logo
Trump Melts Down After Reporter Asks About TACO

Trump Melts Down After Reporter Asks About TACO

Buzz Feed2 days ago

President Donald Trump threw a fit on Wednesday after a reporter asked him about an insulting acronym being bandied about on Wall Street.
It's called TACO, or 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' and refers to how Trump often announces massive tariffs, which cause stocks to sink, then backs off, causing them to rise again. Savvy investors say they've figured out how to make a bundle via 'TACO' trades.
A reporter asked Trump about it on Wednesday, and the president did not like the question at all. 'I chicken out? I've never heard that,' Trump fired back, then defended his tariff strategy, which was rejected by a federal trade court later in the day.
Trump ultimately attacked the reporter for even asking the question. 'But don't ever say what you said,' Trump said. 'That's a nasty question. To me, that's the nastiest question.'
That got Trump's critics talking about TACO:
America, this is so utterly embarrassing. pic.twitter.com/6hfr0FnV7t
— Matt McDermott (@mattmfm) May 29, 2025
@mattmfm / Via x.com
I just found out why everyone is tweeting #TACO
Because Trump always chickens out. pic.twitter.com/r5Gsf1Xqgm
— Quadcarl (@quadcarl_carl) May 28, 2025
@quadcarl_carl / Via x.com
🚨 'Don't ever say what you said!'
Holy shit. Trump just learned Wall Street is calling his tariffs 'TACO trade' ('Trump Always Chickens Out') — and you have to watch his meltdown. pic.twitter.com/fQUIoWqiJN
— Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) May 28, 2025
@keithedwards / Via x.com
Trump Always Chickens Out: This feckless fuckwad is forever going to be known as "TACO Trump," the moron who Wall Street secretly laughs at. Trump, like all bullies, is actually a wimp who oozes insecurity. Watch Trump's reaction to a reporter's benign question. #TACO 😂🤣😂🤣👇 pic.twitter.com/JbkdRsNMfD
— Bill Madden (@maddenifico) May 28, 2025
@maddenifico / Fox / Via x.com
BREAKING: In an insane moment, Trump has a complete meltdown when asked by a reporter about the phrase coined by Wall Street brokers, "Trump Always Chickens Out," or TACO. "Don't ever say what you said, that's a nasty question."
He can't handle the truth. pic.twitter.com/U4L5LOl02q
— Really American 🇺🇸 (@ReallyAmerican1) May 28, 2025
@ReallyAmerican1 / Fox / Via x.com
Translation: he chickened out https://t.co/k46dVoF3hT
— Claus Wachmann #Democracy #FBR #FBPE 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈 (@ClausWachmann) May 29, 2025
@ClausWachmann / Fox / Via x.com
Trump becomes even more unhinged when he hears 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out). Share the hell out of this clip. #TACOTrump pic.twitter.com/cfKwmmmNsa
— 💥Arbiter of Cool💥😎✌🏻👊🏻 (@ArbiterofCool) May 28, 2025
@ArbiterofCool / Fox / Via x.com
"Don't ever say what you said."
Say it louder. https://t.co/WX99k6AieE
— DC Perry (@dcperry) May 28, 2025
@dcperry / Fox / Via x.com
Did she say 'TACO' stands for Trump Always Chickens Out?
😏 #TACO pic.twitter.com/8cJknyDs12
— 💙Jillian Hurley (@JillianMHurley) May 28, 2025
@JillianMHurley / Via x.com
I feel like taco is gonna stick
And he's gonna Absolutley hate it and lose his shit https://t.co/kmezDB1KWb
— GoDucks.net (@GoDucksnet) May 29, 2025
@GoDucksnet / Fox / Via x.com
Trump is the ultimate Chicken. Tries to act tough, but when he gets held to account always folds like a broken deck chair. #TACOTrump #TACO https://t.co/IKtZpjgwlR
— Stonehelm (@TheStonehelm) May 29, 2025
@TheStonehelm / Fox / Via x.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ambarella First Quarter 2026 Earnings: Beats Expectations
Ambarella First Quarter 2026 Earnings: Beats Expectations

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ambarella First Quarter 2026 Earnings: Beats Expectations

Revenue: US$85.9m (up 58% from 1Q 2025). Net loss: US$24.3m (loss narrowed by 36% from 1Q 2025). US$0.58 loss per share (improved from US$0.93 loss in 1Q 2025). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 2.2%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 8.2%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 13% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 16% growth forecast for the Semiconductor industry in the US. Performance of the American Semiconductor industry. The company's shares are down 15% from a week ago. It's still necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Ambarella, and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet
What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet

New York Times

time6 minutes ago

  • New York Times

What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet

A transgender girl in California qualified for this week's state high school track and field meet, and her inclusion in the two-day event has angered people who do not believe that trans girls should compete in girls' events. They believe that trans girls hold a physical advantage and say that allowing them to take part is unfair. Her participation has fueled a political debate that has reached the White House: President Trump has threatened to pull federal funding from the state if it lets the trans girl, AB Hernandez, compete at the meet. Civil rights advocates have denounced the threat as bullying behavior. Now the eyes of the president, the governor, conservative activists and transgender rights groups will be on the meet, which began Friday in Clovis, near Fresno. It's arguably the most competitive high school track and field meet in the nation. Here's what to know: What events is the trans girl competing in? Hernandez qualified for the meet in three events: the high jump, the long jump and the triple jump. On Friday, she finished as the top qualifier in all three events and advanced to Saturday's finals. There, medals typically go to the top nine athletes. She is one of the favorites in the long jump and the triple jump. What is the gist of the debate? People who are against trans girls' competing in girls' events believe that those athletes hold unfair advantages over other competitors. Athletes who were born male, they say, have a physiological edge — including muscle mass and bone length — that they retain even after their transition. They think that physical edge makes it harder for all girls to have an equal chance at making teams, qualifying for meets and winning. In California, trans girls have had the right to compete in girls' events since 2013, when a law was passed that said students could participate in school sports in the category that matched their gender identity. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Constellation Brands Insiders Sold US$33m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy
Constellation Brands Insiders Sold US$33m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Constellation Brands Insiders Sold US$33m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy

The fact that multiple Constellation Brands, Inc. (NYSE:STZ) insiders offloaded a considerable amount of shares over the past year could have raised some eyebrows amongst investors. When evaluating insider transactions, knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more beneficial than knowing whether they are selling, as the latter can be open to many interpretations. However, shareholders should take a deeper look if several insiders are selling stock over a specific time period. Although we don't think shareholders should simply follow insider transactions, logic dictates you should pay some attention to whether insiders are buying or selling shares. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Over the last year, we can see that the biggest insider sale was by the Director, Robert Sands, for US$29m worth of shares, at about US$243 per share. While insider selling is a negative, to us, it is more negative if the shares are sold at a lower price. The good news is that this large sale was at well above current price of US$178. So it may not tell us anything about how insiders feel about the current share price. All up, insiders sold more shares in Constellation Brands than they bought, over the last year. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below! Check out our latest analysis for Constellation Brands For those who like to find hidden gems this free list of small cap companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. The last quarter saw substantial insider selling of Constellation Brands shares. In total, insider Samuel Glaetzer dumped US$594k worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. Overall this makes us a bit cautious, but it's not the be all and end all. For a common shareholder, it is worth checking how many shares are held by company insiders. I reckon it's a good sign if insiders own a significant number of shares in the company. Constellation Brands insiders own 2.3% of the company, currently worth about US$750m based on the recent share price. This kind of significant ownership by insiders does generally increase the chance that the company is run in the interest of all shareholders. An insider hasn't bought Constellation Brands stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. And our longer term analysis of insider transactions didn't bring confidence, either. While insiders do own a lot of shares in the company (which is good), our analysis of their transactions doesn't make us feel confident about the company. While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. To assist with this, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Constellation Brands. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store