2 House Judiciary Democrats Urge Chief Justice to Call for More Security for Judges
Two top House Judiciary Democrats have called on U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to request more help from Congress to protect federal judges and court personnel, citing an alarming surge in threats and chronic underfunding of the court system's security infrastructure.
In a
'We write to you about the alarming rise in threats of violence being made against federal judges, with many of these threats not being idle ones at all,' they wrote. 'The whole climate of anti-judicial violence and intimidation is intolerable within our constitutional order.'
Their letter follows the release of a stark warning from the Judicial Conference of the United States, the judiciary's policymaking body. In an April 10 funding
'We have significant concerns about our ability to properly secure federal courthouses given current resource levels,' they wrote, calling the situation 'unsustainable.'
The Judiciary's Court Security account remains stuck at $750 million, the same level as in fiscal year 2023, despite a request for $797 million in its December 2024 funding appeal, the letter said. That shortfall has forced delays in security upgrades, including systems that screen entrants and control access to restricted areas.
Related Stories
4/18/2025
4/18/2025
According to the St. Eve-Conrad letter, 67 federal judges are now receiving enhanced online threat monitoring from the U.S. Marshals Service due to their roles in high-profile or politically sensitive cases.
Roughly 50 individuals have been charged with criminal threats against judges in recent years. In several instances, marshals have had to take 'extraordinary measures' to protect judges under threat.
Chief Justice Roberts himself noted these dangers in his 2024 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary,
The judges' letter also notes that courts cannot choose their caseloads and are constitutionally required to adjudicate all civil, criminal, and bankruptcy matters brought before them, while urging Congress to restore adequate funding in the upcoming fiscal year 2026 budget.
'We must provide constitutionally guaranteed representation to individuals charged with federal crimes who are unable to afford an attorney. And we must pay citizens for performing their civic duty of serving on federal juries,' St. Eve and Conrad wrote. 'This is a broad mission that depends on sufficient funding from Congress to carry out.'
The 2026 federal judiciary budget request is expected later this month.
Reps. Raskin and Johnson said in their letter to the chief justice that they are prepared to work with the Supreme Court to address what they suggested was a funding crisis.
'We know our constitutional democracy relies strongly on the ability of Justices and judges to carry out your duties without fear of retaliation or harm,' the lawmakers wrote. 'We are your partners in this endeavor, and we urge you to call upon us to help.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
7 minutes ago
- Fox News
Republican attorneys general accuse California of excusing 'lawlessness'
FIRST ON FOX: Nearly all Republican attorneys general blasted California's Democratic leaders on Tuesday in a joint statement, accusing them of condoning criminal behavior and saying they left President Donald Trump with no choice but to activate thousands of National Guard soldiers. "In California, we're seeing the results of leadership that excuses lawlessness and undermines law enforcement," 26 attorneys general wrote in the statement, first provided to Fox News Digital. "When local and state officials won't act, the federal government must." The attorneys general said Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard to address anti-immigration enforcement riots and protests that broke out in parts of Los Angeles County over the weekend was the "right response." Their remarks stand in direct contrast to those of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats across the country, who widely condemned Trump's decision to send the military into California as an unnecessary escalation. Newsom sued Trump over the move and accused the president of stripping California of its sovereignty. Presidents federalizing the National Guard, which is a state-based military force that falls under the dual control of governors and presidents, is rarely carried out without the consent of a governor. Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, who led the attorneys general in issuing the statement, told Fox News Digital in a brief interview he felt Newsom was "gaslighting" the public by saying California's local and state law enforcement had the unrest under control and did not need Trump to intervene. "We all saw what was happening," Carr said. "There were federal law enforcement officers that were being attacked by mobs. And in fact, I read articles where local law enforcement were saying they were overwhelmed and they needed help. My question is, why in the world would he not accept the help of the federal government at a time where there was mob rule, where there was arson that was taking place, where assaults were occurring, instead of coddling the criminals that are doing this again?" Carr said those opposed to the Trump administration's immigration raids could "peacefully disagree with what the federal government is doing." Newsom, for his part, alleged that Trump exacerbated the riots, echoing a position some criminal justice advocates take that an immediate show of force in response to intensifying protests is an ineffective approach. In Newsom's lawsuit, attorneys wrote that Trump's decision was not only unwise but also an unlawful and "unprecedented usurpation of state authority and resources." Fox News Digital reached out to the California Attorney General's Office for comment.
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Small Fiscal Step for the GOP
Republicans in Congress talk a better spending game than they execute, and so far in 2025 they haven't cut a dime. They'll get their first chance when they vote this week on a modest spending-cut package sent by the White House. The House plans to vote this week on legislation to cancel $9.4 billion of discretionary spending. The cuts were proposed by the White House as part of a process known as rescission, which lets the President cancel previously approved funds if a majority of both houses of Congress agree. President Trump submitted the cuts in May, leaving Congress 45 days to vote.
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump's new tactic for bypassing Congress
President Donald Trump's budget chief is trying out an audacious strategy to eliminate congressionally approved funding without lawmakers' sign-off. Russ Vought, who leads the Office of Management and Budget, has directed a dozen federal agencies to freeze upward of $30 billion in spending on a broad array of programs, including ones at NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, write Scott Waldman and Corbin Hiar. The plan is to delay that funding until the final weeks of the fiscal year, which runs until Sept. 30. Then, the White House will ask Congress to permanently eliminate the funding through a so-called rescission request. Even if Congress rejects the request — or, more likely, doesn't vote on it at all — the White House could try to withhold the funds until the fiscal year clock resets on Oct. 1 and the cuts become permanent. If the so-called pocket rescission works, it could pave the way for the administration to retroactively cancel congressional funding. 'I think it upends a fundamental check and balance contemplated in our Constitution, and I don't understand how you subordinate Congress' power of the purse,' Joseph Carlile, former associate director at OMB in the Biden administration, told Scott and Corbin. Vought is calling the funding freeze a deferral — which first requires congressional sign-off. But instead, he has told agencies to withhold the funds before he sends the deferral package to Congress. Some agency officials were 'shocked' at the move, an administration source with direct knowledge of the plan told Scott and Corbin. In a Friday email to top officials, the National Science Foundation's budget director wrote that the spending freeze targets the agency's research and education programs. 'I imagine you will all have questions, as do we,' Caitlyn Fife wrote. 'However we are immediately focused on pulling the funds back to ensure there are no further commitments or obligations.' Also on the list are tens of millions of dollars for national park operations as well as more than $100 million in science spending at NASA, which includes climate research. The strategy is expected to draw legal pushback. That could land the administration's effort before the Supreme Court, which Vought would welcome. He has long argued that impounding some congressionally appropriated funding is constitutional, and he has said he wants the Supreme Court to validate what would be a significant weakening of congressional oversight of the federal budget. It's Tuesday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Debra Kahn breaks down how carbon capture has largely dodged GOP attacks and why the technology hits close to home for House Speaker Mike Johnson. hot off the press Dispatches from POLITICO's 2025 Energy Summit today in Washington: GOP megabill could undermine US energy production, Republicans warnFive takeaways from the Trump administration officials, lawmakers, former policymakers and business leaders who spoke today. Trump energy adviser slams renewables, says focus is on fossil fuelsSome other Republicans might favor investing in solar and wind energy, but 'the president is in charge,' the executive director of the National Energy Dominance Council said. Energy powerhouse to Republicans: Don't 'take renewables off the table'The head of NextEra Energy warns that building new natural gas generation and nuclear power will take too long — and wind and solar power are quicker to add now. Heinrich: 'Republicans are going to own increased energy prices'GOP candidates will pay an 'enormous political price' for their cuts to renewable energy projects, the New Mexico Democrat predicted. Power Centers EPA to propose rolling back power plant ruleEPA will move Wednesday to repeal federal limits on power plant climate pollution, write Jean Chemnick and Zack Colman. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin will announce the proposal to roll back the Biden-era rule at an event at agency headquarters, according to six people familiar with the situation. He will also propose repealing a separate regulation to curb hazardous air pollution such as mercury. Scrapping the power plant rule would effectively shelve regulations for the electricity sector, which accounts for one-quarter of U.S. greenhouse gases. California vehicle emission rules on chopping blockTrump plans to sign a trio of resolutions Thursday to revoke California's national-leading vehicle emissions standards, writes Alex Nieves. Trump's signature will finalize his administration's monthslong effort to thwart California's authority to set stricter electrification rules for passenger vehicles and commercial trucks, along with higher standards for heavy-duty diesel engines. Democrats scramble to save green creditsSenate Democrats are ramping up pressure on Republicans to try to protect swaths of their 2022 climate law as the GOP races to advance their party-line megabill, writes Kelsey Brugger. The situation has Democrats trying to influence legislation they have no intention of supporting. Whether they succeed is another question altogether. Utilities await DOE action on loansA growing chorus of consumer advocates and environmentalists is urging Trump's Energy Department to lock in billions of dollars in loan guarantees for utilities, arguing that the loans will help cut utility bills for everyday Americans as prices spike nationwide, write Brian Dabbs and Jason Plautz. The $23 billion in Biden-era loans — much of which would go to Midwest states that voted for Trump — could trigger big investments in new long-range power lines, batteries, clean energy and natural gas infrastructure. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Trump has taken a 'scorched earth' approach to climate policy by going far beyond his first-term actions, a former diplomat said Tuesday during the POLITICO Energy Summit. Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis raised doubts Tuesday the GOP could pass its megabill by its self-imposed Independence Day deadline. House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie suggested Tuesday that he is looking ahead of the fight over Republicans' mega reconciliation bill toward bipartisan legislation tackling issues like artificial intelligence. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
