times more asylum seekers now than a decade ago. Home Office policy is to disperse asylum seekers around the country. Officials insist they are not given a choice as to location and the accommodation. Local authorities also do not get a say in how many are housed in their areas, insiders insist. They are given £1,200 for each asylum seeker being housed in their boundaries. A spokesman for the Local Government Association said: 'We are keen to continue to work with government on a more equitable approach across asylum and resettlement. 'One that takes into account wider housing, homelessness and cohesion challenges, with sufficient lead in time for engagement with councils on any new sites.' The Home Office says value for money, community cohesion and the wellbeing of those working and living in asylum accommodation will continue to be at the 'forefront of decision-making'. Although authorities can object, they have little formal power to actually stop asylum seekers being housed in their areas. Newly-elected Reform politicians have vowed to stand up for their communities and fight against their dispersal. Mr Farage said he was opposed to the government 'plonking scores of young men' in counties where his party now has control. He has vowed to 'resist' asylum seekers being housed in the counties where Reform was in control, claiming they were being 'dumped into the north of England, getting everything for free'. 'People hate them,' he told The Telegraph. 'They see a sense of total unfairness that they are working themselves to bits to pay tax for young men who can illegally come into the country and be given everything for free.' Newly-elected County Durham councillor and ex-GB News presenter Darren Grimes said Reform would not 'allow our communities to be a dumping ground for illegal migrants'. And in her victory speech, Reform's new mayor for Greater Lincolnshire Dame Andrea Jenkyns proposed housing them in tents instead, saying 'tents are good enough for France; they should be good enough for you in Britain.' Her comments prompted some rival candidates to walk off the stage in outrage. As well as getting free accomodation, asylum seekers are also entitled to UK taxpayer-funded NHS healthcare, prescriptions, dental care and children under 18 are required to go to school (where they may be able to get free meals). If their accommodation provides meals each person gets £8.86 per week, this rises to £49.18 per week if no meals are provided. Extra money is also provided to pregnant mothers and young children. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We are working to fairly disperse asylum seekers across the country, consulting closely with local authorities to further reduce our reliance on hotels and deliver better value for money for taxpayers, while giving control back to communities through our Plan for Change. 'We've taken immediate action to fix the broken asylum system this government inherited, by increasing asylum decision making by 52 per cent and removing nearly 30,000 people with no right to be here. 'By restoring grip on the system and speeding up decision making, we will end the use of hotels and are forecast to save the taxpayer £4 billion by the end of 2026.'
